PDA

View Full Version : Ranking the Dynasties


irvin88
01-30-2005, 10:24 PM
"As much as I admire the Patriots, and Bill Belichick . . . I really don't think you can compare post-salary cap and pre-salary cap," former Cowboys coach Jimmy Johnson said. "I just don't think the teams are as good with all the player movement, free agency and the salary cap. I think Bill and I pretty well agree on it. The Steelers, 49ers and Cowboys - that was the best football that has ever been played."


It's not unexpected that Johnson, or others from the Packers, Steelers and 49ers, are protective of what their respective teams accomplished. Still, those are the best teams the league has ever produced.


New England has put together back-to-back 14-2 seasons and this group is 8-0 in the playoffs over the last four seasons. But rank them against those Packers, Steelers, 49ers and Cowboys teams and they finish fifth.


Four of the Pats' eight playoff victories have come by three points, including both Super Bowls. They have dominated a weak era.


So here's how we rank them:


1. '70s Steelers.
2. '60s Packers
3. '90s Cowboys
4. '80s 49ers
5. '00s Patriots


Giants GM Ernie Accorsi, a student of the history of the game, says "personnel-wise" the Patriots can't compare with the great teams. "Accomplishment-wise, I would put them with the Steelers and Packers and all of them. Coaching-wise, they stack up with anybody. How can you argue?" he said. "They have good, sound players. Do you think there's any chance they are going to have seven or nine Hall of Famers? Personnel-wise, I don't think you can make a case. But it's a team."


Aikman said if the Pats win their third in four years, tying what his Dallas teams did in the '90s, he would consider it a more significant achievement. "I think it's harder to win consistently today in the league than when I was playing," he said. "The talent gap between teams is not that significant."


Physically, the game has changed so much over the years. Pittsburgh's Joe Greene, one of the greatest defensive tackles of all time, played at 6-4, 260. Vikings quarterback Daunte Culpepper is listed at 264 pounds. New England All-Pro DE-DT Richard Seymour plays at 6-6, 310. Steelers All-Pro linebacker Jack Ham was listed at 225 pounds, only five pounds more than New England safety Rodney Harrison plays at today.


But all five teams were more talented than the Patriots.


"There is no way they would stack up against the Steelers, it's that simple," said former 49ers coach Bill Walsh. "You take any team, even our great ones - the Steelers had the best grouping of players in the history of the game. No question about it."


And what about the Niners?


"It would have been interesting for our 1988-89 49ers to play any defense," Walsh said. "We had truly a great offensive unit. Our defense was as strong as anybody."


Pittsburgh won four Super Bowls in the 1970s, twice winning back-to-back. The Niners won four times in the '80s and the Cowboys of the '90s became the first to win three in a four-year period. If free agency didn't hit and those Cowboys teams stayed intact, and if Johnson didn't leave after the second title in a bitter breakup with owner Jerry Jones, Dallas might have won five in a row. All their best players were so young.


Terry Bradshaw, Jack Lambert, Greene, Ham, Lynn Swann and John Stallworth headline a group of nine Hall of Fame Steelers from those '70s teams. Coach Chuck Noll also was inducted. The Packers, led by Bart Starr, Paul Hornung and Ray Nitschke, have 10 players in the Hall of Fame from their championship teams of the '60s, when they won five titles in a seven-year span. Lombardi is also in.


Montana, Walsh and Ronnie Lott are 49er Hall of Famers from the '80s, and Jerry Rice will join them five years after he is done playing. Steve Young, a 49ers backup in the late '80s who later was the starting quarterback for their fifth title team in 1994, is expected to be elected to the Hall on Saturday. Aikman and Smith are locks when they are eligible, and Irvin is among the final 15 Saturday in his first year of eligibility.


The Patriots? Only Belichick and Brady, if they win their third title together, will have spots reserved for them in Canton. They might have secured spots already with what they've accomplished. "The Patriots have a really good team," Montana said.


"They have a great team. I'm sure they fit in the category with all those teams. They are as good as anybody out there. It's so hard to tell. Even comparing us to the Steelers - the game has changed."


The Pats win because they play smart, have superior coaching, don't make mistakes and when one or two game-deciding plays need to be made, they make them. They don't win because they overwhelm teams with their talent. For the most part, they are a blue-collar team comprised of role players. Brady, Bruschi and kicker Adam Vinatieri were the only Patriots selected for the Pro Bowl this season.


But Johnson says New England gets the edge in one important area. "The Patriots might be better coached than any of those teams," he said. "The Patriots might be the best coached team ever. I think they've done a masterful job of coaching."


"The New England Patriots rival any coaching staff and their execution is as good as any team," Walsh said. "But I honestly don't believe they have some of the truly great players that the dynasty teams had."


Players and coaches from those Packers, Steelers, 49ers and Cowboys teams admire what the Patriots have done. It's impressive because it's so hard to keep teams together now.


"I never dreamed anybody would be in position to do what they've done," Bradshaw said. "If they win this one, giving them three out of four, it puts them right up there with the best teams that ever played."


Ham says comparing teams from different eras is difficult. "You're talking 25 years ago," he said. "If you take our team now and bring it forward, frozen in time, we can't compete. Our biggest guy was Joe Greene."


But he said as many as 13 starters were the same on all four of their Super Bowl teams. Accorsi noted that the Patriots turned over their roster by about 30% after last season. The quality of play was better 25 years ago due to the continuity.


The Lombardi Packers tend to get lost in the equation because their run was 40 years ago. But they dominated a decade.


"Our team was one of the best teams ever," Hornung said. "I don't think there are 12 Hall of Famers on the Patriots. That doesn't say they are not as good as the Steelers, 49ers and Packers. If you look at Hall of Famers, I don't think you find three players. You might look upon that as a negative. Other people look at it as a positive saying that is what a great team is."


Hornung says a friend of his who used to set the betting line in Las Vegas told him the '60s Packers would have been an eight-point favorite against the great Dolphins teams of the early 70s. "He said, 'There's not a team I think that you all would be underdogs to - maybe the 49ers team or one of the Pittsburgh teams, but you would almost have to call it a tossup,'" Hornung said.


The Patriots have certainly gotten a lot of mileage out of the no-star concept, but, Aikman adds, "They have a much more talented team than they get credit for. They are regarded as blue-collar, hard-working guys. They are pretty talented. It's not just Bill Belichick drawing lines on a board."


So how do the Patriots think they would do against the all-time great teams?


"To worry how we would play against those other teams is just something that we don't really want to concern ourselves with," Bruschi said. "We'll save that for the video game."


Super squads


Each of the last five decades has had its signature NFL team. The Patriots are the latest. Here's how New England compares to the great dynasties of the past:


1960s: Packers
Record: 96-37-5
Super Bowl appearances: 2
Titles: 2*
Coaches: Vince Lombardi, Phil Bengtson
Hall of Famers: Herb Adderley, Willie Davis, Forrest Gregg, Paul Hornung, Henry Jordan, Lombardi, Ray Nitschke, Jim Ringo, Bart Starr, Jim Taylor, Emlen Tunnell, Willie Wood


1970s: Steelers
Record: 99-44-1
Super Bowl appearances: 4
Titles: 4
Coach: Chuck Noll
Hall of Famers: Mel Blount, Terry Bradshaw, Joe Greene, Jack Ham, Franco Harris, Jack Lambert, Noll, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Mike Webster


1980s: 49ers
Record: 104-47-1
Super Bowl appearances: 4
Titles: 4
Coaches: Bill Walsh, George Seifert
Hall of Famers: Ronnie Lott, Joe Montana, Walsh


1990s: Cowboys
Record: 101-59
Super Bowl appearances: 3
Titles: 3
Coaches: Jimmy Johnson, Barry Switzer, Chan Gailey
Hall of Famers: None yet


2000s: Patriots
Record: 53-27
Super Bowl appearances: 3
Titles: 2
Coach: Bill Belichick
Hall of Famers: None yet


* The Packers also won three NFL Championship Games in the early 1960s, predating the Super Bowl.


** A win next Sunday would make the Pats 3-for-3 in the Super Bowl this decade.


FAB FIVE


Former 49ers coach Bill Walsh ranks the QBs from the five greatest NFL dynasties:


1. Joe Montana, 49ers: "He could do everything. He was so resourceful. Joe did everything beautifully and he had composure. He threw a soft ball that could be caught and his receivers could make plays on."


2. Terry Bradshaw, Steelers: "He was a great athlete with an incredible arm. A tremendous competitor. He carried his team when he felt like it, otherwise the team would win on defense."


3. Troy Aikman, Cowboys: "I just thought he was a tremendous all-around player. He had everything. They had a great team, also."


4. Tom Brady, Patriots: "He is just a natural. He is smooth, poised, totally composed. He reminds me of Joe. I think Joe was a little quicker and a little more active on his feet."


5. Bart Starr, Packers: "Simply because he was with such a great team, he never really had to carry his team."

Originally published on January 30, 2005

Tio
01-30-2005, 10:30 PM
In terms of how they dominated the league, the packers and 9ers and steelers are the best. But in terms of the best talent, It is definately the cowboys and niners.

HoustonSucks
01-30-2005, 10:31 PM
How nice that the team with Five superbowl appearances, more playoff appearances and more winning seasons than any other team at the time gets left off the list.

The 70s Cowboys. The Steelers barely beat us twice.

This is hel l. This whole superbowl is hel ll hel l hel l. This is merely the surface. When NE wins, Dallas will disappear from the annals of 'great football' Oh, that is, until the next big trendy team comes along.

tyke1doe
01-30-2005, 11:01 PM
But the Steelers won four Super Bowls, we won two. The Cowboys weren't the team of the 70s.

Tio, the Steelers had by far the best talent off the dynasties. They were stocked across the board. Bradshaw, Franco, Stallworth and Swann. Joe Green and L.C. Greenwood, Blount and Ham. That team was loaded.
The Cowboys were next, at least the 1996 Super Bowl team with Haley and Deion (two future Hall of Famers), and Aikman, Irvin and Smith on the offense.
The 49ers never really had a franchise running back in the mold of Emmitt and Franco. Craig was good, but I wouldn't put him above the aforementioned.

My ranking would go

1. 70 Steelers
2. 90 Cowboys
3. 80 49ers
4. 60 Packers (though I'm bias because I didn't see them play.)
5. 00 Patriots (who are still writing their history.)

I put the Steelers No. 1 because of their overall talent, because they beat an equally talented Cowboys team twice. :( and because they defeated a veteran Vikings team (which should have many Hall of Famers if it wasn't for the lack of Super Bowl win bias against them) in Pittsburgh's first Super Bowl.

I put the Cowboys above the 49ers because the 49ers first Super Bowl team was nothing special, IMO. It played a sorry Bengals team. The Cowboys teams had talent across the board on offense and played two Bills teams with future Hall of Famers (Reed, Bruce Smith, Kelly and maybe Thurman Thomas though his lack of Super Bowl wins and his Super Bowl blunders may hurt him.)

Sarge
01-31-2005, 05:29 AM
How nice that the team with Five superbowl appearances, more playoff appearances and more winning seasons than any other team at the time gets left off the list.

The 70s Cowboys. The Steelers barely beat us twice.

This is hel l. This whole superbowl is hel ll hel l hel l. This is merely the surface. When NE wins, Dallas will disappear from the annals of 'great football' Oh, that is, until the next big trendy team comes along.


...and Dallas barely beat the Steelers in the 90's. It all comes out in the wash IMO.

HoustonSucks
01-31-2005, 11:08 AM
...and Dallas barely beat the Steelers in the 90's

We dominated the second half of that game. But recollect whatever makes you happy.

FIVE supberbowl appearances in the 70s. Barely losing those SBs - one of which Lynn Swan ADMITTED to ESPN he cheated.

Wasn't that the decade we were "America's Team?"

How quickly they forget.

tyke1doe
01-31-2005, 11:16 AM
We dominated the second half of that game. But recollect whatever makes you happy.

FIVE supberbowl appearances in the 70s. Barely losing those SBs - one of which Lynn Swan ADMITTED to ESPN he cheated.

Wasn't that the decade we were "America's Team?"

How quickly they forget.

No, we didn't dominate the second half of the game. We lost the momentum in that game and had it not been for our honorary Cowboy - Neil O'Donnel - we could have lost. That game shouldn't have been that close.

We went to five Super Bowls in the 70s and lost three. The Steelers went to four and won four. And as for Lynn Swann admitting he cheated - when was this?
And really does it make a difference? We didn't make plays when we needed to. They beat us. That's what the history books will say.

Steelers were clearly the team of the 70s.

Yes, how quickly they do forget.

TheHustler
01-31-2005, 11:46 AM
Do you have a link to the original article? Just an FYI, when you're posting an article you should leave in the author/publication info, and a link to the article is always nice :)

Maikeru-sama
01-31-2005, 11:50 AM
Do you have a link to this article?

- Mike G.

Sarge
01-31-2005, 05:08 PM
We dominated the second half of that game. But recollect whatever makes you happy.

.

There is one of us who comes up short on the recollection of that game and it isn't me there junior.

We could have easily have lost that Steelers game.

Thank you Neil O'Donnell.

SultanOfSix
01-31-2005, 05:19 PM
We dominated the first half of the Steeler's - Cowboy's 90s SB statistically. We should have been up by three touchdowns but we weren't. The second half was a wash with Pittsburgh having the momentum until Neil O'Donnell became black-gold, blue-silver color blind. We barely escaped that SB with a victory, but I'm happy we did. At least we dominated the other two, unlike the Patriots. :)

The30YardSlant
01-31-2005, 05:28 PM
The greatest team ever was the 1992 Cowboys, there is not a team in history that had more talent than that team. #1 defense, #1 offense. WOW....

zagnut
01-31-2005, 08:21 PM
The first Cowboys dynasty, weren't they in 6 championships/Super Bowls, starting in 1967 through 1979. That's 6 in 13 years. 2 back-to-back appearances. We won 2 and lost 3 of the remaining 4 to the top two dynasties of all time.

The loss, 21-17, to Green Bay in the Ice Bowl was lost on a late QB sneak.

The loss, 16-13, to Baltimore in Super Bowl V was on a last second field goal.

The loss, 21-17, to Pittsburgh in Super Bowl X. The game that made Swann's career.

The loss, 35-31, to Pittsburgh in Super Bowl XIII is generally regarded as the best Super Bowl ever.

We lost 4 Super Bowls by an average of just under 4 points. Give me a friggin break. I'll give the Steelers their due. I'll give the Packers their due. They're both ahead of us on the dynasty scale. They were great. FINE. I get it. To the victor and all that. Can we get just a little bit of bleeping credit. A few more Hall of Famers for going to a Super Bowl on average every other year from the late 60's through the late 70's.

:banghead:

1970's Cowboys are ahead of the Pats. Heck, the 70's Dolphins and 80's Skins are ahead of the Pats too. In fact, the Skins are exactly who I'd compare the Pats to. Great coach and staff. Great team play. Almost no great players. Sure, the Skins needed strike years to do anything, but hey... :D

TruBlueCowboy
02-01-2005, 01:57 AM
If we're going with a straight up battle, team against team, the 90's Cowboys win just because they have the advantage of playing right before the salary cap meaning they have a lot more stockpiled talent than the Pats. They also win out againt teams like the Packers and Steelers because of the size advantage. I don't care how great those teams were in the day, they can't compete against a 300 pound offensive line! And I also think newer dynasties will not only have problems with the lack of depth compared to past teams, but offenses are much easier to run with the continuing trend of new rules to limit defenses.

If we're going with the greatest teams for their time, then I respectfully give it to the Patriots because just like Aikman says, it is more difficult in this day and age to consistently win. With such little depth, injuries can ruin teams more than they ever could, it's difficult to sign all your stars, and everyone seems to be level in the scouting field now too. It's not like the early Cowboys who got a head start on the draft. Teams are equal now.

If we're going for best team considering everything, I probably go with the Steelers because of the 4 Super Bowls. With AFC vs. NFC competition, playing before the Super Bowl in some of its dynasty, not as great of financial stability with every team, and not as many expansion teams yet, I think it was easier for the Packers to hog up talent or win championships. The Steelers had to go through a system closer to today's pro sports world and boy buddy, did they have one hell of a roster! I think they're a little overrated and I could just as easily see the HOF littered with Cowboys if we had won those Super Bowls in the 70's, but I guess I should give the Steelers props for the fact that they beat another one of the greatest teams ever assembled: the 70's Cowboys. But I also want to add that if not for the stinking salary cap and the Jimmy vs. Jerry crap, the 90's Cowboys would have also been in this third category.

mr.jameswoods
02-01-2005, 02:17 AM
I think our 1992 Cowboys team is the most accomplished of all the teams because their competition at the time was brutal. In 1992, you still had the

1. Bufallo Bills dynasty
2. Eagles team and their insane defense
3. Redskins and the hogs
4. 49ers dynasty minus Joe Montana
5. Houston Oilers run n shoot team

Honestly, I would argue any of those 5 teams could beat the Patriots today and were more talented. That's who we had to go through to win the Superbowl that year. The competition back then was much more fierce in my opinion.