Obama Gay Rumor

[Danny White]

Has anyone else heard this rumor being floated around about some guy claiming to have done coke with Obama as recently as 1999? The guy also claims to have engaged in oral sex with the then state representative Obama.

He's submitting to a polygraph next week or sometime around then to gauge the veracity of his claims.

The dude's YouTube video making the claim:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

The website that's giving him the polygraph:
http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=110#comments

[zrinkill]

I do not believe it for a second .... this is Clinton's attack machine about to go in full force ..... right before the Texas vote.

So predictable.

[arglebargle]

I think they must have eaten Karl Rove's brain!

[Danny White]

I do not believe it for a second .... this is Clinton's attack machine about to go in full force ..... right before the Texas vote.

So predictable.

I think you're probably right. It'll be interesting to see how many more attacks like this surface over the next two weeks.

If it was a Republican the claims were made against, I'm sure the New York Times would have run it on the front page!

[burmafrd]

You guys are forgetting Carville and company- they were doing this sort of thing years before Rove ever showed up. BUT the media would have you think this was all his doing. And a lot of people are stupid enough to still believe the mediots.

[Danny White]

You guys are forgetting Carville and company- they were doing this sort of thing years before Rove ever showed up. BUT the media would have you think this was all his doing. And a lot of people are stupid enough to still believe the mediots.

That is true... this is vintage Ragin' Cajun!

[zrinkill]

Think about it .... who does the Clinton's think "dumb old Texans" hate the most?

Drug users and Gays .....

So all of a sudden ..... when Clinton desperately needs a Win in a very "Red" state ....... a story comes out that Obama is a cocaine snorting homosexual.

Its ridiculous and its also the reason so many people hate the Clinton's.

[Doomsday101]

Obama: I did not have coke or sexual relationship with that man. :lmao2:

Just kidding, I think that this is a dirty underhand political trick. If these allegations were true why wait until now to bring them up?

[Danny White]

Think about it .... who does the Clinton's think "dumb old Texans" hate the most?

Drug users and Gays .....

So all of a sudden ..... when Clinton desperately needs a Win in a very "Red" state ....... a story comes out that Obama is a cocaine snorting homosexual.

Its ridiculous and its also the reason so many people hate the Clinton's.
The only thing worse is if he would have accused Obama of being a vegetarian as well! :laugh2:

[Doomsday101]

I'm waiting to see if this guy can produce a blue shirt with a stain on it. :lmao:

[iceberg]

i was gonna make some jokes, but am far too late now.

[Danny White]

I'm waiting to see if this guy can produce a blue shirt with a stain on it. :lmao:

It's probably on the blue hat he's wearing in the video!

[zrinkill]

I do not think Larry the Cable guy is Obama's type ..... even if he was gay.

[ScipioCowboy]

Think about it .... who does the Clinton's think "dumb old Texans" hate the most?

Drug users and Gays .....

So all of a sudden ..... when Clinton desperately needs a Win in a very "Red" state ....... a story comes out that Obama is a cocaine snorting homosexual.



I legitimately laughed out loud.:D

[BrAinPaiNt]

Think about it .... who does the Clinton's think "dumb old Texans" hate the most?

Drug users and Gays .....

So all of a sudden ..... when Clinton desperately needs a Win in a very "Red" state ....... a story comes out that Obama is a cocaine snorting homosexual.

Its ridiculous and its also the reason so many people hate the Clinton's.

I thought we were talking about Obama and not Ted Haggard.:eek: :p: :laugh2:

[joseephuss]

You guys are forgetting Carville and company- they were doing this sort of thing years before Rove ever showed up. BUT the media would have you think this was all his doing. And a lot of people are stupid enough to still believe the mediots.

Rove did learn from his mentor, Donald Segretti.

[AbeBeta]

I thought we were talking about Obama and not Ted Haggard.:eek: :p: :laugh2:

:hammer: :hammer:

Obama can't be gay -- he hasn't used his position to slam gay people or try to legislate against them.

[ConcordCowboy]

You guys are forgetting Carville and company- they were doing this sort of thing years before Rove ever showed up. BUT the media would have you think this was all his doing. And a lot of people are stupid enough to still believe the mediots.

Well did you forget Lee Atwater....friend and mentor of Rove.

:rolleyes:

[CanadianCowboysFan]

You guys are forgetting Carville and company- they were doing this sort of thing years before Rove ever showed up. BUT the media would have you think this was all his doing. And a lot of people are stupid enough to still believe the mediots.

you know everything isn't a "the libs did it long before the reactionaries" did.

It is politics 101. If you can sling mud, you do it because, despite people saying they do not like negative campaigning, those type of campaigns work.

[joseephuss]

Well did you forget Lee Atwater....friend and mentor of Rove.

:rolleyes:

That was the other name I was trying to remember. It actually should have been the easier name to remember for me. And you are right. He was doing this type of stuff for a long time.

[Heisenberg]

This video has been around for a while. It's interesting that guy can make something up like this, get publicity for it, and then get PAID to take a polygraph about it. Only in America.

[theebs]

Hillarious. this isnt as funny as the fed judge getting a dwi while dresses as a woman though.

the best rumour of the year is the one that was going around about osi umenyiora the weeks leading up to the super bowl. If you havent heard them go look them up. they are hysterical, and in case your wondering it involves what he likes to do to women.

[ThreeSportStar80]

People are sad these days.... I hope Obama sues for slander and defamation of character.

[Cajuncowboy]

:lmao2:

While I want Hillary to get the Dem nod anytime you have these creeps having anything to do with an election, you can expect this stuff.

But again......



:lmao2:

[Cajuncowboy]

:hammer: :hammer:

Obama can't be gay -- he hasn't used his position to slam gay people or try to legislate against them.

:rolleyes:

Some people.

[Vintage]

:rolleyes:

Some people.

Well.

Can you say he is wrong? Huck has gone against gay marriage.

McCain, well, its hard to get a real read on his thoughts on this issue.

The sad part is....without the fiscal conservative policy and small gov't policy Republicans have advocated, many libertarians may vote Democratic in this election.

[Cajuncowboy]

Well.

Can you say he is wrong? Huck has gone against gay marriage.

McCain, well, its hard to get a real read on his thoughts on this issue.

The sad part is....without the fiscal conservative policy and small gov't policy Republicans have advocated, many libertarians may vote Democratic in this election.

I was referring to his asinine remark about you must be gay if you oppose gay marriage.

It's an idiotic comment.

[theogt]

Hillarious. this isnt as funny as the fed judge getting a dwi while dresses as a woman though.

the best rumour of the year is the one that was going around about osi umenyiora the weeks leading up to the super bowl. If you havent heard them go look them up. they are hysterical, and in case your wondering it involves what he likes to do to women.For the curious, google "Osi Umenyiora" and "poops."

[CanadianCowboysFan]

I was referring to his asinine remark about you must be gay if you oppose gay marriage.

It's an idiotic comment.

you aren't gay if you oppose gay marriage but you are homophobic as there is no logical reason why our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters should be denied the right to express their love and commitment through marriage

[heavyg]

you aren't gay if you oppose gay marriage but you are homophobic as there is no logical reason why our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters should be denied the right to express their love and commitment through marriage

Here we go again. I see this thread getting closed real soon

[Cajuncowboy]

you aren't gay if you oppose gay marriage but you are homophobic as there is no logical reason why our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters should be denied the right to express their love and commitment through marriage

Not gonna get into this again with you people but it has nothing to do with anything other than wanting to preserve the sanctity of traditional American values and homosexual marriage is not one of them.

[CanadianCowboysFan]

Not gonna get into this again with you people but it has nothing to do with anything other than wanting to preserve the sanctity of traditional American values and homosexual marriage is not one of them.

traditional values kept women out of the workforce in large numbers until the 1960/70s, said it was ok to beat your children, children were property, and that men were the head of the households.

There is such a thing as progression in society.

[Vintage]

Here we go again. I see this thread getting closed real soon


It only gets closed if its an attack against Christianity.

Otherwise, hell, anything goes...

So long as the Christians don't feel attacked.

And I say this as a confirmed christian.

[Cajuncowboy]

traditional values kept women out of the workforce in large numbers until the 1960/70s, said it was ok to beat your children, children were property, and that men were the head of the households.

There is such a thing as progression in society.

Some would say this is Regression. Actually, most would say this.

[CanadianCowboysFan]

Some would say this is Regression. Actually, most would say this.

Tell me then, how is it a regression? How does it hurt society? Come on, make a case

[Cajuncowboy]

It only gets closed if its an attack against Christianity.

Otherwise, hell, anything goes...

So long as the Christians don't feel attacked.

And I say this as a confirmed christian.

Nope, it gets closed only when Christians defend their faith, then it's seen as insensitive or a violation of the rules.

[Vintage]

Tell me then, how is it a regression? How does it hurt society? Come on, make a case

Are you asking a christian to make a case/

we are incapable of such.

adjust accordingly.

[Cajuncowboy]

Tell me then, how is it a regression? How does it hurt society? Come on, make a case

I've already told you how in the other thread how it hurts.

One way is that employers have to pay more for insurance for homosexual couple than for heterosexual couples. When an employer has higher costs, then their product costs more and that means I have less money in my pocket because I had to spend more.

Also, we are paying out billions, and I mean Billions of dollars all over the world to help stem the tide of AIDS which was genesied in homosexual activity. While it now has become a disease that effects anyone and quite possibly by no ones own fault, there is no denying the genesis of it.

It also erodes the moral fabric of our civilization because it is an immoral act.

Now, I do not think we should make it illegal to have a homosexual relationship, but it should not be viewed by our society as the same as between one man and one woman. For al the reasons above and more.

[Vintage]

I've already told you how in the other thread how it hurts.

One way is that employers have to pay more for insurance for homosexual couple than for heterosexual couples. When an employer has higher costs, then their product costs more and that means I have less money in my pocket because I had to spend more.

Also, we are paying out billions, and I mean Billions of dollars all over the world to help stem the tide of AIDS which was genesied in homosexual activity. While it now has become a disease that effects anyone and quite possibly by no ones own fault, there is no denying the genesis of it.

It also erodes the moral fabric of our civilization because it is an immoral act.

Now, I do not think we should make it illegal to have a homosexual relationship, but it should not be viewed by our society as the same as between one man and one woman. For al the reasons above and more.


Well, now it is a heterosexual problem too. And I am sure that probably pisses you off more than anything. Because now, you cannot blame it on the gays. Its the straight people too who are proliferating aids.


And it does not erode the moral fabrics of society in any way. Other than it pisses off the religious right. Which, in my opinion, is probably a sign that we are heading in the right way....

[Cajuncowboy]

Well, now it is a heterosexual problem too. And I am sure that probably pisses you off more than anything. Because now, you cannot blame it on the gays. Its the straight people too who are proliferating aids.


And it does not erode the moral fabrics of society in any way. Other than it pisses off the religious right. Which, in my opinion, is probably a sign that we are heading in the right way....

Of course it pisses me off that "Straight" people get Aids. Why wouldn't it. It seems like you are happy that is the case. It also pisses me off that gay people get Aids as well.

I've seen first hand how it ravages the body. How a grown man, who is in his early thirties looks like a man of 70 years old and worse. I watched as my friend since Jr. High who contracted it through his homosexual life style suffered intense pain and also ridicule.

I watched as people mocked him without a care in the world about how it made his last days even more unbearable.

Yeah, it pisses me off. Gay, straight, bi, it doesn't matter. the whole thing pisses me off.

His last wish was to go to a minor league baseball game in Williamsport, PA. He could barley breathe and we knew he wasn't gonna make it too much longer. So I took him and his nurse to the game to watch The Williamsport Crosscutters play a game.

We sat in the "Family" section of the stadium and I listened while some moron behind us kept yelling, move the queer because he didn't want to "catch" something. All the guy wanted to do was watch the game. He begged me not to say anything because it would cause a problem so I didn't. I regret that today.

He died less than a week later from pneumonia.

If you think that it is some kind of hate for gays why I am against gay marriage, then you have no freakin clue what you are talking about. If you think I am "homophobic" and that is why, again, you are clueless.

You either need to try and understand the reasons, or shut up when you don't know instead of making yourself look like a jerk by saying something like it pisses me off because straight people now get it.

If you really were tolerant like you think you are then you would think a bit more clearly before you post such ridiculous things.

[Vintage]

I never claimed i was tolerant of the religious right.

[Cajuncowboy]

I never claimed i was tolerant of the religious right.

And that has exactly what to do with the preponderance of the post?

[CanadianCowboysFan]

how does allowing gay marriage increase insurance costs? not like a gay male gets ill more than a straight male as a general rule of thumb

you are right, aids was originally a gay disease passed mostly through anal intercourse. Of course that begs the question, if that is how it is mainly passed, does that mean straight people who have it get through anal as well and if so, how is that affecting the moral values of society?

I used to think like Cajun, then I woke up one day and realized that there is no logical reason to have that belief. the only logical reasoning I could see in being against such love unions was the fact deep down in parts of me I don't talk about at parties, I was homophobic. Once I realized that fact, I was able to come to grips with my prejudices and became a better person.

[Cajuncowboy]

how does allowing gay marriage increase insurance costs? not like a gay male gets ill more than a straight male as a general rule of thumb

you are right, aids was originally a gay disease passed mostly through anal intercourse. Of course that begs the question, if that is how it is mainly passed, does that mean straight people who have it get through anal as well and if so, how is that affecting the moral values of society?

I used to think like Cajun, then I woke up one day and realized that there is no logical reason to have that belief. the only logical reasoning I could see in being against such love unions was the fact deep down in parts of me I don't talk about at parties, I was homophobic. Once I realized that fact, I was able to come to grips with my prejudices and became a better person.

That's insane and shows how little you know about Aids. My belief is rooted in my Christian faith as it is plainly dealt with in the Bible. It has nothing to do with homophobia. If you would have even read the above post you would know that. Some people just like to put themselves on a pedestal to make themselves feel better about themselves.

This is what you have done. You just said you were a better person than me because you are for gay marriage.

You are intolerant of other views and that makes you the one with the problem.

And as for the costs....Insurance companies charge a higher premium for gay couples. And yes, they do run a higher risk of getting ill.

[ScipioCowboy]

traditional values kept women out of the workforce in large numbers until the 1960/70s, said it was ok to beat your children, children were property, and that men were the head of the households.

There is such a thing as progression in society.

You're engaging in transference here.

You're linking a certain position on an issue (in this case, support of gay marriage and rejection of traditional values) to concepts that carry highly positive connotations (in this case, social progression) when there's really no logical reason to make such as connection.

Ancient Greece, for instance, tended to be far more tolerant of the homosexual lifestyle than the United States has been, yet Greek society was very oppressive towards women.

History suggests that opposition to a set of hypothetical traditional values, embracing of the homosexual lifestyle, and woman's rights do not necessarily go hand-in-hand.

[ScipioCowboy]

Of course it pisses me off that "Straight" people get Aids. Why wouldn't it. It seems like you are happy that is the case. It also pisses me off that gay people get Aids as well.

I've seen first hand how it ravages the body. How a grown man, who is in his early thirties looks like a man of 70 years old and worse. I watched as my friend since Jr. High who contracted it through his homosexual life style suffered intense pain and also ridicule.

I watched as people mocked him without a care in the world about how it made his last days even more unbearable.

Yeah, it pisses me off. Gay, straight, bi, it doesn't matter. the whole thing pisses me off.

His last wish was to go to a minor league baseball game in Williamsport, PA. He could barley breathe and we knew he wasn't gonna make it too much longer. So I took him and his nurse to the game to watch The Williamsport Crosscutters play a game.

We sat in the "Family" section of the stadium and I listened while some moron behind us kept yelling, move the queer because he didn't want to "catch" something. All the guy wanted to do was watch the game. He begged me not to say anything because it would cause a problem so I didn't. I regret that today.

He died less than a week later from pneumonia.

If you think that it is some kind of hate for gays why I am against gay marriage, then you have no freakin clue what you are talking about. If you think I am "homophobic" and that is why, again, you are clueless.

You either need to try and understand the reasons, or shut up when you don't know instead of making yourself look like a jerk by saying something like it pisses me off because straight people now get it.

If you really were tolerant like you think you are then you would think a bit more clearly before you post such ridiculous things.

That's terrible, Cajun. I'm very sorry for your loss.

And don't let the term homophobic bother you. It's not even a clinical term in this usage. It's a political buzzword whose implications grow increasingly detached from the actual meanings of the terms that comprise it, homo and phobic.

It's becoming ridiculous. Many people oppose legal recognition of polygamous unions yet I've never heard them described polygamaphobic.

[AbeBeta]

I was referring to his asinine remark about you must be gay if you oppose gay marriage.

It's an idiotic comment.

Just as asinine as the behavior of folks like Larry Craig who fight to deny gay folks rights because they think that will make them not gay anymore.

[zrinkill]

Just as asinine as the behavior of folks like Larry Craig who fight to deny gay folks rights because they think that will make them not gay anymore.

Has anyone on this website defended Larry Craig?

Comparing your argument with a obvious idiot is not helping your case.


Cajun I am very sorry about your friend ..... had to be unimaginably difficult to watch that.

[AbeBeta]

Has anyone on this website defended Larry Craig?

Comparing your argument with a obvious idiot is not helping your case.


My "argument" was clearly a joke about the various hypocrites who like Craig and Haggard who have been extraordinarily anti-gay and then exposed as engaging or trying to engage in gay activities.

Of course for some, the joke struck a nerve. Perhaps those reacting in this way are a bit less confident in their sexuality or have a few skeletons in the closet. Or perhaps they just see a little bit of themselves in Larry Craig.

[CanadianCowboysFan]

That's insane and shows how little you know about Aids. My belief is rooted in my Christian faith as it is plainly dealt with in the Bible. It has nothing to do with homophobia. If you would have even read the above post you would know that. Some people just like to put themselves on a pedestal to make themselves feel better about themselves.

This is what you have done. You just said you were a better person than me because you are for gay marriage.

You are intolerant of other views and that makes you the one with the problem.

And as for the costs....Insurance companies charge a higher premium for gay couples. And yes, they do run a higher risk of getting ill.


I thought of Nazareth preached tolerance, at least that is what those sunday school teachers I had as a child told me?

You simply cannot based 2007 social values on ancient texts (Old Testament) written by men in social situations that bore no comparison whatsoever to the present.

live and let live. gay marriage will not hurt you in the least, it won't damage society

[ScipioCowboy]

I thought of Nazareth preached tolerance, at least that is what those sunday school teachers I had as a child told me?

taught patience and long-suffering. He never taught that sin should be excused.

[BrAinPaiNt]

And BP sat his flapjack arse down in his semi-comfy computer chair and addressed the masses by saying - Once again please do not turn yet another thread into a religious debate that will wind up getting closed.

And with this decree he let out a thunderous fart that shook the world.

[vta]

You simply cannot based 2007 social values on ancient texts (Old Testament) written by men in social situations that bore no comparison whatsoever to the present.

Is there a statute of limitations on values? If so, what is it?
Can we expect a departure from our Constitutional values based on this?

It's a bit naive to think that you and I are experiencing something new and profound, merely because of the era in which we exist. Humanity is humanity and it's wants and desires are perpetual. Sexual, economic wealth and social standing. They've all existed long before us and all societies have dealt with them.

Ego tells the 'kid's' of today that those who went before us couldn't have gone through what we're going through, despite the fact that everything we know and have, from the mathematics of music and art; the science of self deception and lying, to our continuing daily struggles are a product of them.

They've laid a foundation and our generation walks over it as if it were a product of our simply deigning to exist.

[zrinkill]

My "argument" was clearly a joke about the various hypocrites who like Craig and Haggard who have been extraordinarily anti-gay and then exposed as engaging or trying to engage in gay activities.

Of course for some, the joke struck a nerve. Perhaps those reacting in this way are a bit less confident in their sexuality or have a few skeletons in the closet. Or perhaps they just see a little bit of themselves in Larry Craig.

I do not think so ..... I think its just you having no argument once again.

And in the absence of an argument you go back to "everyone is gay on the inside" ....

I think the only person who is confused or has "skeletons" is you.

You seem to take it more personally than anyone else here.

[ScipioCowboy]

Is there a statute of limitations on values? If so, what is it?
Can we expect a departure from our Constitutional values based on this?

It's a bit naive to think that you and I are experiencing something new and profound, merely because of the era in which we exist

You said this far better than I was going to say it. The debate over what constitues sexually moral and immoral is as relevant today as it was centuries ago.

As I said before, certain Ancient Societies were far more tolerant of homosexuality than the US has been. An ambivalent attitude towards homosexuality is certianly no indication of enlightenment.

[SultanOfSix]

Sexual, economic wealth and social standing. They've all existed long before us and all societies have dealt with them.

Yep. Human nature is essentially the same. Beautiful women are still prized and sought after. Camels and horses have been changed to fast cars and aeroplanes.

Only the "trinkets" change, and sometimes don't even do that.

[AbeBeta]

I do not think so ..... I think its just you having no argument once again.

And in the absence of an argument you go back to "everyone is gay on the inside" ....

I think the only person who is confused or has "skeletons" is you.

You seem to take it more personally than anyone else here.

Get over it. I made a joke and it struck a nerve with some folks.

[zrinkill]

Get over it. I made a joke and it struck a nerve with some folks.

This is funny coming from you.

[AbeBeta]

This is funny coming from you.

There is a difference between a joke and constant idiotic "me too-isms"

[zrinkill]

There is a difference between a joke and constant idiotic "me too-isms"

Well you are the king of the idiotic "isms"
http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1961415&postcount=224



try to think of your own material. ;)

[AbeBeta]

All you expose is your own immaturity and inability to engage in actual discussions of these topics.

This statement continues to apply to your posts.

Over and over all you do is jump on someone else's post and scream "ya, me too" -- It continues to be lame, tired, and a tactic devised to do nothing but annoying like a child who needs attention. You lack both the intelligence or knowledge to actively participate in this forum so you resort to trying to get under the skin of those who have the cognitive resources to actually think about these topics and discuss them.

This is not the forum for you. Go back to discussing video game with your geek friends.

[zrinkill]

This statement continues to apply to your posts.

Over and over all you do is jump on someone else's post and scream "ya, me too" -- It continues to be lame, tired, and a tactic devised to do nothing but annoying like a child who needs attention. You lack both the intelligence or knowledge to actively participate in this forum so you resort to trying to get under the skin of those who have the cognitive resources to actually think about these topics and discuss them.

This is not the forum for you. Go back to discussing video game with your geek friends.


Wow you already tried using that argument as well ....

Everyone knows your deal "abersonc", you are a bigot who pretends to care about others problems to try and make himself look good.

Whether its you trying to get attention for championing Racism or Sexism or Gun control, or whatever it all boils down to how much attention the diva can get for himself.

No one is falling for it. You have been exposed.

P.S. ..... Those "geek" friends are mostly ex military ..... so you would hate them as well. :lmao:

[AbeBeta]

Wow you already tried using that argument as well ....

Everyone knows your deal "abersonc", you are a bigot who pretends to care about others problems to try and make himself look good.

Whether its you trying to get attention for championing Racism or Sexism or Gun control, or whatever it all boils down to how much attention the diva can get for himself.

No one is falling for it. You have been exposed.

P.S. ..... Those "geek" friends are mostly ex military ..... so you would hate them as well. :lmao:

There you go again. Bringing out the idiotic "you have been exposed" line.

Sorry, you've made something up about me when you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. That exposes nothing but your ignorance.

All you've done is shout "me too" on a politics board.

With every post you expose yourself as an annoying know nothing.

[iceberg]

There you go again. Bringing out the idiotic "you have been exposed" line.

Yes, making something up about someone when you have no idea what the hell you are talking about is "exposing" them. Right. I have devoted many of my professional efforts toward work on those issues.

All you've done is shout "me too" on a politics board.

With every post you expose yourself as an annoying know nothing.

if it's idiotic, why did you just do it?

[zrinkill]

Sorry, you've made something up about me when you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. That exposes nothing but your ignorance.

I did expose ignorance alright ..... yours.

Anyone can look at your post history and see I tried talking the issues with you .... and you scream racism or sexism and then run away.

You are a blowhard ..... sorry if that bothers you.

[AbeBeta]

if it's idiotic, why did you just do it?

you are missing the context there Ice.

[AbeBeta]

I did expose ignorance alright ..... yours.

Anyone can look at your post history and see I tried talking the issues with you .... and you scream racism or sexism and then run away.

You are a blowhard ..... sorry if that bothers you.

You haven't exposed crap - you don't post a thing of value in these threads -- you express no opinion other than shouting "me too" and incessantly use the :lmao2: :lmao: :hammer: rather than expressing an opinion of your own.

Blowhards at least have something to say. You say nothing. Ever.

I run away from threads and arguments? Right. You can't even make up crap that is vaguely true.

[locked&loaded]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_wRb8J_bjM&NR=1

funniest video i have ever seen. dont know if it has been posted.

[iceberg]

you are missing the context there Ice.

heh, no i'm not. : )

[zrinkill]

Blowhards at least have something to say. You say nothing. Ever.

I run away from threads and arguments? Right. You can't even make up crap that is vaguely true.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1956809#post1956809

Like I have said ...... You just seek attention pretending to champion those you think need your help. You scream racism and sexism at the top of your lungs because most people will cower if called that.

Blowhard describes you to a tee .....