PDA

View Full Version : brockers pretty good game


jblaze2004
12-11-2012, 09:37 PM
vs the bills, 1.5 sacks a force fumble and 7 tackles. Pretty good numbers. He has been pretty good.

danielofthesaints
12-11-2012, 09:58 PM
I think you meant this for the NFL zone. :rolleyes:

supercowboy8
12-11-2012, 10:04 PM
Yes he played very well om a 4-3. Still don't believe he would make a good 3-4 DE

burmafrd
12-12-2012, 05:08 AM
not worth a first rd pick so far

Manwiththeplan
12-12-2012, 10:10 AM
not worth a first rd pick so far

4 sacks through 13 games is actually pretty good for an interior lineman.

So using this logic, Warren Sapp wasn't worth a first rounder as a rookie.

And judging an interior guy on sacks alone, makes no sense.

cowboysooner
12-12-2012, 12:25 PM
Brockers also missed the first 3 or 4 weeks with an ankle. Brockers would be in the top 10 in a redraft.

Manwiththeplan
12-12-2012, 12:30 PM
maybe top 5. Better prospect than Hankins imo.

Joshmil53
12-12-2012, 12:54 PM
He hasn't been impressive at all IMO. Definitely not top 5.

Manwiththeplan
12-12-2012, 01:15 PM
He hasn't been impressive at all IMO. Definitely not top 5.

if hankins is being talked about going top 5, then there's no reason to say Brockers wouldn't have the same talk.

tomson75
12-12-2012, 01:18 PM
I think you meant this for the Ru3age zone. :rolleyes:

FIFY..

burmafrd
12-12-2012, 02:05 PM
4 sacks through 13 games is actually pretty good for an interior lineman.

So using this logic, Warren Sapp wasn't worth a first rounder as a rookie.

And judging an interior guy on sacks alone, makes no sense.

you are comparing him to Warren Sapp. You do know that.

its not just sacks. He has not done all that much else. But clearly you are just a homer on this guy so who cares?

Manwiththeplan
12-12-2012, 02:23 PM
you are comparing him to Warren Sapp. You do know that.

its not just sacks. He has not done all that much else. But clearly you are just a homer on this guy so who cares?

if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

DBOY3141
12-12-2012, 02:29 PM
not worth a first rd pick so far

Then neither is Claiborne with his 1 interception.

Brockers is and will be a very good DL.

Joshmil53
12-12-2012, 06:17 PM
if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

Quinn is also turning into an elite DE and Lauranitis too. Jenkins and Finnegan help too.

burmafrd
12-13-2012, 06:50 AM
if what you got from my post was brockers = sapp, then you're clearly the one who's biased on the subject.

FWIW, I don't think it's a coincidence that St.Louis went from allowing 4.8 ypc and 152.1 ypg, to 4.0 ypc and 110.3 ypg.

Brockers isn't soley responsibile, but when you combine the improvement in the run game, and his success collapsing the pocket, there's really no argument to say he's still not worth a first round pick.

depends on what you define as what is worth a first rd pick.

This guy is not a Seymour and that to me is the only one I would say is worth it

jobberone
12-13-2012, 07:05 AM
depends on what you define as what is worth a first rd pick.

This guy is not a Seymour and that to me is the only one I would say is worth it

I'm thinking you don't really mean Seymour is the only DL worth a first round pick.

One of the best DL I've ever seen doesn't get a lot of 'stats' but he makes his defense much much better....Vince Wilfork.

RoyTheHammer
12-13-2012, 08:38 AM
vs the bills, 1.5 sacks a force fumble and 7 tackles. Pretty good numbers. He has been pretty good.

Would you say overall that he's.. pretty good?

Ntegrase96
12-13-2012, 08:58 AM
If the purpose of this thread is truly to congratulate a young man on his success in the NFL then I'm all for it. He's been good this season.

If the purpose of this thread is to rue not taking Brockers in the draft then it's completely flawed for numerous reasons.

A.) Draft for talent, not for need... Mo' Claiborne has more potential as a CB than Brockers as a DL.

B.) Would Brockers even be successful as a 3-4 DE? I have a feeling that he wouldn't be.

C.) It's way to early to tell for either rookie.

And so on an so forth.

Joshmil53
12-13-2012, 11:02 AM
I'm thinking you don't really mean Seymour is the only DL worth a first round pick.

One of the best DL I've ever seen doesn't get a lot of 'stats' but he makes his defense much much better....Vince Wilfork.
Wilfork has been pretty trash this year (from A LOT of Patriot fans). Geno Atkins is the best DL in the league and there's no question about it.

RoyTheHammer
12-13-2012, 11:13 AM
Wilfork has been pretty trash this year (from A LOT of Patriot fans). Geno Atkins is the best DL in the league and there's no question about it.

Umm.. Patriot fans must be as dumb as most Dallas fans if they think that.

tomson75
12-13-2012, 11:16 AM
Wilfork has been pretty trash this year (from A LOT of Patriot fans). Geno Atkins is the best DL in the league and there's no question about it.

Yeah...not sure what games they've been watching, because Wilfork has been far from "trash".

Probably hearing that from the same type of fans that were ready to send Witten packing in week 4.

CopenhagenCowboy
12-13-2012, 11:35 AM
If the purpose of this thread is truly to congratulate a young man on his success in the NFL then I'm all for it. He's been good this season.

If the purpose of this thread is to rue not taking Brockers in the draft then it's completely flawed for numerous reasons.

A.) Draft for talent, not for need... Mo' Claiborne has more potential as a CB than Brockers as a DL.

B.) Would Brockers even be successful as a 3-4 DE? I have a feeling that he wouldn't be.

C.) It's way to early to tell for either rookie.

And so on an so forth.

Psst...it's not like they had the same pricetag.

I still prefer Brockers and Wagner over Claiborne.

Manwiththeplan
12-13-2012, 12:06 PM
depends on what you define as what is worth a first rd pick.

This guy is not a Seymour and that to me is the only one I would say is worth it

that's just not a realistic standard. It would be like if I said Matt Ryan was worth a top 5 pick b/c he doesn't have Peyton Manning like potential.

I would be completely ignoring the bust rate at that position (and for DTs, it almost as high as QBs)

Manwiththeplan
12-13-2012, 12:07 PM
Geno Atkins is the best DL in the league and there's no question about it.

The 6'6 300 pound guy on the Texans DL says otherwise

Manwiththeplan
12-13-2012, 12:12 PM
Psst...it's not like they had the same pricetag.

I still prefer Brockers and Wagner over Claiborne.

I liked Brockers, but give me Claiborne.

I know according to our board, Wagner was the BPA at 45, but I still don't think we'd take him.

Joshmil53
12-13-2012, 02:09 PM
The 6'6 300 pound guy on the Texans DL says otherwise

Oops, yeah forgot about Juggerwatt