PDA

View Full Version : Government to back $306 billion in Citi loans


Maikeru-sama
11-24-2008, 07:42 AM
Government to back $306 billion in Citi loans
Feds will also take direct $20 billion stake in troubled financial giant

updated 29 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Rushing to rescue Citigroup, the government agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of possible losses at the stricken bank and to plow a fresh $20 billion into the company.

Regulators hope the dramatic action will bolster badly shaken confidence in the once mighty banking giant as well as the nation's financial system, a goal that so far has been elusive despite a flurry of government interventions to battle the worst global crisis since the 1930s.

The action, announced late Sunday by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is aimed at shoring up a huge financial institution whose collapse would wreak havoc on the already fragile financial system and the U.S. economy.

"With these transactions, the U.S. government is taking the actions necessary to strengthen the financial system and protect U.S. taxpayers and the U.S. economy," the three agencies said in a joint statement. "We will continue to use all of our resources to preserve the strength of our banking institutions, and promote the process of repair and recovery and to manage risks."

Investors reacted cautiously. Most Asian stock markets retreated when they opened Monday, weighed down by worries about Citigroup. However, losses were pared after the government announcement.

Latest bold move
The bold move is the latest in a string of high-profile government bailout efforts. The Fed in March provided financial backing to JPMorgan Chase's buyout of ailing Bear Stearns. Six months later, the government was forced to take over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and throw a financial lifeline — which was recently rejiggered — to insurer American International Group.

Critics worry the actions could put billions of taxpayers' dollars in jeopardy and encourage financial companies to take excessive risk on the belief that the government will bail them out of their messes.

The Citigroup rescue came after a weekend of marathon discussions led by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, who is being tapped by President-elect Barack Obama as his Treasury chief also participated.

Vikram S. Pandit, Citi's chief executive officer, welcomed the action. "We appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market stability," he said in a statement issued early Monday.

The $20 billion cash injection by the Treasury Department will come from the $700 billion financial bailout package. The capital infusion follows an earlier one — of $25 billion — in Citigroup in which the government also received an ownership stake.

As part of the plan, Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky loans and securities backed by commercial and residential mortgages.

Under the loss-sharing arrangement, Citigroup Inc. will assume the first $29 billion in losses on the risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citigroup 10 percent. Money from the $700 billion bailout and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses. The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup.

In exchange for the guarantees, the government will get $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup.

As a condition of the rescue, Citigroup is barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years unless the company obtains consent from the three federal agencies. The bank is currently paying a dividend of 16 cents, halved from a 32-cent payout in the previous quarter. The agreement also places restrictions on executive compensation, including bonuses.

Importantly, the agreement calls on Citigroup to take steps to help distressed homeowners.

Specifically, Citigroup will modify mortgages to help people avoid foreclosure along the lines of an FDIC plan that was put into effect at IndyMac Bank, a major failed savings and loan based in Pasadena, Calif.

Under the IndyMac plan, struggling home borrowers pay interest rates of about three percent for five years. Rates are reduced so that borrowers aren't paying more than 38 percent of their pretax income on housing.

The IndyMac plan also was used as a model for a new program by mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for two other failed thrifts taken over by the government on Friday. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has been pressing Treasury to use $24 billion from the $700 billion bailout program to put the mortgage modification program on national footing, but Paulson is opposed to that idea.

Citigroup has seen its shares lose 60 percent of their value in the past week, reflecting a crisis of confidence among skittish investors. They are worried all the risky debt on Citigroup's balance sheet will turn into losses as the economy worsens and the markets stay turbulent — losses that could be nearly impossible to reverse.

Citigroup is such a large, interconnected player in the financial system that it is seen by Washington policymakers as too big to fail. The company has operations stretching around the globe in more than 100 countries.

Analysts consider Citigroup the most vulnerable among the major U.S. banks — especially after it failed to nab Wachovia Corp., which was bought instead by Wells Fargo & Co. That was a missed opportunity for Citi to gets its hands on much-needed U.S. deposits that would bolster its cash position.

Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with tarnished credit or low incomes. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies wracking up huge losses on the soured investments. The company has failed to turn a profit during the past four quarters and has announced plans to slash thousands of jobs.

link (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27877195/)

Maikeru-sama
11-24-2008, 07:49 AM
Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with tarnished credit or low incomes. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies wracking up huge losses on the soured investments.


Why doesn't the government just pay the mortgages of these people and get this over with already.

It really sucks that me as a taxpayer will have to pay for their financial risks.

But but the government is getting a $7 Billion stake in the company :rolleyes: .

burmafrd
11-24-2008, 09:53 AM
Actually would rather put the money there then in GM. I think the risk is less and the return greater.

Phrozen Phil
11-24-2008, 10:11 AM
Why doesn't the government just pay the mortgages of these people and get this over with already.

It really sucks that me as a taxpayer will have to pay for their financial risks.

But but the government is getting a $7 Billion stake in the company :rolleyes: .

Lets' suppose that things stabilize and that profitability returns to the financial sector. Will the same CEO's be asking for the government to "get out the way of business" ? These things are cyclical in nature and greed is a constant. I have no problem with people making an honest buck, but some of these guys need to be kicked out of their corporate jets and held accountable. Hopefully, some ethical business people will surface and provide some leadership.

JiggsCasey
11-24-2008, 02:57 PM
did anybody see what just happened with this convenient move? anyone at all?

Big 3 Automakers <--- extensive hearings <----questions answered <---- DENIED

Citigroup <---- no hearings whatsoever <---- no questions asked <----- "how much do you need? where do I sign?"

That was the BIg 3's money that just got deferred... 2-3 million out of work....

The Cheney-Bush End Game scenario and the Great Wealth Transfer of the 21st Century is now almost complete... This nation has been Enronned...

Maikeru-sama
11-24-2008, 03:42 PM
did anybody see what just happened with this convenient move? anyone at all?

Big 3 Automakers <--- extensive hearings <----questions answered <---- DENIED

Citigroup <---- no hearings whatsoever <---- no questions asked <----- "how much do you need? where do I sign?"

That was the BIg 3's money that just got deferred... 2-3 million out of work....

The Cheney-Bush End Game scenario and the Great Wealth Transfer of the 21st Century is now almost complete... This nation has been Enronned...

Not an Economist, but I think many who are, feel that if Citi were to go under, the Economy would be in alot more trouble versus the Big 3 going under.

Hostile
11-24-2008, 03:43 PM
Why doesn't the government just pay the mortgages of these people and get this over with already.

It really sucks that me as a taxpayer will have to pay for their financial risks.

But but the government is getting a $7 Billion stake in the company :rolleyes: .Also, why didn't you and I make these loans for houses we couldn't afford and get to keep? ;)

theogt
11-24-2008, 04:17 PM
Summation of the markets' reception:

The market unambiguously voted for more bailouts Monday, as investors sent shares soaring in a rollicking session that piggybacked on the news of a federal bailout for Citigroup Inc., one that will guarantee a nice sum of capital for the company, handle several billion dollars of losses, and not wipe out the equityholders in the process. The deal fell short of the putative structure that wiped out the common equity of AIG and the government-sponsored entities, and so Citigroup’s shares gained 58%, with more than 700 million shares changing hands on the Big Board. “They’ve managed to craft a solution that in some way, shape or form, managed not to totally torch any of the stakeholders,” says Mitch Stapley, chief fixed income officer at Fifth Third Asset Management. The banking stocks on their own rallied by 20% (even though that still leaves them substantially lower in November) and the strength was witnessed across all sectors as the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has managed to tack on a mere 14% over a two-day trading period. “We had the aggressive selloff from last week, which broke through old support levels, and came amid a lot of talk and no action from Congress — a deadly combination for the market,” says Alan Gayle, senior investment strategist at RidgeWorth Capital Management in Atlanta. “It was a series of favorable events following a very difficult week.”