PDA

View Full Version : Text of John McCain's CPAC Remarks


trickblue
02-07-2008, 02:46 PM
Link (http://www.examiner.com/blogs/Yeas_and_Nays/2008/2/7/Text-of-John-McCains-CPAC-Remarks)

Text of John McCain's CPAC Remarks
February 7, 3:32 PM

Said one Yeas & Nays tipster: "It's like a zoo in here. A riot might break out."


Thank you. Thank you for inviting me. It's been a little while since I've had the honor of addressing you, and I appreciate very much your courtesy to me today. We should do this more often. I hope you will pardon my absence last year, and understand that I intended no personal insult to any of you. I was merely pre-occupied with the business of trying to escape the distinction of pre-season frontrunner for the Republican nomination, which, I'm sure some of you observed, I managed to do in fairly short order. But, now, I again have the privilege of that distinction, and this time I would prefer to hold on to it for a while.

I know I have a responsibility, if I am, as I hope to be, the Republican nominee for President, to unite the party and prepare for the great contest in November. And I am acutely aware that I cannot succeed in that endeavor, nor can our party prevail over the challenge we will face from either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama, without the support of dedicated conservatives, whose convictions, creativity and energy have been indispensible to the success our party has had over the last quarter century. Many of you have disagreed strongly with some positions I have taken in recent years. I understand that. I might not agree with it, but I respect it for the principled position it is. And it is my sincere hope that even if you believe I have occasionally erred in my reasoning as a fellow conservative, you will still allow that I have, in many ways important to all of us, maintained the record of a conservative. Further, I hope you will grant that I have defended many positions we share just as ardently as I have made my case for positions that have provoked your opposition. If not, thank you for this opportunity to make my case today.

I am proud to be a conservative, and I make that claim because I share with you that most basic of conservative principles: that liberty is a right conferred by our Creator, not by governments, and that the proper object of justice and the rule of law in our country is not to aggregate power to the state but to protect the liberty and property of its citizens. And like you, I understand, as Edmund Burke observed, that "whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither . . . is safe."

While I have long worked to help grow a public majority of support for Republican candidates and principles, I have also always believed, like you, in the wisdom of Ronald Reagan, who warned in an address to this conference in 1975, that "a political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers."

I attended my first CPAC conference as the invited guest of Ronald Reagan, not long after I had returned from overseas, when I heard him deliver his "shining city upon a hill" speech. I was still a naval officer then, but his words inspired and helped form my own political views, just as Ronald Reagan's defense of America's cause in Vietnam and his evident concern for American prisoners of war in that conflict inspired and were a great comfort to those of us who, in my friend Jerry Denton's words, had the honor of serving "our country under difficult circumstances." I am proud, very proud, to have come to public office as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. And if a few of my positions have raised your concern that I have forgotten my political heritage, I want to assure you that I have not, and I am as proud of that association today as I was then. My record in public office taken as a whole is the record of a mainstream conservative. I believe today, as I believed twenty-five years ago, in small government; fiscal discipline; low taxes; a strong defense, judges who enforce, and not make, our laws; the social values that are the true source of our strength; and, generally, the steadfast defense of our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which I have defended my entire career as God-given to the born and unborn.

Those are my beliefs, and you need not examine only my past votes and speeches to assure yourselves that they are my genuine convictions. You can take added confidence from the positions I have defended during this campaign. I campaigned in Iowa in opposition to agriculture subsidies. I campaigned in New Hampshire against big government mandated health care and for a free market solution to the problem of unavailable and unaffordable health care. I campaigned in Michigan for the tax incentives and trade policies that will create new and better jobs in that economically troubled state. I campaigned in Florida against the national catastrophic insurance fund bill that passed the House of Representatives and defended my opposition to the prescription drug benefit bill that saddled Americans with yet another hugely expensive entitlement program. I have argued to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, to reduce the corporate tax rate and abolish the AMT. I have defended my position on protecting our Second Amendment rights, including my votes against waiting periods, bans on the so-called "assault weapons," and illegitimate lawsuits targeting gun manufacturers. I have proudly defended my twenty-four year pro-life record. Throughout this campaign, I have defended the President's brave decision to increase troop levels in Iraq to execute a long overdue counterinsurgency that has spared us the terrible calamity of losing that war. I held these positions because I believed they were in the best interests of my party and country."

Surely, I have held other positions that have not met with widespread agreement from conservatives. I won't pretend otherwise nor would you permit me to forget it. On the issue of illegal immigration, a position which provoked the outspoken opposition of many conservatives, I stood my ground aware that my position would imperil my campaign. I respect your opposition for I know that the vast majority of critics to the bill based their opposition in a principled defense of the rule of law. And while I and other Republican supporters of the bill were genuine in our intention to restore control of our borders, we failed, for various and understandable reasons, to convince Americans that we were. I accept that, and have pledged that it would be among my highest priorities to secure our borders first, and only after we achieved widespread consensus that our borders are secure, would we address other aspects of the problem in a wa y that defends the rule of law and does not encourage another wave of illegal immigration.

All I ask of any American, conservative, moderate, independent, or enlightened Democrat, is to judge my record as a whole, and accept that I am not in the habit of making promises to my country that I do not intend to keep. I hope I have proven that in my life even to my critics. Then vote for or against me based on that record, my qualifications for the office, and the direction where I plainly state I intend to lead our country. If I am so fortunate as to be the Republican nominee for President, I will offer Americans, in what will be a very challenging and spirited contest, a clearly conservative approach to governing. I will make my case to voters, no matter what state they reside in, in the same way. I will not obscure my positions from voters who I fear might not share them. I will stand on my convictions, my conservative convictions, and trust in the good sense of the voters, and in my confidence that conservative pr inciples still appeal to a majority of Americans, Republicans, Independents and Reagan Democrats.

Often elections in this country are fought within the margins of small differences. This one will not be. We are arguing about hugely consequential things. Whomever the Democrats nominate, they would govern this country in a way that will, in my opinion, take this country backward to the days when government felt empowered to take from us our freedom to decide for ourselves the course and quality of our lives; to substitute the muddled judgment of large and expanding federal bureaucracies for the common sense and values of the American people; to the timidity and wishful thinking of a time when we averted our eyes from terrible threats to our security that were so plainly gathering strength abroad. It is shameful and dangerous that Senate Democrats are blocking an extension of surveillance powers that enable our intelligence and law enforcement to defend our country against radical Islamic extremists. This election is going to be about big things, not small things. And I intend to fight as hard as I can to ensure that our principles prevail over theirs.

Senator Clinton and Senator Obama want to increase the size of the federal government.

I intend to reduce it. I will not sign a bill with earmarks in it, any earmarks in it. I will fight for the line item veto, and I will not permit any expansion whatsoever of the entitlement programs that are bankrupting us. On the contrary, I intend to reform those programs so that government is no longer in that habit of making promises to Americans it does not have the means to keep.

Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will raise your taxes.

I intend to cut them. I will start by making the Bush tax cuts permanent. I will cut corporate tax rates from 35 to 25% to keep industries and jobs in this country. I will end the Alternate Minimum Tax. And I won't let a Democratic Congress raise your taxes and choke the growth of our economy.

They will offer a big government solution to health care insurance coverage.

I intend to address the problem with free market solutions and with respect for the freedom of individuals to make important choices for themselves.

They will appoint to the federal bench judges who are intent on achieving political changes that the American people cannot be convinced to accept through the election of their representatives.

I intend to nominate judges who have proven themselves worthy of our trust that they take as their sole responsibility the enforcement of laws made by the people's elected representatives, judges of the character and quality of Justices Roberts and Alito, judges who can be relied upon to respect the values of the people whose rights, laws and property they are sworn to defend.

Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will withdraw our forces from Iraq based on an arbitrary timetable designed for the sake of political expediency, and which recklessly ignores the profound human calamity and dire threats to our security that would ensue.

I intend to win the war, and trust in the proven judgment of our commanders there and the courage and selflessness of the Americans they have the honor to command. I share the grief over the terrible losses we have suffered in its prosecution. There is no other candidate for this office who appreciates more than I do just how awful war is. But I know that the costs in lives and treasure we would incur should we fail in Iraq will be far greater than the heartbreaking losses we have suffered to date. And I will not allow that to happen.

They won't recognize and seriously address the threat posed by an Iran with nuclear ambitions to our ally, Israel, and the region.

I intend to make unmistakably clear to Iran we will not permit a government that espouses the destruction of the State of Israel as its fondest wish and pledges undying enmity to the United States to possess the weapons to advance their malevolent ambitions.

Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will concede to our critics that our own actions to defend against its threats are responsible for fomenting the terrible evil of radical Islamic extremism, and their resolve to combat it will be as flawed as their judgment.

I intend to defeat that threat by staying on offense and by marshaling every relevant agency of our government, and our allies, in the urgent necessity of defending the values, virtues and security of free people against those who despise all that is good about us.

These are but a few of the differences that will define this election. They are very significant differences, and I promise you, I intend to contest these issues on conservative grounds and fight as hard as I can to defend the principles and positions we share, and to keep this country safe, proud, prosperous and free.

We have had a few disagreements, and none of us will pretend that we won't continue to have a few. But even in disagreement, especially in disagreement, I will seek the counsel of my fellow conservatives. If I am convinced my judgment is in error, I will correct it. And if I stand by my position, even after benefit of your counsel, I hope you will not lose sight of the far more numerous occasions when we are in complete accord.

I began by assuring you that we share a conception of liberty that is the bedrock of our beliefs as conservatives. As you know, I was deprived of liberty for a time in my life, and while my love of liberty is no greater than yours, you can be confident that mine is the equal of any American's. It is a deep and unwavering love. My life experiences in service to our country inform my political judgments. They are at the core of my convictions. I am pro-life and an advocate for the Rights of Man everywhere in the world because of them, because I know that to be denied liberty is an offense to nature and nature's Creator. I will never waver in that conviction, I promise you. I know in this country our liberty will not be seized in a political revolution or by a totalitarian government. But, rather, as Burke warned, it can be "nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts." I am alert to that risk and will defend against it, and ta ke comfort from the knowledge that I will be encouraged in that defense by my fellow conservatives.

You have heard me say before that for all my reputation as a maverick, I have only found true happiness in serving a cause greater than my self-interest. For me, that cause has always been our country, and the ideals that have made us great. I have been her imperfect servant for many years, and I have made many mistakes. You can attest to that, but need not. For I know them well myself. But I love her deeply and I will never, never tire of the honor of serving her. I cannot do that without your counsel and support. And I am grateful, very grateful, that you have given me this opportunity to ask for it.

Thank you and God bless you.

CowboyJeff
02-07-2008, 03:13 PM
That's like Obama or Clinton saying, "My fellow moderates.." :lmao:

CanadianCowboysFan
02-07-2008, 07:17 PM
certainly not a very presidential thing to say.

trickblue
02-07-2008, 09:27 PM
certainly not a very presidential thing to say.

He isn't presidential material, but not for that...

You have to give him a bit of a pass to some extent as those " s" tortured the Hell out of him over a few years...

I don't condone the term, but I can understand how it could slip out...

It's not an "excuse"; but he did suffer greatly at the hands of his captors so I will excuse him here...

All other things are fair game... and he still isn't presidential material...

theogt
02-07-2008, 09:32 PM
He still isn't presidential material...Sure he is. ;)

trickblue
02-07-2008, 09:59 PM
Sure he is. ;)

That's what the media wants America to think... They will crucify him in the general election... Think "Keating Five"... ;)

theogt
02-07-2008, 10:06 PM
That's what the media wants America to think... They will crucify him in the general election... Think "Keating Five"... ;)I seriously doubt the Keating Five thing will have any effect on the election whatsoever.

Mavs Man
02-07-2008, 10:54 PM
I'm not sure if the media will eventually turn on McCain, but if they did, they have a lot of ammo for it.

A certain joke about the Clintons' daughter comes to mind.

Danny White
02-07-2008, 11:20 PM
The McCain speech ended up turning into a big pep rally once Romney announced he was dropping out.

The only organized opposition to McCain at the conference was Romney people (no real Huckabee or Paul presence) and since he dropped out two hours prior, then McCain officially became the Republican candidate and most people fell in line behind him. Romney, in his remarks, was very generous towards McCain, and his excuse for ending his campaign was party unity, winning the war against radical Islam, and beating Hillary or Obama.

The speaker before McCain was Dick Armey, and he set the tone for the next hour. Basically it's "McCain is great on spending, has a pretty good conservative record, we don't agree with him on everything but hopefully he's moving in the right direction and he's a hell of a lot better than Hillary or Obama." Armey ended his remarks by taking a shot at Ann Coulter... making fun of her for saying she'd vote for Hillary.

Then they brought out George Allen, who gave a surprise pre-introduction for McCain. He basically said the same thing: "McCain is great on fighting terrorism, he took a heroic stand on the surge, he stands for what he believes in despite the political consequences, he's great on cutting spending and earmarks, we disagree with him on some things, but he's going to be our party's nominee."

Then came Senator Coburn for McCain's official introduction. Coburn has a sterling record among conservatives and was a great choice by McCain for the intro. He talked about how heroic McCain has been on fighting against earmarks. He said he firmly believed that McCain had seen the light on immigration and border security, and that if McCain was plotting to sneak amnesty through once he got elected, "He knows I'll track him down and kill him." That was a direct quote and got some good applause.

McCain then came up... mostly to applause but some audible boos as well. I sat on my hands through the whole speech.... although I did laugh rather loudly and mockingly when he was going through his whole "sorry I didn't make it here last year B.S."

For the most part, taken at face value, the speech was excellent and hit on everything he needed to hit on.

I wanted to see him own up to what he's been bad on, and he did do that to an extent, by bringing up immigration and then saying he was wrong and he had seen the light on it.

One really slick thing he did was bundle everything he's been bad on and make it sound like it could all be folded into his amnesty push... even though that's just the surface. When he mentioned immigration, he was booed very loudly. But he was ready for that and deflected it rather well and with good humor.

I still don't like the guy, but I'll reserve my final judgement until November.

Cheney gave a very good speech earlier in the day. I'm not a guy who's wild about the ongoing war in Iraq, but Cheney does give you a good sense that they've had a plan and still do.

Romney gave a solid speech, although I had heard a few minutes before his remarks that he was going to drop out. I admire him for dropping out at CPAC. I think that shows a degree of respect for the movement.

Bush was supposed to speak at 10:00 tomorrow, but moved it up to 7:15 a.m. because he's going down to visit the tornado victims. I doubt if he has much of a crowd now. No way I'm getting up that early!

arglebargle
02-08-2008, 12:21 AM
I watched a lot of this today, what was available on the tube. I thought McCain's speech was decent, and aimed well at his audience.

Watching it, and the foofarah response of the ultra-conservative'ss pundits afterwards, it sure looks like the far right political activists think they are the conservative movement. And are kind of cranky that the primaries are not behaving properly.

McCain's the best shot the Republican's have. The knowledge of the mismanagement of the last 8 years has filtered down to the grassroots. McCain's Maverick status insulates him from some of this. Not a lot of people making arrangements for Bush to campaign for them......

trickblue
02-08-2008, 12:47 AM
I seriously doubt the Keating Five thing will have any effect on the election whatsoever. k... so you think the Clinton Machine won't get this front and center?

trickblue
02-08-2008, 12:59 AM
Armey, Allen and Coburn should turn in their conservative cards; they are now officially a disgrace...

This McCain love sickens me... He has continually thrown conservatives under the bus for years and now he wants our votes...

He shouldn't be trusted...

**** McCain's ego and his campaign...

burmafrd
02-08-2008, 06:02 AM
If the mudslinging starts the Clintons have a WHOLE lot more to worry about then McCain does.

heavyg
02-08-2008, 06:46 AM
Armey, Allen and Coburn should turn in their conservative cards; they are now officially a disgrace...

This McCain love sickens me... He has continually thrown conservatives under the bus for years and now he wants our votes...

He shouldn't be trusted...

**** McCain's ego and his campaign...

While I agree that McCain is not my first choice. Lets not forget he is running on the Rep card and is the only thing standing between us and a Clinton or Obamba presidency. As much as we may not agree with everything he has stood for. He is far better than the alternative. I just hope he picks a good running mate to replace him in 4 yrs

03EBZ06
02-08-2008, 08:04 AM
I heard he said he doesn't like " s" and never will. Is that true?
The use of N-word is a taboo and and yet this site allows a racist and disparaging word like " s"?

I bet N-word is filtered on here and yet, this particular word degrading Asians isn't, this is very disappointing.

theogt
02-08-2008, 09:18 AM
k... so you think the Clinton Machine won't get this front and center?I doubt they even try. It's just a non-issue.

Doomsday101
02-08-2008, 09:23 AM
Armey, Allen and Coburn should turn in their conservative cards; they are now officially a disgrace...

This McCain love sickens me... He has continually thrown conservatives under the bus for years and now he wants our votes...

He shouldn't be trusted...

**** McCain's ego and his campaign...

He has my vote. I don't agree with him on somethings but in the big picture there are more things I agree with him than disagree. On the other hand there are many things I disagree with Hillary and Obama.

heavyg
02-08-2008, 09:24 AM
He has my vote. I don't agree with him on somethings but in the big picture there are more things I agree with him than disagree. On the other hand there are many things I disagree with Hillary and Obama.

Thats the way I look at it. As I said I just hope he picks a good running mate to replace him in 4 yrs. I don't see him seeking a second term

Doomsday101
02-08-2008, 09:29 AM
Thats the way I look at it. As I said I just hope he picks a good running mate to replace him in 4 yrs. I don't see him seeking a second term

I agree I hope he picks a good running mate that can help in the elections. One other thing I'm hoping to see soon and that is Huckabee doing what Romney did so the McCain can focus his comments against the Democrats. Right now Hillary and Obama have to focus on each other and spend money in the process. Sooner Huckabee steps aside the better off the Republicans will be

heavyg
02-08-2008, 09:31 AM
I agree I hope he picks a good running mate that can help in the elections. One other thing I'm hoping to see soon and that is Huckabee doing what Romney did so the McCain can focus his comments against the Democrats. Right now Hillary and Obama have to focus on each other and spend money in the process. Sooner Huckabee steps aside the better off the Republicans will be

As much as I want to see Huckabee get the nod I agree with you. I do not understand this whole primary system with the super delegates and all that. Why cant we just have a mojority rule voting system?

BrAinPaiNt
02-08-2008, 10:07 AM
As much as I want to see Huckabee get the nod I agree with you. I do not understand this whole primary system with the super delegates and all that. Why cant we just have a mojority rule voting system?

I like Mojo rules as well.:p:

I know you meant majority but just got a laugh out of that one.

heavyg
02-08-2008, 10:22 AM
I like Mojo rules as well.:p:

I know you meant majority but just got a laugh out of that one.

lol.......yeah missed that one. Im at work and sometimes I have to hit submit real fast to get on to something work related....lol

Danny White
02-08-2008, 10:11 PM
I went to Ann Coulter's speech today. She was on fire! It was a 45 minute diatribe against John McCain. Trickblue would have loved it!

Cajuncowboy
02-08-2008, 10:16 PM
I went to Ann Coulter's speech today. She was on fire! It was a 45 minute diatribe against John McCain. Trickblue would have loved it!

I wonder how hard she will campaign for Hillary? :D

Gotta love Ann's spirit. She sure can get folks all hot and bothered.

Danny White
02-08-2008, 10:21 PM
I wonder how hard she will campaign for Hillary? :D

Gotta love Ann's spirit. She sure can get folks all hot and bothered.

I got up and asked the first question, where I basically challenged her to run for President as a third-party candidate rather than campaign for Hillary. The crowd loved my question but she deflected it to say that she hoped Romney would run as third party and fund his own campaign.


Here's some of the highlights of her speech as recapped by some blog:

On February 8, less than 12 hours after her appearance on NBC's Today show, right-wing pundit Ann Coulter delivered a speech to the Young America's Foundation in which she referred to Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (IL) as "B. Hussein Obama" and asserted, "His strongest selling point is that he is one of the least dangerous people I know named Hussein." As the blog Think Progress noted, Coulter went on to say: "Other than that, Barack's really been kind of coasting on his record, since his first big accomplishment of being born half-black. I keep hearing people say, 'Oh, Obama could never be elected because he's half-black. You know, 'cause we're just such a racist country.' What are they talking about? He wouldn't be running for president if he weren't half-black. He'd be [Sen.] Dick Durbin [D-IL] with less experience." The speech was broadcast live on the Townhall.com.

During the February 8 speech, Coulter also said that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) "wanted 'I Am Woman' " as her campaign song, "but that was already taken by [former Sen.] John Edwards [D-NC]." As Media Matters for America noted, in a March 2, 2007, speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), Coulter said she could not "really talk about" Edwards because "you have to go into rehab if you use the word ' .' " The CPAC audience applauded her comment. Several newspapers dropped Coulter's column following her remarks at CPAC.

From Coulter's February 8 Young America's Foundation speech:

COULTER: Thank you. Well, now I'm going to have to give you an Edwards joke for that. So my girl Hillary is really on the move now. Her recent big policy shift is they've changed the campaign song from Celine Dion's "You and I" to something like Big Head Todd and the Monsters' song "Big Sky." She wanted "I Am Woman," but that was already taken by John Edwards.

[applause]

Hillary keeps announcing to us that she wants to be judged on her full 35-year record in public service, and, you know, I'm concerned about this, now that I'm on her team. And I'm just thinking, people might ask, whoever heard of Hillary before 1992, when she foist that horny hick on the nation? Her biggest accomplishment is taking what could have been, you know, a small family's neurosis and turning it into a national neurosis. Her strong selling point, though, is almost half the population does not hate her with the hot hate -- hot hate of a thousand suns.

And the only Democrat who can stop her now is B. Hussein Obama. His strongest selling point is that he is one of the least dangerous people I know named Hussein. [applause] Other than that, Barack's really been kind of coasting on his record, since his first big accomplishment of being born half-black. I keep hearing people say, "Oh, Obama could never be elected because he's half-black. You know, 'cause we're just such a racist country." What are they talking about? He wouldn't be running for president if he weren't half-black. He'd be Dick Durbin with less experience.

When asked how he would respond, in one of the debates, how he would respond to simultaneous attacks on two U.S. cities, Obama said he would call ambulances. "And I'd be right there chasing them," piped in John Edwards. Yeah, of course you'd want to send bandages to the wounded; I think we knew that. You know, my answer would have been: "which two cities?"

In other words, the Democrats are trying to give away an election they ought to win in a walk.

Cajuncowboy
02-08-2008, 10:25 PM
I got up and asked the first question, where I basically challenged her to run for President as a third-party candidate rather than campaign for Hillary. The crowd loved my question but she deflected it to say that she hoped Romney would run as third party and fund his own campaign.


Here's some of the highlights of her speech as recapped by some blog:

How about a Newt/ Coulter Ticket????

theogt
02-08-2008, 10:27 PM
I went to Ann Coulter's speech today. She was on fire! It was a 45 minute diatribe against John McCain. Trickblue would have loved it!Do people actually take her seriously? You guys know she's just an act right? It's schtick, designed to sell books, get airplay.

Cajuncowboy
02-08-2008, 10:31 PM
Do people actually take her seriously? You guys know she's just an act right? It's schtick, designed to sell books, get airplay.

Either way, she's correct more often than not.

Danny White
02-08-2008, 10:36 PM
Do people actually take her seriously? You guys know she's just an act right? It's schtick, designed to sell books, get airplay.

That's an interesting question. At her most outrageous I don't take her seriously. Most of what she says though, is pretty clever analysis and she can be quite funny as well. But then she loves to take it that extra step to get the added attention.

She was pretty on today, though. Funny and brutal when it came to Johnny Mac.

Danny White
02-08-2008, 10:42 PM
I wonder how hard she will campaign for Hillary? :D

Gotta love Ann's spirit. She sure can get folks all hot and bothered.

When are you going to make to CPAC buddy?

Cajuncowboy
02-08-2008, 10:51 PM
When are you going to make to CPAC buddy?

The start of this year has been brutal. Little time to do the fun stuff. It's a good brutal though but time consuming.

I would to make it up next year. I just have to order myself to take the time to do it. Last trip up there I was in and out in 24 hours.

Danny White
02-08-2008, 11:08 PM
The start of this year has been brutal. Little time to do the fun stuff. It's a good brutal though but time consuming.

I would to make it up next year. I just have to order myself to take the time to do it. Last trip up there I was in and out in 24 hours.

Shoulda come this year... I could have gotten you up close and personal with Ann!

BrAinPaiNt
02-09-2008, 06:23 AM
Shoulda come this year... I could have gotten you up close and personal with Ann!

I heard they did not invite her this year.

Danny White
02-11-2008, 02:05 PM
I heard they did not invite her this year.

She was not invited to speak... that is true. I don't think they liked the distraction her CPAC speeches have caused in the past.

A couple of organizations that were co-sponsors of CPAC privately hosted the Coulter speech and made it an invitation-only event.