PDA

View Full Version : Brandt: Art of the draft deal


trickblue
04-06-2005, 03:49 PM
Art of the draft deal
By Gil Brandt
NFL.com Senior Analyst

(April 5, 2005) -- What goes around in the NFL does not always come around. That axiom, however, is true in the case of quarterbacks Rich Gannon and Brad Johnson.

In 1987, the Patriots and Raiders made a multi-pick trade on draft day in which New England moved down to get the Raiders' fourth-round pick. The Patriots used that pick to draft Gannon ... who eventually made his way to the Raiders and led them to Super Bowl XXXVII. (The Raiders, by the way, used the third-round pick they got from New England that year to select Penn State running back Steve Smith.)

In 1992, Tampa Bay thought nothing of sending Minnesota its ninth-round draft choice in exchange for veteran linebacker Jimmy Williams. The Vikings used that late-round pick to select Johnson, who would later find his way to Tampa Bay in time to help them win Super Bowl XXXVII. Now Johnson is back in Minnesota.

These quirks of draft history prove one thing: Teams never know exactly what they're getting into when they trade draft picks. Still, that doesn't stop them from trying to make it as exact a science as possible.

The art of draft-day trades has evolved over the years. At the 1961 draft, it was as simple as 49ers coach Red Hickey walking over to the Colts table at the hotel ballroom where the draft was being held. "I'll give you one of our tight ends, Monty Stickles or Dee Mackey, in exchange for your first-round pick," Hickey proposed to Colts head coach Weeb Ewbank. In a matter of 10 minutes, Ewbank decided he'd take Mackey, and the deal was done. Hickey calmly walked back to the 49ers' table and then used the acquired draft pick to select quarterback Billy Kilmer.

That's the way most draft-day deals were done back then. Eventually, teams began to map their strategies well in advance. In 1977, for instance, when I was with the Dallas Cowboys, we and the Seattle Seahawks had worked out a deal for the second overall pick as early as 10 days before the draft. But it was contingent on the player we wanted -- Tony Dorsett -- being available. We were pretty sure the Buccaneers were going to take running back Ricky Bell with the first pick, but the trade was not consummated until Tampa Bay made its pick official.

Most experts predict a lot of trading to take place in the first round, but you can be sure that much of the trade talk has already transpired. And to make things more of a science, teams have their own systems of "ranking" every spot in the draft. That way they can mix and match picks like a puzzle.

For instance, let's examine the trade last year between the Giants and Chargers. The Giants wanted Eli Manning, whom the Chargers took with the No. 1 overall selection. They got him, but they gave up their pick (fourth overall, who was Philip Rivers), a third-round pick in 2004, and first- and fifth-round picks this year.

Was it worth it? For now it's too soon to really tell, but one way we can figure out who got the edge of this trade is to consult the following chart, which is one NFL team's value chart, obtained by NFL.com.

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7
1 3,000 33 580 65 265 97 112 129 43 161 27 193 14.2
2 2,600 34 560 66 260 98 108 130 42 162 26.6 194 13.8
3 2,200 35 550 67 255 99 104 131 41 163 26.2 195 13.4
4 1,800 36 540 68 250 100 100 132 40 164 25.8 196 13
5 1,700 37 530 69 245 101 96 133 39.5 165 25.4 197 12.6
6 1,600 38 520 70 240 102 92 134 39 166 25 198 12.2
7 1,500 39 510 71 235 103 88 135 38.5 167 24.6 199 11.8
8 1,400 40 500 72 230 104 86 136 38 168 24.2 200 11.4
9 1,350 41 490 73 225 105 84 137 37.5 169 23.8 201 11
10 1,300 42 480 74 220 106 82 138 37 170 23.4 202 10.6
11 1,250 43 470 75 215 107 80 139 36.5 171 23 203 10.2
12 1,200 44 460 76 210 108 78 140 36 172 22.6 204 9.8
13 1,150 45 450 77 205 109 76 141 35.5 173 22.2 205 9.4
14 1,100 46 440 78 200 110 74 142 35 174 21.8 206 9
15 1,050 47 430 79 195 111 72 143 34.5 175 21.4 207 8.6
16 1,000 48 420 80 190 112 70 144 34 176 21 208 8.2
17 950 49 410 81 185 113 68 145 33.5 177 20.6 209 7.8
18 900 50 400 82 180 114 66 146 33 178 20.2 210 7.4
19 875 51 390 83 175 115 64 147 32.6 179 19.8 211 7
20 850 52 380 84 170 116 62 148 32.2 180 19.4 212 6.6
21 800 53 370 85 165 117 60 149 31.8 181 19 213 6.2
22 780 54 360 86 160 118 58 150 31.4 182 18.6 214 5.8
23 760 55 350 87 155 119 56 151 31 183 18.2 215 5.4
24 740 56 340 88 150 120 54 152 30.6 184 17.8 216 5
25 720 57 330 89 145 121 52 153 30.2 185 17.4 217 4.6
26 700 58 320 90 140 122 50 154 29.8 186 17 218 4.2
27 680 59 310 91 136 123 49 155 29.4 187 16.6 219 3.8
28 660 60 300 92 132 124 48 156 29 188 16.2 220 3.4
29 640 61 292 93 128 125 47 157 28.6 189 15.8 221 3
30 620 62 284 94 124 126 46 158 28.2 190 15.4 222 2.6
31 600 63 276 95 120 127 45 159 27.8 191 15 223 2.3
32 590 64 270 96 116 128 44 160 27.4 192 14.6 224 2

According to this chart, the first overall pick is worth 3,000 points and the fourth overall pick is worth 1,800. The third-round pick the Chargers got, which they used on Nate Kaeding, was the No. 65 pick overall, worth 265 points. The first rounder they got from the Giants this year is No. 12 overall, worth 1,200 points, and the fifth rounder was 144th overall (San Diego traded it to Tampa Bay). That was worth 34 points.

Do the math, and for the 3,000 point pick the Giants got, they gave up picks totaling 3,299 points. That's not bad considering they unloaded two first-round picks plus two more picks for Manning's services.

Here's another example: In 2003, the Bears dealt the No. 4 overall pick to the Jets for their pair of first-round picks, Nos. 14 and 22. According to the chart, the Bears gave up a pick worth 1,800 for picks totaling 1,880. That's about as close to even as can be. The Bears used the picks on DE Michael Haynes and QB Rex Grossman while the Jets took DT Dewayne Robertson.

Of course, how these trades work out is another matter. And it often takes years to evaluate that sort of thing. But it's amazing to see how the process has evolved over the years. And you can be sure that when trades are consummated this weekend, more went into it than the 15 minutes between picks.

Juke99
04-06-2005, 03:54 PM
Hey...what's the deal....where's the chart?

:confused:

Reality
04-06-2005, 03:57 PM
Here is the draft points chart in a better format:


Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7
1 3,000 33 580 65 265 97 112 129 43 161 27 193 14.2
2 2,600 34 560 66 260 98 108 130 42 162 26.6 194 13.8
3 2,200 35 550 67 255 99 104 131 41 163 26.2 195 13.4
4 1,800 36 540 68 250 100 100 132 40 164 25.8 196 13
5 1,700 37 530 69 245 101 96 133 39.5 165 25.4 197 12.6
6 1,600 38 520 70 240 102 92 134 39 166 25 198 12.2
7 1,500 39 510 71 235 103 88 135 38.5 167 24.6 199 11.8
8 1,400 40 500 72 230 104 86 136 38 168 24.2 200 11.4
9 1,350 41 490 73 225 105 84 137 37.5 169 23.8 201 11
10 1,300 42 480 74 220 106 82 138 37 170 23.4 202 10.6
11 1,250 43 470 75 215 107 80 139 36.5 171 23 203 10.2
12 1,200 44 460 76 210 108 78 140 36 172 22.6 204 9.8
13 1,150 45 450 77 205 109 76 141 35.5 173 22.2 205 9.4
14 1,100 46 440 78 200 110 74 142 35 174 21.8 206 9
15 1,050 47 430 79 195 111 72 143 34.5 175 21.4 207 8.6
16 1,000 48 420 80 190 112 70 144 34 176 21 208 8.2
17 950 49 410 81 185 113 68 145 33.5 177 20.6 209 7.8
18 900 50 400 82 180 114 66 146 33 178 20.2 210 7.4
19 875 51 390 83 175 115 64 147 32.6 179 19.8 211 7
20 850 52 380 84 170 116 62 148 32.2 180 19.4 212 6.6
21 800 53 370 85 165 117 60 149 31.8 181 19 213 6.2
22 780 54 360 86 160 118 58 150 31.4 182 18.6 214 5.8
23 760 55 350 87 155 119 56 151 31 183 18.2 215 5.4
24 740 56 340 88 150 120 54 152 30.6 184 17.8 216 5
25 720 57 330 89 145 121 52 153 30.2 185 17.4 217 4.6
26 700 58 320 90 140 122 50 154 29.8 186 17 218 4.2
27 680 59 310 91 136 123 49 155 29.4 187 16.6 219 3.8
28 660 60 300 92 132 124 48 156 29 188 16.2 220 3.4
29 640 61 292 93 128 125 47 157 28.6 189 15.8 221 3
30 620 62 284 94 124 126 46 158 28.2 190 15.4 222 2.6
31 600 63 276 95 120 127 45 159 27.8 191 15 223 2.3
32 590 64 270 96 116 128 44 160 27.4 192 14.6 224 2

Reality
04-06-2005, 04:00 PM
I broke out the chart and made a sticky thread for it :)

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:01 PM
I broke out the chart and made a sticky thread for it :)


Thanks...at least someone's got their act together around here... :rolleyes: ;)

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:01 PM
Hey...what's the deal....where's the chart?

:confused:

Watchoo talkin' 'bout Willis... http://img99.exs.cx/img99/9541/arnoldwillis8fn.jpg

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:09 PM
Watchoo talkin' 'bout Willis... http://img99.exs.cx/img99/9541/arnoldwillis8fn.jpg


Hey...don't try the Gaslight routine on me...I'm WAY too smart for that.

BTW, have you seen my little red stapler?

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:10 PM
Hey...don't try the Gaslight routine on me...I'm WAY too smart for that.

BTW, have you seen my little red stapler?

I saw Winky with it earlier... I had to scold him for running with scissors... AGAIN...

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:12 PM
I saw Winky with it earlier... I had to scold him for running with scissors... AGAIN...


He always does that when Reality isn't around...that and eating the paste we use for our dioramas... :rolleyes:

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:19 PM
He always does that when Reality isn't around...that and eating the paste we use for our dioramas... :rolleyes:

Remember that episode when The Simpsons spoofed the Zone mods?

I still crack up at their rendition of winky...

http://www.antennaballsetc.com/sat38_sm.jpg

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:26 PM
Remember that episode when The Simpsons spoofed the Zone mods?

I still crack up at their rendition of winky...

http://www.antennaballsetc.com/sat38_sm.jpg


:p:


Maybe this will help...

http://img136.exs.cx/img136/8657/untitled101copy6pf.jpg

But then there's still that, forgetting to zip his fly thing that we have to contend with.

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:33 PM
But then there's still that, forgetting to zip his fly thing that we have to contend with.

Oh there's no forgetting there... it's on purpose... ask brainpaint about "The Incident" that happened at the Mod Twister Party... :eek:

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:40 PM
Oh there's no forgetting there... it's on purpose... ask brainpaint about "The Incident" that happened at the Mod Twister Party... :eek:


I heard about that...originally, no one could understand why Winky brought magnifying glasses for all the mods who were there...

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:43 PM
I heard about that...originally, no one could understand why Winky brought magnifying glasses for all the mods who were there...

Well... because of his antics Reality has banned further Twister Parties...

We know know that absinthe and twister don't mix for some... AT ALL...

Are plans still on for the Slip -N- Slide Picnic?

Juke99
04-06-2005, 04:51 PM
Well... because of his antics Reality has banned further Twister Parties...

We know know that absinthe and twister don't mix for some... AT ALL...

Are plans still on for the Slip -N- Slide Picnic?


Well, from what I understand, Winicki has been pushing for a curling tournament... and Reality is a bit out of sorts over all the complaints from Hos regarding our playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey last year... and our using him as the donkey.

Either way, we're only getting Ovaltine this year...

trickblue
04-06-2005, 04:56 PM
Well, from what I understand, Winicki has been pushing for a curling tournament... and Reality is a bit out of sorts over all the complaints from Hos regarding our playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey last year... and our using him as the donkey.

Either way, we're only getting Ovaltine this year...

I did like Hostile's idea of the "Dress as your Favorite Cowboy" party we had that time... Although brainpaint dressing as Lance Rentzel and Winky coming as the Cowboy from the Village People kinda ruined it for me...

Juke99
04-06-2005, 05:06 PM
I did like Hostile's idea of the "Dress as your Favorite Cowboy" party we had that time... Although brainpaint dressing as Lance Rentzel and Winky coming as the Cowboy from the Village People kinda ruined it for me...


Is this thread sufficiently off topic for one of us to move it yet? :)

With regard to BP, ya gotta admit it was pretty funny the way his zipper kept getting caught on his rain coat...

I didn't mind Winky's Cowboy outfit, although I thought the pocket protector took away from it...

trickblue
04-06-2005, 05:07 PM
Is this thread sufficiently off topic for one of us to move it yet? :)

With regard to BP, ya gotta admit it was pretty funny the way his zipper kept getting caught on his rain coat...

I didn't mind Winky's Cowboy outfit, although I thought the pocket protector took away from it...

Yes... nothing like hijacking your own thread... :D

Move it Juke... ;)

Juke99
04-06-2005, 05:08 PM
Yes... nothing like hijacking your own thread... :D

Move it Juke... ;)


OK...will do...

Which one do ya wanna ruin next????

Reality
04-06-2005, 05:08 PM
Well... because of his antics Reality has banned further Twister Parties...

We know know that absinthe and twister don't mix for some... AT ALL...

Are plans still on for the Slip -N- Slide Picnic?

Well, no offense to Winicki but I absolutely refuse to play a twister game that uses colors like lilac, turqoise and fuschia.

Juke99
04-06-2005, 05:11 PM
Well, no offense to Winicki but I absolutely refuse to play a twister game that uses colors like lilac, turqoise and fuschia.


Yeah but he said it matched his underwear...

trickblue
04-06-2005, 05:13 PM
OK...will do...

Which one do ya wanna ruin next????

I've had my eye on a few of Pops' threads...

He deserves it... cause in our two mock drafts... I got the iggles and redskins... :banghead:

I'm currently working a deal to trade McNabb for a 7th...

trickblue
04-06-2005, 05:14 PM
Yeah but he said it matched his underwear...

I had never heard of anyone dying tighty-whities up until that point... :eek:

Juke99
04-06-2005, 05:16 PM
I had never heard of anyone dying tighty-whities up until that point... :eek:


*L*

Yeah but that didn't bother me as much as hearing about that little velcro trap door thingie he had on the back of them....what was THAT all about? :eek:

Reality
04-06-2005, 05:21 PM
I had never heard of anyone dying tighty-whities up until that point... :eek:

What concerned me was how eager he was to show them to everyone.

trickblue
04-06-2005, 05:22 PM
*L*

Yeah but that didn't bother me as much as hearing about that little velcro trap door thingie he had on the back of them....what was THAT all about? :eek:

That's when I went outside for some air...

I got tired of hearing "Relax" by Frankie Goes to Hollywood over and over... and that dance... he looked like Elaine from "Seinfeld" or was that the wig...