PDA

View Full Version : Cowboys frustrate Parcells to the end


Mr Cowboy
01-03-2005, 08:12 PM
Cowboys frustrate Parcells to the end
By JAIME ARON, AP Sports Writer
January 3, 2005

IRVING, Texas (AP) -- Bill Parcells is heading into the offseason knowing what he must change about the Dallas Cowboys.

After all, they've had the same problems since training camp.

Dallas wrapped up its slide from 10-6 to 6-10 in fitting fashion late Sunday, ruining its own dramatic comeback by making a bunch of mistakes in the final minute. So instead of going out in a good way, the Cowboys gave up a touchdown in the closing seconds and lost 28-24 to the New York Giants, reaffirming many of the things Parcells already thought about his club.

ADVERTISEMENT
``We've been the same since preseason. The team has never changed,'' Parcells said. ``We don't take care of the ball, we're not mentally tough and we're not physically tough enough at certain spots and it transcends to the rest of the team.''

Parcells didn't speak to reporters very long after the loss, saying he was tired and wanted to go home. The 63-year-old coach was not available Monday and planned to take his time before publicly discussing his offseason plans.

That is, his plans for the team. He's expected back for his third season, especially after saying on his weekly television show broadcast Sunday, ``My intention is to continue to coach here.''

Although Parcells knew what had to be fixed six months ago, he couldn't do it. Tweaks to scheme and personnel weren't enough and coaches were unable to get players to break bad habits, such as false starts on offense.

Dallas started 2-1, then won once in October, once in November and twice in December. As bad as the NFC was, the Cowboys still had a chance to make the playoffs with a strong final month, but lost three of their last four.

``A pretty good percentage of the guys fight to do well, then another percentage -- that's more than you can tolerate -- do not,'' Parcells said.

The changes will begin on defense, overhauling a unit that went from giving up the fewest yards in the NFL in 2003 to middle-of-the pack in '04.

The Cowboys allowed at least 30 points five times and struggled to produce takeaways. They didn't have a return touchdown for the first time since 1961; while special teams is to blame, too, they could've used a fumble or interception taken into the end zone.

``It's very disappointing, frustrating,'' linebacker Dat Nguyen said. ``We've just got to figure out what's wrong. Coach will find a way.''

Parcells believes it starts with getting more pressure up front. End Marcellus Wiley was the top offseason acquisition, but was practically invisible this season and probably won't be back.

Dallas also needs a tackle to pair with Pro Bowl pick La'Roi Glover -- unless Parcells opts for a major shakeup, dropping the 4-3 alignment preferred by defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer and going to the 3-4 he's used most of his career.

The secondary will be another priority. Right cornerback already was a hole and the retirement of Darren Woodson means the Cowboys need a safety, too.

Other areas of concern are the offensive line and depth at running back behind Julius Jones, who was among the few bright spots in 2004.

Tight end Jason Witten also made that short list by becoming the team's most dependable receiver.

``When guys went down, I had to step up and show my talent,'' Witten said. ``I took advantage of every opportunity I had.''

Quarterback is the team's most talked-about position, but the big decision there will be whether Parcells wants Drew Henson and Tony Romo to spend the offseason in Europe or at team headquarters. Going overseas would provide experience, but might leave them too banged-up to be counted on next season.

Parcells has said one of them could be the starter in 2005, although they'll probably have to beat out Vinny Testaverde. The 41-year-old said Sunday night he wants to keep playing and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones already has said the team wants him back.

Henson threw just 18 passes his rookie season and Romo has yet to take a snap in two seasons. Parcells insisted Testaverde gave the team a better chance to win, but he may find himself wishing the youngsters had played more.

The best news for Dallas is having a lot to work with this offseason: plenty of room under the salary cap and two of the top 20 picks in the draft.

The Cowboys have No. 11 and they own Buffalo's first-rounder, which is 20th. It would improve a spot if St. Louis or Minnesota reach the Super Bowl.

Parcells worries that the available free agents may not play the positions he's looking to upgrade. Considering all the work that's needed, there should still be plenty of good candidates.

TonyS
01-04-2005, 01:27 AM
Parcells worries that the available free agents may not play the positions he's looking to upgrade. Considering all the work that's needed, there should still be plenty of good candidates.

Could you imagine next season Parcells getting up and saying, "I wanted to improve the team, but the right groceries weren't out there. Sorry, hopefully this year there will be better players available."

It sounds like he's already setting up his excuse for next year. Not a good sign.

BadKarma
01-04-2005, 02:15 AM
Could you imagine next season Parcells getting up and saying, "I wanted to improve the team, but the right groceries weren't out there. Sorry, hopefully this year there will be better players available."

It sounds like he's already setting up his excuse for next year. Not a good sign.

It certainly sounds like he's already got an excuse. He's looking to shop at the nearest New York grocery store is his problem. I just wish he'd stop relying on adding HIS players to bridge the gap between now and his two year plan.

"Bill...think outside the box...outside the box...mmmkay...thanks!"

Dale
01-04-2005, 02:33 AM
Like I've said before, while it's just speculation on my part, I truly think this offseason will test the will and the patience between Jerry and Bill like no other offseason has. The two have worked very well together so far, as both have proven far more flexible than anyone had previously expected them to be (Parcells going with Q and Hutch his first year; Jerry not stepping in and naming Henson the starter or demanding the team to be more active throughout free agency).

If Parcells is passive yet again in free agency, I think Jerry will begin wondering whether he should meddle and become more involved again. Perhaps he won't speak up during the offseason, but if Parcells' approach proves to fail during the 2005 season, he'll most certainly begin speaking his mind more freely and, in my opinion, will become convinced the team would be better off if he had more influence in the decisions.

I just don't know that Jerry can tolerate another offseason consisting of all Parcells' former guys coming here, while free-agent superstars sign in Philadelphia and Washington.

This offseason may well be quiet (meaning Parcells and Jerry won't feud), but it'll most certainly determine the future well being of their relationship. Hell, Jerry even admitted following last season that winning cured all; he wondered aloud whether, had the team lost, they would have had such a cozy relationship. Two years of losing will undoubtedly put a strain on them.

Dale
01-04-2005, 02:40 AM
It certainly sounds like he's already got an excuse. He's looking to shop at the nearest New York grocery store is his problem. I just wish he'd stop relying on adding HIS players to bridge the gap between now and his two year plan.

"Bill...think outside the box...outside the box...mmmkay...thanks!"

The good news this offseason is that two former Parcellites, Ferguson and Abraham, should actually top our free-agent wish list, and for once not because of their ties to the Tuna.

Call me a glutton for punishment, but I think Parcells knows what's at stake here. Considering how miserable he is when he loses, I think he's long known the problems on this team this season and is chomping at the bit to expedite such problems. Certainly every position will not be filled with a long-term solution this offseason, but I think the players he feels are holding this team back will be gone in a heartbeat.

It seemed this past season that he became too comfortable and lax with a number of players he probably thought would either underachieve or underperform, but extended them this one last opportunity in hopes they could turn it around (in the case of a guy like Gurode, he saw the talent and was hopefuly he'd finally get it). Unfortunately, he signed few alternative plans during the offseason, leaving him attached to these players despite how they ended up performing.

It turned out all such players bombed (Gurode, Tucker, Randal Williams, Dixon, all the backup corners that competed for a starting job, Stewart, among many others).

In Gurode's case, for instance, he left himself with such poor backup plans that he had to essentially start some guy off the street just to find a guy that might actually improve the position after Lehr bombed and Peterman was hurt.

For one, I don't see him relying on players he "hopes" will finally get it next season, and I also don't think he'll leave himself without a few Plan B's. And if he doesn't, then I'm clearly not the only one that's a glutton for punishment.

dmq
01-04-2005, 07:51 AM
I am glad we lost that last game against the Giants. Losing to such a bad team just showed that we didn't learn anything this year. If we would have won, it might have given Parcells a bit better of an attitude about this team since we almost beat Philly and beat Washington. This team needed to lose to the Giants, so Parcells could have the frame of mind to just blow up the whole team and remake it in his own image. This team as it is will not win a Superbowl. Big time changes are needed.

Woods
01-04-2005, 07:58 AM
I am glad we lost that last game against the Giants. Losing to such a bad team just showed that we didn't learn anything this year. If we would have won, it might have given Parcells a bit better of an attitude about this team since we almost beat Philly and beat Washington. This team needed to lose to the Giants, so Parcells could have the frame of mind to just blow up the whole team and remake it in his own image. This team as it is will not win a Superbowl. Big time changes are needed.

It probably was a blessing in disguise we lost to the Giants.

And not because of the draft pick!

But like you said, no one can hide the reality now. And no one can get cozy this off-season.

mr.jameswoods
01-04-2005, 08:09 AM
Could you imagine next season Parcells getting up and saying, "I wanted to improve the team, but the right groceries weren't out there. Sorry, hopefully this year there will be better players available."

It sounds like he's already setting up his excuse for next year. Not a good sign.

This is exactly the impression I got from reading this article. It was very disheartening to say the least.

notherbob
01-04-2005, 10:30 AM
I'm not sure what to think about this season but the word disappointment slithers into my mind. I'm disappointed in the injuries, I'm disappointed in the thoughtless mistakes that have plagued this team, I'm disappointed that the young QBs go little and no opportunity to play, even in blowouts, I'm disappointed in the performance of numerous players and the coaching staff alike. I'm disappointed in Bill Parcells this year - from the poor performance in the free agency market to the "Jap plays" comment to the bum challenges, to the poor selection of what free agents they did get, the play calling and the general demeanor of the team in such incidents as the anonymous derogatory posting at the press conference to the griping by Wiley.

Yeah, I would say that disappointing is the best word to describe this team this year.

On the bright side, we found a few players this year in Campbell, Witten, Julius, Johnson, Crayton, and others. We finally found a punter and now the kicker don't work.

Hopefully, this will be a very interesting off-season. My only real hope here, though, is that Parcells will show better decision-making in 2005 than he did in 2004. I no longer firmly believe he is the man, I now only hope he is. :confused: