View Full Version : Super Bowl XXX highlights - ESPN classic
T-New41
05-21-2005, 02:03 AM
I just watched the highlights of Superbowl 30 and I am reminded of just how terribly coached we were at that point. Bill Cower outcoached Switzer at every corner, 2 lucky ints, and the immense amount of talent the team had carried us on that day.
If we still had Jimmy, we would have 4 maybe 5 superbowls in the 90's. :banghead:
I know, dont dwell on the past, but it is slow time and I saw the highlights and in a way it was bittersweet. We won, but that was the last year that we were any kind of serious contender.
Here;s hopin for a return to glory!
Nav22
05-21-2005, 02:45 AM
As crazy as it sounds, that was my favorite Super Bowl the Cowboys won. I've only been alive for the last 3. They had already won 2 Super Bowls, EVERYBODY hated their guts (at least in the Bay Area), and this was their last realistic chance at glory in the 90s.
I was 10 and had a bunch of friends over for a Super Bowl party, and I was the only Cowboys fan. After Deon Figures recovered the onside kick, the world was crashing down. My friends were deliriously happy, and you could just feel all the Cowboys-haters thinking, "YES! They finally get their come-uppance!" O'Donnell's INT and Emmitt's TD silenced everyone in my house, and we snuck away with #5.
And only 1 year after SF won their 5th, which people here WOULDN'T shut up about. Dallas snagged their 5th and shut everybody up one last time. Good times.
Juke99
05-21-2005, 07:28 AM
I just watched the highlights of Superbowl 30 and I am reminded of just how terribly coached we were at that point. Bill Cower outcoached Switzer at every corner, 2 lucky ints, and the immense amount of talent the team had carried us on that day.
If we still had Jimmy, we would have 4 maybe 5 superbowls in the 90's. :banghead:
I know, dont dwell on the past, but it is slow time and I saw the highlights and in a way it was bittersweet. We won, but that was the last year that we were any kind of serious contender.
Here;s hopin for a return to glory!
The other team that made it very clear that Switzer wasn't a very good coach, was SF.
The talent level of the two teams was very close. In the years before Switzer, Jimmy Johnson was the difference maker. You could actually feel his presence in those games.
When Switzer came on board, the reverse was true. You could feel Switzer's presence but in a negative way. Against inferior teams, Switzer had enough talent to pull through (just as when he was a college coach).
But when faced with an opponent like the 49ers, he was simply out coached.
And I agree, we'd have rung up at least an other two superbowl wins if Johnson had stayed.
dbair1967
05-21-2005, 08:03 AM
I just watched the highlights of Superbowl 30 and I am reminded of just how terribly coached we were at that point. Bill Cower outcoached Switzer at every corner, 2 lucky ints, and the immense amount of talent the team had carried us on that day.
If we still had Jimmy, we would have 4 maybe 5 superbowls in the 90's. :banghead:
I know, dont dwell on the past, but it is slow time and I saw the highlights and in a way it was bittersweet. We won, but that was the last year that we were any kind of serious contender.
Here;s hopin for a return to glory!
Switzer was a clown, no doubt...
but that game would have never been close had the officiating not been so poor...a couple that stood out were the Steelers scoring a td after having a ball spotted at least a yard and half past where it should have been (difference between a 4th down fg and a new set of downs) and Kevin Williams being tackled on a bomb that would have been an easy td, amazingly no flag thrown for PI
David
jimmy40
05-21-2005, 08:39 AM
Switzer was a clown, no doubt...
but that game would have never been close had the officiating not been so poor...a couple that stood out were the Steelers scoring a td after having a ball spotted at least a yard and half past where it should have been (difference between a 4th down fg and a new set of downs) and Kevin Williams being tackled on a bomb that would have been an easy td, amazingly no flag thrown for PI
DavidDamnit here we go again, now we're going to blame the refs for a Super Bowl being close. :rolleyes: Maybe if we would have actually played better than Pittsburg it wouldn't have been close.
jimmy40
05-21-2005, 08:41 AM
The other team that made it very clear that Switzer wasn't a very good coach, was SF.
The talent level of the two teams was very close. In the years before Switzer, Jimmy Johnson was the difference maker. You could actually feel his presence in those games.
When Switzer came on board, the reverse was true. You could feel Switzer's presence but in a negative way. Against inferior teams, Switzer had enough talent to pull through (just as when he was a college coach).
But when faced with an opponent like the 49ers, he was simply out coached.
And I agree, we'd have rung up at least an other two superbowl wins if Johnson had stayed.Jerry had to prove that 500 coach thing after he ran his mouth to Johnson and damned if he didn't do it with Switzer.
T-New41
05-21-2005, 09:51 AM
Jerry had to prove that 500 coach thing after he ran his mouth to Johnson and damned if he didn't do it with Switzer.
Yeah, I guess that why Switzer was up there after the win crying "we did it our way baby!"
Please. They showed the teams huddling up before the game giving motivational speeches. Bill Cowher was giving a great one to pitt, Emmit was the one trying to pump up the boys.
In fact didn't really hear much about switzer until the post game speech. If you guys watched the highlights from the Boys - Skins game (that a nice gentleman posted here a few days back) you see the type of plays that Jimmy was calling, only in SB30, its not the Cowboys coach, it was Bill Cowher making the ballsy decisions. After Pitt surprised Dallas with an early onside kick, Switzer was dumbfounded. We would unfortunately get to see that look again.
Campo - Eagles. You all remember, no need to salt the wounds. We scraped by in SB30 against a team that had a LOT less talent (in terms of pro bowl players) than we did and it took a last minute lame duck throw directly to Larry Brown to finish these guys off.
Pitt was moving and at worst could have tied the game, at best (or worst depending on point of view) taking a touchdown and gone up by 4.
Anyway, I just want BP to take us back to the promised land.
Nav22
05-21-2005, 07:43 PM
After Pitt surprised Dallas with an early onside kick, Switzer was dumbfounded.
It wasn't early. It was the 4th quarter and the score was 20-10.
T-New41
05-21-2005, 07:55 PM
It wasn't early. It was the 4th quarter and the score was 20-10.
I meant early by the fact that it wasn't the last second with less than a minute left. It was still early in the 4th quarter, when you would not expect an onside kick.
Nav22
05-21-2005, 08:39 PM
I meant early by the fact that it wasn't the last second with less than a minute left.
Gotcha. That was the first part of the game where I thought, "Oh crap, we actually might LOSE this game." You're the man, Larry Brown.
Billy Bullocks
05-21-2005, 08:42 PM
As crazy as it sounds, that was my favorite Super Bowl the Cowboys won. I've only been alive for the last 3. They had already won 2 Super Bowls, EVERYBODY hated their guts (at least in the Bay Area), and this was their last realistic chance at glory in the 90s.
I was 10 and had a bunch of friends over for a Super Bowl party, and I was the only Cowboys fan. After Deon Figures recovered the onside kick, the world was crashing down. My friends were deliriously happy, and you could just feel all the Cowboys-haters thinking, "YES! They finally get their come-uppance!" O'Donnell's INT and Emmitt's TD silenced everyone in my house, and we snuck away with #5.
And only 1 year after SF won their 5th, which people here WOULDN'T shut up about. Dallas snagged their 5th and shut everybody up one last time. Good times.
no doubt. I think i was like 10 or so at the time as well. Got into the cowboys after they won 27 against Buff...first game I ever saw, my mom was a big Cowboys fan from the 70's. Niners fans wouldn't shut up about their stupid team. I do miss the 9ers Cowboys rivalry days tho.
Manster68
05-21-2005, 08:46 PM
Remember one thing about the 1995 Cowboys.
In the three years prior, the Cowboys lost about 30 players to free agency and expansion.
Yet despite all of those losses of personnel Dallas continued to be the best team in pro football.
I wonder how well the Packers, Steelers, or 49ers would have fared if they lost 30 players off of their teams before they reached the summit of their greatness?
kojak
05-22-2005, 03:43 AM
O'dennel lost that game with them horrible passes. I thought he was actually throwing them passes to Brown. Maybe he had the "Mcnabb Syndrome" in clutch time. ;)
Also remembering Irvin at the Sb presenation telling the world "to get off his s*** (swtizer)" on live tv. I loved it :cool:
Nav22
05-22-2005, 04:23 AM
I do miss the 9ers Cowboys rivalry days tho.
I think I miss that rivalry more than anything else (except the SB wins) from the 90s. Especially being a diehard Dallas fan growing up in the Bay Area.
dbair1967
05-22-2005, 09:37 AM
Damnit here we go again, now we're going to blame the refs for a Super Bowl being close. :rolleyes: Maybe if we would have actually played better than Pittsburg it wouldn't have been close.
not blaming them for anything, but the facts are there were some dreaful in game decisions by the refs...
I guess you think Lynn Swann really go interfered with in 1978 too huh? And you probably think it had no impact on the outcome?
David
Juke99
05-22-2005, 10:04 AM
not blaming them for anything, but the facts are there were some dreaful in game decisions by the refs...
I guess you think Lynn Swann really go interfered with in 1978 too huh? And you probably think it had no impact on the outcome?
David
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Fred Swearingen...slowly I turn...step by step....
JakeCamp12
05-22-2005, 11:29 AM
The best memory of that game for me was watching Larry Allen pull around the left side and de-cleating Greg Lloyd and springing Emmitt for a big game. Lloyd was going to be the difference according to the media in Pittsburgh upsetting Dallas. We did not run real well that day, but that memory is priceless to me. LA in his prime was the best and no one could stop him when he was motivated.
big dog cowboy
05-22-2005, 11:53 AM
Fred Swearingen
Somebody who doesn't have a clue how much he was cussed at in my house.
Juke99
05-22-2005, 11:53 AM
The best memory of that game for me was watching Larry Allen pull around the left side and de-cleating Greg Lloyd and springing Emmitt for a big game. Lloyd was going to be the difference according to the media in Pittsburgh upsetting Dallas. We did not run real well that day, but that memory is priceless to me. LA in his prime was the best and no one could stop him when he was motivated.
Hey...fyi...here's a wallpaper I made of that moment...
:)
http://img225.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img225&image=gregandlarryjpg10240jk.jpg
Manster68
05-22-2005, 12:27 PM
O'dennel lost that game with them horrible passes. I thought he was actually throwing them passes to Brown. Maybe he had the "Mcnabb Syndrome" in clutch time.
O'Donnel wasn't the soul reason Pittsburgh lost that game.
When were the Steelers ever in the lead during that game? They weren't.
Granted, Dallas didn't take advantage of all of their opportunities either, but they were still dominating in the first half.
When Switzer arrived, Dallas had a horrible reputation of "Letting off on the throttle." That is what happened in Super Bowl XXX.
Dallas let Pittsburgh restore their hope - which ended up in the Cowboys having a rough time of it in the second half.
In Super Bowl XIV, Pittsburgh had a rough time with the Rams. Yet, what did narrator John Facenda say in their highlight video?
"Great teams aren't great all the time, they are only great when they have to be."
Don't you think that should apply to the 1995 Dallas Cowboys in Super Bowl XXX?
I do remember the Cowboys stuffing Pittsburgh on a 4th and 1 in the 2nd half as well. Was that O'Donnel's fault too?
Pittsburgh was not as close to beating Dallas in Super Bowl XXX as Dallas was to beating Pittsburgh in Super Bowls X and XIII.
At least the Cowboys had a lead.
DID YOU KNOW:
That on all five of the Cowboys Super Bowl wins, the opponent never scored a touchdown in the end zone marked "COWBOYS."
In all three of Dallas' Super Bowl losses, the opponent did score a touchdown in the end zone marked "COWBOYS."
dbair1967
05-22-2005, 12:32 PM
people do practice revisionist history with that game...they think we lucked out or were dominated when in fact niether were true...the Steelers never led...they outgained us somewhat in yards but it took them like 50 something pass attempts to do it, plus we scored on a couple of short drives, limiting our yards gained potential
factor in the two poor official decisions I mentioned and this game wasnt that close...we were way better than the Steelers that yr
I stll remember that idiot Kevin Green bragging at games end "yeah but Emmitt didnt gain a 100 yds!!!"...memo to caveman, hey fool, you lost the game
David
Jon88
05-22-2005, 05:55 PM
people do practice revisionist history with that game...they think we lucked out or were dominated when in fact niether were true...the Steelers never led...they outgained us somewhat in yards but it took them like 50 something pass attempts to do it, plus we scored on a couple of short drives, limiting our yards gained potential
factor in the two poor official decisions I mentioned and this game wasnt that close...we were way better than the Steelers that yr
I stll remember that idiot Kevin Green bragging at games end "yeah but Emmitt didnt gain a 100 yds!!!"...memo to caveman, hey fool, you lost the game
David
Sure, we were way better than Pittburgh, but we showed up like it was our game to lose. We should have blown them out. We didn't. We didn't play to our potential - and we never did under Switzer.
T-New41
05-22-2005, 06:33 PM
Sure, we were way better than Pittburgh, but we showed up like it was our game to lose. We should have blown them out. We didn't. We didn't play to our potential - and we never did under Switzer.
Thats sums up my feelings.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.