View Full Version : Girl, 6, allegedly videotaped mom having group sex
big dog cowboy
08-21-2011, 06:01 AM
Girl, 6, allegedly videotaped mom having group sex
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
DALLAS (AP) — Authorities in Texas have charged a Dallas woman with forcing her 6-year-old daughter to repeatedly videotape her having group sex.
According to police records, the 24-year-old woman is charged with indecency with a child by exposure, a third-degree felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The woman, who was arrested Saturday, was in jail Tuesday on a $50,000 bond.
The Associated Press does not generally identify those whom authorities believe to be the victims of sexually assault, and is not naming the woman because it might lead to the identification of her daughter.
Read more: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Girl-6-allegedly-videotaped-mom-having-group-sex-1808401.php#ixzz1VezMbs22
Cythim
08-21-2011, 06:20 AM
Some people should never be allowed to become parents.
SaltwaterServr
08-21-2011, 06:47 AM
Some people are alive solely because it's illegal to kill them.
burmafrd
08-21-2011, 07:00 AM
I predict CCF will be on here saying how that is not so bad.
Romo 2 Austin
08-21-2011, 07:43 AM
Why....
big dog cowboy
08-21-2011, 08:08 AM
Why....
You are looking at this as a logical thinking person would. Obviously the woman wasn't thinking that way at all.
Heisenberg
08-21-2011, 08:17 AM
She probably would have been better off just buying a tripod.
urface59
08-21-2011, 09:50 AM
She probably would have been better off just buying a tripod.
:laugh2:
casmith07
08-21-2011, 09:52 AM
?
She could have found some local frat boy to film it for free, get all the angles. I don't get it.
Biggems
08-21-2011, 09:52 AM
this is disgusting. thanks for ruining my sunday morning happy thought time.:bang2:
tupperware
08-21-2011, 10:08 AM
She probably would have been better off just buying a tripod.
Dangit, you got to it before I could.
Well on the bright side the girl shouldn't need any birds and bees talk.
She probably should have been doing something for good her daughter instead of getting gang banged.
Payton34Smith22
08-21-2011, 10:50 AM
Some people are alive solely because it's illegal to kill them.
This.
bbgun
08-21-2011, 10:57 AM
Irresponsible. Kids that young don't know how to properly operate a camera.
tupperware
08-21-2011, 11:05 AM
Irresponsible. Kids that young don't know how to properly operate a camera.
:lmao2:
CowboyMcCoy
08-21-2011, 12:17 PM
She probably would have been better off just buying a tripod.
No doubt.
ninja
08-21-2011, 02:49 PM
I hear, some schools have kindergarten and 6 yr olds putting condoms on bananas. So, how many years until videos like this make it into the elementary schools as mandatory sex ed? You knowe some idiot with a PHD in education will add it to the curiculum.
peplaw06
08-21-2011, 03:28 PM
I hear, some schools have kindergarten and 6 yr olds putting condoms on bananas. So, how many years until videos like this make it into the elementary schools as mandatory sex ed? You knowe some idiot with a PHD in education will add it to the curiculum.
Seriously?? You gotta link?
tupperware
08-21-2011, 03:53 PM
Seriously?? You gotta link?
Gotta get em ready early nowadays.
casmith07
08-21-2011, 04:06 PM
I hear, some schools have kindergarten and 6 yr olds putting condoms on bananas. So, how many years until videos like this make it into the elementary schools as mandatory sex ed? You knowe some idiot with a PHD in education will add it to the curiculum.
Well, if they learn how to use condoms early, then maybe we can get somewhat of a hold on all this teen mom garbage.
Lack of education + stupidity = teen pregnancy.
ninja
08-21-2011, 05:37 PM
Seriously?? You gotta link?
Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.
But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.:)
tupperware
08-21-2011, 05:43 PM
Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.
But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.:)
Well can you blame him? That's pretty crazy sounding.
Dawgs0916
08-21-2011, 08:23 PM
Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.
But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.:)
Kind of an unnecessarily smart ellic response. Sounded like he was genuinely curious about it, but whatever.
peplaw06
08-21-2011, 08:33 PM
Sorry, Link Police. No, I don't have a link. And, no, I am not going to look for one for you. If you are that interested, start with Google and see if you can find something. I read it in a newspaper or heard it on the news.
But, don't look for it tonight because there is a Cowboy game on.:)Fine... I call bull**** then.
I heard a rumor that they're teaching safe sex to toddlers. Don't believe me? I don't care.
Fine... I call bull**** then.
I heard a rumor that they're teaching safe sex to toddlers. Don't believe me? I don't care.
Hyperbole amidst criticism of the proposal may have caused the idea that condoms would be a part of it, but the claim of introducing sex-ed to kindergarteners isn't bogus...
Link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lynn-sweet/romney-targets-obama-over_b_57092.html)
Hostile
08-21-2011, 09:51 PM
Some people should never be allowed to become parents.
She isn't a parent, she just gave birth.
Cythim
08-21-2011, 10:35 PM
Hyperbole amidst criticism of the proposal may have caused the idea that condoms would be a part of it, but the claim of introducing sex-ed to kindergarteners isn't bogus...
Link (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lynn-sweet/romney-targets-obama-over_b_57092.html)
That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.
Illini88228
08-21-2011, 11:13 PM
That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.
I was part of a pilot program for a similar protocol. They teach very young children that it's okay to talk to the school counselor if someone touches them in a way that makes them uncomfortable. There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.
Cythim
08-21-2011, 11:27 PM
I was part of a pilot program for a similar protocol. They teach very young children that it's okay to talk to the school counselor if someone touches them in a way that makes them uncomfortable. There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.
This is probably the best info I've heard on the matter. Teaching personal safety isn't the same as teaching the birds and the bees. That is to say, this is common sense stuff, not sex-ed.
big dog cowboy
08-21-2011, 11:56 PM
There's no condoms on bananas for kindergarteners.
Good. Now I can talk my wife in from the ledge. The thought of our kindergartner son participating in that made her :eek:
yimyammer
08-22-2011, 01:08 AM
31pQOiclaTo
CanadianCowboysFan
08-22-2011, 01:40 AM
I predict CCF will be on here saying how that is not so bad.
I own you so badly
That is just hyperbole added to hyperbole. "Keyes based his assertion on his extremist interpretation of sex ed legislation Obama supported in the state Senate." No one was proposing sex-ed for kindergarteners.
Not really. It's a broader topic of discussion for a reason, based on the proposal and all the word-play surrounding it doesn't change it from what it is: Sex-Ed for kindergarteners.
It's not explicit or condoms on banana's, but it's introducing the subject to kindergarteners. Why else would it have an 'opt-out' provision?
Link (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html)
DallasEast
08-22-2011, 06:58 AM
http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif (http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif)
http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif (http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/General%20Gifs/a8a6b20c.gif)
:laugh2:
Sorry.
bbgun
08-22-2011, 12:00 PM
more weirdness involving kids
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028645/Redvers-Stokes-12-Britains-youngest-DRAG-QUEEN-Naughty-Nora.html
Sam I Am
08-22-2011, 12:08 PM
more weirdness involving kids
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028645/Redvers-Stokes-12-Britains-youngest-DRAG-QUEEN-Naughty-Nora.html
How do you come across articles like that?
...nevermind. I don't wanna know!
Cythim
08-23-2011, 04:02 AM
Not really. It's a broader topic of discussion for a reason, based on the proposal and all the word-play surrounding it doesn't change it from what it is: Sex-Ed for kindergarteners.
It's not explicit or condoms on banana's, but it's introducing the subject to kindergarteners. Why else would it have an 'opt-out' provision?
Link (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html)
The opt-out provision is to satisfy those extremist parents who believe this is a form of Sex-Ed. Teaching a child to report abuse isn't the same as teaching a child the who/what/when/where/why of sex. It it teaching children how to cross a street, not drive a car.
The opt-out provision is to satisfy those extremist parents who believe this is a form of Sex-Ed. Teaching a child to report abuse isn't the same as teaching a child the who/what/when/where/why of sex. It it teaching children how to cross a street, not drive a car.
Shhhhh. DE is watching.
Cythim
08-23-2011, 10:54 AM
Shhhhh. DE is watching.
I didn't realize discussing child rearing was against forum policy. :confused:
I didn't realize discussing child rearing was against forum policy. :confused:
It's probably not, but that's not what was being discussed.
BraveHeartFan
08-23-2011, 11:26 AM
Just another prime canidate for why some people should be....nah never mind. I'm not even going to say anything and cause a stir with the people who would think I'm being too mean to this...whatever you choose to call her. She certainly isn't a woman or a mother though. Those facts are quite clear.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.