PDA

View Full Version : Galloway, keep it simple


dbair1967
04-21-2005, 05:59 AM
Cowboys just need to keep it simple

By Randy Galloway

Star-Telegram Staff Writer


Saturday can not get here fast enough.

Upon arrival, Saturday will not move fast enough.

Nothing drags on like an NFL Draft.

Figure on about nine hours Saturday, and about the same on Sunday.

Hollywood marriages don't last this long.

Neither have most Cowboys' draftees over the past 10 years.

The NFL Draft is the most overblown media event in sports.

But in my business, the people demand to know. That's why the draft continues to be overblown. There's a demand for media guesswork.

Therefore, it's imperative I offer a strong opinion, first, on what the Cowboys should do. And then Saturday night, on what they did do.

Which is basically never what I thought they should do or would do.

But I can fake it. I can guru-up with the best of 'em.

Shawne Merriman? Never heard of him until a month ago.

Demarcus Ware? He's from Troy? Is that in America?

Anyway, those are two names who are supposed to be high on the Cowboys' got-to-have first-round list.

Me? I like Matt Jones from Arkansas.

Why? Well, the dearly departed Barry Switzer, who as the Cowboys' head coach knew as much about the NFL Draft as I do, was once being grilled by the media on why a certain player had been taken.

Fed up, Switzer finally fired back:

"Because he's a damn football player."

If the Cowboys had drafted more damn football players, Barry wouldn't be selling fried chicken in Oklahoma.

I'm all for that.

Drafting damn football players.

Julius Jones comes immediately to mind.

But the Cowboys have had many more Jacob Rogerses than Julius Joneses.

Speaking of Julius:

Since Big Bill pulled a swift one last April in trading out of the first round, picking up a first-rounder for Saturday, and then drafting a damn football player (Jones) early in the second round, what's the issue?

The Cowboys have the 11th pick and the 20th pick of this draft. And then the 10th pick in the second round, No. 42 overall.

So if you have three picks in the first 42, why get cute on Saturday?

Why is there all this talk about trading down and trading around?

Stay where you are. Is that a problem? Is it even an issue?

If your football people cannot find a couple of damn football players with three of the first 42 picks in this draft, then the next step is obvious.

Fire everybody.

Start with the general manager.

Oh, I forgot. That's Jerry.

But outside of that one year he went wacko on Quincy Carter, I don't see Mr. Jones as a big problem in the drafting equation.

He has scouts. He has coaches. He knows by now to listen.

I'm more interested in what Big Bill is thinking.

By Saturday night, once the first-day picks are in, Big Bill is supposed to speak for the first time in months.

Meanwhile, we've heard plenty from Jerry of late.

Jerry hints at the dreaded cuteness for Saturday.

Trade down, trade all around. Generate extra picks. Recoup that third-rounder the Cowboys don't have.

Oh, brother.

Then again, all this might be a smokescreen.

This time of year, why would anyone actually tell you what his team is thinking in the draft?

One theory says the Cowboys want an impact defensive player in the first round and then will use the other first-rounder to generate more picks.

Babe Laufenberg, the Channel 11 guy who used to play the game, says if anyone would care to review the statistical numbers over the last five years, then the Cowboys should draft nothing but offensive players.

Personally, it's not in my Star-Telegram contract to provide statistical numbers, but memory alone tells me the Cowboys, since Aikman, have been much more anemic offensively than defensively.

So let Babe do the drafting.

Frankly, I don't see any problems for the Cowboys on Saturday. They have plenty of needs, and they have multiple early picks to fill those needs.

So, Bill ...

Don't screw it up.

And, also, draft quickly. It's a long, long day, and night.

Sarge
04-21-2005, 06:07 AM
Not a bad read, really. I would have no problem whatsoever staying put at all spots but to state ahead of time that your staying there and not listen to possible offers is ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is, you leave ALL options open.

Cbz40
04-21-2005, 06:12 AM
Not a bad read, really. I would have no problem whatsoever staying put at all spots but to state ahead of time that your staying there and not listen to possible offers is ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is, you leave ALL options open.

I certainly can't argue with that Sarge.

I also agree with Galloway........Get some football players in here.

Scotman
04-21-2005, 06:13 AM
I keep hearing about "recouping" that third round pick. Why? We already recouped that spent pick. Except, it's a first rounder! I'm for staying put unless someone just starts throwing stupid picks our way. I would have traded down a couple of weeks ago, but I've changed my tune. Stay put, pick the best player on the board. We've got holes almost everywhere and we are one injury away from having holes everywhere else. No projects, no reaches-just smart picks.

AmarilloCowboyFan
04-21-2005, 06:15 AM
Demarcus Ware? He's from Troy? Is that in America?

That's my thinking. Who exactly has he played against. Kareem Larrimore looked great at WTAMU. He couldn't do it against the big boys though.

big dog cowboy
04-21-2005, 06:18 AM
A real groundbreaking article. Yea we need real football players. It's been that way, it is that way and will be that way.

Sarge
04-21-2005, 06:25 AM
I certainly can't argue with that Sarge.

I also agree with Galloway........Get some football players in here.

Morning Pops/BD.

dbair1967
04-21-2005, 06:30 AM
That's my thinking. Who exactly has he played against. Kareem Larrimore looked great at WTAMU. He couldn't do it against the big boys though.

Larrimore was a great talent but a total knucklehead with a pot problem...if he'd have worked at his game and stayed off the wacky weed he'd have been a solid player...he didnt fail due to lack of ability

Ware to my knowledge is nothing like that and doesnt have off field issues

David

Cbz40
04-21-2005, 06:34 AM
Give me Ware, Spears or Merriman.....or even better, a combination of any of the three and I'll be a happy camper.

Sarge
04-21-2005, 06:34 AM
Larrimore was a great talent but a total knucklehead with a pot problem...if he'd have worked at his game and stayed off the wacky weed he'd have been a solid player...he didnt fail due to lack of ability

Ware to my knowledge is nothing like that and doesnt have off field issues

David

Actually - the biggest problem with Ware is Parcells' logic. No small schools. He isn't coming here - period. I guarantee it.

Unless, and only unless, we trade down or grab him at 20 but WE WILL NOT BE TAKING HIM AT 11.

AmarilloCowboyFan
04-21-2005, 06:39 AM
Actually - the biggest problem with Ware is Parcells' logic. No small schools. He isn't coming here - period. I guarantee it.

Unless, and only unless, we trade down or grab him at 20 but WE WILL NOT BE TAKING HIM AT 11.

Small schools are too risky IMO. I know...once in a while you hit on one like LA, but I would still rather steer clear of them. We really need a solid draft.

Sarge
04-21-2005, 06:42 AM
Small schools are too risky IMO. I know...once in a while you hit on one like LA, but I would still rather steer clear of them. We really need a solid draft.

Therein lies my point. For every Charles Haley out of James Madison, there are 100 others who never make it, but you don't really hear of them.

It's simply too risky at 11.

Simply not going to happen.

AmarilloCowboyFan
04-21-2005, 06:45 AM
Larrimore was a great talent but a total knucklehead with a pot problem...if he'd have worked at his game and stayed off the wacky weed he'd have been a solid player...he didnt fail due to lack of ability

Ware to my knowledge is nothing like that and doesnt have off field issues

David

Larrimore was fast. That was about it. Yes, he was a pot head and maybe he could have been better if he would have worked on his game instead of his bong, but that is still a maybe.

Juke99
04-21-2005, 06:49 AM
Mornin' kids....

Biggest fear... Jerry and Bill can't resist the temptation to play wheeler dealers and trade themselves into oblivion.

This is one of those "sit tight" kinda drafts because it's going to be difficult enough to get talent in the position we currently have let alone moving down. With each trade down, the task of betting good talent becomes more difficult; especially in a draft like this.

I'd be very happy if we took the BPA when I turn arrived.

AmarilloCowboyFan
04-21-2005, 06:51 AM
Biggest fear... Jerry and Bill can't resist the temptation to play wheeler dealers and trade themselves into oblivion.

Agreed

Sarge
04-21-2005, 06:52 AM
Mornin' kids....

Biggest fear... Jerry and Bill can't resist the temptation to play wheeler dealers and trade themselves into oblivion.

This is one of those "sit tight" kinda drafts because it's going to be difficult enough to get talent in the position we currently have let alone moving down. With each trade down, the task of betting good talent becomes more difficult; especially in a draft like this.

I'd be very happy if we took the BPA when I turn arrived.

Morning muffin.

:)

booboo
04-21-2005, 06:56 AM
I keep hearing about "recouping" that third round pick. Why? We already recouped that spent pick. Except, it's a first rounder! I'm for staying put unless someone just starts throwing stupid picks our way. I would have traded down a couple of weeks ago, but I've changed my tune. Stay put, pick the best player on the board. We've got holes almost everywhere and we are one injury away from having holes everywhere else. No projects, no reaches-just smart picks.

It's still early, but so far you get my post of the day award.

dbair1967
04-21-2005, 06:56 AM
Mornin' kids....

Biggest fear... Jerry and Bill can't resist the temptation to play wheeler dealers and trade themselves into oblivion.

.

trading down (or up) is fine as long as it makes sense...case in point was last yr when we passed on K Jones, Jackson and Perry and got picks to move down and get a guy they had a similar grade on...

same thing could apply this yr if say, at 11 they have similar grades of Merriman, Ware, Spears and Pollack but could move back to 15 and pick up a 3rd...they still get the guy they want and pick up the 3rd...now if they have a substancially higher grade on someone (say Spears) they shoudl just take him at 11 and be done with it...

personally I think they'll use the 11 where it is and move back from 20, unless someone they really like falls in their laps

David

Juke99
04-21-2005, 06:56 AM
Morning muffin.

:)

'Mornin bugle boy.

:)

Juke99
04-21-2005, 06:59 AM
trading down (or up) is fine as long as it makes sense...case in point was last yr when we passed on K Jones, Jackson and Perry and got picks to move down and get a guy they had a similar grade on...

same thing could apply this yr if say, at 11 they have similar grades of Merriman, Ware, Spears and Pollack but could move back to 15 and pick up a 3rd...they still get the guy they want and pick up the 3rd...now if they have a substancially higher grade on someone (say Spears) they shoudl just take him at 11 and be done with it...

personally I think they'll use the 11 where it is and move back from 20, unless someone they really like falls in their laps

David

I'm not opposed to trading down...In fact, I dont mind trading up (prefer it sometimes)

My concern is that they get "cute"...ya know, that they can't resist the temptation to be shakers and movers because the spot light is on them. We've certainly seen Jerry do that before.

Hollywood Henderson
04-21-2005, 07:13 AM
If Ware is said to be the best pass rusher and grades the highest at #11, you better beleive we take him at #11...

Redball Express
04-21-2005, 09:11 AM
I agree about Laufenburg and the offense. We still need several big playmakers on offense and we have too many injuries from last year to key players to just sit pat. Anderson, Glenn, Key, Campbell, etc.

Sure, we have Jujo, but he was injured also for half the year. We really don't know about him yet for the long run.

I agree..we got two big pieces in FA in a DT and CB to fix the defense.

But we need an impact player at WR who can scare the defense and spread the field for our slower receivers to be effective. And we need to stabilize the right side of the OL to run the ball and protect the QB and have a balance attack..not just run behind Allen and the left side.

Draft a scary WR and a starter RT on offense and let's score points.

Later.

ParcellsWaterBoy

Waffle
04-21-2005, 09:18 AM
Actually - the biggest problem with Ware is Parcells' logic. No small schools. He isn't coming here - period. I guarantee it.

Unless, and only unless, we trade down or grab him at 20 but WE WILL NOT BE TAKING HIM AT 11.

Sarge, I have to agree with your assessement here.

L-O-Jete
04-21-2005, 09:26 AM
Mornin' kids....

Biggest fear... Jerry and Bill can't resist the temptation to play wheeler dealers and trade themselves into oblivion.

This is one of those "sit tight" kinda drafts because it's going to be difficult enough to get talent in the position we currently have let alone moving down. With each trade down, the task of betting good talent becomes more difficult; especially in a draft like this.

I'd be very happy if we took the BPA when I turn arrived.

If this is such a bad draft then trade for next years picks, i say.

lkelly
04-21-2005, 09:28 AM
The title of this article by Galloway should have been: "I Don't Know Anything About The Draft, I Don't Want To Do Any Real Research, But I Have To Write An Article."

At least he got a Switzer mention in.

Crown Royal
04-21-2005, 09:33 AM
The title of this article by Galloway should have been: "I Don't Know Anything About The Draft, I Don't Want To Do Any Real Research, But I Have To Write An Article."

At least he got a Switzer mention in.

Amen. Gawd I hate Galloway. He is my most hated member of all Dallas/Dallas Cowboys media. He just gets to me. The beginning of the article explains to the audience why he hates the draft...why should he have to work 9 hours on a saturday..etc.etc.etc. Give Dale your column if you don't like it.

Then, for wisdom regarding the draft, he mentions Switzer. Yeah, good source, knucklehead.

Doomsday101
04-21-2005, 09:39 AM
I have to agree with Galloway on getting cute, sorry but I'm not going to lose out on a top player to get a 3rd rd pick, if the right deal comes are way (2 or 3 spots) and the top 3 Defensive players that have been talked about are still on the board then I would consider a trade knowing I have a very good chance of getting the player I wanted but if 1 or 2 of the top D players are gone before 11 then I stay put and get the defensive help this team needs. You do not sacrifice a top 11 pick for a damn 3rd rounder

Spontae
04-21-2005, 09:44 AM
I keep hearing about "recouping" that third round pick. Why? We already recouped that spent pick. Except, it's a first rounder! I'm for staying put unless someone just starts throwing stupid picks our way. I would have traded down a couple of weeks ago, but I've changed my tune. Stay put, pick the best player on the board. We've got holes almost everywhere and we are one injury away from having holes everywhere else. No projects, no reaches-just smart picks.

The beauty of every draft is that someone will start throwing stupid picks someone's way...hopefully they will be thrown to us this year.

Tobal
04-21-2005, 09:54 AM
It all depends on who is available when you draft. If the only guy you love is there then take him, but if you love several or don't like anyone trade.