PDA

View Full Version : We are waiting on Bledsoe, if he is available then he's a Cowboy


whcarm
02-15-2005, 12:13 AM
Parcells likes veteran QBs. Especially veteran QBs he has a history with and trusts.

I think Parcells is waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. If he is released and available then I think we will make a play for him and I think he will end up here.

If he isn't then we will probably re-sign Testaverde. The only reason I can see that we haven't already done this is because we are waiting on Bledsoe.

Parcells isn't going to go into the season without a veteran QB. We aren't going to draft a QB. So the only thing that makes sense to me is that we are waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. There aren't any other QBs that will be available that Parcells would want to bring in.

Bluefin
02-15-2005, 12:20 AM
It seems plausible.

I was surprised to find out Parcells and the Joneses hadn't been in touch with Vinny's agent since the season ended.

And while I like Bledsoe better than Gramps, would he be willing to come into a situation where he knew the franchise was wanting to get a young quarterback ready for action?

If he's OK with that, why would he leave Buffalo and uproot his family from the northeast?

Some were speculating it was about money, but I've heard buffalo doesn't want bledsoe to take a paycut.

We shall see what happens.

Fan Since 77
02-15-2005, 03:03 AM
Please, no more washed up quarterbacks.

FuzzyLumpkins
02-15-2005, 03:59 AM
You started a whole new thread with this?

Joy

Zaxor
02-15-2005, 04:03 AM
You started a whole new thread with this?

Joy
the dude has some serious man crush

Zaxor

KingTuna
02-15-2005, 06:35 AM
Parcells likes veteran QBs. Especially veteran QBs he has a history with and trusts.

I think Parcells is waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. If he is released and available then I think we will make a play for him and I think he will end up here.

If he isn't then we will probably re-sign Testaverde. The only reason I can see that we haven't already done this is because we are waiting on Bledsoe.

Parcells isn't going to go into the season without a veteran QB. We aren't going to draft a QB. So the only thing that makes sense to me is that we are waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. There aren't any other QBs that will be available that Parcells would want to bring in.

I think you are 100% correct...The ONE factor above all else that leads me to believe Bledsoe will be a Cowboy is the fact that Vinny has NOT been contacted. Parcells is waiting this one out. Bledsoe should be released a week from today on Feb 22.

Yesterday Steve Tasker on the NFL show on Sirrius Radio said that 3 or 4 teams will be interested in Bledsoe as their starter.

You've got to think Dallas is #1, Cleavland are in the mix. The other couple of teams could be Miami and San Fran...Could be a team we don't even suspect right now.

Anyway, I think Parcells will snag Bledsoe the very moment he is available on the market and will be the Cowboys starter this year.

Zaxor
02-15-2005, 06:47 AM
I think you are 100% correct...The ONE factor above all else that leads me to believe Bledsoe will be a Cowboy is the fact that Vinny has NOT been contacted. Parcells is waiting this one out. Bledsoe should be released a week from today on Feb 22.

Yesterday Steve Tasker on the NFL show on Sirrius Radio said that 3 or 4 teams will be interested in Bledsoe as their starter.

You've got to think Dallas is #1, Cleavland are in the mix. The other couple of teams could be Miami and San Fran...Could be a team we don't even suspect right now.

Anyway, I think Parcells will snag Bledsoe the very moment he is available on the market and will be the Cowboys starter this year.
:banghead:

maybe logic doesn't appeal to you folk...so lets try something different..

how about..."the Post" aka Bledsoe will be a Cowboy when Pigs sprout wings and fly...

Zaxor

Aikmaniac
02-15-2005, 07:40 AM
No to Bledsoe. Vinny is just as good (or bad) as Bledsoe, is cheaper, has more experience and is more comfortable with this offense, and is a quality backup to one of the TWO QB's we know nothing about. Henson/Romo will start this season with Vinny as backup.

Hollywood Henderson
02-15-2005, 08:01 AM
I agree Aik, Bledoe just doesn't make any sense, on any level...

Vinny has already proven to be good for the young QB's and chemistry would be worse IMHO with Bledsoe...

Just because we have not yet resigned Vinny, doesn't mean Bledsoe is on his way here...At least I hope not...

Yakuza Rich
02-15-2005, 08:11 AM
I think Bledsoe is their guy. Mainly because if they wanted to re-sign VT, they would've done so by now. Instead, they are waiting to see what the Bills do first.

Rich..........

notherbob
02-15-2005, 08:19 AM
If Parcells pursues Bledsoe, that means he thinks Henson will not be ready for a couple of years, since Bledsoe will demand big money. If Parcells sticks with Vinny, that means he thinks Henson is close to being ready and will want to develop him. But then again, I thought Parcells would give both the kids a little playing time last year.

Doomsday101
02-15-2005, 08:27 AM
If Parcells pursues Bledsoe, that means he thinks Henson will not be ready for a couple of years, since Bledsoe will demand big money. If Parcells sticks with Vinny, that means he thinks Henson is close to being ready and will want to develop him. But then again, I thought Parcells would give both the kids a little playing time last year.

How do you figure that Bleadsoe will be in a position to demand big money? His numbers where not that good and there is no upside to him, what you see is what you get and what he can give you is not worth a big payday.

Aikmaniac
02-15-2005, 08:59 AM
If for some reason, Henson is declared a bust by Parcells. Matt Hasselbeck is the best option for this team. He's still young enough to make a good 4-5 year career here in Dallas. He's better than Bledsoe, Warner, etc.

However, I do think Parcells wants to give Henson a shot to win the starting job. Bledsoe won't come here if he's not the starter so I believe Vinny will be back as the backup to Drew Henson.

Nightshade
02-15-2005, 09:03 AM
Parcells likes veteran QBs. Especially veteran QBs he has a history with and trusts.

That's why we have Vinny.

I think Parcells is waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. If he is released and available then I think we will make a play for him and I think he will end up here. If he isn't then we will probably re-sign Testaverde. The only reason I can see that we haven't already done this is because we are waiting on Bledsoe.

The Cowboys never rush on signing anyone. The Superbowl was only two weeks ago. No rush.

Parcells isn't going to go into the season without a veteran QB. We aren't going to draft a QB. So the only thing that makes sense to me is that we are waiting to see what happens with Bledsoe. There aren't any other QBs that will be available that Parcells would want to bring in.

I saw a lot of Bills games this past year. Bledsoe is a statue. With our O-line the offense would regress even further if we had Bledsoe instead of Testaverde. I'm not a Testaverde fan, but again VT at 42 is ALOT more mobile than Bledsoe. Both QB's are playing with similar accuracy and decision making ability. Testaverde knows our offense. The Bills will keep Bledsoe if he agrees to back up Losman, so Bledsoe won't leave unless he demands to start. If he does he won't be coming to Dallas, where Henson will be our starter long before any contract Bledsoe signs is up.

I really think Bledsoe in Dallas would be a big mistake. The name sounds great. But like Eddie George, the name doesn't reflect the reality any more.

notherbob
02-15-2005, 09:08 AM
How do you figure that Bleadsoe will be in a position to demand big money? His numbers where not that good and there is no upside to him, what you see is what you get and what he can give you is not worth a big payday.
I don't think he is worth a big payday, either, but he will want to start and he and his agent will want veteran QB starter money and that would be more than Vinny and too much for a backup. He would also want the vast majority of snaps, thereby slowing down Henson's development.

The only way I see Bledsoe coming here is if Parcells decides Henson is far enough away from starting that he needs a couple more seasons to prepare. Otherwise, I see BP standing pat with Vinny as backup.

royhitshard
02-15-2005, 09:08 AM
However, I do think Parcells wants to give Henson a shot to win the starting job. Bledsoe won't come here if he's not the starter so I believe Vinny will be back as the backup to Drew Henson.
God I hope so!

Doomsday101
02-15-2005, 09:10 AM
I don't think he is worth a big payday, either, but he will want to start and he and his agent will want veteran QB starter money and that would be more than Vinny and too much for a backup. He would also want the vast majority of snaps, thereby slowing down Henson's development.

The only way I see Bledsoe coming here is if Parcells decides Henson is far enough away from starting that he needs a couple more seasons to prepare. Otherwise, I see BP standing pat with Vinny as backup.

I agree they will look for that not sure how many takers will be willing to give him what he may want. There does come a time if a player wants to remain in the league that they are willing to take the lesser role. I guess we will find out soon enough

SuspectCorner
02-15-2005, 09:27 AM
isn't the REASON bledsoe is being ushered outta buffalo in the FIRST PLACE - that he refused to take a pay-cut because he wants to be THE STARTER?
vinny was brought in last off-season thinking he would BACK UP carter. if we want to see the young guys play - aren't we better off with the QB that WE ALREADY KNOW is willing to sacrifice his ego for the good of the team?
just a thought.

dewey
02-15-2005, 09:31 AM
isn't the REASON bledsoe is being ushered outta buffalo in the FIRST PLACE - that he refused to take a pay-cut because he wants to be THE STARTER?
vinny was brought in last off-season thinking he would BACK UP carter. if we want to see the young guys play - aren't we better off with the QB that WE ALREADY KNOW is willing to sacrifice his ego for the good of the team?
just a thought.Although I don't think Bledsoe is the answer for Dallas, last year he agreed to a paycut, but wasn't interested in doing it two years in a row. Also, I'm sure he wants to be the starter. How many QB's ever want to admit that they have lost the edge to make them starter material?

VA Cowboy
02-15-2005, 09:39 AM
If we sign Bledsoe then Parcells hire will have been a total waste because it'll be obvious he is only interested in stopgap solutions instead of building a solid foundation.
A win-now approach with a slew of 30-somethings isn't going to cut it and will only further undermine the future of the team.

Aikmaniac
02-15-2005, 09:45 AM
isn't the REASON bledsoe is being ushered outta buffalo in the FIRST PLACE - that he refused to take a pay-cut because he wants to be THE STARTER?
vinny was brought in last off-season thinking he would BACK UP carter. if we want to see the young guys play - aren't we better off with the QB that WE ALREADY KNOW is willing to sacrifice his ego for the good of the team?
just a thought.


Yes. Vinny is the best backup money can buy for the Cowboys. He's a good mentor for Henson/Romo, he knows this offense like the back of his hand, and he's fine with being a backup.

I have no reservations in keeping Vinny here as a backup to Henson.

Keep the three QB's they have and spend the money on the supporting cast.

-OL (FA)
-WR (Draft)
-DL (FA and/or Draft)
-CB (FA)
-S (FA and/or Draft)
-RB (FA)

The Boys have got the money...go out there and make some waves, Jerruh.

ddh33
02-15-2005, 12:09 PM
It's the same old thing.

I think it's safe to assume that if Bledose is brought in, then Bill believes that Henson has a future - but it's still a ways off.

If Vinny is brought back, Henson is close, or Bledsoe got signed by someone else.

If Hasselbeck or Brees is brought in, there are serious doubts about whether or not Henson can ever be a franchise QB.

KingTuna
02-15-2005, 12:33 PM
It's the same old thing.

I think it's safe to assume that if Bledose is brought in, then Bill believes that Henson has a future - but it's still a ways off.

If Vinny is brought back, Henson is close, or Bledsoe got signed by someone else.

If Hasselbeck or Brees is brought in, there are serious doubts about whether or not Henson can ever be a franchise QB.

Bledsoe is ONLY coming here if he IS the starter for at LEAST 2 years in my mind..

Nors
02-15-2005, 12:55 PM
isn't the REASON bledsoe is being ushered outta buffalo in the FIRST PLACE - that he refused to take a pay-cut because he wants to be THE STARTER?
vinny was brought in last off-season thinking he would BACK UP carter. if we want to see the young guys play - aren't we better off with the QB that WE ALREADY KNOW is willing to sacrifice his ego for the good of the team?
just a thought.


Came to Dallas assured he could compete to start. VT did not want to be a backup.

I don't want QB's that don't want to compete. Sign Bledsoe and play the best QB, thats pretty simple. If Henson is all that - you'd think he could beat out a 42 Year old VT or the Bledsoe Bum.