PDA

View Full Version : Obama off to black-tie dinner while FEMA


irvin88
02-01-2009, 10:01 PM
Obama off to black-tie dinner while FEMA
and blacked-out Kentucky freeze

This kind of thinking helped to demonize Bush.
Why isn't turnaround fair play?

January 31, 2009
Obama hates white people and wants them to die
Rick Moran

With nearly 1.5 million people in the mid-west without power during a cold snap, what other possible reason is there that this new "competent" administration and FEMA would be failing so spectacularly in helping in this natural disaster?

It's got to be that Obama hates white people and wants them to die!

Of course, I am just aping what lefty blogs were saying about Bush less than 24 hours after Katrina's hurricane winds stopped blowing. But AP is reporting that Midwest disaster relief people are none too pleased with our new president's FEMA.

In Kentucky's Grayson County, there are 25 National Guardsmen there to help - but no chain saws to cut away fallen limbs and trees. EM Director Randell Smith is quoted as saying, "We've got people out in some areas we haven't even visited yet," Smith said. "We don't even know that they're alive."


Smith is also quoted as saying that FEMA is a "no show."


What's that? Here we are 5 days after the storm ended and still no FEMA? I demand a Congressional investigation. And let's get all the anchors and media people down here pronto. People's lives are at stake. For all we know, there are babies being eaten and people jumping off their roofs committing suicide because FEMA is nowhere to be found.


And where is our president? Shouldn't he be visiting these ravaged areas? It must be that he HATES WHITE PEOPLE AND WANTS THEM TO DIE. That is the only possible explanation for this incredible failure of our national government to relieve the suffering of these people.


Isn't it interesting that now that we have a Democrat as president that all of a sudden, disaster relief is a state and local matter and the federal government should stand aside and allow them to do their jobs?


Just wondering...

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 12:05 AM
Where's the telethon for the stricken in this as well?

Why hasn't the government moved faster to help these people.

Why oh why does Obama hate white people????

I blame him for every death from this terrible thing.

I also heard that Obama created a weather machine and turned it on the white people of KY.

He's the devil I tell ya, the devil.

:lmao2:

CowboyMcCoy
02-02-2009, 12:08 AM
Where's the telethon for the stricken in this as well?

Why hasn't the government moved faster to help these people.

Why oh why does Obama hate white people????

I blame him for every death from this terrible thing.

I also heard that Obama created a weather machine and turned it on the white people of KY.

He's the devil I tell ya, the devil.

:lmao2:

Why is this funny? People there need help. I have relatives there, bro.--not funny.

bbgun
02-02-2009, 12:12 AM
Liberal media? What liberal media? I hear tell they're bipartisan. (lol) What Katrina taught the media was that they could hurt Bush by lying. What 2008 taught them was that they could help Obama by not reporting at all.

CowboyMcCoy
02-02-2009, 12:29 AM
Liberal media? What liberal media? I hear tell they're bipartisan. (lol) What Katrina taught the media was that they could hurt Bush by lying. What 2008 taught them was that they could help Obama by not reporting at all.

The overall media is bipartisan. It's set up that way so you play into their agenda when they tell you your choice(s) are either ___, or ____.

You've obviously never studied many aspects of the media, ethics and politics. Most media is owned by a few owners with deep political ties and their interests lie in keeping the old-school, bipartisan platform.

If you can't see that much, that they want you to vote either D or R, then I'd say stop drinking and then see what you think after you consider this proposition after two weeks of sobriety.

'Tis not that hard to see.

Hostile
02-02-2009, 01:03 AM
I hate the tone of the article even though I understand the point trying to be made. I hated the articles post Katrina that accused Bush of similar racism.

I don't care about the politics of either President. I feel bad for the victims of both disasters. I wish people and the media would be balanced and fair. It will never happen. This is just another sad example.

CowboyMcCoy
02-02-2009, 01:06 AM
I hate the tone of the article even though I understand the point trying to be made. I hated the articles post Katrina that accused Bush of similar racism.

I don't care about the politics of either President. I feel bad for the victims of both disasters. I wish people and the media would be balanced and fair. It will never happen. This is just another sad example.

Did you notice the author?


"Rick Moran" :D

Tells us quite a bit, now, doesn't it?

burmafrd
02-02-2009, 01:13 AM
Media BIPARTISAN?
What planet do you live on?

CowboyMcCoy
02-02-2009, 01:29 AM
Media BIPARTISAN?
What planet do you live on?

Wow, all I can say is you must be one partisan son of a gun to believe it is solely "slanted" towards one specific political view.

Let me guess, you think the media is liberal, in the modern sense of the word?

IMO, the whole problem lies within linguistic interpretation and bias. That's why media is flawed and, in my expert opinion, very bipartisan. It wants the public to be divided along the lines of right and left. From there, the agenda is easier to set.
Let me ask you this, what would their ratings be like without the us versus them element of conflict-i.e.-, party loyalty, patriotism etc.?

How is that cave?

burmafrd
02-02-2009, 01:37 AM
You use a lot of fancy words to cover up the fact that you are full of it.

Numerous surveys over the last 10 years have conclusively shown that the media is about 75% left leaning. That is NOT bipartisan by any definition that makes sense to normal people. A heavily slanted media is NOT bipartisan. Just keep digging that hole deeper if you want. You are rapidly reaching the Jiggsy level.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 09:52 AM
I hate the tone of the article even though I understand the point trying to be made. I hated the articles post Katrina that accused Bush of similar racism.

I don't care about the politics of either President. I feel bad for the victims of both disasters. I wish people and the media would be balanced and fair. It will never happen. This is just another sad example.

The effort here, while sarcastic is to show the unfair treatment of Bush by the left. Yet when faced with something somewhat similar they are dead silent. I think the article was well right on mark for what it attempted to do.

Sometimes you have to use absurdity to demonstrate absurdity because some people only understand that.

Hostile
02-02-2009, 10:06 AM
Did you notice the author?


"Rick Moran" :D

Tells us quite a bit, now, doesn't it?I have no idea who that is. I am not political.

Hostile
02-02-2009, 10:08 AM
The effort here, while sarcastic is to show the unfair treatment of Bush by the left. Yet when faced with something somewhat similar they are dead silent. I think the article was well right on mark for what it attempted to do.

Sometimes you have to use absurdity to demonstrate absurdity because some people only understand that.Yeah, which is why I said "I understand the point trying to be made."

I may not know or care about politics, but I'm really not that dense. Thanks though. I appreciate wanting to clarify for me.

Yeagermeister
02-02-2009, 10:10 AM
I have no idea who that is. I am not political.

I think he's trying to say that his last name is close to moron.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 10:21 AM
Yeah, which is why I said "I understand the point trying to be made."

I may not know or care about politics, but I'm really not that dense. Thanks though. I appreciate wanting to clarify for me.

:confused:

Wasn't saying you were dense about it at all.

I made the reply to make the point about absurdity being used to illustrate absurdity, which was the reason for my first post in the thread. THat's all.

Wasn't trying to make any other point.

bbgun
02-02-2009, 11:18 AM
The overall media is bipartisan. It's set up that way so you play into their agenda when they tell you your choice(s) are either ___, or ____.

No one refers to the press as "bipartisan." That's a term reserved for politicians. The press is either objective or biased.

You've obviously never studied many aspects of the media, ethics and politics. Most media is owned by a few owners with deep political ties and their interests lie in keeping the old-school, bipartisan platform.

I have an MA in Journalism. Is that good enough for you, or do you want to keep playing games?

If you can't see that much, that they want you to vote either D or R, then I'd say stop drinking and then see what you think after you consider this proposition after two weeks of sobriety.

You know who else thinks the media overwhelmingly leans left? The media! In survey after survey, they self-identify as liberals. The vast majority of them are registered Democrats. The vast majority of the networks, wire services, chat shows, and influential newspapers (CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, AP, UPI, Reuters, BBC, Oprah, The View, NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, Time, Newsweek) are staffed with practitioners hostile to Republicans, Christians, gun-owners, pro-lifers, and generic conservative causes. Anyone who doesn't concede this is either blind or a liar.

'Tis not that hard to see

Here's "fair and balanced" Diane Sawyer crying on Inauguration night. Embrace the professionalism.

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5821/sawyerhs6.jpg

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 11:21 AM
Here's "fair and balanced" Diane Sawyer crying on Inauguration night. Embrace the professionalism.

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5821/sawyerhs6.jpg

How on earth anyone can argue these people are bipartisan is wayyyyy beyond anyone's normal reasoning.

Fools.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 11:21 AM
How on earth anyone can argue these people are bipartisan is wayyyyy beyond anyone's normal reasoning.

Fools.

I have been told many times by you that Fox is not partisan.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 11:30 AM
I have been told many times by you that Fox is not partisan.

As a network they aren't. But there are some on there that are. Obviously Hannity is but he is a commentator, not a news reporter.

Van Sustren, Geraldo and Colmes are all libs and they all had very visable and successful shows on the network.
Sawyer et all are supposed to be.

Which is why I don't call the likes of Obhermann and Mathews reporters or anchors. But Sawyer, Couris and Lauer are supposed to be. Big difference.

bbgun
02-02-2009, 11:31 AM
There must be something in the water at "bipartisan" ABC.

George Stephanopoulos cried on Inauguration Day

Via Mediabistro, George “Hussein” Stephanopoulos’ wife Ali Wentworth tells Oprah that she and her husband cried on Inauguration Day…

“We watched everything and George was still doing all the anchoring for ABC…When Beyonce said At Last, George called me at home and he went, 'Honey?' and I said 'I know!' and we both started crying."

ABQCOWBOY
02-02-2009, 12:03 PM
There must be something in the water at "bipartisan" ABC.

George Stephanopoulos cried on Inauguration Day

Via Mediabistro, George “Hussein” Stephanopoulos’ wife Ali Wentworth tells Oprah that she and her husband cried on Inauguration Day…

“We watched everything and George was still doing all the anchoring for ABC…When Beyonce said At Last, George called me at home and he went, 'Honey?' and I said 'I know!' and we both started crying."

Maybe they are just fore shadowing?

:)

Jarv
02-02-2009, 12:31 PM
I have been told many times by you that Fox is not partisan.

Fox is one network, BB listed almost 20 that lean the other way.

That is probably why Fox kills them all in ratings, they have no competition in the cable world, while the rest fight for a slice of the liberal pie.

But hey, if you want to think 20 to 1 is balanced...Well, who am I to argue :)

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 01:08 PM
Fox is one network, BB listed almost 20 that lean the other way.

That is probably why Fox kills them all in ratings, they have no competition in the cable world, while the rest fight for a slice of the liberal pie.

But hey, if you want to think 20 to 1 is balanced...Well, who am I to argue :)

Where did I claim that?

I just was ragging on someone like cajun that never admits that Fox is bias and will fight it till the day he dies that they are bias.

So it is funny seeing him rag on bias when it does not fit his political agenda.

vta
02-02-2009, 01:21 PM
Where did I claim that?

I just was ragging on someone like cajun that never admits that Fox is bias and will fight it till the day he dies that they are bias.

So it is funny seeing him rag on bias when it does not fit his political agenda.

They're all biased. It's pretty sad that we just take it for granted, that it is this way. This is really a source of corruption enabling and it's doing our country some profound damage.

And in between we have lunatics with conspiracies muddying the waters further, with their pissant blogs.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 01:25 PM
Where did I claim that?

I just was ragging on someone like cajun that never admits that Fox is bias and will fight it till the day he dies that they are bias.

So it is funny seeing him rag on bias when it does not fit his political agenda.

Did you not even read my reply??????

Hoofbite
02-02-2009, 01:38 PM
The effort here, while sarcastic is to show the unfair treatment of Bush by the left. Yet when faced with something somewhat similar they are dead silent. I think the article was well right on mark for what it attempted to do.

Sometimes you have to use absurdity to demonstrate absurdity because some people only understand that.

"somewhat similar"?

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 01:40 PM
"somewhat similar"?

over a million people left without power in the middle of a freeze. Their lives are at stake as well aren't they?

Or don't they count?

bbgun
02-02-2009, 01:48 PM
over a million people left without power in the middle of a freeze. Their lives are at stake as well aren't they?

Or don't they count?

Well, the victims are primarily white, and there's a Democrat in the Oval Office who needs to be protected. So no, they don't count.

Hoofbite
02-02-2009, 02:15 PM
over a million people left without power in the middle of a freeze. Their lives are at stake as well aren't they?

Or don't they count?

Hasn't been a million in a while but the numbers don't really matter.

And of course their lives count. Only an idiot would say otherwise.

I was just wondering if you really believe that this ice storm can honestly be compared to what happened in New Orleans.

Jarv
02-02-2009, 02:19 PM
Hasn't been a million in a while but the numbers don't really matter.

And of course their lives count. Only an idiot would say otherwise.

I was just wondering if you really believe that this ice storm can honestly be compared to what happened in New Orleans.

People died in both occurrences because of Mother Nature. Why wouldn't they be comparable ? Do you prefer the people in NO over the people in Kentucky ?

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 02:22 PM
Hasn't been a million in a while but the numbers don't really matter.

And of course their lives count. Only an idiot would say otherwise.

I was just wondering if you really believe that this ice storm can honestly be compared to what happened in New Orleans.

I see, it only matters when a Dem is in office.

Well let's see.

Natural disaster hits NO and Miss.

Natural disaster hits KY.

Millions without power in both places.

Lives at stake in both places.

Yep, I can compare the two.

Again, if their lives matter the same, why are you trying to differentiate.

How about you telling me the difference.

Hoofbite
02-02-2009, 02:36 PM
I see, it only matters when a Dem is in office.

What are you talking about? I said it didn't matter because I didn't want to get into an argument about how many people it really is at this point. Its not 1 million anymore and that is all that I was trying to say. I guess I could have said its around 300K but I thought it would just be pointless to put a number out there.

Well let's see.

Natural disaster hits NO and Miss.

Natural disaster hits KY.

Millions without power in both places.

Lives at stake in both places.

Yep, I can compare the two.

Again, if their lives matter the same, why are you trying to differentiate.

How about you telling me the difference.

Honestly if you don't know the difference or don't care to acknowledge it then there is nothing that can be said to change your mind.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 02:42 PM
What are you talking about? I said it didn't matter because I didn't want to get into an argument about how many people it really is at this point. Its not 1 million anymore and that is all that I was trying to say. I guess I could have said its around 300K but I thought it would just be pointless to put a number out there.



Honestly if you don't know the difference or don't care to acknowledge it then there is nothing that can be said to change your mind.

Gotcha! You can't differentiate but you want me to. I did but you can't.

We all understand now.

BTW, it's actually nearly a half million now. 470,000 at last count, but that still doesn't mean anything.

Why do those people deserve less fema aid than went to NO? Don't they deserve it as well?

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 02:56 PM
Did it require the national guard over 5 days to get water to people in Kentucky?

Did they call for an evacuation of Kentucky or the areas of Kentucky that were going to be hit bad?

Just curious.

We had the same ice storm a few years ago that Kentucky just had...trust me I would rather have another Ice Storm than to have been in NOLA during and after Katrina.

Jarv
02-02-2009, 03:06 PM
Did it require the national guard over 5 days to get water to people in Kentucky?

Did they call for an evacuation of Kentucky or the areas of Kentucky that were going to be hit bad?

Just curious.

We had the same ice storm a few years ago that Kentucky just had...trust me I would rather have another Ice Storm than to have been in NOLA during and after Katrina.

I heard on the news that the entire Kentucky national guard is going to many homes bringing food and water, for what its worth.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 04:48 PM
I heard on the news that the entire Kentucky national guard is going to many homes bringing food and water, for what its worth.

Did they call for the evacuation of towns?

Did they have whole blocks or neighborhoods demolished?

Did they find their houses completely gone?

There is no way someone with a straight face can even come close to comparing that ice storm to what happened in NOLA. Well yeah some kind but they would be flat out silly.

Many people in NOLA had no home after that thing hit.

I realize some want to vindicate the criticism of W and I realize some want to paint some dirty liberal in a bad light but this comparison is flat out idiotic.

I went through that ice storm a few years ago and it was basically the same thing Kentucky is going through now. We had no power for close to two weeks. You could go outside at any time of the day and hear tree limbs, and whole trees breaking and falling. We had many people who had trees fall on their houses or on their vehicles.

Yet we also had many people that had heat from natural gas, fire places, wood burning stoves, carosene heaters or electric generators. Many people could also still have food to cook because of gas stoves or just a simple grill outside. Many people saved a good deal of their food because they could bury it in mounds of snow. They did not have to worry about half of their homes being under water or their houses flat out being washed off its foundation. They did not have to worry about the chance of an arsenal of diseases due to septic situations with water and seweres flowing in the street.

They don't have to worry about looters out.

People could actually go to Wal Mart, although you had to have a 4 wheel drive, a vehicle with chains or a 4-wheeler...but Still Wal Mart would stay open a few hours a day, with no electricity, so you could by essentials to help get through the cold and loss of power.

If they absolutely had to have emergency care they got it because we had vehicles with chains on the tires and emergency crews making rounds.

No sir...it is just flat out silly to compare the conditions in Katrina to the ice storm that hit kentucky and the only reason people are doing it is because it is Obama and people ripped on W for things.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 04:50 PM
Did they call for the evacuation of towns?

Did they have whole blocks or neighborhoods demolished?

Did they find their houses completely gone?

There is no way someone with a straight face can even come close to comparing that ice storm to what happened in NOLA. Well yeah some kind but they would be flat out silly.

Many people in NOLA had no home after that thing hit.

I realize some want to vindicate the criticism of W and I realize some want to paint some dirty liberal in a bad light but this comparison is flat out idiotic.

I went through that ice storm a few years ago and it was basically the same thing Kentucky is going through now. We had no power for close to two weeks. You could go outside at any time of the day and hear tree limbs, and whole trees breaking and falling. We had many people who had trees fall on their houses or on their vehicles.

Yet we also had many people that had heat from natural gas, fire places, wood burning stoves, carosene heaters or electric generators. Many people could also still have food to cook because of gas stoves or just a simple grill outside. Many people saved a good deal of their food because they could bury it in mounds of snow. They did not have to worry about half of their homes being under water or their houses flat out being washed off its foundation. They did not have to worry about the chance of an arsenal of diseases due to septic situations with water and seweres flowing in the street.

They don't have to worry about looters out.

If they absolutely had to have emergency care they got it because we had vehicles with chains on the tires and emergency crews making rounds.

No sir...it is just flat out silly to compare the conditions in Katrina to the ice storm that hit kentucky and the only reason people are doing it is because it is Obama and people ripped on W for things.


Ahhh, so the key here is to call for evacuations before fema can move.

Kinda what I've been saying all along that the local government in NO and state government in LA screwed up and caused the problem.

Thanks for finally admitting that.

Now we can move on from the Bush caused it thing.

Amazing how it takes this long to get the point across.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 04:54 PM
Ahhh, so the key here is to call for evacuations before fema can move.

Kinda what I've been saying all along that the local government in NO and state government in LA screwed up and caused the problem.

Thanks for finally admitting that.

Now we can move on from the Bush caused it thing.

Amazing how it takes this long to get the point across.

They did call evacuations before the storm even hit so don't try that stupidity with me.

W had his faults with that storm, so Did brownie. But they were not the ONLY ones who had fault.

The only problem with you and your stubborness is not admitting that W had any fault even when W himself admitted they should have done better.

All you will admit is they gave out money to help people.

So try again.

The bull headed stubbornness of you to defend W even when he admits they should have done better is the definition of denial.

And furthermore you in here trying to compare the ice storm to katrina is the definition of political partisan lunacy.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 04:58 PM
They did call evacuations before the storm even hit so don't try that stupidity with me.

W had his faults with that storm, so Did brownie. But they were not the ONLY ones who had fault.

The only problem with you and your stubborness is not admitting that W had any fault even when W himself admitted they should have done better.

All you will admit is they gave out money to help people.

So try again.

The bull headed stubbornness of you to defend W even when he admits they should have done better is the definition of denial.

And furthermore you in here trying to compare the ice storm to katrina is the definition of political partisan lunacy.

:lmao2:

People freezing is far better than people drowning, right???

And telling people to evacuate and not making the proper arrangements to do so is pointless, which is what happened in NO.

BTW, why haven't we heard a lot of complaining from the people in MS who were hit just as bad????

You know why, because they were better prepared by their government, Republican I might add.

But the local gov't in NO screwed it up.

Bush did the thing a leader does, and that is take responsibility, but anyone with any understanding at all how government works knows why it took Fema that long to get there.

Even a rudimentary understanding would help.

masomenos
02-02-2009, 04:58 PM
The storms aren't really comparable as the loss of life, cost of damage were much greater from Hurricane Katrina. That said, of course FEMA and the state government should be helping out as much as they can.

Now, a neat story a heard that ties Katrina and Kentucky together...

After Katrina hit, a church in Kentucky sent people down to another church in Louisiana to help with clean up and relief. After the ice storm, that same church from Louisiana sent people up to Kentucky to help out the church that helped them.

Pretty cool.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 05:02 PM
The storms aren't really comparable as the loss of life, cost of damage were much greater from Hurricane Katrina. That said, of course FEMA and the state government should be helping out as much as they can.

Now, a neat story a heard that ties Katrina and Kentucky together...

After Katrina hit, a church in Kentucky sent people down to another church in Louisiana to help with clean up and relief. After the ice storm, that same church from Louisiana sent people up to Kentucky to help out the church that helped them.

Pretty cool.

That is pretty cool.

But why would they do that? The Ice storm was no big deal according to some in here with an agenda. :rolleyes:

CowboyWay
02-02-2009, 05:06 PM
When the govt starts saying "We just can't get into the area to help people", yet CNN is reporting live from those very same areas, we can talk.

Until this happens, this article's a joke.

masomenos
02-02-2009, 05:12 PM
That is pretty cool.

But why would they do that? The Ice storm was no big deal according to some in here with an agenda. :rolleyes:

Well, of course people with agendas will distort reality, whether it be the media, posters on our forum or guys like Rick Moran.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 05:13 PM
:lmao2:

People freezing is far better than people drowning, right???

Freezing? What part of my examples did you not read.

Most people in rural areas have alternatives for heat just besides Electricity. Many people have natural gas so even if the blower is not working they can either use gas fireplaces, or ovens to heat small areas. Many people have propane gas for a source of fuel. Many have wood burning buck stoves or wood burning fire places. Many people have generators for plug in heaters. many have kerosene heaters as well.

And even if you had no electric, no fireplace, no gas of any sorts and no generator...like my mom and my elderly grandmother during our ice storm...they still had plenty of blankets to keep warm enough to not be in danger...my GRANDMOTHER who had quadruple bi-pass heart surgery just a year prior to it and she survived the ice storm easily.

You act like there is a mass of people freezing solid like jeramiah johnson finding some old mountaineer in the hills frozen solid and takes his hawkins rifle.

Geez.

And telling people to evacuate and not making the proper arrangements to do so is pointless, which is what happened in NO.

Yet they still called for an evacuation which they did not for a bad ice storm.


BTW, why haven't we heard a lot of complaining from the people in MS who were hit just as bad????

You know why, because they were better prepared by their government, Republican I might add.

But the local gov't in NO screwed it up.

Bush did the thing a leader does, and that is take responsibility, but anyone with any understanding at all how government works knows why it took Fema that long to get there.

Even a rudimentary understanding would help.

I have said time and time and time and time and time and time and time and time again that both Nagin and that nipple head gov had a large part in the problems in Katrina yet I have NEVER heard you say W had any blame afterwards except for giving out some money.

He and his admin did a bad job afterwards and that was why brownie was let go and later talked about it. That is why W admitted that it should have been handled better.

And yet still you only make this argument about Obama and the ice storm because it is to be a sarcastic reason to still defend W and bash a liberal. It is pure stupidity and partisan politics to the lowest denominator. Because you are always willing to lay blame problems on one side while rarely ever laying it on the other even when both sides share blame. It's silly and disgusting.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 05:14 PM
That is pretty cool.

But why would they do that? The Ice storm was no big deal according to some in here with an agenda. :rolleyes:

Another show of your complete silliness in trying to compare the two. It's really sad.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 05:27 PM
Here is another capper. In peoples silly way of trying to compare Obama not being there during the ice storm to the hurricane Katrina mess....W did not come around us when we were going without power in that Ice Storm that hit us years back and he was president at that time.

So I guess that is a double whammy even by some people's foolish standards in here.

DIAF
02-02-2009, 06:11 PM
What a stupid thread. What the hell is a president (Bush or Obama) supposed to do, put on a damn cape and carry FEMA trailers under each arm through the air to needy residents? It was a stupid and unfair criticism of the president in 2005 and its a stupid and unfair one now. Mobilizing a Federal resource depends on hundreds and even thousands of complacent, lazy workers through tens of levels of bureaucracy to even get anything started. Speed of the response doesn't depend on the President.

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 06:12 PM
Another show of your complete silliness in trying to compare the two. It's really sad.

Bash Bush...Screw reality....Bash Bush...Screw Reality...Screw Reality...Screw Reality...Screw Reality


:laugh2:

Cajuncowboy
02-02-2009, 06:12 PM
What a stupid thread. What the hell is a president (Bush or Obama) supposed to do, put on a damn cape and carry FEMA trailers under each arm through the air to needy residents? It was a stupid and unfair criticism of the president in 2005 and its a stupid and unfair one now. Mobilizing a Federal resource depends on hundreds and even thousands of complacent, lazy workers through tens of levels of bureaucracy to even get anything started. Speed of the response doesn't depend on the President.

Figures. :rolleyes:

DIAF
02-02-2009, 06:15 PM
Figures. :rolleyes:

Speaking of stupid....

yes, this is a personal attack.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 06:16 PM
Bash Bush...Screw reality....Bash Bush...Screw Reality...Screw Reality...Screw Reality...Screw Reality


:laugh2:

Yeah because according to you W screwed up during the Ice Storm I was part of so he must be responsible for things TWICE.

Stupid Stupid Stupid and still to this day you will not admit that he and his admin had a hand in that disaster after the hurricane.

CowboyWay
02-02-2009, 06:41 PM
Current temp in Kentucky.....34

Yes, this is another Katrina. Send out the national guard.

Hostile
02-02-2009, 06:42 PM
I think he's trying to say that his last name is close to moron.Not close enough.

BrAinPaiNt
02-02-2009, 06:57 PM
Not close enough.

Ok how about...

http://www.celebritynooz.com/watn/images/erin-moran-then.jpg

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/00643/news-graphics-2007-_643882a.jpg
JOANIE LOVES CHACHI!!