WoodysGirl
03-19-2012, 03:27 PM
Mar 19
2:52
PM ET
Email (http://sendtofriend.espn.go.com/sendtofriend/SendToFriend?URL=http%3A%2f%2fespn.go.com%2fblog%2 fnfceast%2fpost%2f_%2fid%2f37237%2fno%2dyour%2dtea m%2dshould%2dnot%2dtrade%2dfor%2dtebow&title=No,+your+team+should+not+trade+for%26nbsp%3B Tebow)
Print (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/print?id=37237)
Comments (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow#comment)404 (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow#comment)
By Dan Graziano
I have to give you guys credit. After the news broke that Eli Manning (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/5526/eli-manning)'s brother had found a new job, along with the news that the Broncos would now try to trade Tim Tebow (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/13200/tim-tebow), I didn't hear from very many of you. Normally, when a player arrives on the market, I get Twitter queries within five minutes from fans of all four of our teams, asking whether their team should or will pursue said player. But today, not much. The one Redskins one I got was later explained as sarcastic by the person who asked it (silly me for not figuring that out immediately), and I've had a couple of people ask whether it'd be worth it for the Eagles to bring him in as a long-term project behind Michael Vick (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/2549/michael-vick). But that's it.
Anyway, the answer is no. Whichever team is your favorite in the NFC East should not be trying to trade for Tebow. To wit:
The Cowboys just signed a three-year deal with Kyle Orton (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/8520/kyle-orton) to be their backup, and it wouldn't surprise me if it included language guaranteeing that Orton never had to hear Tebow's name again as long as he lives.
Read more: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow
2:52
PM ET
Email (http://sendtofriend.espn.go.com/sendtofriend/SendToFriend?URL=http%3A%2f%2fespn.go.com%2fblog%2 fnfceast%2fpost%2f_%2fid%2f37237%2fno%2dyour%2dtea m%2dshould%2dnot%2dtrade%2dfor%2dtebow&title=No,+your+team+should+not+trade+for%26nbsp%3B Tebow)
Print (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/print?id=37237)
Comments (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow#comment)404 (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow#comment)
By Dan Graziano
I have to give you guys credit. After the news broke that Eli Manning (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/5526/eli-manning)'s brother had found a new job, along with the news that the Broncos would now try to trade Tim Tebow (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/13200/tim-tebow), I didn't hear from very many of you. Normally, when a player arrives on the market, I get Twitter queries within five minutes from fans of all four of our teams, asking whether their team should or will pursue said player. But today, not much. The one Redskins one I got was later explained as sarcastic by the person who asked it (silly me for not figuring that out immediately), and I've had a couple of people ask whether it'd be worth it for the Eagles to bring him in as a long-term project behind Michael Vick (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/2549/michael-vick). But that's it.
Anyway, the answer is no. Whichever team is your favorite in the NFC East should not be trying to trade for Tebow. To wit:
The Cowboys just signed a three-year deal with Kyle Orton (http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/_/id/8520/kyle-orton) to be their backup, and it wouldn't surprise me if it included language guaranteeing that Orton never had to hear Tebow's name again as long as he lives.
Read more: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/37237/no-your-team-should-not-trade-for-tebow