View Full Version : Crayton could be out for the year
CowboyChris
10-16-2005, 03:29 PM
in BP press conference he thinks Crayton mightve broke his right ankle
ConcordCowboy
10-16-2005, 03:30 PM
That would BLOW!
Talk about a downer after this big win! :mad:
Damn... Sucks. He made a couple of good first down catches today.
Cbz40
10-16-2005, 03:31 PM
Hope it's not true.......but the replay looked bad.
2much2soon
10-16-2005, 03:32 PM
answer to the question of why we signed Price. Someone was bound to go down.
Jammer
10-16-2005, 03:32 PM
It that is true then it's Price time. I love Crayton too.
Kangaroo
10-16-2005, 03:32 PM
So it was the ankle I thought it was his knee
He landed at an akward angle because of getting hit high and making his legs go out from under him.
Man the kid was tough great hands and made so great plays for us this year
I hope he gets well quick and returns next year because he is quite a find
Juke99
10-16-2005, 03:33 PM
Looked awful...he made a few big catches today..
I guess it's Peerless time...
JDSmith
10-16-2005, 03:33 PM
Thanks to our great coaches and the fact that they play for overtime rather than actually try to win a game. Crayton got hurt when he shouldn't have been playing, and if we'd had ANY guts we would have won the game in regulation. So I think we should give a game ball to Parcells and Zimmer for their wonderful work, or maybe we can just draw the ball on Crayton's cast and then beat them both over the head with it...
Muhast
10-16-2005, 03:33 PM
Well signing price was a good call now
DBoys
10-16-2005, 03:35 PM
It is beter that it was his ankle than his knee. Kid came up huge today.
dargonking999
10-16-2005, 03:36 PM
Now we cans top hearing these threads about when will price play, this is exactly what he was brought here for.
marchetta
10-16-2005, 03:37 PM
It looked just like KJ's break last year, except KJ's break was more evident during replay.
cobra
10-16-2005, 03:39 PM
Broken ankles aren't that bad...typically. He might be out a month or so. A lot of times, spraining the ankle is WORSE than breaking it. And ankles are better than knees.
It really sucks, and I hope for the best. But there are worse things than a broken ankle, so maybe there is something promising there.
50cent
10-16-2005, 03:40 PM
1-800-peer-les
Tenkamenin
10-16-2005, 03:41 PM
Thats gonna hurt, because Crayton made some big key catches this season. I love his toughness and reliable. Man I hope all he suffered was a high ankle sprain
Gordon
10-16-2005, 03:44 PM
That sucks man, stalls the progress he was making. I hope he'll be alright, but this just shows how badly we needed Price. I'll admit, I thought Crayton would be the last of our 3 WRs to go down, but knew there was a good chance one would. I feel bad for Crayton, but we shouldn't lose much production because of the security FA signing we made.
kaboy
10-16-2005, 03:47 PM
Big loss if he is hurt. Looked like he was making good progress on PR too. Hope Price is ready.
DWAREZ
10-16-2005, 03:50 PM
that sucks because he was doing well..speedy recovery and lets see if the price was right
MikeD17
10-16-2005, 03:50 PM
I got a new nickname for crayton ....Patrick ''when you need a play '' crayton.
or patrick ''big play'' crayton
Mickey just said Crayton left locker room with a cast on his foot.
Although, he did say he didn't hear any official confirmation on the extent of the injury.
DWAREZ
10-16-2005, 04:08 PM
Someone said could be 4-6 weeks with regard to Crayton's injury and he may be available for end of regular season/post season if indeed it is a broken ankle..we shall see once they do the MRI but if so he could be back.
Yeagermeister
10-16-2005, 04:10 PM
breaking his ankle is not good but at least it wasn't his knee
Martice
10-16-2005, 04:14 PM
Now this puts even more importance for TG not to go down. We needed TG to stay healthy this year but we really need him to stay healthy now that Crayton has gone down.
Tuna Helper
10-16-2005, 04:25 PM
Depth - don't leave training camp without it.
Price gets his turn.
SA_Gunslinger
10-16-2005, 04:30 PM
that would hurt, really really bad.....but that's why we signed price.
get ready for it!
JDSmith
10-16-2005, 04:31 PM
You might want to edit that, since it's a bannable offense. I'd hate to lose a quality poster like yourself because of a moment of indiscretion.
You might want to edit that, since it's a bannable offense. I'd hate to lose a quality poster like yourself because of a moment of indiscretion.
No, because I don't edit anything that attacks such a stupid philosophy as yours. Tell me you don't really believe what you just said. It makes no sense, and just shows your ignorance as to the game of football. So if what I said is bannable...then fine. I'll take a banning to correct such stupid comments as what you said. Enough said.
DBoys
10-16-2005, 04:37 PM
No, because I don't edit anything that attacks such a stupid philosophy as yours. Tell me you don't really believe what you just said. It makes no sense, and just shows your ignorance as to the game of football. So if what I said is bannable...then fine. I'll take a banning to correct such stupid comments as what you said. Enough said.
Only one out of line here is you Rezz I agree with Jd's post totally. I thnk you are taking it the wrong way.
LaTunaNostra
10-16-2005, 04:40 PM
No, because I don't edit anything that attacks such a stupid philosophy as yours. Tell me you don't really believe what you just said. It makes no sense, and just shows your ignorance as to the game of football. So if what I said is bannable...then fine. I'll take a banning to correct such stupid comments as what you said. Enough said.
Rezz, your point has merit but it's a family board.
Please edit it...I find it offensive myself.
SA_Gunslinger
10-16-2005, 04:41 PM
somebody already replied on it, so it doesn't even matter if he edits it.
AmericasTeam
10-16-2005, 04:41 PM
Thanks to our great coaches and the fact that they play for overtime rather than actually try to win a game. Crayton got hurt when he shouldn't have been playing, and if we'd had ANY guts we would have won the game in regulation. So I think we should give a game ball to Parcells and Zimmer for their wonderful work, or maybe we can just draw the ball on Crayton's cast and then beat them both over the head with it...
Gimme a break...good grief
CaptainAmerica
10-16-2005, 04:42 PM
Only one out of line here is you Rezz I agree with Jd's post totally. I thnk you are taking it the wrong way.
JD is absolutely right. We did not play aggressive go for the TD football with 4:30 to go in the game. Run to the right on first down, which was stuffed all day, screen pass on 3rd down, never threw it in the endzone. Parcells played for the FG and was not aggressive, thus we end up playing in OT when Crayton was hurt.
Obviously Parcells didn't intend it, but we should have put the game away in regulation.
Whatever, I'm offensive fine. What he said was plain ignorant. So have fun on your board with your politically correct language. You can be wrong with a bunch of nice people. I don't care. But ignorant comments like this poison this board and make it worse than it should be.
When someone makes patently wrong statements about how the game should be played, especially after WE WON. I won't let it stand.
I apologizie for the vulgarity, and I wish there would have been asterisks over some of the words like the filter caught some of mine, but I will not take it back,
I will not apologize for calling someone out for being completely and utterly WRONG.
It's been nice knowing you.
Rezz.
NorthTexan95
10-16-2005, 04:52 PM
Thanks to our great coaches and the fact that they play for overtime rather than actually try to win a game. Crayton got hurt when he shouldn't have been playing, and if we'd had ANY guts we would have won the game in regulation. So I think we should give a game ball to Parcells and Zimmer for their wonderful work, or maybe we can just draw the ball on Crayton's cast and then beat them both over the head with it...
Coaches? It wasn't the coaches who turned it over four times. It wasn't coaches who dropped passes. It wasn't coaches who at times let defenders run right at Bledsoe.
We're were playing OT not because of a lack of guts but because of a lack of execution.
ddh33
10-16-2005, 04:59 PM
Yeah, I find it hard to blame coaches for making sure a touchdown can't beat you, when your defense hasn't allowed them in the endzone yet.
I mean, let's be fair. What if Dallas goes for it and doesn't get it. It certainly isn't a sure thing? Then what if the Giants still score their touchdown? Say what you will, but Bill is consistent. He puts guys in positions to succeed.
JDSmith
10-16-2005, 05:00 PM
Coaches? It wasn't the coaches who turned it over four times. It wasn't coaches who dropped passes. It wasn't coaches who at times let defenders run right at Bledsoe.
We're were playing OT not because of a lack of guts but because of a lack of execution.
I disagree. I think we played for the FG on both of our final drives in regulation. We never even threw to the endzone. We lined up for a 4th and inches and then backed off, because Parcells didn't believe in our guys on either side of the ball. That wouldn't have been as galling if we hadn't gone for such stupid 4th downs in other games this season, even to the point of lining up for a 'fake' punt and then standing there with Crayton under center for 10 seconds or so just so that the D could be absolutely positive we weren't really punting before going for it. We also went with a 3 man rush when the Giants were as desperate as any team could be, and when it was obvious that Eli had struggled all game with our pressure. Sorry, I don't think execution was the problem at the end. I think coaching as if a 7 pt lead is secure with 4 minutes to play was the problem. You would have thought after the final 4 minutes of the Washington game that Parcells would learn that you go for the jugular, just like he did in the Eagles game all day long.
Danny White
10-16-2005, 05:06 PM
Well signing price was a good call now
Signing Price was always a good idea. Can never have too much depth.
I'm sick for Crayton. That guy has ridiculous hands. Godspeed to you Patrick!
Cbz40
10-16-2005, 05:09 PM
I hate losing Crayton..........the kid has become a weapon. You cannot afford to lose weapons.
Now Mr. Price...you better step up
Sitting Bull
10-16-2005, 05:13 PM
I'm really bummed about this, as well. I was so pleased with Crayton's improved ball security today and he really is clutch in the middle of the field. I just don't see Price replacing that type of production. I do like Barber's potential catching balls out of the backfield. He's a natural.
stiletto
10-16-2005, 05:13 PM
I think Price could be a weapon as a third receiver, he is a pretty dangerous guy but we have to keep in mind it might take him a couple weeks to get used to playing again much less with a new team. I think if Glenn stays healthy Price will be playing big for us come week 10/11...
Sitting Bull
10-16-2005, 05:18 PM
I think Price could be a weapon as a third receiver, he is a pretty dangerous guy but we have to keep in mind it might take him a couple weeks to get used to playing again much less with a new team. I think if Glenn stays healthy Price will be playing big for us come week 10/11...
I hope Crayton is getting ready to come back by week 10/11...
Paniolo22
10-16-2005, 05:51 PM
I disagree. I think we played for the FG on both of our final drives in regulation. We never even threw to the endzone. We lined up for a 4th and inches and then backed off, because Parcells didn't believe in our guys on either side of the ball. That wouldn't have been as galling if we hadn't gone for such stupid 4th downs in other games this season, even to the point of lining up for a 'fake' punt and then standing there with Crayton under center for 10 seconds or so just so that the D could be absolutely positive we weren't really punting before going for it. We also went with a 3 man rush when the Giants were as desperate as any team could be, and when it was obvious that Eli had struggled all game with our pressure. Sorry, I don't think execution was the problem at the end. I think coaching as if a 7 pt lead is secure with 4 minutes to play was the problem. You would have thought after the final 4 minutes of the Washington game that Parcells would learn that you go for the jugular, just like he did in the Eagles game all day long.
Do you think the reason they were conservative had anything to do with the 4 turnovers we had already suffered?
JDSmith
10-16-2005, 05:56 PM
Do you think the reason they were conservative had anything to do with the 4 turnovers we had already suffered?
Honestly, no. We turned the ball over doing routine things. When you can't snap the ball, or your WR fumbles without being stripped, you can't prevent those things with play calling. It's not as if Bledsoe was under tremendous pressure from the Giants and that was forcing turnovers. He got stripped once, and had one interception partially due to pressure up the middle, but both of those came on long pass attempts and if you were trying to pass from the 15 yard line you could easily get the pass off - the Giants simply weren't generating enough pressure to stop that. Even when Bledsoe got stripped he had to stand there with the ball around his waste for quite a while before the defender made a diving swipe at it. So I don't see much correlation between the turnovers and the conservative calls at the end. Especially on the 4th and inches. Unless Parcells believed we couldn't snap the ball correctly, which might be a legit concern at this point.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.