PDA

View Full Version : Philip Rivers info.


D1G
01-08-2005, 01:46 PM
Chargers have lots of support in their Rivers infatuation
By Jim Trotter
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
April 22, 2004



Associated Press
Phillip Rivers may lack "escapability" in the pocket, but he started an NCAA-record 51 consecutive games of North Carolina State and completed 72 percent of his passes in his senior year.

If the Chargers trade the first pick in this weekend's NFL draft and pass on Mississippi quarterback Eli Manning, they likely would take North Carolina State quarterback Philip Rivers with a lower selection.

How good is Rivers, a four-year starter with a quirky delivery and a jaw-dropping résumé?

"Whoever drafts him will be in the Super Bowl in three years," said USC offensive coordinator Norm Chow, who coached Rivers for one season at N.C. State. "This guy is a quarterback. He understands how to play quarterback. He started something like 54 straight games in college and set all kinds of records. He's special. Guys like him don't come along very often. But I'm prejudiced. I love the kid."

For a more objective assessment of Rivers' abilities, phone calls were made to several coaches whose teams competed against Rivers the past four years in the Atlantic Coast Conference.

Manning to Bolts: Don't draft me
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe Stein's Draft Preview
Defense
Ends | Nose tackles
Tackles
Inside linebackers
Outside linebackers
Cornerbacks | Safeties
Special teams
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offense
Quarterbacks
Running backs
Wide receivers | Tight ends
Offensive lines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jerry Magee's draft analysis



"We played against a lot of good quarterbacks in the 20 years that we've been here," said Florida State defensive coordinator Mickey Andrews, "and he ranks right up there against the best. We played against some Heisman winners and All-Americans, and I don't know if I played against a guy any harder to defend."

Added Clemson coach Tommy Bowden: "He is good, real good. Just the simple fact that he has played in five bowl games and been the MVP of every one of them. He broke every (passing) record in the conference and never missed a game . . . In the end, we beat him twice and he beat us twice. Notice I said 'he,' not 'they.' It was him. Not the wideout, not the defense, not this guy or that guy. He beat us."

Rivers' stock has soared since the end of last season. He initially was projected to go late in the first round, but some now believe he could go as high as fourth overall to the Chargers if San Diego trades down with the New York Giants.

Some NFL personnel people and coaches believe Rivers is in the same class as – if not better than – Mississippi quarterback Eli Manning, the projected No. 1 pick. Rivers has size at 6-foot-5, 228 pounds. He has durability, starting an NCAA-record 51 consecutive games. And he has a history of producing, completing 63.6 percent of his passes for 13,484 yards and 95 touchdowns with only 34 interceptions.

As a senior, Rivers completed an astounding 72 percent for 4,491 yards and 34 touchdowns with 17 interceptions. His arm strength trails that of Manning and Ben Roethlisberger of Miami of Ohio, but his understanding of defenses and a quick, albeit unorthodox, release make him tough to defend. Just ask Chan Gailey, who coached 16 years in pro football before accepting the Georgia Tech job three years ago.

Philip Rivers
Position: Quarterback
Height: 6-5
Weight: 228
School: North Carolina State

Scouting report: He has a weird sidearm throwing motion and is not going to rate any comparisons with Michael Vick or even Ben Roethlisberger for the way he moves around in the pocket. So what? Rivers racked up extraordinary statistics, has a quick release and unerring accuracy. Norm Chow, the USC quarterback guru, worked with Rivers as a freshman and still raves about him. Rivers, the son of a football coach, seems to have an innate understanding of the game and the ability to make the right decision time after time. He's not regarded as a great deep thrower but compensates with all the other outstanding things he does, such as going to the right man with his passes and hitting receivers in stride. Rivers might be the quarterback closest to playing effectively in the NFL immediately.


– JOE STEIN



As the offensive coordinator with the Pittsburgh Steelers, Gailey was credited with making Kordell Stewart an effective quarterback, something few others have accomplished. So, he knows what it takes to succeed at the NFL level.

"Philip Rivers is going to be very successful," Gailey said. "He has all the intangibles, and the two biggest for playing quarterback are decision-making and accuracy. He has both of those. The speed of the game will get him initially, but he'll adjust.

"You can pressure him and fluster him at times, but he'll get it before long. There's no doubt in my mind he's going to be successful."

Like others, Gailey said he initially was struck by Rivers' awkward delivery, which sometimes looks as if he's throwing sidearm. But Rivers rarely had his passes batted at the line.

"I know he's got an awkward motion and it looks nasty," Gailey said. "But after being on the field against him, shoot, he gets the job done. It's irrelevant."

Asked about potential negatives with Rivers, Gailey stated the obvious: "Speed, mobility, escapeability. He's not very good at that. But the other thing is that he's hard to tackle. He's so big and strong, you can hit him, but you can't knock him down. He finds a way to get the ball off."

Some believe Rivers would be the consensus No. 1 pick if his surname were Manning. The Chargers are known to love Rivers' ability, particularly after coaching him for a week in the Senior Bowl in Mobile, Ala. But do they dare pass on a Manning, particularly after they passed on chances to draft quarterbacks John Elway in 1983 and Michael Vick in 2001?

Rivers sounds as if he knows whom he would select.

"I'm certainly confident I'm as good as anybody in the draft," he said recently. "If me and (Manning) were on opposite teams with equal talent around us, it would be a battle. I think he's a great player. I was around him some this summer, and he can really throw it. My evaluation is he's as good as he's made up to be."

The question for the Chargers is whether the same can be said of Rivers.

:jints:

ROMOSAPIEN9
01-08-2005, 02:01 PM
I'll pass on Phillip Rivers.

Leinart(sp?) or bust!

D1G
01-08-2005, 02:03 PM
I will reserve judgement until I can do some more research on rivers. the only thing i do know about rivers is that he was considered a better prospect than brees coming out of college.

ROMOSAPIEN9
01-08-2005, 02:09 PM
I will reserve judgement until I can do some more research on rivers. the only thing i do know about rivers is that he was considered a better prospect than brees coming out of college.

Ryan Leaf was considered a better prospect than Peyton Manning.

D1G
01-08-2005, 02:15 PM
lets not split hairs. brees was a second rd choice. rivers top 5 overall. but like i said i know very little about rivers.

SALADIN
01-08-2005, 02:28 PM
lets not split hairs. brees was a second rd choice. rivers top 5 overall. but like i said i know very little about rivers.

Brees = QB who has gotten it done in the NFL

Rivers = QB who has gotten it done ...

Who's the better QB today, Brees or River's?

D1G
01-08-2005, 02:36 PM
we may not even get him. so this discussion could be a moot point. however, something has to be done about the qb if henson isn't the answer. obviously rivers has some potential, but i don't know enough about him yet.

Tuna Helper
01-08-2005, 02:43 PM
Brees = QB who has gotten it done in the NFL

Rivers = QB who has gotten it done ...

Who's the better QB today, Brees or River's?

Fortunately, both QBs are in San Diego, and their front office ties with ours as the dumbest in the NFL.

I'll bet money that Drew Brees is on the trading block even if San Diego wins the Super Bowl. They have a lot less invested in Brees financially than in Rivers.

The question is...do we make a move for Brees in the offseason? Brees does not have great arm strength, but he does make plays. He is adequate IMO. Matter of fact, I think we should have moved up a bit in 2001 to draft the kid in the 2nd round instead of Q***** C*****.

Hell, I wanted Marcus Tuiasasoppo before QC, and the Raiders drafted him instead.

RCowboyFan
01-08-2005, 03:39 PM
I'll pass on Phillip Rivers.

Leinart(sp?) or bust!

I dont know, I wasn't all that impressed with Leinart. Especially his Arm Strength. But he does seem to be a perfect bus driver type of QB, in Chad Pennington or Drew Brees mold. Wont make mistakes and will make enough plays.


Besides, I almost can bet Henson will be given the chance to start or try to win starting job next year and no trade's will be made for any QB. I guess I will eat crow if I am wrong, but from Jerry's comments, I dont see any QB trades or signing unless they come cheap.

The30YardSlant
01-08-2005, 03:43 PM
If we want a QB, draft Alex Smith.

jcollins28
01-08-2005, 03:48 PM
Trust me no way Rivers gets traded. Chargers could not afford to trade Rivers and sign Brees. Not only that but Bress came out last week and said he wants a multi year deal that has a good amount of coin in it. I do not see anyway that the Chargers can keep him.

JackMagist
01-08-2005, 04:19 PM
Trust me no way Rivers gets traded. Chargers could not afford to trade Rivers and sign Brees. Not only that but Bress came out last week and said he wants a multi year deal that has a good amount of coin in it. I do not see anyway that the Chargers can keep him.I wouldn't mind giving Brees some coin to play here. He is experienced and has had some success in the NFL. I'd take a smart player with a weaker but accurate arm over a like Vinny or Quincy any day. Unless they are committed to playing Henson or Romo next year they need to go after Brees if he becomes available. I just can't see SD letting Rivers go after all they gave up to get him. He cost them a ton of draft picks and cash so no way they let him go.

Rack Bauer
01-08-2005, 05:04 PM
I just can't see SD letting Rivers go after all they gave up to get him. He cost them a ton of draft picks and cash so no way they let him go.


What have you been smoking? The Chargers didn't give up a d**ned thing for Rivers. They RECIEVED a King's Ransom from the Giants for Eli Manning.

SuspectCorner
01-08-2005, 05:26 PM
please, one experiment at a time. there isn't really a place here for rivers. we're just under way on henson. i could see brees if i didn't think it'd cost an arm and a leg - but it would. so would the rights to rivers and he'd only further muddy the waters in dallas.

JackMagist
01-08-2005, 05:30 PM
What have you been smoking? The Chargers didn't give up a d**ned thing for Rivers. They RECIEVED a King's Ransom from the Giants for Eli Manning.My Bad. I completely had the trade turned around in my head for a minute. Yeah SD raped the Giants in that deal. I actually corrected this in another post in another thread but forgot what thread I had made this mistake in.

Sorry about that.

Rack Bauer
01-08-2005, 05:38 PM
My Bad. I completely had the trade turned around in my head for a minute. Yeah SD raped the Giants in that deal. I actually corrected this in another post in another thread but forgot what thread I had made this mistake in.

Sorry about that.


Yeah I figured you got it mixed up. The Giants got bent over hardcore in that deal. lol

The only problem is they had to trade Rivers to get the deal done. It would of been better if they had traded Eli to the Giants BEFORE they took Rivers and just gave them the pick instead (plus this years 1st rounder) then they could of taken something other then a QB. They could of had Roy Williams instead of Rivers. Brees had a great year, but imagine if he had a Roy Williams to throw to? He got a good WR at the halfway point (when they traded for McCardell) but Roy Williams still would of been a better fit then Rivers.

Then Rivers likely would of fallen to the Steelers and we'd be talking about how great he is, instead of talking about Big Ben. :D

JackMagist
01-08-2005, 05:46 PM
Yeah I figured you got it mixed up. The Giants got bent over hardcore in that deal. lol

The only problem is they had to trade Rivers to get the deal done. It would of been better if they had traded Eli to the Giants BEFORE they took Rivers and just gave them the pick instead (plus this years 1st rounder) then they could of taken something other then a QB. They could of had Roy Williams instead of Rivers. Brees had a great year, but imagine if he had a Roy Williams to throw to? He got a good WR at the halfway point (when they traded for McCardell) but Roy Williams still would of been a better fit then Rivers.

Then Rivers likely would of fallen to the Steelers and we'd be talking about how great he is, instead of talking about Big Ben. :DThe deal was that at this time last year they had prematurely given up on Brees and were calling him a bust in SD. I don't know for sure but I think that they were trying to cut the deal before the pick and just told the giants to go ahead and pick Rivers because that is who they were going to take anyway. But hindsight being what it is they would have been much better off with Roy Williams than with Rivers. I would have given some very important parts of my anatomy for us to get a shot at Roy Williams last year.

JDSmith
01-08-2005, 05:53 PM
If the Chargers trade him they are going to take a 12.5 million dollar cap hit unless I'm mistaken. They'd burn up 60% of their free cap money just getting rid of Rivers. Most of the rest would probably go towards signing Brees. Why do I think it's unlikely that they'll trade Rivers?

Rack Bauer
01-08-2005, 05:55 PM
If the Chargers trade him they are going to take a 12.5 million dollar cap hit unless I'm mistaken. They'd burn up 60% of their free cap money just getting rid of Rivers. Most of the rest would probably go towards signing Brees. Why do I think it's unlikely that they'll trade Rivers?


Someone mentioned the other day that Rivers had his signing bonus split or something like that. Supposedly his deal is set up to where they could trade him this year and only take a 3 million dollar cap hit.

JDSmith
01-08-2005, 06:12 PM
Someone mentioned the other day that Rivers had his signing bonus split or something like that. Supposedly his deal is set up to where they could trade him this year and only take a 3 million dollar cap hit.
OK, I just found a reference to it. He's due a roster bonus of 6 million on March 10th. If they trade him prior to March 10 they will take a 6.5 million dollar hit. If they trade him after March 10 it goes up to over 10 million.

To me, 6 million still seems pretty steep to get rid of a second year player. So I'd still say it's unlikely, and that Mort is probably (again) talking out his ***. Or did I miss where we signed Tim Couch like Mort said we would last offseason?

Boy's fan in Giant land
01-09-2005, 12:34 AM
I dont know, I wasn't all that impressed with Leinart. Especially his Arm Strength. But he does seem to be a perfect bus driver type of QB, in Chad Pennington or Drew Brees mold. Wont make mistakes and will make enough plays.


Besides, I almost can bet Henson will be given the chance to start or try to win starting job next year and no trade's will be made for any QB. I guess I will eat crow if I am wrong, but from Jerry's comments, I dont see any QB trades or signing unless they come cheap.

I agree completely with this statement, though I've gotta admit I'd love to see us go after Brees, Rivers, or Hasselbeck.