Anybody want to bet... back up Qb

[scrives]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.

[SultanOfSix]

I agree. Alex Smith hasn't looked that great in preseason either and he was never out of the game as long as Henson.

[cml750]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.


I agree that Henson has done a lot better than most people give him credit for but I think Bill already has his mind made up. I believe Romo will be second string with Henson third. (Edit: I did think just as you do until Bill made Henson take a knee before halftime. If he were truely interested in what Henson could do he would of been aloud to run the 2-minute offense.) I do feel Henson has a much brighter future than Romo.

[NovaCowboy]

Ive said this before but it really doesnt matter if Henson is 2nd or 3rd, neither him or Romo will get any signifigant playing time in real games as long as Parcells is here.

If Bledose went down with injury, I bet Vinny would get a phone call.

[jksmith269]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.
Wait a second he has put us in a position to score more than Romo and Bledsoe? He also helps out the other team more than Bledsoe and Romo or was that my imagination he threw an INT? Henson is done for He'll make the team due to the investment in him but he won't be #2 and I wouldn't be surprised if we try and move him to another team this season or next offseason...

[ABQCOWBOY]

Wait a second he has put us in a position to score more than Romo and Bledsoe? He also helps out the other team more than Bledsoe and Romo or was that my imagination he threw an INT? Henson is done for He'll make the team due to the investment in him but he won't be #2 and I wouldn't be surprised if we try and move him to another team this season or next offseason...


It's your imagination.

[Hollywood Henderson]

Hensen already looks better then Noodle arm Romo...

[cml750]

Wait a second he has put us in a position to score more than Romo and Bledsoe? He also helps out the other team more than Bledsoe and Romo or was that my imagination he threw an INT?


True Henson made a bad throw on the interception but I don't think it was my imagination that both Bledsoe and Romo made throws that should of been intercepted. Just because the Hawks actually caught Hensons mistake doesn't make it a whole lot worse than the mistakes the other two made. Romo's mistake was really bad.

[jksmith269]

It's your imagination.
Whew so he really didn't look that confussed back there Monday Night. Man thats a load off my mind.......

[ABQCOWBOY]

Whew so he really didn't look that confussed back there Monday Night. Man thats a load off my mind.......

I hear ya barking Smitty.

;)

[Trophy#6]

The fork was put in Henson last year. We're just going through the motions now. He has no future on this team. The only reason he was kept because we were already revamping the top stop, couldn't honestly switch 2 of the 3 quarterbacks out in one offseason.

And as far as Romo is concerned...one of two things is either happening here. He's actually getting a feel for it and with the competition with Henson, stepping up to the plate, so to say. OR...Henson is that bad, he's making Romo look like a viable #2 option.

I've said it once I'll say it again.. our next real quarterback hasnt' even taken his first snap in the NFL yet. And with Parcells reluctance to draft someone young at the posistion, god only knows what draftclass he is going to be part of.

[jksmith269]

Hensen already looks better then Noodle arm Romo...
Romo's passes looked crisper and with more velocity on them did HensOn's

True Henson made a bad throw on the interception but I don't think it was my imagination that both Bledsoe and Romo made throws that should of been intercepted. Just because the Hawks actually caught Hensons mistake doesn't make it a whole lot worse than the mistakes the other two made. Romo's mistake was really bad.

I agree that all the qb's made bad throws but being intercepted and should have been are big differences. That's like I almost got that babes phone number and getting it. BIG difference IMO

[Fletch]

Wait a second he has put us in a position to score more than Romo and Bledsoe? He also helps out the other team more than Bledsoe and Romo or was that my imagination he threw an INT? Henson is done for He'll make the team due to the investment in him but he won't be #2 and I wouldn't be surprised if we try and move him to another team this season or next offseason...

Do you have an extra pair of HOMER GOGGLES that I could borrow? :D So do you discount the throw by Romo to the middle of the field where no Cowboy could be found that reminded me of a wounded duck and that nearly got intercepted, only to be dropped? :eek:

At least Henson's INT had Witten in the same vacinity.

[scrives]

Some of you guy seem to think Henson is done. Year 2 people!!! No Qb looks great in year two. Iam so glad some of you guys are our GM. No clue what so ever!!!!!!!!!!

[ABQCOWBOY]

The fork was put in Henson last year. We're just going through the motions now. He has no future on this team. The only reason he was kept because we were already revamping the top stop, couldn't honestly switch 2 of the 3 quarterbacks out in one offseason.

And as far as Romo is concerned...one of two things is either happening here. He's actually getting a feel for it and with the competition with Henson, stepping up to the plate, so to say. OR...Henson is that bad, he's making Romo look like a viable #2 option.

I've said it once I'll say it again.. our next real quarterback hasnt' even taken his first snap in the NFL yet. And with Parcells reluctance to draft someone young at the posistion, god only knows what draftclass he is going to be part of.

OK........

[jksmith269]

Do you have an extra pair of HOMER GOGGLES that I could borrow? :D So do you discount the throw by Romo to the middle of the field where no Cowboy could be found that reminded me of a wounded duck and that nearly got intercepted, only to be dropped? :eek:
OK people let me clarify my position.....

I don't think Henson is the answer heck I don't think he even knows the question.

Do I think Romo is the answer? To be honest I haven't really paid any attention to him since he's been here until the game the other night. He looked more comfortable back there than did Henson. He made mistakes glaring mistakes but he didn't look like a deer caught in headlights like Henson did (to me that is maybe you saw something I didn't)

Bledsoe hasn't really lit it up and made some mistakes but I liked the heart he showed trying to run for the first down Stupid but heart with that dive. That spoke volumes to me he wants to win and looks willing to sacrifice for it....

So in closing I don't think any of them have shown much but Bledsoe is and should be the starter and Romo will be the back up he just looks more settled to me back there....

[LeonDixson]

Romo's passes looked crisper and with more velocity on them did HensOn's



I agree that all the qb's made bad throws but being intercepted and should have been are big differences. That's like I almost got that babes phone number and getting it. BIG difference IMO

The "consequences" are different, but the decision making, quality of throw, etc. is just as bad on the one hand as it is on the other.

[ABQCOWBOY]

Romo's passes looked crisper and with more velocity on them did HensOn's



I agree that all the qb's made bad throws but being intercepted and should have been are big differences. That's like I almost got that babes phone number and getting it. BIG difference IMO

I really can't agree with this. When your evaluation players, you don't grade them higher because the mistake didn't cost you. You grade them on mistakes. For example, if a RB coughs up the ball and your RG recovers it, it's still a fumble. When a QB throws a strike and the WR drops it, it's not counted against the QB. No difference at all IMO.

[Doomsday101]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.

I would agree that he has yet to determine the backup job and said as much last week when he said the QB competition could be extended past his initial deadline he had set.

[DIAF]

Henson or Romo, if they switched jerseys no one would be able to tell them apart. They both stink right now, and I don't feel comfortable at this point with either one of them being the #2. I WILL guarantee you, though, that Henson will have a more successful NFL career than Romo will. Never understood the fascination with Romo. I guess football fans LOVE underdogs.

[trickblue]

Henson or Romo, if they switched jerseys no one would be able to tell them apart. They both stink right now, and I don't feel comfortable at this point with either one of them being the #2. I WILL guarantee you, though, that Henson will have a more successful NFL career than Romo will. Never understood the fascination with Romo. I guess football fans LOVE underdogs.

oh my... the Romologists are gonna be miffed at you... ;)

[jksmith269]

I really can't agree with this. When your evaluation players, you don't grade them higher because the mistake didn't cost you. You grade them on mistakes. For example, if a RB coughs up the ball and your RG recovers it, it's still a fumble. When a QB throws a strike and the WR drops it, it's not counted against the QB. No difference at all IMO.
assume your another coach in the league and your in need of a backup qb you look at his stats. and almost int's aren't on a stat sheet but INT's are...

and dropped passes count against the QB it's an incomplete either way...

I agree with the assement that neither are doing well actually less than well. I was contending with the argument that Henson put us in better positions to score which IMO he didn't....He threw an INT the others threw passes that should have been INT'd but wheren't and the O kept the ball which gave us more of an chance to score than not having the ball. Granted it was only 1 int and in preseason... And Drew B has thrown his fair share and more but we are discussing Henson putting us in a better chance to score position...

[ABQCOWBOY]

Henson or Romo, if they switched jerseys no one would be able to tell them apart. They both stink right now, and I don't feel comfortable at this point with either one of them being the #2. I WILL guarantee you, though, that Henson will have a more successful NFL career than Romo will. Never understood the fascination with Romo. I guess football fans LOVE underdogs.

I don't agree with this. I think these two players are very different. I don't know, I guess I just can't bring myself to be down on either one. I like them both. I'm just not as pessimistiic about either one of these guys as other's appear to be. I think were going to be OK.

The real problem here is that nobody wants to pay the dues, IMO. This day has been coming for 10 years and now that it's hear, eveybody wants to skip on the check. Young QBs take time to develope. All those who didn't want to spend picks on QBs when Aikman was here are now paying the price. All those who wanted to keep QC around are paying the price. All those who didn't want to draft a Leftwich or whomever else we had an opportunity to get are paying the price. All those who didn't want to spend money on a decent FA QB in the past are paying the price.

The check is due, we're all going to have to pick up the tab on this one. Might as well get used to the idea of a young QB or two throwing INTs.

[scrives]

Go back and look at the two preseason games. Henson has definatly put us in possition to score more thus far.....

[ABQCOWBOY]

assume your another coach in the league and your in need of a backup qb you look at his stats. and almost int's aren't on a stat sheet but INT's are...

and dropped passes count against the QB it's an incomplete either way...

I agree with the assement that neither are doing well actually less than well. I was contending with the argument that Henson put us in better positions to score which IMO he didn't....He threw an INT the others threw passes that should have been INT'd but wheren't and the O kept the ball which gave us more of an chance to score than not having the ball. Granted it was only 1 int and in preseason... And Drew B has thrown his fair share and more but we are discussing Henson putting us in a better chance to score position...


Irrelivant. If I'm another coach, I'll obtain film on the prospect and grade him accordingly. That's what personnel guys get paid for. The approach your suggesting is exactly how Tom Brady slipped to the 6th round. How Favre got traded in Atlanta to GB and how Hasselbeck had the same deal in reverse to Seattle.

For what it's worth, I think the first poster is correct. Henson has QBed scoring opportunities. He has had a few things go against him that have hurt him where this is concerned. This can not be held against him. He didn't drop the passes and he didn't create the penalties. It's just how things work.

[Doomsday101]

All QB's will throw INT's even the best but how you respond after throwing an INT is a major key at that position. Some guys will get very tentative with their passes almost trying to guild the ball instead of just dropping back and firing it in there. One thing I have always noticed with a guy like Favre, he never changes his play after throwing a pick he just comes right back at you I think you can say that about most of the top QB’s who play in this league. You can't be afraid to make mistakes

[cowboyfreak]

assume your another coach in the league and your in need of a backup qb you look at his stats. and almost int's aren't on a stat sheet but INT's are...

and dropped passes count against the QB it's an incomplete either way...

I agree with the assement that neither are doing well actually less than well. I was contending with the argument that Henson put us in better positions to score which IMO he didn't....He threw an INT the others threw passes that should have been INT'd but wheren't and the O kept the ball which gave us more of an chance to score than not having the ball. Granted it was only 1 int and in preseason... And Drew B has thrown his fair share and more but we are discussing Henson putting us in a better chance to score position...


Sorry JK, but ABQCowboy wins this argument hands down.
Coaches/general managers wouldn't buy a product without checking it out first. Game film my man. No idiot coach or GM besides the one in Denver would pick someone up by looking at a freaking Stat sheet. Now, a stat sheet might help alert him to a player that may picque (sp?) his interest, but that's all.

I guarantee that a coach counts a dropped INT just as much as one that was caught. He counts a recovered fumble the same as one that was lost.

PS: Neither QB has done enough in my opinion to be a formidable back-up at this point :(

[ABQCOWBOY]

All QB's will throw INT's even the best but how you respond after throwing an INT is a major key at that position. Some guys will get very tentative with their passes almost trying to guild the ball instead of just dropping back and firing it in there. One thing I have always noticed with a guy like Favre, he never changes his play after throwing a pick he just comes right back at you I think you can say that about most of the top QB’s who play in this league. You can't be afraid to make mistakes

I completely agree Dooms. That's a good observation.

[jksmith269]

Sorry JK, but ABQCowboy wins this argument hands down.
Coaches/general managers wouldn't buy a product without checking it out first. Game film my man. No idiot coach or GM besides the one in Denver would pick someone up by looking at a freaking Stat sheet. Now, a stat sheet might help alert him to a player that may picque (sp?) his interest, but that's all.

I guarantee that a coach counts a dropped INT just as much as one that was caught. He counts a recovered fumble the same as one that was lost.

PS: Neither QB has done enough in my opinion to be a formidable back-up at this point :(
I agree with you and ABQ about the film but if your looking for a young Qb as a backup what do you look at first? the teams with more than one young backup then you look at the players available stats granted 1 int difference won't make a difference and one thing Henson has is the Hype he had coming out of college.... anyway if you compare two Qb's from one team and one has say 8 more int's in the same number of games which would you look film on first? Me I'd look at the one who threw the least int's and if he sucked I'd look at the other one or move on to another team. Now Henson faced better D this week than did Romo just like the week before Romo faced better than did henson. Who has the better stats thus far in Preseason? I haven't looked but I will and honestly I don't care which is the back up. I want to see Bledsoe look better then maybe I will worry about the backup position....

[ravidubey]

Henson has better physical skills and that can't be denied. Romo looks polished and it's a credit to his work. Romo just has the look of a career backup while Henson is a boom-bust type player who if he can put it all together will either be very good or be out of the league.

[VirusX]

Henson's pick could have EASILY been a 13 yard completion he only overthrew Witten by about 3 feet which isnt much because he didnt throw a tight spiral and it sailed. Thats what happens when they overhaul your throwing motion. I think Henson is a long way off from starting but I think he has more potential then Romo. Romo does looks comfortable in the offense but thats not what counts. I think neither is more ready then the other to start so I would give the edge to Henson over romo.

[jksmith269]

Henson has better physical skills and that can't be denied. Romo looks polished and it's a credit to his work. Romo just has the look of a career backup while Henson is a boom-bust type player who if he can put it all together will either be very good or be out of the league.
I agree with the Romo assesment and the boom or bust part on Henson but where do you get Henson has better physcial skills? Didn't he have to completly redo his throwing motion? which may have actually hurt him in the short term? and are you basing your assesment on his abilities on his college days because he surley hasn't shown that yet in the NFL and if you are do you not think that his time away could have hurt his abilities? Just wondering and again I don't think either is very good right now....

[ravidubey]

I agree with the Romo assesment and the boom or bust part on Henson but where do you get Henson has better physcial skills? Didn't he have to completly redo his throwing motion? which may have actually hurt him in the short term? and are you basing your assesment on his abilities on his college days because he surley hasn't shown that yet in the NFL and if you are do you not think that his time away could have hurt his abilities? Just wondering and again I don't think either is very good right now....

Arm strength and physical size. Henson has a cannon. Romo for all his "moxie" will have trouble zinging the deep out in a real game on a consistent basis. Henson is still in development, but I have a feeling the ceiling is far higher for Henson than for Romo. And Romo, for his recent preseason success, is also still developing. Against Seattles' third stringers Romo panicked when facing a LB blitz and lobbed a pitiful pass straight into the chest of a safety. The ball bounced out, but you wonder what would happen had that blitz been in a real game.

Right now Dallas fans definitely do not want to see Bledsoe getting hurt because at this point we're talking a total disaster of a season should that happen.

[jksmith269]

Arm strength and physical size. Henson has a cannon. Romo for all his "moxie" will have trouble zinging the deep out in a real game on a consistent basis. Henson is still in development, but I have a feeling the ceiling is far higher for Henson than for Romo. And Romo, for his recent preseason success, is also still developing. Against Seattles' third stringers Romo panicked when facing a LB blitz and lobbed a pitiful pass straight into the chest of a safety. The ball bounced out, but you wonder what would happen had that blitz been in a real game.

Right now Dallas fans definitely do not want to see Bledsoe getting hurt because at this point we're talking a total disaster of a season should that happen.


I agree with you on this and you know Drew B hasn't really been tearing it up either. I do think BP has been holding him back a bit so far. I think we will be fine at QB barring injury

[CactusCowboy]

Romo looks comfortable, Henson still does not. Who cares if Hensons arm is stronger, Romo makes the plays. He is a play maker. I will take Romo as my backup.

[blindzebra]

I find it soooooooo funny, the extremes people are going to, I really do.

Romo is in his 3rd year coming right from college, the offense is clicking for him, his mechanics are more fluid and he has fun while he's out there, so he looks like he's doing more than he is really doing. That does not change the fact that he threw 3 times late over the middle on Monday and did it twice in AZ. You replace 2nd and 3rd stringers with starters and Romo's mistakes become 3 or 4 INTs.

Henson is in his second year after a layoff, with a brand new throwing motion, so it is understandable that he does not look as polished. Through two games he has made really only one bad throw. Yeah, he's missed some receivers and threw several away, but I'm talking obvious mistakes in judgement.

The difference between them is Henson's mistake got picked, Romo has had a horseshoe in his pocket and his mistakes have not ended up on the stat sheet, but I quarantee they made it on Parcells stat sheet.

[Rack Bauer]

Henson's pick could have EASILY been a 13 yard completion he only overthrew Witten by about 3 feet which isnt much because he didnt throw a tight spiral and it sailed



That's almost as good as "Carter's INTs are as good as punts".

Hey, I supported Carter, but even I knew that was completely stupid.

[Novacek84]

[QUOTE= Never understood the fascination with Romo. I guess football fans LOVE underdogs.[/QUOTE]

I don't get the Romo love either. I keep hearing how he has potential and just needs to play. Well, except for the pre-season comeback last year vs. Oakland, Romo has shown me nothing to merit him being a #2. At least henson has a strong arm and upside. Again, if Henson got some playing time at the end of last season he'd be that much further ahead. Good thing Vinny played the whole season... :confused:

[jksmith269]

I find it soooooooo funny, the extremes people are going to, I really do.

Romo is in his 3rd year coming right from college, the offense is clicking for him, his mechanics are more fluid and he has fun while he's out there, so he looks like he's doing more than he is really doing. That does not change the fact that he threw 3 times late over the middle on Monday and did it twice in AZ. You replace 2nd and 3rd stringers with starters and Romo's mistakes become 3 or 4 INTs.

Henson is in his second year after a layoff, with a brand new throwing motion, so it is understandable that he does not look as polished. Through two games he has made really only one bad throw. Yeah, he's missed some receivers and threw several away, but I'm talking obvious mistakes in judgement.

The difference between them is Henson's mistake got picked, Romo has had a horseshoe in his pocket and his mistakes have not ended up on the stat sheet, but I quarantee they made it on Parcells stat sheet.

Now thats a crock of crap... Romo played against first and second team against the Cards and went 8-10 no int's for 71 yards

Henson against the cards went 6-13 for 64 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed

against the Hawks Henson against first and second team went 4-10 for 38 yards and an INT

Romo went 2-6 for 48 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed players.

Looks like against the same comp of first and second team players Romo beats Henson hands down. Period

[blindzebra]

Now thats a crock of crap... Romo played against first and second team against the Cards and went 8-10 no int's for 71 yards

Henson against the cards went 6-13 for 64 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed

against the Hawks Henson against first and second team went 4-10 for 38 yards and an INT

Romo went 2-6 for 48 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed players.

Looks like against the same comp of first and second team players Romo beats Henson hands down. Period

I rest my case mister stat sheet.:rolleyes:

Damn I love it when they prove my point.:D

[ABQCOWBOY]

Now thats a crock of crap... Romo played against first and second team against the Cards and went 8-10 no int's for 71 yards

Henson against the cards went 6-13 for 64 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed

against the Hawks Henson against first and second team went 4-10 for 38 yards and an INT

Romo went 2-6 for 48 yards against 3rd and future unemployeed players.

Looks like against the same comp of first and second team players Romo beats Henson hands down. Period

I think Romo looked very good against Az but in that game, he did throw a ball that should have been intercepted. The thing about Romo is that he doesn't seem to get the pressure on him that the other two get. I suspect that it has something to do with the fact that he is generally pretty good at getting rid of the ball but in that Az game, I think it was pretty clear that he got better protection then did Henson or Bledsoe. Still, he should get credit for at least getting the ball out. He did nice job of that.

As for Henson, he may have been playing against 2nd and 3rd string but he was also playing with the same type of talent. He again had balls dropped, he had constant pressure, guys coming free, and he did manage to take the team down the field for the game winning FG. I think you also have to give credit where do to Henson as well.

[ndanger]

I agree that Henson has done a lot better than most people give him credit for but I think Bill already has his mind made up. I believe Romo will be second string with Henson third. (Edit: I did think just as you do until Bill made Henson take a knee before halftime. If he were truely interested in what Henson could do he would of been aloud to run the 2-minute offense.) I do feel Henson has a much brighter future than Romo.
You know I've been thinking about that taking a knee scenario and I'm not so sure it was directed at Henson as perhaps Sean Payton.Bill certainly had a very animated discussion on more than one occasion during the game with Payton.Could be my rose colored glasses but I guess it's possible.After all that all any of us can do is guess. :confused:

[CaptainAmerica]

Did any of you Romo-ites happen to notice the DBs breaking on almost every one of Romo's throws and breaking the pass up? Take a look at that throw to the TE Pierce on 3rd down. That happened to be the 2nd time it happened in his first two series.

I'm not making this stuff up. Go back and look at the game on tape. He cannot zip a ball in against top-flight competition, I don't care how much he moves his pinky finger around on the ball .

Romo would be seriously exposed if he had to start a game.

[Banned_n_austin]

oh my... the Romologists are gonna be miffed at you... ;)


Pot stirrer ... :D

[Banned_n_austin]

I rest my case mister stat sheet.:rolleyes:

Damn I love it when they prove my point.:D


You didn't prove squat. It's in your head, again.

[The30YardSlant]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.

Betting on the backup QB....we've hit a new low :rolleyes:

[blindzebra]

You didn't prove squat. It's in your head, again.

Has Romo thrown late 5 times over the middle and had near picks doing it?

Any answer but yes is a complete lie, but you will never let the facts get in the way of bashing Henson.:rolleyes:

[Billy Bullocks]

Bill will not make a decision until after the Houston game and maybe until after the last preseason game. Because contrary to popular belief, Henson is not as bad as you think. Yes, he does not look as comfortable as Romo yet but he has put the team in position to score more than any of the Qb's inclucing Bledsoe. If it were not for the drop passes in his last drive it could have been a TD drive. Do not get me wrong, in my opinion neither he or Romo look that great but I believe DH is doing more with less time. If the light comes on (if)...we could have something special.

Morgan dropped a 1st down, and I think the way we were moving, TD. You're right. Morgan hasn't shown anything this pre season. Crayton is far superior.

[Cowboy Junkie]

This would make a good poll question and I say Henson is the back up.
Romo 3rd string.