View Full Version : Slim pickings @ #14
TheSport78
01-19-2012, 10:39 AM
If you could choose from THREE PLAYERS who you truly believe will be available at #14, let's hear them, with #1 being your top choice and #3 being your last choice.
1. OG David DeCastro
2. CB Dre Kirkpatrick (I know, I know)
3. DE/LB Melvin Ingram
Kirkpatrick probably still goes top 15.
1) DeCastro
2) Jonathan Martin
3) Michael Brockers
Gaede
01-19-2012, 10:55 AM
1.Ingram
2.DeCastro
3.Kirkpatrick
MichaelWinicki
01-19-2012, 10:56 AM
1. Decastro
2. Kirkpatrick
Trade down.
GloryDaysRBack
01-19-2012, 11:12 AM
1. Decastro
2. Kirkpatrick
Trade down.
1) Coples
2) Decastro
3) Dre/trade down
VACowboy
01-19-2012, 11:34 AM
1. DeCastro
2. Martin
3. Still
tm1119
01-19-2012, 11:39 AM
Where exactly would Jonathan Martin play?
But I agree that its DeCastro, Imgram, or Dre. If all 3 are gone Im trading back and hoping a team covets a player available.
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 11:44 AM
I don't see slim picking at 14, right now none of us really know how the draft will play out and who will slide in the 1st rd and who will rise in the 1st rd. I'm sure many boards around the league will start to change over the course of the next 2 months as the combines and individual work outs start taking place.
DBOY3141
01-19-2012, 11:51 AM
1. Melvin Ingram
2. Nick Perry
3. DeCastro
We have to improve the defense, first and foremost.
supercowboy8
01-19-2012, 11:52 AM
#1 Kirkpatrick
#2 Ingram
#3 DeCastro
DeCastro might be the more for sure and safer pick but I value a OLB in a 3-4 or a great CB more than I do a OG.
I love DeCastro but OG is not worth the 14th pick. I can find a starting OG round 2 or 3. Chances of doing that with a CB or OLB is very very slim.
VACowboy
01-19-2012, 11:59 AM
Where exactly would Jonathan Martin play?
But I agree that its DeCastro, Imgram, or Dre. If all 3 are gone Im trading back and hoping a team covets a player available.
Right tackle with Free moving inside.
DBOY3141
01-19-2012, 12:17 PM
Right tackle with Free moving inside.
Now that would be a huge reach. Drafting a RT at #14 with no possibility of moving to LT. We all knew that Smith would move to LT.
No way I draft a RT only in the 1st round. Free will be fine at RT.
We need defense.
VACowboy
01-19-2012, 12:36 PM
Now that would be a huge reach. Drafting a RT at #14 with no possibility of moving to LT. We all knew that Smith would move to LT.
No way I draft a RT only in the 1st round. Free will be fine at RT.
We need defense.
It has nothing to do with Free not being ok at RT. It has to do with putting a talented OL in front of Romo. If Martin is there at #14 he is probably at the top of the board and we aren't just drafting a RT. We are drafting a very talented player who starts from day one and instantly makes two positions on the OL better.
I agree that we need defense, but in my opinion, any pass rusher or corner likely to be there at #14 would be a much greater reach than Martin.
Phrozen Phil
01-19-2012, 12:47 PM
It has nothing to do with Free not being ok at RT. It has to do with putting a talented OL in front of Romo. If Martin is there at #14 he is probably at the top of the board and we aren't just drafting a RT. We are drafting a very talented player who starts from day one and instantly makes two positions on the OL better.
I agree that we need defense, but in my opinion, any pass rusher or corner likely to be there at #14 would be a much greater reach than Martin.
I could not agree more. Marrtin has the ability to play more than one position and would not be a reach.
burmafrd
01-19-2012, 12:51 PM
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
JUST PLAIN STUPID
reddyuta
01-19-2012, 12:54 PM
1)ingram
2)decastro
3)kirkpatrick.
VACowboy
01-19-2012, 01:10 PM
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
JUST PLAIN STUPID
I'm just afraid he'll be long gone.
Flyo87
01-19-2012, 01:26 PM
I'm not sure the infatuation with Kirkpatrick. People talk about wanting ball hawks and guys who play the ball in the air and you want to draft this guy? He's too long legged and stiff to stick with guys like Nicks, Cruz, and all the other smaller WR's in our division. Unless we're playing a press man or cover 2 scheme I'm not looking at him. IMO his best attribute is his run support. Janoris Jenkins is a much better corner but he's got too many off the field issues and we've already take too many risks with these knucklehead guys. For me its Jared Crick all day. Complete player who would come in and improve our pass rush and collaspe the pocket. Got 9 sacks as a Jr without Suh there to take the attention away and is very good in the run game. He's going to be a nice 3-4DE for someone.
robert70x7
01-19-2012, 01:31 PM
I'll go Top 5. I'm glad it seems like some people are shying away from Kirkpatrick. His boneheaded mistake makes him untouchable from a Cowboys perspective (in my opinion).
David DeCastro
Jonathan Martin
Melvin Ingram
Courtney Upshaw
Luke KuechlyMy reasoning behind this is that cornerback seems to be an area of strength in the free agency market and I think it is a long shot that we drop the dough on Nicks/Grubbs. Outside of Kirkpatrick, there is no cornerback that is worth taking in that spot that will be availabe (Dennard would be a reach). Jenkins or Minnifield might be there in the 2nd round and I think that's when we can take advantage of the deep second tier corners in this draft class.
I think we have to get on offensive linemen in here that can come in and start right away, whether it be through free agency or the draft. DeCastro isn't a reach in my opinion because he played in a pro-style offense, as well as Martin, and is one of the highest graded interior lineman since Steve Hutchinson (who was also taken in the first round at pick 17).
The DE/OLB crop is somewhat weak this year and I don't know if Ingram/Upshaw would be significant upgrades over Spencer, which is why I think we will eventually bring Spencer back. Unless Coples fell to us, and there are questions about his motor and I don't know how he'd adjust to playing in a 3-4 as a DE, but I just don't see a lot of players that will be there at 14 who would come in right away and fill Spencer's void.
jnday
01-19-2012, 01:38 PM
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
JUST PLAIN STUPID
I know from your previous post that you would like an elite pass rusher in this draft , but you have enough common sense to know that the BPA would be the wise pick at 14 . That pick just happens to be DeCastro . Some of these posters would rather take a CB or OLB that was ranked much lower , just to address defense . If Romo gets hurt for the third straight year, the same posters will be the first to blame Jerry for drafting poorly .
DBOY3141
01-19-2012, 02:01 PM
It has nothing to do with Free not being ok at RT. It has to do with putting a talented OL in front of Romo. If Martin is there at #14 he is probably at the top of the board and we aren't just drafting a RT. We are drafting a very talented player who starts from day one and instantly makes two positions on the OL better.
I agree that we need defense, but in my opinion, any pass rusher or corner likely to be there at #14 would be a much greater reach than Martin.
But what if Free can't play guard? Or Martin can't play guard? Then you just drafted a guy to play a position that you already have a guy at.
I agree DeCastro is a beast, but offense was not our problem last year. Nagy and Arkin will get better, as will Smith. If DeCastro is rated #10 and say Ingram is rated 18. To me that's not a huge gap and you go with your biggest need.
unionjack8
01-19-2012, 02:04 PM
DeCastro
Coples
Brockers
then
Kirkpatrick
BrAinPaiNt
01-19-2012, 02:06 PM
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
Agreed...it is not like we are talking about a punter or kicker (wink wink raiders).
I think decastro is much better than most of the players that will be available at our position.
It fits the BPA AND the need mantra to a T.
It just makes sense.
With that said, I would not be shocked if we reached for a lesser player at another position like Barron at safety.:mad:
visionary
01-19-2012, 02:06 PM
got news for ya buddy
the pickins are never slim at pick #14 of a 7 round draft
just have to know who to pick
decastro
ingram
martin
trade down
and i am sure many others
Phrozen Phil
01-19-2012, 02:13 PM
Agreed...it is not like we are talking about a punter or kicker (wink wink raiders).
I think decastro is much better than most of the players that will be available at our position.
It fits the BPA AND the need mantra to a T.
It just makes sense.
With that said, I would not be shocked if we reached for a lesser player at another position like Barron at safety.:mad:
I agree. In my earlier post I agreed that Martin was not a reach. I am on board with taking DeCastro if he's available. At 14, he would be the BPA, provided he's still there.
I believe that we would do better if we could keep our offense on the field longer and sustain drives. Our D played too many downs in critical games, particularly late in the game. The best favour we could do for our defense is to keep them off the field as much as possible.
That being said, i'd like to see some new blood at DB. Round 2 could yield some real talent.
robert70x7
01-19-2012, 02:15 PM
But what if Free can't play guard? Or Martin can't play guard? Then you just drafted a guy to play a position that you already have a guy at.
I agree DeCastro is a beast, but offense was not our problem last year. Nagy and Arkin will get better, as will Smith. If DeCastro is rated #10 and say Ingram is rated 18. To me that's not a huge gap and you go with your biggest need.
Coach Houck addressed this on Norm yesterday. His objective was to start the five best offensive line players, regardless of position, and he believes that Free would have the capability of playing guard, he's a big man.
You are comparing apples and oranges between DeCastro and Ingram. You should be asking yourself if Ingram is better than Anthony Spencer.
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 02:17 PM
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
JUST PLAIN STUPID
I agree. While I'm not going to call anyone stupid I will say in many reports I have seen DeCastro is looked at as one of the 3 top players in this draft. If he is at 14 I take him and would not blink an eye. I don't think it is over valuing the position of Guard especially when teams are getting a big push up our middle and here is a guy that can put an end to that. Keeping Romo up and healthy is a pretty critical job.
My rule of thumb avg players are a dime a dozen, great players you grab them when you get the chance regardless of the position they play
JoeCorrado
01-19-2012, 02:28 PM
If you could choose from THREE PLAYERS who you truly believe will be available at #14, let's hear them, with #1 being your top choice and #3 being your last choice.
1. OG David DeCastro
2. CB Dre Kirkpatrick (I know, I know)
3. DE/LB Melvin Ingram
Of your three...
1. Ingram - projected pass rusher fills a real need.
2. DeCastro - projected anti-pass rusher, fills a need.
3. Kirkpatrick - projected idiot, creates problems we don't need. (Dez, x 1000)
robert70x7
01-19-2012, 02:36 PM
Ingram reminds me too much of Spencer. Both are 6'2-6'3 and weigh(ed) 260-270 prior to the draft (although combine numbers aren't availabe for Ingram).
Here's what they said about Spencer:
"Spencer is a big time threat off the edge. He constantly applies pressure from the outside and is always battling to make the play. He is a solid athlete, with good quickness. He gets a great burst off the line and used it to gain an initial step, but also has the strength to create space with his hands. He shows good pop at the point of attack and the quickness to break down and move towards the quarterback.
Even though he plays with enough power to play end in the NFL, he may lack the pure bulk to be an every down end. He also will need work playing off the line and in space.
Anthony Spencer is a very good pass rusher who can provide consistent pressure off the edge. He gets good leverage and can hold his own in run blocking. If he can add some weight to sustain more of a pounding in the NFL, he may develop into a starting caliber DE. His best fit may be as a 3-4 OLB with his pass rushing ability. Spencer has really risen on many boards, and could land in the first round on draft day."
Here's what people are saying about Ingram:
"Began career at LB and has been in a rotation at DE the last two seasons (2009-'10). Will be a fulltime starter at DE in 2011. Has the potential to play DE in a four-man front, as well as OLB in some 3-4 schemes (Ravens, Steelers, etc.). Has some experience rushing the QB from inside, as well. "
"Has more game experience on passing downs but flashes upside in this area. Uses his leverage effectively and is a bit stronger at the point of attack than expected. Flashes the ability to anchor versus the double team. Also does a nice job of keeping his feet moving versus the zone run. Shows above average discipline and works hard to maintain outside contain. Has very good range versus the run. Can really turn on the jets when pursuing from the backside. He can improve his tackling skills. Awareness is adequate but can still improve. Flashes some power at the point of attack but leaves his feet and will fall off too many attempted tackles."
I haven't found anything that says that he would be adequate in coverage and the comparisons between him and Spencer are eerie, with the slight edge given to Ingram for playing against tougher competition in the SEC.
jblaze2004
01-19-2012, 02:48 PM
Coach Houck addressed this on Norm yesterday. His objective was to start the five best offensive line players, regardless of position, and he believes that Free would have the capability of playing guard, he's a big man.
You are comparing apples and oranges between DeCastro and Ingram. You should be asking yourself if Ingram is better than Anthony Spencer.
the problem with this is are you willing to pay spencer over 7mil a season (the contract calvin pace got from the jets last year?) IDK if spencer is going to give us a discount or not but spencer might be looking for that type of deal if so would you pony up the 7mil or pass. I would pass. Sometimes you have to draft a guy to replace a guy that bolted in FA to save money on upgrading another position. If we draft someone like ingram or upshaw....(i want nic perry right now) that doesn't mean he has to be better than spencer. He might not be better in coverage off the bat but he might be better at getting to the qb. Spencer problem is his motor and maybe work ethic. Most of the time it looks like he is just going through the motions. You have a hall of famer playing across from you. You should be practicing and following ware steps and picking his brain to get better at passrushing but no spencer is content with never having more than 6 sacks in a season. Heck hatcher had 4.5 sacks in 13 games this year as a rotation player.
Put it this way spencer has to step up. I rather throw victor butler out there than overpay for spencer like we did marion barber and even t-new.
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 02:54 PM
the problem with this is are you willing to pay spencer over 7mil a season (the contract calvin pace got from the jets last year?) IDK if spencer is going to give us a discount or not but spencer might be looking for that type of deal if so would you pony up the 7mil or pass. I would pass. Sometimes you have to draft a guy to replace a guy that bolted in FA to save money on upgrading another position. If we draft someone like ingram or upshaw....(i want nic perry right now) that doesn't mean he has to be better than spencer. He might not be better in coverage off the bat but he might be better at getting to the qb. Spencer problem is his motor and maybe work ethic. Most of the time it looks like he is just going through the motions. You have a hall of famer playing across from you. You should be practicing and following ware steps and picking his brain to get better at passrushing but no spencer is content with never having more than 6 sacks in a season. Heck hatcher had 4.5 sacks in 13 games this year as a rotation player.
Put it this way spencer has to step up. I rather throw victor butler out there than overpay for spencer like we did marion barber and even t-new.
That is the issue I have with Spencer as well. To me it will come down to the money he is looking for. I would rather go with a rookie like an Ingram before I would over pay for Spencer.
burmafrd
01-19-2012, 03:01 PM
I know from your previous post that you would like an elite pass rusher in this draft , but you have enough common sense to know that the BPA would be the wise pick at 14 . That pick just happens to be DeCastro . Some of these posters would rather take a CB or OLB that was ranked much lower , just to address defense . If Romo gets hurt for the third straight year, the same posters will be the first to blame Jerry for drafting poorly .
when you are the one that makes the final decision as he keeps saying he is, you have to take the heat. But it is true that there will be some that whine and complain no matter what
jnday
01-19-2012, 03:09 PM
the problem with this is are you willing to pay spencer over 7mil a season (the contract calvin pace got from the jets last year?) IDK if spencer is going to give us a discount or not but spencer might be looking for that type of deal if so would you pony up the 7mil or pass. I would pass. Sometimes you have to draft a guy to replace a guy that bolted in FA to save money on upgrading another position. If we draft someone like ingram or upshaw....(i want nic perry right now) that doesn't mean he has to be better than spencer. He might not be better in coverage off the bat but he might be better at getting to the qb. Spencer problem is his motor and maybe work ethic. Most of the time it looks like he is just going through the motions. You have a hall of famer playing across from you. You should be practicing and following ware steps and picking his brain to get better at passrushing but no spencer is content with never having more than 6 sacks in a season. Heck hatcher had 4.5 sacks in 13 games this year as a rotation player.
Put it this way spencer has to step up. I rather throw victor butler out there than overpay for spencer like we did marion barber and even t-new.
I would rather draft V. CURRY IN THE SECOND to rotate with Butler and let Spencer go .
robert70x7
01-19-2012, 03:47 PM
That is the issue I have with Spencer as well. To me it will come down to the money he is looking for. I would rather go with a rookie like an Ingram before I would over pay for Spencer.
Make it a situation like the one with Spears where you let him try to find a deal, and if he can't, then sign him for cheaper. Odds are he will find a deal though and that's when Butler can step in as well as a guy we pick up in the 3-5th rounds.
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 03:51 PM
Make it a situation like the one with Spears where you let him try to find a deal, and if he can't, then sign him for cheaper. Odds are he will find a deal though and that's when Butler can step in as well as a guy we pick up in the 3-5th rounds.
I agree. I think Dallas will likely let Spencer test the market. As for keeping him at the right price I don't mind but we still need to find someone along the font D line to get pressure on the QB. Spencer is not doing it.
robert70x7
01-19-2012, 03:59 PM
I agree. I think Dallas will likely let Spencer test the market. As for keeping him at the right price I don't mind but we still need to find someone along the font D line to get pressure on the QB. Spencer is not doing it.
We quickly forget that Dallas was tied for 7th in the league in sacks, and isn't it Ware's sole job to get to the quarterback? I'm not saying that Spencer doesn't need to get better, but it's not like Rob Ryan is moving him around in schemes to try and get to the quarterback. He often plays second fiddle to Ware and is asked to do more in coverage if I'm not mistaken. It would be interesting to see the % of blitz plays for Spencer over the season.
While our problems do include Spencer, there are other ones as well and I don't think drafting someone to play opposite our primary pass rusher and ask him to get 10 sacks a season is realistic.
ragingbull2488
01-19-2012, 04:04 PM
1. Nick Perry
2. Whitney Mercilus
3. Melvin Ingram
MichaelWinicki
01-19-2012, 04:06 PM
I would rather draft V. CURRY IN THE SECOND to rotate with Butler and let Spencer go .
Agreed.
the_h0wey
01-19-2012, 04:23 PM
I don't see slim picking at 14, right now none of us really know how the draft will play out and who will slide in the 1st rd and who will rise in the 1st rd. I'm sure many boards around the league will start to change over the course of the next 2 months as the combines and individual work outs start taking place.
Who is slim? Is he someone assisting Jerry in the draft process? This is the first I've heard of this fellow.
TheSport78
01-19-2012, 04:30 PM
Who is slim? Is he someone assisting Jerry in the draft process? This is the first I've heard of this fellow.
Slim Shady. Duh.
texbumthelife
01-19-2012, 04:34 PM
1. Ingram
2. Kirkpatrick
3. Burfict (in a trade down)
the_h0wey
01-19-2012, 04:35 PM
Slim Shady. Duh.
That makes sense. I remember reading that he was a Cowboys fan. I think it's great he's going to help out Jerry with the draft!
TheSport78
01-19-2012, 04:36 PM
That makes sense. I remember reading that he was a Cowboys fan. I think it's great he's going to help out Jerry with the draft!
:laugh2: can't be any worse!
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 04:42 PM
Who is slim? Is he someone assisting Jerry in the draft process? This is the first I've heard of this fellow.
He played in the movie Dr Stranglove, he is currently fighting a condition called death but he may be good to go before the start of the season. :lmao:
tm1119
01-19-2012, 04:49 PM
Right tackle with Free moving inside.
And how do we know that Free can play guard? Does he have the bulk or strength to handle some of the DT's in the league? I would say its far from a sure thing that he could move inside with no problems.
the_h0wey
01-19-2012, 04:53 PM
He played in the movie Dr Stranglove, he is currently fighting a condition called death but he may be good to go before the start of the season. :lmao:
He rode the bomb right?
Doomsday101
01-19-2012, 04:55 PM
He rode the bomb right?
Yeah big bomb guy. But it is the aggressiveness your looking for. :laugh2:
the_h0wey
01-19-2012, 05:05 PM
Yeah big bomb guy. But it is the aggressiveness your looking for. :laugh2:
Great to know Jerry will have help...:)
the_h0wey
01-19-2012, 05:06 PM
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXbwAs2Vrx1B6Y2KHIkx5plvtsOEaq-SIHawXfTpO9NVacCSFC
Here is Slim enjoying the offseason
burmafrd
01-19-2012, 06:09 PM
one of the all time classic movie scenes
JonJon
01-19-2012, 06:13 PM
I'm not sure the infatuation with Kirkpatrick. People talk about wanting ball hawks and guys who play the ball in the air and you want to draft this guy? He's too long legged and stiff to stick with guys like Nicks, Cruz, and all the other smaller WR's in our division. Unless we're playing a press man or cover 2 scheme I'm not looking at him. IMO his best attribute is his run support. Janoris Jenkins is a much better corner but he's got too many off the field issues and we've already take too many risks with these knucklehead guys. For me its Jared Crick all day. Complete player who would come in and improve our pass rush and collaspe the pocket. Got 9 sacks as a Jr without Suh there to take the attention away and is very good in the run game. He's going to be a nice 3-4DE for someone.
I have to roll my eyes at some here.
After all the years of whining about not picking the BPA - so many are unwilling to pick the absolute best player at one position. And that will be Decastro.
And it is a position of serious need as well.
No one else that will be available at #14 will be considered the absolute BEST in the league at that position while at the same time being considered one of the BEST at that position that has come around in YEARS.
Luck is that way; no one here would blink at taking him if we had the chance.
But because DeCastro is a guard some turn their noses up at him?
JUST PLAIN STUPID
I approve of these two post.
jblaze2004
01-19-2012, 06:35 PM
And how do we know that Free can play guard? Does he have the bulk or strength to handle some of the DT's in the league? I would say its far from a sure thing that he could move inside with no problems.
I think free could do it but will struggle. Free struggles more vs power.
The30YardSlant
01-19-2012, 06:43 PM
1) Coples
2) Decastro
3) Dre/trade down
Coples is going to dominate at the combine, no way he'll fall to #14.
burmafrd
01-19-2012, 07:02 PM
Coples is going to dominate at the combine, no way he'll fall to #14.
lots of stories about him making "business decisions" this year. NYET
The30YardSlant
01-19-2012, 07:34 PM
lots of stories about him making "business decisions" this year. NYET
That's North Carolina's problem
burmafrd
01-20-2012, 08:13 AM
That's North Carolina's problem
well if one is stupid enough to draft a part time guy you deserve what you get
casmith07
01-20-2012, 08:31 AM
DeCastro.
We need to continue the trend of building inside out. Success comes from who dominates the line of scrimmage. The Saints offensive line has shown that -- San Francisco's defensive line showed us they were a little better.
newlander
01-20-2012, 08:53 AM
DeCastro.
We need to continue the trend of building inside out. Success comes from who dominates the line of scrimmage. The Saints offensive line has shown that -- San Francisco's defensive line showed us they were a little better.
....and although it hurts in the worst way to admit: the gspots do the same thing. But again Casmith, we see it, but the man in charge doesn't. It's why Dez was such a BAD pick: he can play, he's talented but he plays a position that's important but not critical to building a team as you put it: "from the inside out."
Right now we have so many holes on the Oline, Dline, LB and CB it's critical we draft well. Hitting on one guy per draft or even two....doesn't cut it when you have this many holes. Same old same old with Jerrah really.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.