**Official PC Thread*** if they ever start the pc lol

[Sportsbabe]

I can't stomach these guys :ralph: .... bring on the PC.

Lord I wish they would shut up!!!!

[Bungarian]

What are they talking about "the greatest cowboy note ever"?

[LarryCanadian]

Anyone else getting this message when trying to listen to the PC today. It's almost 2PM CT.

Thx,

LarryCanadian

[Yeagermeister]

The name of the show says it all....yes I know BAD doesn't mean the word bad :D

[BigDFan5]

ESPN 1033 is not working for me, and the Cowboys website says hear it live but then the real player tells me to tune back during regualr broadcast hours

[Bungarian]

Why is the PC delayed?

[BigDFan5]

I did as well

[mullet]

i am assuming it hasn't started yet.

[Next_years_Champs]

Same here.........

[Sportsbabe]

What are they talking about "the greatest cowboy note ever"?

They talk over each other, there is this awful background noise (I guess they're broadcasting live from somewhere), they have horrible radio voices, they are talking about how bad the Boys were last year and how bad they're going to be this year. They are just boring!!!!! The PC should be getting ready to start now .... thank God.

[Bungarian]

It is delayed for some reason.

[Yeagermeister]

Why is the PC delayed?
Maybe Bill is still napping :D

[BigDFan5]

well the "listen live" icon was flashing meaning it is on thats why I was wondering

[mullet]

it is on the ticket now....
dallascowboys.com not working.

[Anguillidae]

Go to the ticket: http://www.theticket.com/listen.htm

[Banned_n_austin]

it is on the ticket now....
dallascowboys.com not working.

Can a brotha get a link?

[LaTunaNostra]

Bill has put the kibbosh on all pcs for the remainder of the year.

He has just discovered he is the source of those 'leaks'.

[jlust22]

You can listen at theticket.com. Parcells said Ryan, Curtis, Ferguson and T. Johnson (pre-cautionary reasons) are out. He said Spears and Beriault are game-time decisions. He said Bledsoe will start followed by Romo and Henson. He wants to get his 1st team OL quite a bit of work on Sat. He is working hard on putting together the 53-man roster. He is contemplating all of the potential contingencies that could take place between now and the start of the season.

[jlust22]

Newman will get a chance to return at least 1 punt. Crayton will get a couple of shots at is as well. Thompson will continue to return kicks and Glenn will return at least 1 as well. Robinson will get more chances to snap tomorrow night.

They are working on bringing in another kicker. He wouldn't say who it was because of the logistics, only that he was from Jacksonville. He would like for him to be available for the game tomorrow, but he doesn't know if he will be here in time. He said its Cortez's job to lose.

[jksmith269]

How do we have exemptions for Jones and Crayton? or did he transfer the NFLE exemptions from Blade and the LB we cut to these players?

[davey999]

Bringing in some kicker from Jax. Seth Marler?

[JakeCamp12]

Some stats on Marler

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/397297

[JakeCamp12]

Marler is only 60% conversion percentage, why bother? :eek:

[Charles]

Who did he say was practice squad eligble when asked about the back-up QBs? Romo or Henson

[Banned_n_austin]

Do you guys think he was talking about Henson when he said "you have to let some players go and you feel like a failure as a coach"? Also mentioned the "Yankees" ...

Irony?

I think he may have just hinted one of the QB's is not going to be on the roster when the 53 man cuts are made ....

Everything he's saying is pointing to Henskunk being on the outs.

[jobberone]

Henson

[Banned_n_austin]

Henson

Cya, Skunkboy.

[noshame]

I think he may have just hinted one of the QB's is not going to be on the roster when the 53 man cuts are made ....


I don't think he hinted that at all. but I do think there will be a suprise or two come monday.

[Banned_n_austin]

I think he may have just hinted one of the QB's is not going to be on the roster when the 53 man cuts are made ....


I don't think he hinted that at all. but I do think there will be a suprise or two come monday.



What was that spill on the Yankees then?

[jobberone]

I didn't say he was gone. I was answering the question as to which QB was PS eligble.

[Charles]

Henson
So he's practice squad eligble.

I think it would be fair to say based on his performance in camp (to date) he isn't one of the best 53 players on the team.

[LeonDixson]

Some stats on Marler

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/397297

:thumbdo: I'm not a Cundiff fan, but I'd rather re-sign him after the 6th week and go with Cortez in the meantime. Marler sounds horrible. He's not even money on the short kicks.

[jobberone]

I should know better than to post anything about Henson

[noshame]

So he's practice squad eligble.

I think it would be fair to say based on his performance in camp (to date) he isn't one of the best 53 players on the team.

True, but there goes the three year development rule. He will not cut Henson until htree years are up. No way will they place him on the PS either, he wouldn't last five minutes.

If anybody goes here, it will be Romo if he has a bad outing. Then it's Vinny time :rolleyes:

[Yeagermeister]

I should know better than to post anything about Henson
Yeah some people will jump at the chance to put Henson in his grave :rolleyes:

[LeonDixson]

So he's practice squad eligble.

I think it would be fair to say based on his performance in camp (to date) he isn't one of the best 53 players on the team.

Maybe not, but you can't go into the season with only two QBs. Henson wouldn't make it to the practice squad and you'd still have to bring in another QB. It doesn't make sense to me they would cut Henson at this point. I only got to hear the end of the PC, so I can't comment on whether BP was hinting at cutting him or not, but I think it would be rediculous if they did.

[AbeBeta]

If we wanted to get rid of Henson we could trade him for something. We aren't going to release him and try to PS him.

[Zaxor]

Yeah some people will jump at the chance to put Henson in his grave :rolleyes:

Only the petty or small minded my friend

[Next_years_Champs]

So he's practice squad eligble.

I think it would be fair to say based on his performance in camp (to date) he isn't one of the best 53 players on the team.

Bill was asked if something happened and he decided to bring in another QB was someone eligible for the PS and he said yes Henson was....

He also said that they (at this point) were still committed to stay with who they had on the roster........

[rcaldw]

Do you guys think he was talking about Henson when he said "you have to let some players go and you feel like a failure as a coach"? Also mentioned the "Yankees" ...

Irony?

I think he may have just hinted one of the QB's is not going to be on the roster when the 53 man cuts are made ....

Everything he's saying is pointing to Henskunk being on the outs.

You prove just how biased you are when you selectively remember things. Did you hear him say that the "Yankees let some pretty good players go"? Because he did. I wonder if he was talking about Henson then?

The truth is, Parcells is using analogies not talking about Drew Henson in some "secret speak". You guys kill me.

[blindzebra]

Does this sound like they are planning on releasing him?



At this point, are you disappointed in Drew Henson?

I would have liked to seem him press Bledsoe more, if I was making my Christmas list. I think everyone would like for him to be more comfortable back there in the pocket. That’s really the issue at the moment. His skills as far as size and arm are undeniable as far as being prototype. But he’s got to get better. We’ll be very patient with him. QB’s don’t just land here, they evolve. If we be patient here, and Bledsoe allows us to be, we’ll see the Henson we want to see down the road.

I’ll speak for the consensus of observers that I talked to at camp, they all say Romo should be the backup.

I’d like the benefit of watching them on Saturday and Thursday before I say anything on that. The key thing for that #2 when they get into the game is to not make the bad plays. Now, if Drew Henson were our #1 QB, we would game plan to his strengths. Just like we did with Quincy. But by the same token, we got to go to the one that doesn’t make the bad plays. I know that’s a cliché, but at the end of the game the other night Romo kind of threw the ball in the air and that’s the kind of thing you want to avoid. You’re better off with a little less ability and arm from that position than a QB who makes bad plays. That was the #1 thing we had with Troy Aikman, he just never made the bad play.

[dboyz]

There is no way Henson would make it to the practice squad. Someone would pick him up. Jerry has control over the 53 man roster and I just don't see any way that he would allow Henson to be cut. Not gonna happen.

[jobberone]

Yeah some people will jump at the chance to put Henson in his grave :rolleyes:

Thanks for helping out. If you are neutral you sure do get an interesting look into the human psyche at times around here.

I missed most of the PC. I'm sitting here waiting on a recap. Man, that is being so spoiled.

[jksmith269]

If we wanted to get rid of Henson we could trade him for something. We aren't going to release him and try to PS him.
The Redskins already made their stupid QB move this offseason so who else would take him, considering how bad his TC has gone? The Bears might but doubt it.

And he said VT is done with FB "He Thinks" when asked about bringing VT back.

[Qwickdraw]

He didn't hint at all to getting rid of Henson.

He was asked which is harder to swallow... letting a player go that turns out to be good for someone else or keeping a player he thinks will be good and having that player not pan out.
He said the latter because sometimes, if you have a really good team, you have to let some good players go.

That says to me if he had 4 really good QBs... he'd have to let a good one go out of necessity. He currently would be lucky to have one really good QB.

[Sportsbabe]

Excellent PC today. The reporters had good questions today (finally); Bill seemed to be jacked up (on something :-). It was funny when he was ragging the reporter about being "happy" today. Also was funny when he spoke about "go get this guy" ... meaning QB.

I'm sooooo ready for the season to start. We are in capable hands guys. Bill is getting the contingency plan together while we sit here and debate over all the superficial stuff.

[Yeagermeister]

Thanks for helping out. If you are neutral you sure do get an interesting look into the human psyche at times around here.

I missed most of the PC. I'm sitting here waiting on a recap. Man, that is being so spoiled.
I just want the best qb not named Quincy or Vinny as our starter.....not sure if that makes me neutral or not :D

[Fletch]

Excellent PC today. The reporters had good questions today (finally); Bill seemed to be jacked up (on something :-). It was funny when he was ragging the reporter about being "happy" today. Also was funny when he spoke about "go get this guy" ... meaning QB.

I'm sooooo ready for the season to start. We are in capable hands guys. Bill is getting the contingency plan together while we sit her and debate over all the superficial stuff.

You mean like whether banned and Nors will get their wish and see Henson cut from the team? :rolleyes:

Sportsbabe, was there any mention on status of Ferguson's ankle and the status of Marcus Spears?

[K-Mart]

Maybe not, but you can't go into the season with only two Qbs. Henson wouldn't make it to the practice squad and you'd still have to bring in another QB. It doesn't make sense to me they would cut Henson at this point. I only got to hear the end of the PC, so I can't comment on whether BP was hinting at cutting him or not, but I think it would be rediculous if they did.


I think I read that Pittsburgh is only going into the season with 2 QB's since they have Randel El who could play in an emergency. We could do the same thing with Crayton. Actually, maybe not. But it would save us a roster spot for another Lineman on either side of the ball.

[InmanRoshi]

I missed the first parts of it becasue of the delay.

Bariault – The question is can I count on him? Maybe I can manage it, but then again maybe I can’t. The worst case scenario is to stick him on the roster when I can’t even use him.

Who gives you a recommendation on that? A Doctor?
I gotta go by what I see.

Would you like to use this 3rd game as dress rehsersal?
I normally do, but with this short week, with 38 hours after a MNF when you’re practicing again you’re in a quandary. We had all those injury waivers, all the moves. I couldn’t prepare my team to be at optimum operation. I practiced twice, practiced longer today to give us a better chance. I’m not crying about it, it’s the way it is.

So do you have to use the 4th preseason game, instead of just brushing it off?
Maybe the case. I got to get the people that count game ready. Im going to play some guys a little longer tomorrow. Not all the starters, but a few certain guys. On defense, I only got 3 nosetackles. I don’t want to wear Glover out. So some of the young guys are going to get a lot of snaps.

Return game?

I’m going to use Newman for 1 punt return. I’ll use Crayton for a couple. I’ll give Jeff Robinson more work. I’ll use Tyson on kick off returns, but you may see Aaron Glenn in there too.

Either/or guys playing tomorrow night?

One of those guys isn’t playing tomorrow night. We’ll have quite a few less players here next Tuesday. But we only have to get to 69 players because of the European players and roster exemptions Julius and Crayton. You wanna start getting things sorted out right now with 53 players in mind. I’m thinking about 53 now, almost exclusively. There are 3 to 4 either/or guys, and the rest of them I know what I’m going to do.

Any sign that a kicker finds it in his 4th or 5th chance in the league?
I’ve seen it happen historically. But we’re still looking. We may have a new kicker tomorrow night. I’d tell you who it was, but I don’t know where we are logistically as to getting him in here on time. Its Cortez’ job to lose. I can’t dismiss his history, but I also have to look at what he’s doing right now. If he looks good right now I’ll put more weight on that than a kid who never has kicked in the league. He’s from Jacksonville, but I don’t know if we can get him in here on time.

Worse case scenario can you see making out this roster?
Worst case scenerio is that I don’t have 2 deep at every position because I’m short. Then if I lose one guy, I don’t have anybody. It’s the same thing we’ve been talking about all summer. You know the positions we’ve been discussing.

Stronger at QB up and down the roster than you were last year?
I think that there is a chance we could be. I don’t know that for sure yet. We could be. Yeah, I think I feel better about it than I did last year.

Do you feel like you’ve tempted fate since you haven’t needed a backup QB for the last 2 years?
Well, it’s a very easy thing to say “Go get a backup QB.” Well, tell me where to get him. That’s what I’m asking. You can’t dial them up. There’s some guys out of work, and everyone says “Why don’t you go get so-and-so”, but you don’t know what kind of shape these guys are in. You don’t know if they’re prepared to throw. They could be playing underhand softball at the firestation.

Why wouldn’t Vinny be a backup?
I don’t think he’s playing any more football. I don’t know that. I saw him this summer and talked to him a little bit. I have a good relationship with him. But right now he’s playing golf at the country club. Its Friday Afternoon, isn’t it?

Pretty happy with what you got at backup QB?
I’m not saying I’m unhappy. Its what I have. I could upgrade every positon. This is it. This is the way we decided to go to camp.

But are you happy?
Happy is a relative term.

Are any of your QB’s eligible for practice squad?
Henson is.

Aaron Glenn, did he have to prove anything with such small size when you coached the Jets?
He’s a better player now than he was with the Jets. Knows what he’s doing. You don’t have to tell him much of anything. Just reminders. With the Jets? Oh yea, him and Mickens both. They were the bobsie twins. You gain an appreciation pretty quickly for these guys when you spend some time with them. You know why they are where they are. I’ve had a few deminitive players .. Joe Morris, Dave Meggett .. you spend some time around them and you know why they are where they are. They have things you don’t see. Now, Glenn was a high draft pick. Everyone knew about him. He had a phenomenal workout heading into the draft. Broke the all time 3 cone drill record. Plus, he’s a high class kid. He’s also in my apartment building, so I have to say nice things about him in case I run into him.

When making these rosters, which bothers you more? A player that pans out elsewhere vs. player that you keep that doesn’t pan out?
A player that I keep that doesn’t pan out. Sometimes when you’re on good teams you’re going to have to let good players go. You just have to. But the ones you keep that don’t pan out, it makes you feel like a little bit of a failure as a coach. But it goes back to what Landry told me with the 3 year deal. That was an excellent piece of advice. It keeps you from being impatient and makes you analytical, but also gives you a limited amount of time to expect results. I think it’s a very good piece of advice. It’s a very fair time evaluation. I’ll say this … If a kid like Tucker would really come forward and be an established NFL player for 8 or 10 years, I would get a lot of satisfaction out of that. I don’t know if he does, or if he ever will without me constantly on him. But if he does, then I know I had a good impact on that guy. Maybe if he was somewhere else, it would have worked out so well for him.

Do you consider Obogu to be a DE or an OLB
He’s really a specialty player. Very much a specialty player. He’ll play in the NFL this year. There are people interested in him. I know that. But to give you an idea, just on this one player … this goes back to what worries you …. Our 3 best outside pass rushers are Ware, Ellis and Obogu … right this minute. That gives him a value. He can play on KO return and a few special teams things. Not an all star, but can get by. You usually don’t get that from guys that size. So I like that about him. Also, he has matured a great deal. Light years since he was with the Jets. He knows where he’s going. He’s got his own business on the side. He’s rock solid. That’s important, because I know what I’m going to get from him. So those are things he has going for him. I’d hate to have him play OLB for a long time. He could get you out of a game. But I look at him as a specialist than anything else. He’s in a category all to himself.

Kalen was an outside pass rusher last year. Has he regressed ?

He’s in a physical category with Bariault. He’s got a physical problem, and I don’t know that I can count on him?

So do you need another experienced at OLB?
Would I like it? Yeah. The only experienced guy I have is Singleton. But where do I get it? Dial it up? I gotta force feed other kids and get them ready to go.

Who starts at Center?
I believe Johnson, but they’ll play equal time and rotate by quarter.

What the difference between that and rotating right tackles?
Nothing . I would do it if it would help us win.

Wouldn’t it be better for Kalen to sit out a few weeks to get healthy?
It’s the exact same situation as Bariault. Where will he be 2 weeks from now? Yeah, it might be better if he sits out and gets completely healthy, but do I really know for certain that he’ll even get much better if I sat him out 2 weeks? I don’t know that. That’s the frustrating part for a coach.

Have you ever made it through a season with a player by sitting him out of practice for the week and then just playing him in games?

Yes, I have. Mark Bravaro, but he was a 7 or 8 year vet where I knew exactly what he could do. So all I was trying to do was keep him alive for the game, and he would not deceive me. He would tell me at the start of the week, “Coach, this is what you’ll get out of me”. He was experienced enough to know. These young kids don’t know. Now I like him. I like him. We’ll see how it goes, but I’m looking on the other side of that right now. If he can’t play, what will happen ?

[Sportsbabe]

I should know better than to post anything about Henson

I hope you've learned your lesson. :spanking: You're such a bad boy/girl.

[Charles]

I think I read that Pittsburgh is only going into the season with 2 QB's since they have Randel El who could play in an emergency. We could do the same thing with Crayton. Actually, maybe not. But it would save us a roster spot for another Lineman on either side of the ball.
I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.

[jksmith269]

I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.
But then it comes down to will JJ let his pet be put on the PS?

[luvtheboys]

Thanks InmanRoshi! While I appreciate everyone's efforts, it is so nice to get your transcripts so I know what Bill said - not a biased interpretation.

[Sportsbabe]

The truth is, Parcells is using analogies not talking about Drew Henson in some "secret speak". You guys kill me.

Isn't it hilarious. We've got to come up with a term to describe how posters have this seperate comprehension level of their own. Something like the term "coachspeak or your secret speak" ... what about posteriorism. I guess understanding is in the mind of the listener.

[RedLine]

Awsome job as usual InmanRoshi! Thanks

[Charles]

But then it comes down to will JJ let his pet be put on the PS?
Very true.

I'd hope Jerry listened to his coaching staff because his track record of evaluating NFL talent is pathetic at best.

[Next_years_Champs]

Isn't it hilarious. We've got to come up with a term to describe how posters have this seperate comprehension level of their own. Something like the term "coachspeak or your secret speak" ... what about posteriorism. I guess understanding is in the mind of the listener.

Seems to me some people are confusing the little voices in their head with the voices coming over the broadcast.

That's the only way I can imagine that you can take what was said today in the press conference and twist it to come to the conclusions some here are suggesting....

[Doomsday101]

I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.

Henson would never clear the waivers. He may be eligable but Dallas is not going to place him on PS

[jobberone]

I hope you've learned your lesson. :spanking: You're such a bad boy/girl.

I did. :laugh1:

[Banned_n_austin]

Bill was asked if something happened and he decided to bring in another QB was someone eligible for the PS and he said yes Henson was....

He also said that they (at this point) were still committed to stay with who they had on the roster........

He also said you have to let some good players go ... "even the Yankees let good players go" ...

etc ...

[Charles]

Henson would never clear the waivers. He may be eligable but Dallas is not going to place him on PS
Never say never bro.......but it's not worth the debate.

Just an option to keep in mind because some of our cuts are going to be players with the same potential label that Henson has carried aroung his entire Pro career.

Guys like Beriault, Reggie Love etc

[dstew60105]

I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.


You are kidding if you think he lcears waivers. For the last time, HENSON WILL NOT BE RELEASED!!!!! Can we talk about something that actualy makes sense?


Don

[Banned_n_austin]

Never say never bro.......but it's not worth the debate.

Just an option to keep in mind because some of our cuts are going to be players with the same potential label that Henson has carried aroung his entire Pro career.

Guys like Beriault, Reggie Love etc

:hammer:

[Doomsday101]

Never say never bro.......but it's not worth the debate.

Just an option to keep in mind because some of our cuts are going to be players with the same potential label that Henson has carried aroung his entire Pro career.

Guys like Beriault, Reggie Love etc

Granted anything is possiable but I don't think Henson is going to PS. I think many fans have given up on Henson I don't think the Cowboys have

[jobberone]

Never say never bro.......but it's not worth the debate.

Just an option to keep in mind because some of our cuts are going to be players with the same potential label that Henson has carried aroung his entire Pro career.

Guys like Beriault, Reggie Love etc

Don't know if Love is on everyone's radar. I'm not certain Berryo is. But I'm relatively certain more are than were after Monday. But an injured very low round pick from an obscure type school might be able to survive the waiver wire better than I'm thinking. I'll give you that. And it may turn out he will be more valuable than some higher picks we have.

[blindzebra]

Gotta love the ag...er what's the new PC term...nevermind.

We hear what Parcells says, they get out their decoder rings and get, "Yada, yada, yada, Henson, blah, blah, blah Yankees, yada, yada, yada, let go, blah, blah, blah, practice squad, yada, yada, yada, Henson is," and poof, Henson is as good as gone.

It would be funny if it was not so sad.

[Banned_n_austin]

You guys say/think whatever you want.

He said he'd do anything to make the team better ... talked about bringing in VT if it made the team better ... mentioned he had a good relationship with Vinny ... etc etc ...

Never say never ...

He said he'd do anything to make the team better - anything.

Why would he be talking about Vinny if this was an entirely impossible scenario?

We've got more ostrich thinking, Henson jock-riders than I once thought ...

[aikemirv]

You guys say/think whatever you want.

He said he'd do anything to make the team better ... talked about bringing in VT if it made the team better ... mentioned he had a good relationship with Vinny ... etc etc ...

Never say never ...

He said he'd do anything to make the team better - anything.

Why would he be talking about Vinny if this was an entirely impossible scenario?

We've got more ostrich thinking, Henson jock-riders than I once thought ...


Listen to the PC, the reporter brought up Vinnie not BP!!!!!

[Next_years_Champs]

He also said you have to let some good players go ... "even the Yankees let good players go" ...

etc ...


Yeah he did but it was in response to a totally different question.

He was asked if it was harder on him as a coach to release a player then have that player have a successful career for another team, or was it harder to stay with a player only to eventually have the player bust out of the league.

And he stated it was worse to stay with the bust because if you have a good team you will sometimes have to let good players go, He then said sometimes the yankees have to let good players go and that he had let good players go.

[Charles]

I hope I am not coming off as wanting Henson gone.

I have always believed that it takes a QB 3-4 years. I have stated in the past months that it was Romo neck onthe chopping block this off-season if he didn't separate himself from Henson. He did. And up until that stupid pass he threw up against the Seahawks I believe he was in the drivers seat.

I think Parcells evened the competition after that one stupid mistake to send a message to Romo........it doesn't really matter what you've done to this point, that stupid pass cleared the score board. Romo toss up was worse than any mistake Henson has made this preseason.

I am all for keeping Henson on the roster, but if anyone took the time to create a 53 man roster based on roles and like Parcells mentioned 2 man deep at every role/position you'll see that you'll be cutting guys that have performed better at their roles than Henson and have also shown more flashes of potential.

That is the mark of a bad team becoming good on paper.

[blindzebra]

You guys say/think whatever you want.

He said he'd do anything to make the team better ... talked about bringing in VT if it made the team better ... mentioned he had a good relationship with Vinny ... etc etc ...

Never say never ...

He said he'd do anything to make the team better - anything.

Why would he be talking about Vinny if this was an entirely impossible scenario?

We've got more ostrich thinking, Henson jock-riders than I once thought ...

It's a PC for crying-out-loud, not a speech.

He was asked about Vinny, he did not bring him up the reporter did.

The reporter asked if things did not work out as planned with the back ups is one of the QBs PS eligible?

The length that you guys go to to make this crap up is mind boggling. It's like you do a hidden Bible code breakdown on every word Parcells says to prove yor asinine position.

[Sportsbabe]

It's like you do a hidden Bible code breakdown on every word Parcells says to prove yor asinine position.

:lmao2:

[jobberone]

Very true.

I'd hope Jerry listened to his coaching staff because his track record of evaluating NFL talent is pathetic at best.

Charles, I don't understand how in the world you can come up with that. He's probably one of the best in the NFL for recognizing talent. He always has been. How else has be come to be so highly regarded.

Do you think he's just lucky?

But you are entitled to your opinion. I certainly hope you are wrong.

[Banned_n_austin]

Yeah he did but it was in response to a totally different question.

He was asked if it was harder on him as a coach to release a player then have that player have a successful career for another team, or was it harder to stay with a player only to eventually have the player bust out of the league.

And he stated it was worse to stay with the bust because if you have a good team you will sometimes have to let good players go, He then said sometimes the yankees have to let good players go and that he had let good players go.


"Henson is practice squad eligible" - Bill Parcells

[ndanger]

I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.
People Drew Henson would be snatched from the practice squad so fast you guys would blow a gasket.With everyones take on him not showing anything its agood thing you guys were not making the decisons about Brett Farve,Steve Young One hall of famer and certainly one future hof.Neither of those two came near to lighting the nfl on fire the first 3 or 4 years of their career. Bill Parcells is not going to cut Henson.As far as cutting a player who has performed better thats just nonsense.Think about what you are saying man.If a coach has to cut someone just how much could they have contributed.There is a reason players get cut and it aint because they have outplayed someone who made the team.There are a few exceptions when teams are crunching numbers at overloaded positions but still you don't get cut in the nfl if you have outperformed and given the team the best chance to win unless you have some serious flaws.A possible franchise q.b far outways a player who like I said if your cuttin' him he obviously hadnt shown enough to warrant being on the team.Sorry if this a hard read but I am banged up and I dont care about puntuation or paragraphs or spelling.Have a nice day folks.

[Charles]

Charles, I don't understand how in the world you can come up with that. He's probably one of the best in the NFL for recognizing talent. He always has been. How else has be come to be so highly regarded.

Do you think he's just lucky?

But you are entitled to your opinion. I certainly hope you are wrong.
Jerry Jones track record as a GM speaks for itself. Only 2 maybe 3 ProBowlers in a 10 year span.

Did you read the post I was replying too?

I am not questioning Parcells track record.

[jobberone]

Jerry Jones track record as a GM speaks for itself. Only 2 maybe 3 ProBowlers in a 10 year span.

Did you read the post II was replying too?

I am not questioning Parcells track record.

Sorry my bad. Thought you were ragging on BP. Again my bad.

[Banned_n_austin]

You guys really need to listen to the PC again ...

He says the one's you keep that don't pan out are the one's that make you feel like a failure ..

I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ...

And he's talking about being patient with players ... giving them a chance ... who ELSE could he be talking about?

Who's been here that is developing?

Tucker?

Who's he talking about?

[ndanger]

It's a PC for crying-out-loud, not a speech.

He was asked about Vinny, he did not bring him up the reporter did.

The reporter asked if things did not work out as planned with the back ups is one of the QBs PS eligible?

The length that you guys go to to make this crap up is mind boggling. It's like you do a hidden Bible code breakdown on every word Parcells says to prove yor asinine position.
:bow: :lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao: Thanks

[ndanger]

You guys really need to listen to the PC again ...

He says the one's you keep that don't pan out are the one's that make you feel like a failure ..

I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ...

And he's talking about being patient with players ... giving them a chance ... who ELSE could he be talking about?

Who's been here that is developing?

Tucker?

Who's he talking about?
It aint Henson cause the 3 yr. plan still has another year after this one :D

[jobberone]

You guys really need to listen to the PC again ...

He says the one's you keep that don't pan out are the one's that make you feel like a failure ..

I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ...

And he's talking about being patient with players ... giving them a chance ... who ELSE could he be talking about?

Who's been here that is developing?

Tucker?

Who's he talking about?

He was talking about players in general. He was not referring to anyone in particular. But you may choose to make it Henson. That I think would be your choice as I did not take it that way and it appears many here would agree with that assessment.

[Banned_n_austin]

It aint Henson cause the 3 yr. plan still has another year after this one :D

He was talking about Tucker as a "case in point" ... used him as an example ... but I don't think it's Tucker.

[Banned_n_austin]

He was talking about players in general. He was not referring to anyone in particular. But you may choose to make it Henson. That I think would be your choice as I did not take it that way and it appears many here would agree with that assessment.


Should be at least interesting ... I think we bring Vinny back ... and Romo isn't going anywhere IMO. He's Bill's boy.

[Next_years_Champs]

"Henson is practice squad eligible" - Bill Parcells

From a earlier post of mine

Bill was asked if something happened and he decided to bring in another QB was someone eligible for the PS and he said yes Henson was....

He also said that they (at this point) were still committed to stay with who they had on the roster........

What is this a merry go round? hey spin it anyway you like I'm sure you will anyway but there is no way Parcells was implying Henson was going to the practice squad. just the opposite is true he stated that at this point they were commited to go with who they had on the roster.........

[Joshmvii]

Who's he talking about? Probably every single player he's drafted since he came here. How about Terence Newman, Bradie James, Julius Jones, Stephen Peterman, Nate Jones, Jacques Reeves, Patrick Crayton. Need I go on, Parcells is talking about developing every single guy.

[jobberone]

Should be at least interesting ... I think we bring Vinny back ... and Romo isn't going anywhere IMO. He's Bill's boy.

Again I wasn't agreeing with you. I was disagreeing. I don't see any current changes with the roster at QB. In fact Bill said that the other day. Not sure exactly when but I do remember it.

[Banned_n_austin]

Again I wasn't agreeing with you. I was disagreeing. I don't see any current changes with the roster at QB. In fact Bill said that the other day. Not sure exactly when but I do remember it.


Never said you were.

[Cbz40]

"I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ..."

Parcells has referred to that philosophy 2-3 times during a PC each year he's been here.

Nothing New.......Nor do I think it was adressed to any one particular player.

[Banned_n_austin]

"I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ..."

Parcells has referred to that philosophy 2-3 times during a PC each year he's been here.

Nothing New.......Nor do I think it was adressed to any one particular player.


CBZ - "Happy is a relative term". ;)

I know I'm reading into it a little ... sorry if I've offended the fandom.

[blindzebra]

"I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ..."

Parcells has referred to that philosophy 2-3 times during a PC each year he's been here.

Nothing New.......Nor do I think it was adressed to any one particular player.

If it was in reference to a QB, which QB is in year #3 and never taken a regular season snap?

Opps, don't want to bring any facts into the PC code theory.:D

[jobberone]

Never said you were.

Then don't quote me and make me a part of your argument please.

[Banned_n_austin]

Then don't quote me and make me a part of your argument please.


I'll quote whoever I want to and respond how I darn well please.

Know what I'm sayin'?

[Banned_n_austin]

If it was in reference to a QB, which QB is in year #3 and never taken a regular season snap?

Opps, don't want to bring any facts into the PC code theory.:D


Fact is he said he'd bring in VT if it made the team better ...

You only want facts when they suit your "agenda" ...

Another fact is ... he said Henson is practice squad eligible ...

The question is ... does 2+2=skunkboy out?

[Doomsday101]

Fact is he said he'd bring in VT if it made the team better ...

You only want facts when they suit your "agenda" ...

No Bill did not say he was going to bring Vinny back

Reporter: Why wouldn’t Vinny be a backup?
Parcells: I don’t think he’s playing any more football. I don’t know that. I saw him this summer and talked to him a little bit. I have a good relationship with him. But right now he’s playing golf at the country club. Its Friday Afternoon, isn’t it?

I added who said what because you have a tendancy to twist every single thing that comes out to fit you lame arguments.

[Banned_n_austin]

No Bill did not say he was going to bring Vinny back

Reporter: Why wouldn’t Vinny be a backup?
Parcells: I don’t think he’s playing any more football. I don’t know that. I saw him this summer and talked to him a little bit. I have a good relationship with him. But right now he’s playing golf at the country club. Its Friday Afternoon, isn’t it?

I added who said what because you have a tendancy to twist every single thing that comes out to fit you lame arguments.



He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..

[ABQCOWBOY]

I believe that Purcells might try and bring Vinnie back but I don't know that he would come back.

I think it's interesting that this discussion has not considered the possability that if VT were brought back, it might be Romo who was cut.

Most here have concluded that while Romo might be ahead in the compatition, neither are exactly lighting it up.

If Bill really is a 3 and out kinda guy, I don't see why it would be so far fetched to come to the conclusion that Romo has had his three and hasn't shown enough.

This is not what I think but I could see the logic if Purcells were to decide to go that way.

[ConcordCowboy]

The length that you guys go to to make this crap up is mind boggling. It's like you do a hidden Bible code breakdown on every word Parcells says to prove yor asinine position.

.... :D

[Verdict]

I was thinking along the same lines.

Its the roster the spot I am more concerned about. It's not a reflection on how I feel about Henson. I think he needs to develop, but because he hasn't played as well as other guys on the roster, he doesn't deserve it and we will cut a player who performed better.

I don't think he's as valuable as most on this board think. He hasn't shown anything yet to the rest of the league that would make him a valuable commodity other than potential and prototype physical attributes.

Crayton presence as an emergency QB could make the release of Henson possible with the hopes he'll clear waivers and land on the practice squad.

It would shock me to death if Henson gets the axe. I just do NOT see it coming this year. Romo could go, if he is deemed to be nothing other than a backup. I also doubt that there is any benefit of cutting Romo and using Crayton as the number 3 quarterback. I'm not sure of the rules on the #3 Qb, but there are some restrictions on that if I remember correctly.

[Next_years_Champs]

Another fact is ... he said Henson is practice squad eligible ...


The reporter asker him specifically if his 2nd or 3rd year quarterbacks were eligible for the practice squad.

What does the conspiracy code suggest his answer should have been? If he had lied and said no would that have been (code wise) a better answer?

[Banned_n_austin]

You know what's funny?

I hear more people agreeing with me every day ...

... it's just that it's not much on the main forum ...

... some of you are so vicious with this Hensonhomeritis that some will only express that they feel the same way about Henskunk in PM's ...

It's the strangest thing ...

[Banned_n_austin]

The reporter asker him specifically if his 2nd or 3rd year quarterbacks were eligible for the practice squad.

What does the conspiracy code suggest his answer should have been? If he had lied and said no would that have been (code wise) a better answer?


I've got a PC code Bible ... remember?

[Doomsday101]

He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..

Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL

[ABQCOWBOY]

You know what's funny?

I hear more people agreeing with me every day ...

... it's just that it's not much on the main forum ...

... some of you are so vicious with this Hensonhomeritis that some will only express that they feel the same way about Henskunk in PM's ...

It's the strangest thing ...

LOL!!!!

If it would make you feel better Ben, I will PM you and tell you that I like Henson.

You know, just to kinda even things out a bit.

;)

[dbair1967]

Everything he's saying is pointing to Henskunk being on the outs.

well Jones today said he was getting at least another yr

David

[Banned_n_austin]

Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL


Like I enjoy reading you make a fool out of yourself everyday ... not because of your opinion (because you don't really have one) ... but because you just come off as not so bright ...

Not to mention all your posts look the same. Like a 10 year old is behind your keyboard. Except I know better. You're a full-grown man with a 5th grade education.

[Verdict]

Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL

I do not think Parcells has indicated in any form or fashion that he intends to cut Henson. If Parcells had already decided to cut anyone, including Henson, the public would be the last to know in most cases. You guys are trying WAY to hard to be ahead of the curve. I will root for whoever plays QB, including but not limited to, Vinnie Testaverde if he is brought back.

[Banned_n_austin]

I do not think Parcells has indicated in any form or fashion that he intends to cut Henson. If Parcells had already decided to cut anyone, including Henson, the public would be the last to know in most cases. You guys are trying WAY to hard to be ahead of the curve. I will root for whoever plays QB, including but not limited to, Vinnie Testaverde if he is brought back.

Here's the sad thing ... IF Henskunk ever takes a snap during regular season ... I'm going to be forced to root for him ...

I'm not above it.

[Doomsday101]

Like I enjoy reading you make a fool out of yourself everyday ... not because of your opinion (because you don't really have one) ... but because you just come off as not so bright ...

Not to mention all your posts look the same. Like a 10 year old is behind your keyboard. Except I know better. You're a full-grown man with a 5th grade education.

Ben when people question grammer from another poster it only shows they can't argue the facts of the subject so they attack else where. I have seen your little game for a while now and your childish behavior, you have no ideal how to talk with people which is why you get yourself banned or threads are moved once you get involved, you have a lot of growing up to do. It is like talking with a punk little kid everytime you come here.

[blindzebra]

Like I enjoy reading you make a fool out of yourself everyday ... not because of your opinion (because you don't really have one) ... but because you just come off as not so bright ...

Not to mention all your posts look the same. Like a 10 year old is behind your keyboard. Except I know better. You're a full-grown man with a 5th grade education.

Nice to see you practicing what you preach:

BNA says, "Take notes of this, BZ. From one of the "more respected" members of this forum (LTN). You need to tone down your act just as much as anyone else, including me. I'm not acting like I'm the exception here. You are.

For the betterment of this board. Get off your high horse with the animosity towards members. It's fine to have an opinion and disagree, but attacking people personally doesn't do a thing for your case. In fact, it has been showing that you're being hypocritical ...:rolleyes:

[silverbear]

He was talking about Tucker as a "case in point" ... used him as an example ... but I don't think it's Tucker.

That's right, everybody knows when Parcells talks about Tucker, it's code for Henson...

:D

[Banned_n_austin]

Nice to see you practicing what you preach:

BNA says, "Take notes of this, BZ. From one of the "more respected" members of this forum (LTN). You need to tone down your act just as much as anyone else, including me. I'm not acting like I'm the exception here. You are.

For the betterment of this board. Get off your high horse with the animosity towards members. It's fine to have an opinion and disagree, but attacking people personally doesn't do a thing for your case. In fact, it has been showing that you're being hypocritical ...:rolleyes:


I wasn't even talking to him, BZ. And he started with the "fool" comments etc ...

In other words, I'm not preaching ... nor did I provoke an insult, but he slung it and I responded ...

And it's not like it isn't true either. Dude is a box of rocks. I didn't fire first, but I'll fire back all day long ... and it really wasn't an insult ... I was just calling it like I see it ... if you want one of those (insults) PM me ...

Big difference.

[Banned_n_austin]

That's right, everybody knows when Parcells talks about Tucker, it's code for Henson...

:D

OH NO!

Big bad Silverbear is here ... I'm gonna keep my trap shut.


:laugh2:


:D

[silverbear]

OH NO!

Big bad Silverbear is here ... I'm gonna keep my trap shut.


:laugh2:


:D

Not to worry, I really don't have a dog in this fight... I was just indulging my semi-legendary fondness for sarcasm...

And big bad Silverbear REALLY needs to grab a coupla hours sleep before work tonight... LOL...

[Banned_n_austin]

Not to worry, I really don't have a dog in this fight... I was just indulging my semi-legendary fondness for sarcasm...

And big bad Silverbear REALLY needs to grab a coupla hours sleep before work tonight... LOL...


I know ... as if ...




:D

[ndanger]

Like I enjoy reading you make a fool out of yourself everyday ... not because of your opinion (because you don't really have one) ... but because you just come off as not so bright ...

Not to mention all your posts look the same. Like a 10 year old is behind your keyboard. Except I know better. You're a full-grown man with a 5th grade education.
Hey it's better than being a big ole' third grader :D

[Banned_n_austin]

Hey it's better than being a big ole' third grader :D


I know. He actually passed that year after repeating it twice. In 5th grade, he was easily identified by his mustache ... :D

[blindzebra]

I wasn't even talking to him, BZ. And he started with the "fool" comments etc ...

In other words, I'm not preaching ... nor did I provoke an insult, but he slung it and I responded ...

And it's not like it isn't true either. Dude is a box of rocks. I didn't fire first, but I'll fire back all day long ... and it really wasn't an insult ... I was just calling it like I see it ... if you want one of those (insults) PM me ...

Big difference.

No he did not, his only thing even close to an insult was saying you were twisting what was said to fit your lame argument. Which is 100% accurate, IMO.

You took it personal, which is exactly what you always do, again IMO.

[Banned_n_austin]

No he did not, his only thing even close to an insult was saying you were twisting what was said to fit your lame argument. Which is 100% accurate, IMO.

You took it personal, which is exactly what you always do, again IMO.

Originally Posted by Doomsday101
Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL

BZ - Now have a coke and a smile ... and ... you know the rest ... ;)

[BigDFan5]

Originally Posted by Doomsday101
Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL

BZ - Now have a coke and a smile ... and ... you know the rest ... ;)



Maybe you should quote your post before his the one he was responding to:


He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Dumbsday ..

[blindzebra]

Originally Posted by Doomsday101
Nothing is out of the question but something are far reaching which is exactly what you do around here. Reaching and twisting of words to fit your arguments. Be my guest I really enjoy watching you make a fool of yourself because you do it so well. LOL

BZ - Now have a coke and a smile ... and ... you know the rest ... ;)

Who fired first,hmmm?

Originally Posted by Doomsday101
No Bill did not say he was going to bring Vinny back

Reporter: Why wouldn’t Vinny be a backup?
Parcells: I don’t think he’s playing any more football. I don’t know that. I saw him this summer and talked to him a little bit. I have a good relationship with him. But right now he’s playing golf at the country club. Its Friday Afternoon, isn’t it?

I added who said what because you have a tendancy to twist every single thing that comes out to fit you lame arguments.





He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..

Keep spinning, you took it to the insult level, and it's not going unnoticed.;)

[BigDFan5]

Who fired first,hmmm?

Originally Posted by Doomsday101
No Bill did not say he was going to bring Vinny back

Reporter: Why wouldn’t Vinny be a backup?
Parcells: I don’t think he’s playing any more football. I don’t know that. I saw him this summer and talked to him a little bit. I have a good relationship with him. But right now he’s playing golf at the country club. Its Friday Afternoon, isn’t it?

I added who said what because you have a tendancy to twist every single thing that comes out to fit you lame arguments.





He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..

Keep spinning, you took it to the insult level, and it's not going unnoticed.;)


Shhhh don't confuse people with facts

[Banned_n_austin]

Maybe you should quote your post before his the one he was responding to:


I did not write Dumbsday ... clearly that was not the case ... I may have jumbled the u and the o up on accident, but I did NOT call him Dumbsday ... you have edited my post ...

[Banned_n_austin]

Maybe you should quote your post before his the one he was responding to:


He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..
__________________


It was a typo ... arrest me ...


Do you guys have anything about football?


Is Duombsday even a word?

Sad if you feel that is offensive .. it was a typo.

[BigDFan5]

I did not write Dumbsday ... clearly that was not the case ... I may have jumbled the u and the o up on accident, but I did NOT call him Dumbsday ... you have edited my post ...


I corrected your spelling wrror, you have called him that a few times. Don't sit her and try to act innocent when anyone with a brain knows you were calling him dumbsday

[BigDFan5]

It was a typo ... arrest me ...


Do you guys have anything about football?


Is Duombsday even a word?

Sad if you feel that is offensive .. it was a typo.




How about this one from another thread


You mean my ars isn't a hole in the ground?

Seriously Dumbsday, Henson won't be named the starter while Parcells is here. His days are numbered in Dallas. He won't put his last two years on the line with a guy who has played only one year out of high school.

Henson may start, but only because whoever (most likely Bledsoe) he named the starter got injured and could not play.

Henson will not start while Parcells is here.

Put this with the other 100 things I told you so on.
__________________

[Banned_n_austin]

I corrected your spelling wrror, you have called him that a few times. Don't sit her and try to act innocent when anyone with a brain knows you were calling him dumbsday

:lmao2:

Please.

You're totally reaching ... and it shows that you've got nothing better to do than whine about something that was never said.

[Banned_n_austin]

How about this one from another thread

__________________


I thought we were talking about this thread?


:confused:

[BigDFan5]

and another




So duombsday, we're a deep threat team now?


Why didn't I get the memo?




I thought we were a ball control offense ... Bill isn't going to be throwing deep too many times. A few, of course, but not a lot.
__________________

[Banned_n_austin]

and another


Do you have anything about football?

[Woods]

and another

Don't ever let me get on your bad side :D

[Banned_n_austin]

Don't ever let me get on your bad side :D

He may stalk you too!

Jeez, get some help dude. No one likes an internet stalker.

[BigDFan5]

:lmao2:

Please.

You're totally reaching ... and it shows that you've got nothing better to do than whine about something that was never said.


Me proving you wrong is reaching?

[BigDFan5]

I thought we were talking about this thread?


:confused:


Your the one said you didn't call him that it was just a spelling error, if you do not want to be proven wrong don;t tell lies.

[BigDFan5]

He may stalk you too!

Jeez, get some help dude. No one likes an internet stalker.


Now you gonna pretend you didn't say these things?

[Banned_n_austin]

Me proving you wrong is reaching?

You've taken it to the level of reaching, yes.

And you're borderline obsessiveness is creepy.

I didn't insult anyone in this thread unless it was a response to an insult.

Whatever "Duombsday" means ... I apologize to anyone offended by it.

[BigDFan5]

You've taken it to the level of reaching, yes.

And you're borderline obsessiveness is creepy.

I didn't insult anyone in this thread unless it was a response to an insult.

Whatever "Duombsday" means ... I apologize to anyone offended by it.




You know exactly what you were typing you are not fooling anyone. I guess you just mistype his name all the time right?

[Doomsday101]

I did not write Dumbsday ... clearly that was not the case ... I may have jumbled the u and the o up on accident, but I did NOT call him Dumbsday ... you have edited my post ...

Now that is lame, no one edited your post and it is not the 1st you have said that to me. Really not offended I have to relize I am dealing with a little kid. As for your opinions I also have no problem with that it just gets old seeing you twist everything Parcells says to fit your weak arguments.

[blindzebra]

He didn't come out and say it ... but said he would if it made the team better ... and followed that statement up with "sure" ...

And then he followed by the comments you have given ... it's not totally out of the question Duombsday ..
__________________


It was a typo ... arrest me ...


Do you guys have anything about football?


Is Duombsday even a word?

Sad if you feel that is offensive .. it was a typo.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=469827#post469827

So duombsday, we're a deep threat team now?


Why didn't I get the memo?


:laugh2:

I thought we were a ball control offense ... Bill isn't going to be throwing deep too many times. A few, of course, but not a lot.




Typo, huh?

[Banned_n_austin]

You know exactly what you were typing you are not fooling anyone. I guess you just mistype his name all the time right?


You're totally creepy man.

And I'm not the greatest typer in the world ... in this thread, it was a typo. But I can see how you might think that it wasn't.

Does that answer satisfy the little stalker in you?

[BigDFan5]

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=469827#post469827

So duombsday, we're a deep threat team now?


Why didn't I get the memo?


:laugh2:

I thought we were a ball control offense ... Bill isn't going to be throwing deep too many times. A few, of course, but not a lot.

Typo, huh?


I beat you ;)

[Banned_n_austin]

Now that is lame, no one edited your post and it is not the 1st you have said that to me. Really not offended I have to relize I am dealing with a little kid. As for your opinions I also have no problem with that it just gets old seeing you twist everything Parcells says to fit your weak arguments.


I openly apologize if you've taken offense to my typo.

You try typing Doomsday real fast - it's hard.

Seriously meant nothing by it. :)

Friends?

[BigDFan5]

You're totally creepy man.

And I'm not the greatest typer in the world ... in this thread, it was a typo. But I can see how you might think that it wasn't.

Does that answer satisfy the little stalker in you?



It is pathetic how badly you are trying to deflect your obvious disregard for the rules by trying to make me the story here. You are the one that can not behave like an adult on this forum (I am not sure if you are an adult actually) Pretend it was a mistype all you want but as all the posts have proven everyone reading will know you are lying. Have a nice day :)

[blindzebra]

I openly apologize if you've taken offense to my typo.

You try typing Doomsday real fast - it's hard.

Seriously meant nothing by it. :)


http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showt...9827#post469827 (http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=469827#post469827)

So duombsday, we're a deep threat team now?


Why didn't I get the memo?


:laugh2:

I thought we were a ball control offense ... Bill isn't going to be throwing deep too many times. A few, of course, but not a lot.


Typo, huh?

[Banned_n_austin]

It is pathetic how badly you are trying to deflect your obvious disregard for the rules by trying to make me the story here. You are the one that can not behave like an adult on this forum (I am not sure if you are an adult actually) Pretend it was a mistype all you want but as all the posts have proven everyone reading will know you are lying. Have a nice day :)

Get a life you little stalker.

It was a typo. Go obssess over something else.

[blindzebra]

Get a life you little stalker.

It was a typo. Go obssess over something else.


http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showt...9827#post469827 (http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=469827#post469827)

So duombsday, we're a deep threat team now?


Why didn't I get the memo?


:laugh2:

I thought we were a ball control offense ... Bill isn't going to be throwing deep too many times. A few, of course, but not a lot.

Typo, huh?

[BigDFan5]

Get a life you little stalker.

It was a typo. Go obssess over something else.


Another grade3 A post from the biggest laughinstock on the forum Congrats :rolleyes:

[Doomsday101]

I openly apologize if you've taken offense to my typo.

You try typing Doomsday real fast - it's hard.

Seriously meant nothing by it. :)

Friends?

I'll accept it. Friends? that may be pushing it but I'm willing to work on it.

[Banned_n_austin]

I'll accept it. Friends? that may be pushing it but I'm willing to work on it.

Likewise.

I'm not trying to be a pain in the you know what.

I just want to talk some football w/out all the personal insults?

Deal?

[Banned_n_austin]

Another grade3 A post from the biggest laughinstock on the forum Congrats :rolleyes:


I'm going to report you to the mods!!! :D

[jobberone]

Ben, I said, "Then don't quote me and make me a part of your argument please."

You responded with this:

I'll quote whoever I want to and respond how I darn well please.

Know what I'm sayin'?

Even on forums people do get offended, Ben. I nicely asked you not to include me as support for your arguments when I clearly did not agree. Your response is juvenile and insensitive. Not IMO either. It is clearly out of the norm of social behavior.

Now you are being basically called out by several members of the forum for your behavior now and in general.

You can seize the opportunity to either apologize for your remarks and try to make amends or you will continue to show us how insensitive you are. That's entirely up to you, Ben.

[blindzebra]

Likewise.

I'm not trying to be a pain in the you know what.

I just want to talk some football w/out all the personal insults?

Deal?

Where are my hip waders, cause it sure is deep.:lmao2:

[Banned_n_austin]

Another grade3 A post from the biggest laughinstock on the forum Congrats :rolleyes:


What's funny is your so obssessed. And you really don't know that Dooms and I go waaaaaay back.

The best advice I can give you is ... get a life. :)

[blindzebra]

Ben, I said, "Then don't quote me and make me a part of your argument please."

You responded with this:



Even on forums people do get offended, Ben. I nicely asked you not to include me as support for your arguments when I clearly did not agree. Your response is juvenile and insensitive. Not IMO either. It is clearly out of the norm of social behavior.

Now you are being basically called out by several members of the forum for your behavior now and in general.

You can seize the opportunity to either apologize for your remarks and try to make amends or you will continue to show us how insensitive you are. That's entirely up to you, Ben.

:bravo: :hammer:

[Juke99]

I rarely weigh in on the QB situation.

I'll state that I prefer Henson over Romo.

That said, the thing that strikes me as almost :laugh2: :laugh1: :lmao2: is, right now, from what I've seen, neither guy has done a good job.

I'd love to see what fans from other teams would say about us battling over who's better; a guy who has never thrown an NFL pass and in this, his 3rd season, is still careless with the ball at times....or...a guy who started one game and got pulled at half time AND spent the entire off season revising his throwing motion...

It really is kinda funny.... in a non-funny sort of way.

[BigDFan5]

I'm going to report you to the mods!!! :D


The button is lower left corner

[Banned_n_austin]

Ben, I said, "Then don't quote me and make me a part of your argument please."

You responded with this:



Even on forums people do get offended, Ben. I nicely asked you not to include me as support for your arguments when I clearly did not agree. Your response is juvenile and insensitive. Not IMO either. It is clearly out of the norm of social behavior.

Now you are being basically called out by several members of the forum for your behavior now and in general.

You can seize the opportunity to either apologize for your remarks and try to make amends or you will continue to show us how insensitive you are. That's entirely up to you, Ben.

I still give you the same answer. I never said you agreed/disagreed.

You were just paranoid that someone was going to lump you in crowd one way or another ...

I stand by that statement to you ... you're not the one that should be offended.

I didn't take your statement out of context - you did mine.

[Banned_n_austin]

The button is lower left corner


Where the heck is that darned ignore button?



:mule:

[Banned_n_austin]

Doomsday - we're going to make an effort, right?

[smashmouth]

I rarely weigh in on the QB situation.

I'll state that I prefer Henson over Romo.

That said, the thing that strikes me as almost :laugh2: :laugh1: :lmao2: is, right now, from what I've seen, neither guy has done a good job.

I'd love to see what fans from other teams would say about us battling over who's better; a guy who has never thrown an NFL pass and in this, his 3rd season, is still careless with the ball at times....or...a guy who started one game and got pulled at half time AND spent the entire off season revising his throwing motion...

It really is kinda funny.... in a non-funny sort of way.Amen, why are be bickering over 2 nobodies? Would any of these guys start on any team without an injury.

I'm the first to know that if Bledsoe goes down, we're going to need someone, but I don't think it's either at the moment.

[jobberone]

I rarely weigh in on the QB situation.

I'll state that I prefer Henson over Romo.

That said, the thing that strikes me as almost :laugh2: :laugh1: :lmao2: is, right now, from what I've seen, neither guy has done a good job.

I'd love to see what fans from other teams would say about us battling over who's better; a guy who has never thrown an NFL pass and in this, his 3rd season, is still careless with the ball at times....or...a guy who started one game and got pulled at half time AND spent the entire off season revising his throwing motion...

It really is kinda funny.... in a non-funny sort of way.

Thanks for turning the conversttion back to football. I doubt that Parcells is thinking the situation is funny in any sort of way. I guess he learned to deal with the pressure a long time ago without getting an ulcer. I try not to even think about Romo or Henson running this team.

[Cbz40]

I enjoy the QB debates........But I must remind you.....attack the post not the poster.

[Banned_n_austin]

I believe that Purcells might try and bring Vinnie back but I don't know that he would come back.

.


I hate to bring you into this, ABQ. But you've made a type. I'm calling you out!




(In a nice way of course)

[Banned_n_austin]

I enjoy the QB debates........But I must remind you.....attack the post not the poster.


Thank you, sir.

[Juke99]

Hey folks...time out. OK?

Even IF you attribute intent to BnA's misspelling, if the guy says, "Sorry" that should be enough.

I'll say this, quite objectively, if I wanted to start warning people, I could warn more than a few in this thread.

So, I ask everyone to please get back on topic, drop the personal stuff and remember, helllllllo, we're Cowboy fans....

So, do over from this point forward, OK?

[Doomsday101]

Doomsday - we're going to make an effort, right?

We will see how it goes.

[Banned_n_austin]

Thanks Juke.

I'm having a coke and a smile ...

The rest of you are welcome to have one as well. :)

[jobberone]

I still give you the same answer. I never said you agreed/disagreed.

You were just paranoid that someone was going to lump you in crowd one way or another ...

I stand by that statement to you ... you're not the one that should be offended.

I didn't take your statement out of context - you did mine.

Well Ben, you cannot project feelings of paranoia onto me successfully because I won't accept them. That is not what I felt. I felt mildly annoyed and thought I might get you to slow down a little.

Have a great day Ben.

[Banned_n_austin]

Well Ben, you cannot project feelings of paranoia onto me successfully because I won't accept them. That is not what I felt. I felt mildly annoyed and thought I might get you to slow down a little.

Have a great day Ben.

You have a great day as well. :)

And I was just making conversation. You took it out of context. Go back and read it.

[smashmouth]

Hey folks...time out. OK?

Even IF you attribute intent to BnA's misspelling, if the guy says, "Sorry" that should be enough.

I'll say this, quite objectively, if I wanted to start warning people, I could warn more than a few in this thread.

So, I ask everyone to please get back on topic, drop the personal stuff and remember, helllllllo, we're Cowboy fans....

So, do over from this point forward, OK?Good job Juke. By the way, are you the one doing all of these fancy pics?

Tony Romo might be the 2nd string, but things can change in a heart beat. When Bill is in control, you never know what'll happen.

[Doomsday101]

Thanks for turning the conversttion back to football. I doubt that Parcells is thinking the situation is funny in any sort of way. I guess he learned to deal with the pressure a long time ago without getting an ulcer. I try not to even think about Romo or Henson running this team.

I agree, if either of them is forced into action we will become limited with play calling, I think Parcells will play it close to the vest which will place a bigger burden on the defense.

[Juke99]

Good job Juke. By the way, are you the one doing all of these fancy pics?

Tony Romo might be the 2nd string, but things can change in a heart beat. When Bill is in control, you never know what'll happen.


Yep....that would be me....

Yours is darn good too.

I really don't have faith in either back up QB. And I've always thought the world of Henson.

[VA Cowboy]

What's funny is your so obssessed. And you really don't know that Dooms and I go waaaaaay back.

The best advice I can give you is ... get a life. :)

Brett, I see some things never change.

You still playing with that little league football team...what was it, the rattlers or something?

[NovaCowboy]

Parcells will be gone before Henson.

[Hollywood Henderson]

Yep, Hensen is staying!
But man, you guys were cracking me up... :cool:

[Smith22]

You guys really need to listen to the PC again ...

He says the one's you keep that don't pan out are the one's that make you feel like a failure ..

I learned from Landry that you keep them for a while and if they don't pan out ... you go get a new one ... it forces you to be patient and be analytical etc ...

And he's talking about being patient with players ... giving them a chance ... who ELSE could he be talking about?

Who's been here that is developing?


Tucker... Gurode.... A. Johnson........

When we traded for Henson, we knew it would take time..........

[CowboyManDan]

VA Cowboy, that is the funniest damn sig pic I've seen in a long time!!

[Chocolate Lab]

I can see it now...

Headed to an Amazon bestseller list near you:

The DaVinci Code III -- Parcells' Hidden Hate

Discover what a fanatical pair of scientists found when they applied the DaVinci code to the transcripts of Bill Parcells' press conferences. The lives of two young backup quarterbacks will never be the same.

Think you know who the franchise favors? The answer will shock you!!

Rated R for violent thoughts.

[Smith22]

I can see it now...

Headed to an Amazon bestseller list near you:

The DaVinci Code III -- Parcells' Hidden Hate

Discover what a fanatical pair of scientists found when they applied the DaVinci code to the transcripts of Bill Parcells' press conferences. The lives of two young backup quarterbacks will never be the same.

Think you know who the franchise favors? The answer will shock you!!

Rated R for violent thoughts.

:lmao:

Nice 1.