PDA

View Full Version : PRUDEN: The faith healer's tent in tatters


ninja
03-21-2009, 10:30 PM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/20/the-faith-healers-tent-in-tatters/

Wes Pruden has always been one of my favorite op-ed writers. Always solid reporting from this guy. And no, the Wash Times is not owned by the Moonies. But I'm sure someone will make that lie. Enjoy. Just wanted to share this guy's column for those who may be unfamiliar.

PRUDEN: The faith healer's tent in tatters

ANALYSIS/OPINION

Watching faith healers is fun, if you can overlook the pain and desperation in the eyes of the supplicants, and cheerfully endure the mosquitoes, gnats and other night bugs flying in tight formation through gaps in the tent flaps. You have to ignore reality and just enjoy the show.

But the next morning, with the sound of the singing and the scent of the sawdust lingering on the cool air, the sick, the halt and the infirm are well advised to call the doctor.

Barack Obama conducted the picture-perfect campaign with the skill and bombast that any smooth-talking piney-woods charlatan would covet, but he's learning that a president can't pack up the piano, fold his tent and hurry off to the next town (or the next state) before the sun rises. Alas, there's no doctor to call for his patient.

Bill Clinton kept us entertained with the permanent campaign, enlivened by his permanent stalking of women that rendered his administration a comic-opera interregnum of sex between the Bushes. But that was then, when we could forgive a bubba for being Bubba because the times, they were good and hardly a-changing.

This time around the singing was enthusiastic and the praying, such as it was, was loud and the faith healer was powerful, persuasive and smooth, as only a big noise from the South Side of Chicago could be. Voters who had never heard a faith healer in full voice were easy marks. Who knew the new president and all his men wouldn't have a clue about what to do about trouble? This is the kind of ambush of events that breaks presidents and endows them with a permanent legacy of criminal incompetence. The sight of Jimmy Carter emerging from a White House visit this week set hearts ashudder.

The Keystone Kops confusion distracts public attention from the Islamic bomb in Iran, the war in Afghanistan, the confiscatory tax increases required to pay for the spending spree, renegade Muslim terrorism and the perennial question about what to do to buck up milkleg European "allies." When "trouble" is about what's no longer in Stupid's pocket, he pays attention to the outrage at hand. Money is divided by a decimal system that everybody understands. Pretty speeches, like the platform performance of a faith healer, won't cut it.

Whistling past the graveyard doesn't work, either, but it's tempting to try.


Sen. Chris Dodd

"People are not sitting around their kitchen tables thinking about AIG," says David Axelrod, the chief designer of the picture-perfect campaign. "They are thinking about their own jobs."

Rahm Emanuel, the White House tough guy, scoffs that the AIG disaster is merely "a big distraction" from the faith healer's real work of healing the economy (as if everything is not related). But the public-opinion polls, which measure the pulse of every administration, say otherwise. Gallup finds a big majority "very upset" about it, with only 11 percent "not particularly bothered." Messrs. Axelrod and Emanuel should talk to their friends to see who is oblivious of the AIG debacle, and how it happened.

This is where Mr. Obama and his friends fear most to go. The $165 million paid out in perfectly legal bonuses are only part of it. The Democrats in Congress are eager to join in the cheap-seat chorus against "greed" and "corruption," as long as nobody notices they're a crucial part of the cabal of corruption that set off the economic slide. The rumbling began with the exposure of mismanagement at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the fingerprints of Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer and particularly Barney Frank are all over the cooked books.

Mr. Obama was elected in part because so many Americans thought he was serious about getting serious. He would relieve a weary nation of "the partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics." Some of us, to be sure, were skeptical. When you've been in Washington for a while it's difficult to be impressed by the sight of a new tent, tattered flaps fluttering in the wind, going up on that vacant lot overgrown with wild blackberries and Johnson grass just down the street.

President Obama and his men act "as if no one is watching them when they contradict their campaign promises," writes Karl Rove, the evil villain of liberal imagination, in the Wall Street Journal. "That behavior is unwittingly giving the Republicans an opening."

The Democrats can take some small comfort in knowing that Republicans know how to blow opportunities, too.

&#8226 Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.

Cajuncowboy
03-21-2009, 10:53 PM
The point of the article notwithstanding, I find the analogy of the faith healing to be obscene and offensive as if supernatural healing from God doesn't happen.

It's an affront to people of faith, IMO.

ninja
03-21-2009, 11:38 PM
The point of the article notwithstanding, I find the analogy of the faith healing to be obscene and offensive as if supernatural healing from God doesn't happen.

It's an affront to people of faith, IMO.

Obscene? Offensive? It's 2009. What century are you living in? Talk about some fragile feelings. Lighten up, Francis.

Do you actually believe that miracle faith healing stuff on tv?

Cajuncowboy
03-21-2009, 11:43 PM
Obscene? Offensive? It's 2009. What century are you living in? Talk about some fragile feelings. Lighten up, Francis.

Do you actually believe that miracle faith healing stuff on tv?

Not only do I believe that it happens, I have experienced it.

And to make light of someones faith is contrary to the board guidelines. It's also contrary to the rules of this forum to discuss, so i will not address it further. I hope it is addressed properly by a Mod.

DIAF
03-22-2009, 12:34 AM
It's funny how he stammers on about posts offending his religious sensibilities.....

The point of the article notwithstanding, I find the analogy of the faith healing to be obscene and offensive as if supernatural healing from God doesn't happen.

It's an affront to people of faith, IMO.

while he himself bashes the religion of others (see any Israel, islam thread).

Also funny how he wants mod intervention because a discussion of "faith" is against board guidelines....

Not only do I believe that it happens, I have experienced it.

And to make light of someones faith is contrary to the board guidelines. It's also contrary to the rules of this forum to discuss, so i will not address it further. I hope it is addressed properly by a Mod.

...when he himself just participated in doing so. :laugh2:

Personally, I thought the analogy was great and spot-on.

ninja
03-22-2009, 12:35 PM
You believe this guy? The audacity of some people here amazes me. It's that "all about me" mentality. How dare you offend my feelings. And then the dude cries for a mod to come to his rescue!

If that article was obscene or offended you, you probably shouldn't read a newspaper, magazine, or the internet. And a political chatroom is probably not the best place for you.

And that article was written by a writer with 40 yrs newspaper experience and writing for the most conservative, pro-religious newspaper in the US. And you found obscenity in a political op-ed. Okay.

ethiostar
03-22-2009, 12:42 PM
What's interesting to me is that we are very selective about this stuff. On the one hand, people ***** and moan about how we have become so PC and sensitive. This is often directed at the use of words that are considered to be racial slurs, some that are directed at gays and lesbians or non-Christian religions. On the other hand, if someone says something about the Christian religion or other topics like the thread involving 'special olympics' some people come running out with thier pitch forks and torches.

No consistancy what so ever.

iceberg
03-22-2009, 01:19 PM
The point of the article notwithstanding, I find the analogy of the faith healing to be obscene and offensive as if supernatural healing from God doesn't happen.

It's an affront to people of faith, IMO.

you live long enough, you get offended. i think we as a people need to toughen up and quit catering down to try and stop every single offensive phrase and potential phrase.

at work the latest craze awhile back in negeotiating classes was you can't say "win / win" anymore because it implies someone lost.

a *BIT* too much.

ethiostar
03-22-2009, 01:31 PM
you live long enough, you get offended. i think we as a people need to toughen up and quit catering down to try and stop every single offensive phrase and potential phrase.

at work the latest craze awhile back in negeotiating classes was you can't say "win / win" anymore because it implies someone lost.

a *BIT* too much.

I thought 'win/win' implied that all parties involved benefited and noone disproportionately shouldered a 'loss' ?:confused:

iceberg
03-22-2009, 03:34 PM
I thought 'win/win' implied that all parties involved benefited and noone disproportionately shouldered a 'loss' ?:confused:

don't look at me, i didn't think it made any sense at all.

Jon88
03-22-2009, 05:29 PM
you live long enough, you get offended. i think we as a people need to toughen up and quit catering down to try and stop every single offensive phrase and potential phrase.

at work the latest craze awhile back in negeotiating classes was you can't say "win / win" anymore because it implies someone lost.

a *BIT* too much.

When I was a kid I played on a basketball team one time that didn't win many games and that phrase offends me.

DIAF
03-22-2009, 05:41 PM
You think that is bad, we have a product at work called "WMSI" but we aren't allowed to call it "Whimsy" because clients get pissed off when we call it that.

iceberg
03-22-2009, 06:13 PM
When I was a kid I played on a basketball team one time that didn't win many games and that phrase offends me.

so get better at basketball or find something you're good at. : )

Cajuncowboy
03-22-2009, 08:34 PM
You believe this guy? The audacity of some people here amazes me. It's that "all about me" mentality. How dare you offend my feelings. And then the dude cries for a mod to come to his rescue!

If that article was obscene or offended you, you probably shouldn't read a newspaper, magazine, or the internet. And a political chatroom is probably not the best place for you.

And that article was written by a writer with 40 yrs newspaper experience and writing for the most conservative, pro-religious newspaper in the US. And you found obscenity in a political op-ed. Okay.

You don't get it. The article makes fun of ones faith or a tenant of that faith. And the rules of this forum do not allow for a discussion on the matter. So I figure if I am going to interject my faith as a reason for my position on something and I get a warning or something for mentioning the faith, then there should be none of it at all.

Sorry, I poo pooed you little article but either mods are consistent or not. I guess I have my answer.

ninja
03-22-2009, 09:10 PM
You don't get it. The article makes fun of ones faith or a tenant of that faith. And the rules of this forum do not allow for a discussion on the matter. So I figure if I am going to interject my faith as a reason for my position on something and I get a warning or something for mentioning the faith, then there should be none of it at all.

Sorry, I poo pooed you little article but either mods are consistent or not. I guess I have my answer.

:confused: Whatever, dude. The article is about politics. If you think that was obscene, I'd hate for you to see my video collection.:)

iceberg
03-22-2009, 09:19 PM
:confused: Whatever, dude. The article is about politics. If you think that was obscene, I'd hate for you to see my video collection.:)

i'd hate for me to see it.

CowboyFan74
03-22-2009, 09:39 PM
http://www.impawards.com/1992/posters/leap_of_faith_ver1.jpg

Cajuncowboy
03-22-2009, 10:45 PM
:confused: Whatever, dude. The article is about politics. If you think that was obscene, I'd hate for you to see my video collection.:)

Whatever is right.

And besides, some of us still have some morals. Even if it is old fashioned.