Brockers over DeCastro?

[sureletsrace]

If they are both there and the Cowboys take Brockers, I will officially freak out.

That is all.

[CowboysLaw87]

Get ready to freak out. Can't see us taking DeCastro over Brockers.

[GloryDaysRBack]

I wouldn't be surprised, nor would I be upset

[da_boyz_mk]

i like brockers upside but i agree decastro has to be the pick. No doubt about it

[Corleone]

I would be pretty mad if that happened because I really want DeCastro, I don't think it will but I'll get over it because I do like Brockers.

[Beast_from_East]

If they are both there and the Cowboys take Brockers, I will officially freak out.

That is all.


I want either DeCastro, Cox, or Barron.


If one of these guys is still on the board at 14 and we take somebody else, I am going to go postal!!!!!

:laugh2:

[rwalters31]

If they are both there and the Cowboys take Brockers, I will officially freak out.

That is all.

Let's see there is DeCastro, there could be DeCastro, don't you thing DeCastro, how about DeCastro, what if DeCastro is at 14th, save a Romo get a DeCastro, last time at Super Bowl we had a dominate OL (DeCastro), . . . . . . . . . .

Sorry, my thoughts drifting about a wining season.:rolleyes:

Running behind a OL, time to throw down field for long passes, touch downs in the Red Zone 90% of the time, 13-3 season, NFC Champs, Super Bowl, . . . . . .

[Hostile]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.

[ThreeandOut]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.

I think option 1 is one of your three players above. Option 2 is trade down. Option 3 is Brockers if you can't trade down.

[This is Our Year]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.


Well Im fine with that Hos, because those are the 3 I like. My order is the oppisite of the Cowboys, but will have no problem with any of the 3 if it happens hopefully

[SilverStarCowboy]

Brockers over DeCastro for me.


1) Coples
2) Cox
3) Brockers
4) Poe
5) Ingram
6) DeCastro
7) Gilmour
8) Barron

[theogt]

I would be extremely surprised if this happens. Brockers is a 2nd/3rd round talent.

[Canadian BoyzFan]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.

100% with your ranking, although I think we take Coples if all 3 are gone :bang2: .

It's not hard to see Cox gone at 9, Barron at 10 and DeCastro at 12 or 13.

[rwalters31]

I would be extremely surprised if this happens. Brockers is a 2nd/3rd round talent.


Amen!!! :bow:

[MichaelWinicki]

If the Cowboys chose Brockers or Coples over DeCastro... I'd snap.

I've not found anything about DeCastro being "immature" or not giving it his all on every play.

The other two?

No thanks.

[theogt]

If the Cowboys chose Brockers or Coples over DeCastro... I'd snap.

I've not found anything about DeCastro being "immature" or not giving it his all on every play.

The other two?

No thanks.Good, cause we need a center.

[da_boyz_mk]

Good, cause we need a center.

:laugh2:

[MichaelWinicki]

Good, cause we need a center.

If you want to see the ball not even reach Romo in the "shotgun", then I'm your man. :)

[sureletsrace]

If you want to see the ball not even reach Romo in the "shotgun", then I'm your man. :)

:laugh2: Couldn't be much worse than who's out there starting already!

[ghst187]

If they are both there and the Cowboys take Brockers, I will officially freak out.

That is all.

I agree. If Barron and Cox are gone and no one will make us a great deal to trade down we HAVE to take DeCastro. If our roster didn't abound with gigantic holes then maybe you gamble on someone's possible upside over their production and lack of effort. Given our situation, you take the probowler at a position of dire need even if its too high to draft a guard and you move on to try to fill other needs. If we weren't so terrible along the interior OL, then don't reach. But you take a likely probowler at a position of need whenever its available, and especially when any other picks at 14 have big question marks.

If both Barron and DeCastro are available...that's the big conundrum IMO. Barron might be really good and drafting a OG at 14 is a stretch, but its pretty certain DeCastro will be great and both are need positions. What do you do?
shoot the hostage?

[DWAREZ]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.

Yep, that is my perspective, I think if these guy are gone they will look to add picks and find a player later in round one.

If they trade down, I would love to take Mercilus for that pass rush ability, we shall see, should be fun!

[Wulfman]

I can't really say why, but I get the feeling they are souring on Brockers.

1. Fletcher Cox
2. Mark Barron
3. David DeCastro

If all three are gone I truly expect a trade down.

:hammer:

[Beast_from_East]

Brockers over DeCastro for me.


1) Coples
2) Cox
3) Brockers
4) Poe
5) Ingram
6) DeCastro
7) Gilmour
8) Barron


So you would draft a run stuffing DE over a probowl G?

You realize we were 6th against the run last year, so its not like we are getting gutted every game.


Wow, seriously dude?