Mark Clayton = Peter Warrick ?

[StoneyBurk]

Is Clayton another Warrick ? I hope not. Please compare them. thanks

[Chuck 54]

In my limited knowledge of the guy, my opinion is that he's a nice addition to any team, a good #2 or #3 receiver...however, I don't think he'll be a #1 threat/impact receiver at his size, but then who'd have thought Hines Ward would do what he's done?

I'd prefer him at the top of round 2, but he probably won't last that long...I don't think he's that far above the other guys behind him to warrant our #20.

Matt Jones definitely intrigues me in round 2 if we gather extra picks by moving down.

[Fletch]

Is Clayton another Warrick ? I hope not. Please compare them. thanks

Hardly! Can Clayton be the next Torry Holt? Very well could.

[Natedawg44]

Clayton is much faster 4.4 compared to 4.6 and hopefully not as injury prone, but who knows when you are projecting to the pro game. I live here in Ohio and the Bengals faithful absolutely love him when he's actually on the field. Before missing last year with a fracture he was one of the best slot WR's in the NFL.

[Future]

Peter Warrick i think is a pretty good WR. But he's been stuck in Cincinatti trying to catch passes from Akili Smith for god's sake. Nobody can be a good reciever in that situation. But with Kitna and Palmer the last 2 years he has turned into a solid #2-3 guy. He's not the superstar he might have been with a different franchise, but a decent player nonetheless.