PDA

View Full Version : McFake... err I mean McShay Mock 3.0


SDogo
02-10-2011, 11:08 AM
Pass-rushers rule top of board

Two elite cornerbacks go back-to-back; four offensive tackles in latest projection

By Todd McShay
ESPN.com


The college all-star circuit has ended, the final first-round order is set and the NFL combine is rapidly approaching. So what better time to update our first-round projection?

The top of Scouts Inc.'s latest mock draft is heavy on defensive players, with defenders occupying the top three spots on the board and seven of the top 10. A pair of elite defensive backs are off the board in consecutive spots in the top 10, which also includes a pair of underclassman quarterback prospects.

There are some new faces in this projection, too, including an under-the-radar offensive lineman and an impressive defensive lineman from a program not known for producing top pro prospects.

Things likely will change significantly as the combine and the rest of the pre-draft process unfold, but this is how we see things playing out based on what we've seen on film and the buzz we're hearing from around the league.


1) Carolina Panthers
Record: 2-14

Da'Quan Bowers, DE, Clemson*

The Andrew Luck dream has long since ended, and it's time to deal with the reality of the situation. Trading out is a long shot, 2010 second-round pick Jimmy Clausen does not appear to be the long-term answer at quarterback and although Blaine Gabbert is the premier quarterback in this year's class, Gabbert is no Luck. Auburn DT Nick Fairley is an option, but I believe that Bowers is the better choice. He is a power rusher with the tools to develop into a Julius Peppers-type impact player.

-

2)Denver Broncos
Record: 4-12

Nick Fairley, DT, Auburn*

The Broncos are likely to transition to a four-man front under new head coach John Fox and defensive coordinator Dennis Allen. They finished last in the NFL with 23 sacks last season, so upgrading the pass rush is a major priority. Bowers would be a possibility if available and Alabama's Marcell Dareus makes sense, but Fairley's specialty is wreaking havoc in opposing backfields (24 tackles for loss, 11.5 sacks in 2010), and he has the elite tools to become an every-down impact player as an under tackle in a 4-3 front.

-

3) Buffalo Bills
Record: 4-12

Von Miller, OLB, Texas A&M

The Bills have no shortage of needs. Left tackle is a priority, but the 2011 class doesn't offer a surefire top-five pick. The team is also likely to draft a quarterback, but it should do so on Day 2, when a legitimate backup to Ryan Fitzpatrick (and potential future starter) can be found. The Bills also need help along the defensive front, and Miller makes sense because he's a versatile playmaker. Miller can play sideline to sideline versus the run, and he's at his best when turned loose off the edge as a pass-rusher.

-

4) Cincinnati Bengals
Record: 4-12

A.J. Green, WR, Georgia*

Using a top-10 pick on a wide receiver is rarely a wise move, but Green is special. Many wideouts are big and fast, but Green's route-running savvy, toughness, body control and ball skills set him apart from most college wideouts. The Bengals also have needs at defensive end (and could select North Carolina's Robert Quinn), middle linebacker (what's Dhani Jones' future?) and quarterback. (Is it time to draft Carson Palmer's replacement?)

-

5) Arizona Cardinals
Record: 5-11

Blaine Gabbert, QB, Missouri

The Cardinals have needs at guard, right tackle, tight end, 3-4 outside linebacker and cornerback, but none is bigger than their need at quarterback. Gabbert is still a work in progress, but he's the most complete signal-caller in this class. His accuracy is far better than his statistics indicate, he has the arm strength to drive the ball vertically (which is what the Cardinals want in their starting quarterback) and he has the work ethic and football intelligence to quickly emerge as a solid starter.

-

9) Dallas Cowboys
Record: 6-10

J.J. Watt, DE, Wisconsin*

The team's most pressing need is for a 5-technique (DE) in its 3-4 scheme. The Cowboys are also aging along the offensive line and need some depth/future starters at inside linebacker and safety. Dallas would have a tough call in this scenario but Watt will continue to fly up boards because of his versatility and nonstop motor. Watt is capable of making an immediate impact on all three downs as a rookie. Finding a player like Watt to generate inside pressure would be a great complement to OLB DeMarcus Ware's edge rushing ability.


Todd McShay is the director of college scouting for Scouts Inc. He has been evaluating prospects for the NFL draft since 1998. Scouts Inc.'s Steve Muench and Kevin Weidl also contributed to this report.

Follow Todd McShay on Twitter: @McShay13 (http://twitter.com/#%21/McShay13)

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/insider/news/story?id=6101352&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnfl %2fdraft2011%2finsider%2fnews%2fstory%3fid%3d61013 52

GloryDaysRBack
02-10-2011, 11:12 AM
worst mock ever

texbumthelife
02-10-2011, 11:14 AM
:ralph:

Watt is a great prospect but not at number 9. He reminds me too much of Roth who can be had in free agency. I firmly believe that if Peterson falls to 7 or 8 we move up to get him. Von Miller at 3 and Solder at 13 are also crazy.

TheCount
02-10-2011, 11:27 AM
Amazing that this dude gets so much TV time.

Sam I Am
02-10-2011, 11:31 AM
I really like Watt; the kid has a motor, but not at #9. Not for a DE. Especially since we won't be playing a 1-gap 3-4 anymore either.

Duane
02-10-2011, 11:33 AM
How does he keep a job?

baj1dallas
02-10-2011, 01:30 PM
How does he keep a job?

I think Watt will get a top 10-12 grade when all is said and done. He's way underrated on this board because he's not a sexy name.

The Realist
02-10-2011, 01:58 PM
JJ Watt is freak. 20 TFL, 8-10 sacks, 9 PBU's

I'm not sure 9 is the right spot for him.

Is he going to be Seymour/Aaron Smith?

Or is he going to be the big kid from Virginia that STL drafted top 5 that ended up in WAS?

If I had to call it right now I would say that Gabbert/Newton go ahead of us which will push someone else down the board to us (Peterson).

There are 4-5 teams ahead of us that are starving at QB.

RS12
02-10-2011, 02:08 PM
I like Watt in the 20's. At 9 gimme Quinn, Jordan, or Smith.

ringmaster
02-10-2011, 02:16 PM
I like Watt in the 20's. At 9 gimme Quinn, Jordan, or Smith.
I saw J.J. Watt play a bit with Wisconsin last season and yes he does have a very high motor, I wouldn't want him with the #9 pick but rest assured if he's there in the mid-late teens, or early twenties he will be a Patriot, I just see Belichick going after him.

As for McShay, I don't know how he came up with the idea that Watt will be the guy the Cowboys target at #9, there will be alot of options there at the Cowboys spot if they were to draft Watt at the ninth pick I won't be too happy about it.

HoleInTheRoof
02-10-2011, 02:34 PM
Watt will continue to fly up boards because of his versatility and nonstop motor.

I really like Watt; the kid has a motor,

yes he does have a very high motor,

The white guys are always described as having a "motor."

ringmaster
02-10-2011, 02:39 PM
The white guys are always described as having a "motor." :laugh2: I'll say a player has a high motor of any color Marcell Daerus comes to mind of being a high motor player as well but not worth a top 10 pick imo the same applies to J.J. Watt just because I say that about them doesn't mean they won't be good players in the NFL.

Tedy Bruschi is another player that comes to mind when he was coming out of college being labeled a "high motor" guy that alot of people believed would good player but nothing spectacular we both know how he turned out.

I say a high motor is a guy who wants to be the best player that he can be regardless and at the end of the day those are the type of players I won't meaning that alot of them can be had later in the draft.

CATCH17
02-10-2011, 02:41 PM
The white guys are always described as having a "motor."


Not true. Quinn and Cam Jordan are being described as high motor guys.

Our own Jay Ratliff is high motor as well.

HoleInTheRoof
02-10-2011, 02:50 PM
I didn't say that the high motor label was exclusive to whitey. I'm just saying that EVERY white player is described as having a high motor.

batman36
02-10-2011, 02:57 PM
JJ Watt is freak. 20 TFL, 8-10 sacks, 9 PBU's

I'm not sure 9 is the right spot for him.

Is he going to be Seymour/Aaron Smith?

Or is he going to be the big kid from Virginia that STL drafted top 5 that ended up in WAS?

If I had to call it right now I would say that Gabbert/Newton go ahead of us which will push someone else down the board to us (Peterson).

There are 4-5 teams ahead of us that are starving at QB.
You are referring to Adam Carreker, who played at Nebraska. Chris Long played at Virginia. But yes, both were selected in the top seven of the draft. As for Watts, I would like to see him in Dallas after a trade down(value).

ringmaster
02-10-2011, 03:00 PM
Not true. Quinn and Cam Jordan are being described as high motor guys.

Our own Jay Ratliff is high motor as well. The same things was said about Spencer coming out of Purdue in 2007.

ringmaster
02-10-2011, 03:04 PM
I didn't say that the high motor label was exclusive to whitey. I'm just saying that EVERY white player is described as having a high motor. Well I wouldn't say that I hear every prognosticator call only white players high motor guys this is a new one to me.

joseephuss
02-10-2011, 03:34 PM
:ralph:

Watt is a great prospect but not at number 9. He reminds me too much of Roth who can be had in free agency. I firmly believe that if Peterson falls to 7 or 8 we move up to get him. Von Miller at 3 and Solder at 13 are also crazy.

I hope not. Dallas can't afford to move up in the draft. They need every pick they can get in this draft and in future drafts.

CATCH17
02-10-2011, 04:27 PM
I didn't say that the high motor label was exclusive to whitey. I'm just saying that EVERY white player is described as having a high motor.

Im a high motor poster.

The Realist
02-10-2011, 04:46 PM
Im a high motor poster.

Bobby Carpenter?

Vintage
02-10-2011, 05:30 PM
Matt Jones. high motor. lol.

AKATheRake
02-10-2011, 07:05 PM
He's right about us on the defensive line. But why JJ. Watt instead of Marcel Dareus?

Miller is definitely a better 3-4 OLB prospect than Robert Quinn.

The Realist
02-10-2011, 07:21 PM
He's right about us on the defensive line. But why JJ. Watt instead of Marcel Dareus?

Miller is definitely a better 3-4 OLB prospect than Robert Quinn.

On paper Watt is a much better pass rusher.

Romo 2 Austin
02-10-2011, 07:29 PM
This guy might be the worst draftnik on the planet

AKATheRake
02-10-2011, 07:48 PM
On paper Watt is a much better pass rusher.

J.J Watt get's eaten up on running plays cause he doesn't hold his gaps well enough.

Dareus does not suffer to Watt in the pass rush.

Cover 2
02-10-2011, 08:05 PM
I would be thrilled if it panned out like this. JJ Watt is a top 10 prospect IMO, and he would provide a pass rush from the defensive end spot. If Spencer can play like he did at the end of the season before and we get Watt, we would have the potential for a terrifying defense.

AKATheRake
02-10-2011, 08:20 PM
I would be thrilled if it panned out like this. JJ Watt is a top 10 prospect IMO, and he would provide a pass rush from the defensive end spot. If Spencer can play like he did at the end of the season before and we get Watt, we would have the potential for a terrifying defense.

Watt did what in the Rosebowl? Nadda!

Look, good college player, good guy but doesn't show up in the big game.

Gets burned on his gap too much on running plays.

Will be a solid pro but not a stud. A Greg Ellis type of pick. We can get an X factor level of player.

Marcel Dareus in his last 2 bowls just took games over on that side of the ball.

If I have to chose between the 2 at # 9, Dareus, who is going to be a stud, no questions asked.

Plus he can play top notch on all spots on the front 3 of a 3-4.

Gives us so much more flexibility and is more pro ready than Watt.

jnday
02-11-2011, 07:36 AM
Watt did what in the Rosebowl? Nadda!

Look, good college player, good guy but doesn't show up in the big game.

Gets burned on his gap too much on running plays.

Will be a solid pro but not a stud. A Greg Ellis type of pick. We can get an X factor level of player.

Marcel Dareus in his last 2 bowls just took games over on that side of the ball.

If I have to chose between the 2 at # 9, Dareus, who is going to be a stud, no questions asked.

Plus he can play top notch on all spots on the front 3 of a 3-4.

Gives us so much more flexibility and is more pro ready than Watt.

Dareus has had some outstanding bowl games , but week to week , in SEC games , he has disappeared . His own coaches have said that he is not a 3-down player and that he is more effective as only a 2-down player . The Cowboys might as well keep Spears. I watched 6 or 7 of Dareus`s games this year , just to get a look at him . He seemed to take too many plays off and he becomes a non-factor.

The Realist
02-11-2011, 07:49 AM
I think Dareus could play 3-4 NT no problem.

He's 22-23 years old and 310.

He can get to 320-330 no problem.

He has a very thick lower body.

Built like a dumptruck.

If we wanted to do that at 9 vs riskier Taylor in 2 I'd have no problem with it.

MarionBarberThe4th
02-11-2011, 07:51 AM
If a white player didnt have a high motor hed get stomped

JPM
02-11-2011, 09:34 AM
Amazing that this dude gets so much TV time.
How does he keep a job?
I think he's only on ESPN so he can disagree and argue with Mel Kiper.

Matt Jones. high motor. lol.
That's the coke.

NeonDeion21
02-11-2011, 11:11 AM
Watt did what in the Rosebowl? Nadda!

Look, good college player, good guy but doesn't show up in the big game.

Gets burned on his gap too much on running plays.

Will be a solid pro but not a stud. A Greg Ellis type of pick. We can get an X factor level of player.

Marcel Dareus in his last 2 bowls just took games over on that side of the ball.

If I have to chose between the 2 at # 9, Dareus, who is going to be a stud, no questions asked.

Plus he can play top notch on all spots on the front 3 of a 3-4.

Gives us so much more flexibility and is more pro ready than Watt.

What about when Wisconsin played #1 Ranked Ohio State? 2 sacks against a tough QB to bring down. I would say thats a pretty big game.

Duane
02-11-2011, 11:23 AM
I think he's only on ESPN so he can disagree and argue with Mel Kiper.

:laugh2:

newlander
02-11-2011, 03:53 PM
I watched Watt ALOT this year and he's a solid college player: that's IT. He didn't stand out, he didn't dominate and his measurables don't in any way, shape or FORM grade out to a top 10 1st round pick. That's the bottom line. Darius is a friggin' BEAST physically who has a question of playing hard, but that's ALL. The fact this is even a discussion shows what a clown McDonkey really is!:lmao:

TheFinisher
02-11-2011, 04:39 PM
Watt did what in the Rosebowl? Nadda!

Look, good college player, good guy but doesn't show up in the big game.



Rewatch the Ohio St game.

Cover 2
02-11-2011, 04:55 PM
Watt did what in the Rosebowl? Nadda!

Look, good college player, good guy but doesn't show up in the big game.

Gets burned on his gap too much on running plays.

Will be a solid pro but not a stud. A Greg Ellis type of pick. We can get an X factor level of player.

Marcel Dareus in his last 2 bowls just took games over on that side of the ball.

If I have to chose between the 2 at # 9, Dareus, who is going to be a stud, no questions asked.

Plus he can play top notch on all spots on the front 3 of a 3-4.

Gives us so much more flexibility and is more pro ready than Watt.
He's not going to dominate every single game he plays in. I thought he played well in his bowl game, but I guess not everyone saw it the same way I did.

Watt and Tyron Smith are the two players I see shooting up draft boards, and I would be fine with either one of them at 9. I've been touting both of them for awhile.

Chocolate Lab
02-11-2011, 05:29 PM
If a white player didnt have a high motor hed get stomped

:fact: :laugh2: