PDA

View Full Version : Bush: No regrets over Iraq invasion


zrinkill
06-11-2008, 08:44 AM
U.S. President George W. Bush claimed Wednesday that he had no regrets about the decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein in 2003 and reiterated his determination to force Iran to halt its nuclear program.

Bush, making the final official visit to Europe of his presidency, was speaking at a press conference in Germany after talks with Chancellor Angela Merkel.


He said he had told Merkel that diplomacy remained his preferred choice for dealing with Iran. But he added that "all options are on the table" and said Tehran needed to "verifiably suspend" its uranium enrichment program. Iran maintains that its nuclear ambitions are peaceful.


"The message to the Iranian government is very clear: that there's a better way forward than isolation and that is for you to verifiably suspend your enrichment program and the choice is theirs to make," Bush said.


On Tuesday the U.S. and the European Union on Tuesday issued a joint declaration urging tougher action against Iran over its nuclear program.
It said the U.S. and EU would implement previously passed Security Council resolutions on Iran and stood "ready to supplement those sanctions with additional measures."


Sanctions in place should be enforced, Bush (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/george_w_bush) said, and allies should work together for additional sanctions if Iran "ignores the demands of the free world."

Merkel (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/angela_merkel) said that further sanctions would follow if Iran (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/iran) failed to meet its commitments. "We again said we want to give room for diplomatic solutions, we want to give diplomacy a chance, but we also have to stay on that particular issue."


Asked about Iraq (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/iraq), Bush said "substantial" progress had been made in helping the country, adding that efforts in Iraq would "change the Middle East for the better."


"Removing Saddam Hussein made the world a safer place," Bush said. But he admitted once again that he regretted the tough rhetoric he had used in the run-up to the conflict which had made it appear he was eager to go to war.

In an interview with UK's Times newspaper Wednesday, Bush said using phrases such as "dead or alive" and "bring them on" had not created an impression of a man of peace.


He also said he had found it painful "to put youngsters in harm's way," adding that he had an obligation to make sure lives had not been lost in vain.


"One of the lessons of Iraq is that in order for a democracy to develop or for an economy to develop there has to be a measure of security, which is now happening," he said.


Bush said he also believed that the U.S. would develop a bilateral strategic agreement relationship with Iraq, a pact now under negotiation.

He said reports that the United States wanted to develop permanent bases in Iraq were "erroneous."

"I think we'll get the agreement done," he said. "This will not involve permanent bases nor will it bind any future president to troop levels."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/11/bush.europe/index.html?iref=topnews

Doomsday101
06-11-2008, 08:45 AM
Laura Bush got on GW for using those phrases as well.

Maikeru-sama
06-11-2008, 08:47 AM
Is there anybody that thinks he does have regrets?

Doomsday101
06-11-2008, 08:49 AM
Is there anybody that thinks he does have regrets?

I think there are things they would have like to have done differently but removing Saddam from power was not one of them.

Vintage
06-11-2008, 08:57 AM
Is there anybody that thinks he does have regrets?


I would hope so.

I understand not having regrets over the decision to invade Iraq. I believe he truly believes that. And I understand that....


But he probably has regrets about some of the mistakes/decision making in the carrying out/reconstruction of Iraq. Or at least, I would hope so...

BrAinPaiNt
06-11-2008, 09:17 AM
He or others can try and sell me that they are not trying to get perm bases over there.

I would be willing to be that W and his admin, McCain, Hillary and would not shock me if Obama all wanted perm bases over there.

Now the come get some type of comments were dumb. However I still think the dead or alive speech was W at his finest and that is NOT sarcasm. I just wish he would have stuck with it instead of turning his eye towards mordor...I mean Iraq.

ConcordCowboy
06-11-2008, 04:02 PM
What else is he going to say?

His whole Presidential legacy is tied to Iraq and he isn't about to come out now and say he has regrets about it.

Even though he should.

vta
06-11-2008, 06:53 PM
What else is he going to say?

His whole Presidential legacy is tied to Iraq and he isn't about to come out now and say he has regrets about it.

Even though he should.

Iraq is getting better and will be better off in the future, for this. Allowing Iraq to go on as it was was just going be a major mess in the future. Saddam was going to die, with what as a succession plan? His basket case son's?

Iran would have had it's hand in the pot, and the country would have went through what it went through, due to the U.S. intervention, only the outcome would have been different: the possibility of an American enemy with a broader base of power, a bigger strain on allies in the region and greater threats to U.S. interests.

Hypotheses like this will always be questioned, but the worst case scenario is better left as such, instead of as a reality.

At this point Iraq is asserting itself as a soveriegn nation and it's tempered relationship with both the U.S. and Iran may very well have some benefits for both countries. To act as mediator allowing both pig headed sides to save face in finding compromise on a number of issue's.

We don't know how it turns out, but the Bush legacy may very well be viewed just a bit more favorably in the future, if Iraq turns out properly.

ConcordCowboy
06-11-2008, 06:58 PM
Iraq is getting better and will be better off in the future, for this. Allowing Iraq to go on as it was was just going be a major mess in the future. Saddam was going to die, with what as a succession plan? His basket case son's?

Iran would have had it's hand in the pot, and the country would have went through what it went through, due to the U.S. intervention, only the outcome would have been different: the possibility of an American enemy with a broader base of power, a bigger strain on allies in the region and greater threats to U.S. interests.

Hypotheses like this will always be questioned, but the worst case scenario is better left as such, instead of as a reality.

At this point Iraq is asserting itself as a soveriegn nation and it's tempered relationship with both the U.S. and Iran may very well have some benefits for both countries. To act as mediator allowing both pig headed sides to save face in finding compromise on a number of issue's.

We don't know how it turns out, but the Bush legacy may very well be viewed just a bit more favorably in the future, if Iraq turns out properly.

How can I say this?

I disagree with you.

:p:

CanadianCowboysFan
06-11-2008, 07:08 PM
Is there anybody that thinks he does have regrets?

he would never admit it even if he did.

the war was wrong and based on lies but he will never admit he was wrong in starting it

Maikeru-sama
06-11-2008, 08:02 PM
he would never admit it even if he did.

the war was wrong and based on lies but he will never admit he was wrong in starting it

Yeah, that was pretty much my point.

It's like saying, "I have no regrets that the Sun rose today" :rolleyes: .