PDA

View Full Version : Archer | Bledsoe makes sense for Cowboys


Bluefin
02-18-2005, 01:12 PM
Todd Archer: Bledsoe makes sense for Cowboys

12:52 PM CST on Thursday, February 17, 2005


IRVING - The quarterback carousel is beginning again and the question does not appear to be, "Will the Cowboys get one?" but, "Which one will they get?"

Jeff Gracia, Drew Bledsoe, Brad Johnson, Jay Fiedler and Kurt Warner will be available at some point for a variety of different reasons. And let's not forget last year's starter Vinny Testaverde, who is a free agent.

Last year, Garcia was linked to the Cowboys even though the team had no interest in him. Now, it's Bledsoe's turn to be linked. This one, at least, makes sense.

There's the Bill Parcells connection. Bledsoe knows what type of offense Parcells likes to run. He knows what the coach wants in a quarterback. He is eight years younger than Testaverde.

Parcells chose Bledsoe with the No. 1 overall pick in the draft in 1993 because he saw a big, talented quarterback with a rocket of an arm. He helped develop Bledsoe into a Pro Bowler. Together they threw an NFL record 691 passes in 1994. In 1996, they went to the Super Bowl together.

By the end, however, their relationship was, shall we say, not the best. Bledsoe felt Parcells needed to back off a little. Parcells, of course, would never do that. But there was always a respect for each other.

Phil Simms went through the same thing with Parcells. He couldn't stand Parcells when he was coach but learned to appreciate him as the years went by. It's the same thing with Bledsoe.

Under Parcells, Bledsoe became the youngest quarterback in history to throw for more than 10,000 yards (23 years, 299 days). Twice he threw for more than 4,000 yards under Parcells. He had 80 touchdown passes and 73 interceptions for Parcells, and New England went to the playoffs twice in those four years.

Recent years have not been kind to Bledsoe. Traded by New England to Buffalo in 2002, Bledsoe had a 23-25 record for the Bills.

He still has the arm strength, but he has been hit so many times that he looks more at the line of scrimmage than down the field.

But Parcells can be what Bledsoe needs to return to his Pro Bowl form. He can protect him in certain situations. And the Cowboys have pieces in place that have helped Bledsoe succeed before.

He was at his best when he had Ben Coates as his tight end. Here, he would have Jason Witten. He can rekindle the magic he had in New England with Terry Glenn (21 touchdowns). He would have a clutch receiver in Keyshawn Johnson. And he would have a running back in Julius Jones.

When Willis McGahee started running for the Bills, they won. Bledsoe was protected better and he didn't find himself in so many third-and-long situations.

When Jones started running for the Cowboys, Testaverde's numbers did not improve. In the final seven games, which Jones started, he threw six touchdown passes and nine interceptions. Only twice did he complete more than 60 percent of his passes. He was also sacked 19 times.

This Bledsoe is not the Bledsoe Parcells coddled in New England, but if the Cowboys want to get on the carousel, he's the best choice.

ddh33
02-18-2005, 01:17 PM
This just makes the most sense.

Dallas gets the guy they need to help them win now. Bledsoe gets what he wants - starting, some comfort, and a chance to win.

Of course, both sides will have to make some concessions. Dallas will have to be willing to let Henson stay out of the limelight for a while longer. Bledsoe may have to understand that there's a young, talented kid behind him who will need to see the field at some point. But I don't see why this couldn't work.

DanTanna
02-18-2005, 01:19 PM
Has any team in the NFL had the rotating door policy the Cowboy's have had over the last 5 years at QB????
1. Anthony W.
2. Crying Qweef
3. Quincy
4. Sterner
5. Hutch
6. Vinny
7. Tony Banks
8. Randal Cunningham

WE SUCK at that position!!

SuspectCorner
02-18-2005, 01:24 PM
nevermind he's almost guaranteed to tap the brakes on any development of the youngsters - what's the cost in terms of $$$ and time? 'cuz i can see a "ceiling" beyond which i would consider any deal involving bledsoe as foolhardy. say... 2 years at $2.5 mil and incentives with a $2-3 mil signing bonus. the market is gonna drive his price up beyond his "worth" as a dallas cowboy.

DallasEast
02-18-2005, 01:26 PM
There's the Bill Parcells connection. Bledsoe knows what type of offense Parcells likes to run. He knows what the coach wants in a quarterback. He is eight years younger than Testaverde.Whether you love or hate the proposal, that'll probably be the basic reasoning behind Bledsoe coming here.

Sabu1
02-18-2005, 01:27 PM
Has any team in the NFL had the rotating door policy the Cowboy's have had over the last 5 years at QB????
1. Anthony W.
2. Crying Qweef
3. Quincy
4. Sterner
5. Hutch
6. Vinny
7. Tony Banks
8. Randal Cunningham

WE SUCK at that position!!
Well, Dallas didn't have the cap room during those days to bring in a high priced free agent QB nor the high draft pick necessary to bring in a franchise QB either. The Tom Bradys of the world don't come around too often.

HTownCowboysFan
02-18-2005, 01:33 PM
Has any team in the NFL had the rotating door policy the Cowboy's have had over the last 5 years at QB????
1. Anthony W.
2. Crying Qweef
3. Quincy
4. Sterner
5. Hutch
6. Vinny
7. Tony Banks
8. Randal Cunningham

WE SUCK at that position!!

Who is "Sterner?"

Anyway, we were damn lucky for about 40 years with QB's - in fact, maybe the luckiest of teams. This is just how it is now until we find a franchise QB. Hopefully Henson is it - even though he may sit another year.

Sabu1
02-18-2005, 01:35 PM
That would be Clint Stoerner. He started a couple of games in 2001.

Bluefin
02-18-2005, 01:35 PM
Well, Dallas didn't have the cap room during those days to bring in a high priced free agent QB nor the high draft pick necessary to bring in a franchise QB either. The Tom Bradys of the world don't come around too often.
But Dallas did have the option of selecting Byron Leftwhich instead of Terence Newman in the 2003 draft.

Given that Bill and Jerry knew Quincy Carter was in the NFL's substance abuse program and that they'd agreed to release him if another positive test occured, it's somewhat surprising they didn't want a signal caller, IMO.

T-New was the best player on the board, but teams don't often have the chance to select a potential franchise quarterback in the draft without the hassle of having to barter picks in a trade up to obtain him.

Did they expect Chad Hutchinson to develop and be the guy?

Why bother holding on to a quarterback with substance issues if you're going to release him after another positive test?

boysfanindc
02-18-2005, 01:38 PM
When Jones started running for the Cowboys, Testaverde's numbers did not improve. In the final seven games, which Jones started, he threw six touchdown passes and nine interceptions. Only twice did he complete more than 60 percent of his passes. He was also sacked 19 times.

I am not making excuses for VT, just stating a few facts.

He lost Glenn & Bryant.
Eddie freaking George started half the year.
He was beat up by the time JJ returned.
The D was so bad we were behind a lot.
Towards the end of the year Gurode and RT became huge problems.

All in all I still would rather have Bledsoe, but there were a lot of reasons including VT why we struggled on O.

Chocolate Lab
02-18-2005, 01:43 PM
Why bother holding on to a quarterback with substance issues if you're going to release him after another positive test?

That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? If I could only ask Parcells one question, that might be it.

IMO the continued refusal to play Henson shows that Parcells didn't take Leftwich because he didn't want to wait on a young QB to develop.

Bluefin
02-18-2005, 01:46 PM
The bottom line for Vinny, IMO, is that he saw plenty of man coverage after Julius Jones returned and he was unable to take advantage of it.

In some games, it was all he could do to throw for a first down.

Defenses weren't game planning on stopping the passing game because they didn't respect the run as they did in '03.

And while it's never one player's fault, I expected Vinny to play better than he did.

He wasn't a first-time starter in a new scheme.

He was a two decade veteran with half a tank of gas.

He can't be counted on to start a full slate of games, if needed.

That's reason enough to make a switch.

I would prefer to see Henson starting, some things must be learned on the field, but I have no problem with him having to earn it over a veteran like Bledsoe.

Bluefin
02-18-2005, 01:54 PM
That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? If I could only ask Parcells one question, that might be it.
Undoubtedly.

I was a big Carter supporter when he was here, but like most everyone else, I never pretended he had the makings of an all-time great.

I felt Q could grow into the position if enough help existed around him to keep the burden of winning off his shoulders.

Since Carter didn't have the makings of a franchise QB, why bother running the risk of a relapse if you aren't going to see it through?

That's just a waste of time.


IMO the continued refusal to play Henson shows that Parcells didn't take Leftwich because he didn't want to wait on a young QB to develop.
I guess.

As things stand now, we're rebuilding anyway and it wouldn't have hurt to develop a quarterback along the way, IMO.

I still think Terence Newman will become a solid cornerback if he ever gets a pass rush in front of him, but with defensive rules the way they are, the selection might've been better used on an offensive skill player.