ESPN Experts Agree

[brokeback]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.

[Mansta54]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.


You play the odds and listen to the experts while our defense COMMENCE to beating that ........ Hope you come back to the board after the game, don't vanish on us... Show some heart and show up.........

[Reality]

KC is 3-3 on the road this year which means there is a 50% chance they will lose the game.

Dallas is 4-2 at home this year which means there is a 66.7% chance they will win the game.

Stats can be so entertaining .. :)

-Reality

[brokeback]

Kansas City wins 67% of their games. And yes, I'm having some fun with stats.

[brokeback]

You play the odds and listen to the experts while our defense COMMENCE to beating that ........ Hope you come back to the board after the game, don't vanish on us... Show some heart and show up.........
I'll be back to gloat or take my medicine. It's bad form to troll only after a win or only before a loss.

[big_neil]

Only 3 of 8 ESPN analysts had voted as of this writing.

[Sarge]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.

That does it, no need to watch the game then.

:rolleyes:

[BigDFan5]

KC is 3-3 on the road this year which means there is a 50% chance they will lose the game.

Dallas is 4-2 at home this year which means there is a 66.7% chance they will win the game.

Stats can be so entertaining .. :)

-Reality


Don't let reality get in the way of his posts Reality LOL

[Mansta54]

I'll be back to gloat or take my medicine. It's bad form to troll only after a win or only before a loss.




Good, show up to take your medicine. Tell me this, has KC ever won anything? Do they have any SB rings and I'm not talking about when they wore leather helmets back in the day... What have they won?

[Reality]

Kansas City wins 67% of their games. And yes, I'm having some fun with stats.Against Houston? Against Oakland twice? Against Miami? Lost to Buffalo? You must be really proud :D

-Reality

[brokeback]

We lost Superbowl I. We won Superbowl IV. What's that have to do with Sunday's game?

[Reality]

Good, show up to take your medicine. Tell me this, has KC ever won anything? Do they have any SB rings and I'm not talking about when they wore leather helmets back in the day... What have they won?Have you seen the rest of their schedule? At Dallas, At New York Giants, then home against the Chargers and Bengals ..

So many great fans from KC and this guy comes along trying to smack talk without the walk ... *sighs*

-Reality

[brokeback]

Against Houston? Against Oakland twice? Against Miami? Lost to Buffalo? You must be really proud :D

-Reality
Beat the 2-time defending SB champs while you were losing to Denver. Beat Denver while you were losing to NY. There's a little bit of pride swelling in my chest.

[brokeback]

Have you seen the rest of their schedule? At Dallas, At New York Giants, then home against the Chargers and Bengals ..

So many great fans from KC and this guy comes along trying to smack talk without the walk ... *sighs*

-Reality
What's the "walk" you're referring to? I'm just throwing out some undeniable facts in this thread. There's been no opinion whatsoever. I was tweaking you a little with the pointless stat, but I admitted that much. (It's still a fact that, if you pick 3 random picks from those experts, there's only about a 1 in 27 chance of them all being wrong.)

[BigDFan5]

Beat the 2-time defending SB champs while you were losing to Denver. Beat Denver while you were losing to NY. There's a little bit of pride swelling in my chest.

You Split with broncos we split with Giants

You lost to Eagles we swept them

you lost to chargers we beat them



You guys have had exactly 1 good win this year last week against Denver, don't even say patriots because everyone knows they suck this year

[brokeback]

They suck so bad they have the same record as the Cowboys. (Better if you don't count the game they played against the Chiefs.) They also lead the division.
Dallas has not beaten a single team with a better record than the Chiefs. Besides, I'd much rather be coming off wins against 6-4 and 9-2 teams than coming off of two losses against 8-2 and 7-4 teams. Congrats on that week 1 win against the Chargers, though. Miami had a blowout win against Denver that week. It doesn't exactly have a huge bearing on how you're playing now inasmuchas it happened 12 weeks ago.

[TunaFan33]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.

Yes-Theisman's, Jaws', and Golic's predix should be taken at face value, ALWAYS. :rolleyes:

[lspain1]

Golic's own words concerning Mike & Mike's 'lead pipe locks'.......we stink!

[brokeback]

Yes-Theisman's, Jaws', and Golic's predix should be taken at face value, ALWAYS. :rolleyes:I'll be the first to admit that I wouldn't have posted it had they picked the Cowboys.

[TunaFan33]

I'll be the first to admit that I wouldn't have posted it had they picked the Cowboys.

Dude-I'm not crystal ball either. However-I'm not so high for the rest of the season either on the Cowboys 'cuz it's obvious now sans Flo may have put a fork in our O.

Even you and your fellow Chiefs fans have admitted sans Willie Roaf for several weeks has made Trent Green look like the TG of 01.

OTOH-this season has had way too many wrinkles. Tomorrow's game could very well be one surprise wrinkle. Who knows?

[brokeback]

Green's as good as his pass protection. He can pick a team apart when his line is healthy, but he doesn't have the athletic ability or arm strength to win games when the defense gets penetration.
In the last 4 years, I don't remember a single game in which our healthy O-line hasn't dominated.
I'm a huge believer in the idea that offenses don't need elite skill players. I'd much rather have a dominant O-line and average skill players.

[TunaFan33]

Green's as good as his pass protection. He can pick a team apart when his line is healthy, but he doesn't have the athletic ability or arm strength to win games when the defense gets penetration.
In the last 4 years, I don't remember a single game in which our healthy O-line hasn't dominated.
I'm a huge believer in the idea that offenses don't need elite skill players. I'd much rather have a dominant O-line and average skill players.

Agreed-the game is won in the trenches. Parcells' Giants team really didn't have any speed at WR, but they had a big, nasty OL. The Iggles' problems this year stemmed from their porous OL-otherwise, their receivers, QB, and RB have so many skilled talents you can poke holes through, but none of them could do anything with this line.

The LT position is still the most important one, nonetheless. That Philly/KC game was televised in my area. Frankly-Philly didn't get a whole lot of pressure. But with Roaf out, Green looked pretty tentative and somehow insecure out there. That INT he threw to Sheldon Brown-he didn't check off the other receivers, and all but looked like he was worried about pressure from that blind side at the same time. Otherwise, without that score, Philly wouldn't have had any kind of momentum for the rest of the game.

BTW-everyone on ESPN are idiots. They went on on on(during Roaf's injury, that is) how Gonzales was underperforming. Now that Roaf's healthy, all of a sudden they're realizing Gonzales is lighting it up.

When Flo was healthy, Jason Witten was able to go out for passes 90% of the time. Now, he's helping Tucker most of the time.

[big dog cowboy]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.
Give me a HUGE break. Everybody knows Joe hates the 'Boys. Everybody knows Jaws loves the Chefs. When only 3 of 8 are picking and there is no way 2 of those 3 will be picking the Cowboys, it only makes me :lmao:

[brokeback]

Don't worry. Hoge, Allen, and Schlereth will pick Dallas. Allen was a Raider and I have never seen him pick the Chiefs. Schlereth was a Bronco and ditto. Hoge just always bags on the Chiefs. I don't really know why.

[vicjagger]

That does it, no need to watch the game then.
Watch it, why even PLAY it?

[Mansta54]

"Brokeback" you never answered my question. I asked you if KC ever won anything big? How many SB rings do they own? How many times have they appeared in the SB and I'm not talking about back in yesteryear when they wore leather helmets with no facemask. Again, WHAT HAVE THEY WON??????

[Uh-Oh]

I'll be back to gloat or take my medicine. It's bad form to troll only after a win or only before a loss.
Then you're a better man than me. Except I never troll. :D

[AdamJT13]

It's KC over DAL

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent

Commence bashing...

By the way, based on their records picking the games, the odds of them going 0-3 on games is 3.7%. That's about 1 in 27.

You're not very good at math, are you?

The three guys that picked all picked one team to win one game. Simply based on their records, there's a 36.3 percent chance that they'll be wrong. But that percentage is based on lots of obvious picks, when one team clearly is better. If you examined their records in games between nearly equal teams -- such as the 8-4 Chiefs as underdogs on the road against the 7-5 Cowboys -- it's probably closer to 50 percent or worse. Last week, for example, out of four such games, they went a combined 6-6. They all picked the same team in two games. One of those won by seven points. The other one lost by 18.

[Uh-Oh]

I'll be the first to admit that I wouldn't have posted it had they picked the Cowboys.
Do Chiefs fans also have a low opinion of Theisman?

[brokeback]

"Brokeback" you never answered my question. I asked you if KC ever won anything big? How many SB rings do they own? How many times have they appeared in the SB and I'm not talking about back in yesteryear when they wore leather helmets with no facemask. Again, WHAT HAVE THEY WON??????
I'm pretty sure I told you they've been in the SB twice and won one. If you want to talk about recent times, let's discuss what the Cowboys have done in the last decade.

[Jimz31]

I seem to remember when the crew on MNF keep all picking the same team to win and were wrong for a few weeks in a row.

[brokeback]

You're not very good at math, are you?

The three guys that picked all picked one team to win one game. Simply based on their records, there's a 36.3 percent chance that they'll be wrong. But that percentage is based on lots of obvious picks, when one team clearly is better. If you examined their records in games between nearly equal teams -- such as the 8-4 Chiefs as underdogs on the road against the 7-5 Cowboys -- it's probably closer to 50 percent or worse. Last week, for example, out of four such games, they went a combined 6-6. They all picked the same team in two games. One of those won by seven points. The other one lost by 18.Actually, I'm incredibly good at math. In fact, I had a perfect math score on the SAT back in the day. (No, I don't expect you to believe me, but it's true.) I admit I'm using very questionable methods to come up with the 1 in 27 stat, but the math is sound.
All I've said is that they're wrong approx 1/3 of the time. If you randomly choose 3 of their collective historical picks, there is approximately a 1 in 27 chance of them all being wrong.
That said, I know I'm very conveniently manipulating the stats here. Lighten up.

[Mansta54]

I'm pretty sure I told you they've been in the SB twice and won one. If you want to talk about recent times, let's discuss what the Cowboys have done in the last decade.


Recent or past, KC history will never be as RICH as the BOYZ. 5 SB rings and a ton of appearences. Named "AMERICA'S TEAM", our fan base probably TRIPLES KC's. By the way, what SB was it that you won, I'm curious?

[brokeback]

Do Chiefs fans also have a low opinion of Theisman?Yes, but he seems to be unusually insightful with this particular pick.

[jbsg02]

after watching our last 2 games i'd pick KC too.

[Mansta54]

after watching our last 2 games i'd pick KC too.



Why?? We played great ball at home against Denver. We stunk up the joint at the Giants but being home makes a world of difference...

[brokeback]

Recent or past, KC history will never be as RICH as the BOYZ. 5 SB rings and a ton of appearences. Named "AMERICA'S TEAM", our fan base probably TRIPLES KC's. By the way, what SB was it that you won, I'm curious?Congratulations if that makes you feel cool. A bunch of people you'll never meet cheer for a bunch of people who couldn't care less about you. It's fun to cheer for your team, but anyone can cheer for any team. It doesn't make a Colts fan any cooler than a Texans fan.
The Chiefs, as I posted earlier, won Superbowl IV against the Vikings. They lost Superbowl I against the Packers. I don't fondle myself at night thinking about how great we were in decades past, though. Maybe I should start.

[brokeback]

Why?? We played great ball at home against Denver. We stunk up the joint at the Giants but being home makes a world of difference...If you can play a great game at home and still lose to Denver, you don't belong in the playoffs.

[Mansta54]

Maybe you should, that may help to relieve the pain. There has to be pain considering you haven't even sniffed a SB since, ahhhhhhh, well I don't know when. Its been a loooooooooooooooooong time since KC has won or done anything..

[Uh-Oh]

Yes, but he seems to be unusually insightful with this particular pick.
The "Yes" is all I wanted to hear. I wonder which other fans also thinks Theisman's a clown...

[Mansta54]

If you can play a great game at home and still lose to Denver, you don't belong in the playoffs.


Sorry dude but that just isn't true. Teams play great games all the time and still lose. It happens....

[brokeback]

Maybe you should, that may help to relieve the pain. There has to be pain considering you haven't even sniffed a SB since, ahhhhhhh, well I don't know when. Its been a loooooooooooooooooong time since KC has won or done anything..I will personally never sniff a Superbowl. Neither will you. I'm not a professional football player. I notice your location is Maryland, by the way. I can call myself a Yankees fan or a Patriots fan or a Steelers fan and talk out of my *** and pretend that it makes me better than someone who roots for other teams too, but that would just make me a .

[brokeback]

Sorry dude but that just isn't true. Teams play great games all the time and still lose. It happens....True. Just not playoff teams.

[Mansta54]

I will personally never sniff a Superbowl. Neither will you. I'm not a professional football player. I notice your location is Maryland, by the way. I can call myself a Yankees fan or a Patriots fan or a Steelers fan and talk out of my *** and pretend that it makes me better than someone who roots for other teams too, but that would just make me a .


What??? Because I'm in Maryland, I can't follow the Boyz. Dogg, I'm 41yrs and have bleed BLUE-n-SILVER all my life... I don't think I'm better then you at all, don't take it personal. I just don't think that KC franchise is in the same league as the BOYZ. Win something then talk smack...

[brokeback]

Win something? I don't play football. I just watch it. I won't win or lose anything on Sunday. You can cheer for whomever you choose. Judging by your age, I'd guess that you chose to root for the Cowboys because they were on top when you started following football. Nothing like being a frontrunner AND living vicariously through others. Sounds like the kind of dad that gets arrested for fighting umpires in Little League.

[big dog cowboy]

I just don't think that KC franchise is in the same league as the BOYZ. Win something then talk smack...
You and millions and millions of other Cowboy fans feel the same way.

:lombardi:

[Mansta54]

You and millions and millions of other Cowboy fans feel the same way.

:lombardi:



Amen!!!

[brokeback]

You and millions and millions of other Cowboy fans feel the same way.

:lombardi:
So what have you ever done to contribute to those Superbowl wins? I'm guessing you swigged a few pull-tab tallboys and cussed a lot. Feel free to talk smack about the accomplishments of complete strangers. I don't recall Staubach hoisting the trophy and thanking big dog cowboy for throwing a key block, catching that pass, or swigging that beer. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.

[Mansta54]

Win something? I don't play football. I just watch it. I won't win or lose anything on Sunday. You can cheer for whomever you choose. Judging by your age, I'd guess that you chose to root for the Cowboys because they were on top when you started following football. Nothing like being a frontrunner AND living vicariously through others. Sounds like the kind of dad that gets arrested for fighting umpires in Little League.


Oh yeah, you're taking all of this to heart. I'm sorry lil fella if I hurt your feelings. Enjoy the game....

[BigDFan5]

Why is this moronic troll still here? Come on mods he is making all the good Chiefs fans look bad.

[superpunk]

Why is this moronic troll still here? Come on mods he is making all the good Chiefs fans look bad.

Do you have a troll slaying knife? Like a +10 against trolls? Cuz things like reason and facts don't work at all.

[brokeback]

I'm not taking it to heart at all. I don't live through the accomplishments of others. I simply cheer for my favorite teams who happen to be my hometown teams. I don't pretend I'm cool if my team wins, and I don't think I'm a failure if my team loses. If I did, I'd cherry pick my favorite teams like you do. I'd have a brand new Colts hat next to my Whitesox hat, my Trojans hat, my Tarheels hat, my Spurs hat, and whatever team is good at hockey hat.

[Mansta54]

Why is this moronic troll still here? Come on mods he is making all the good Chiefs fans look bad.


Yeah, he took this thing waaaaay too far. I think I hurt his feelings.

[superpunk]

So what have you ever done to contribute to those Superbowl wins? I'm guessing you swigged a few pull-tab tallboys and cussed a lot. Feel free to talk smack about the accomplishments of complete strangers. I don't recall Staubach hoisting the trophy and thanking big dog cowboy for throwing a key block, catching that pass, or swigging that beer. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.

What exactly did you do to contribute to that impressive 3 game win streak you keep going on about?

[brokeback]

Do you have a troll slaying knife? Like a +10 against trolls? Cuz things like reason and facts don't work at all.Oh my god. A +10 slaying knife? Are you kidding me? Admit it. You've got greasy hair, acne, pasty white skin, enormous black shoes, and no girlfriend right?

[BigDFan5]

I'm not taking it to heart at all. I don't live through the accomplishments of others. I simply cheer for my favorite teams who happen to be my hometown teams. I don't pretend I'm cool if my team wins, and I don't think I'm a failure if my team loses. If I did, I'd cherry pick my favorite teams like you do. I'd have a brand new Colts hat next to my Whitesox hat, my Trojans hat, my Tarheels hat, my Spurs hat, and whatever team is good at hockey hat.


You are on a Dallas fans board jacking off your favorite team in front of everyone. That is the definition of living through the accomplishments of your team.

[superpunk]

Oh my god. A +10 slaying knife? Are you kidding me? Admit it. You've got greasy hair, acne, pasty white skin, enormous black shoes, and no girlfriend right?

Is your computer screen a mirror?

[brokeback]

What exactly did you do to contribute to that impressive 3 game win streak you keep going on about?Absolutely nothing but swig beer, cuss a lot, and cheer. I haven't been acting like that streak makes me cooler than Cowboyfan, though. I've just used it as evidence that the Chiefs are more likely to win this game.

[Mansta54]

You are on a Dallas fans board jacking off your favorite team in front of everyone. That is the definition of living through the accomplishments of your team.



I couldn't have said it better.. I think the 5 SB rings got to him..

[SkinsandTerps]

brokeback, your time on this board is likely coming to an end.

[superpunk]

Absolutely nothing but swig beer, cuss a lot, and cheer. I haven't been acting like that streak makes me cooler than Cowboyfan, though. I've just used it as evidence that the Chiefs are more likely to win this game.

Actually, you've been jocking that win streak more than anyone bringing up those super bowl wins. Nice try.

[brokeback]

You are on a Dallas fans board jacking off your favorite team in front of everyone. That is the definition of living through the accomplishments of your team.
I'm talking about my team and getting a bunch of Dallas fans all worked up. I'm not the one saying that you personally can't talk about your or anyone else's team unless the team unless you cheer for a team with "X" number of fans, trophies, crack-addict former players, etc.

[BigDFan5]

brokeback, your time on this board is likely coming to an end.


we can only hope

[brokeback]

Actually, you've been jocking that win streak more than anyone bringing up those super bowl wins. Nice try.
1. The win streak has much more to do with Sunday's game than your trophy case that hasn't changed in a decade.
2. I haven't told anyone not to post because they don't have a 3 game winning streak.

[Reality]

Beat the 2-time defending SB champs while you were losing to Denver. Beat Denver while you were losing to NY. There's a little bit of pride swelling in my chest.While we were beating the defending NFC champs for the second time (which beat you by the way), you were losing to Buffalo .. some pride ...

-Reality sucks, I know ...

[BigDFan5]

I'm talking about my team and getting a bunch of Dallas fans all worked up. I'm not the one saying that you personally can't talk about your or anyone else's team unless the team unless you cheer for a team with "X" number of fans, trophies, crack-addict former players, etc.


Nobody else said that either. You came here to troll and try to start arguments. You come in pretending your 3rd place team is some unbeatable force. You a middle of the road team as are the Cowboys.

[superpunk]

1. The win streak has much more to do with Sunday's game than your trophy case that hasn't changed in a decade.
2. I haven't told anyone not to post because they don't have a 3 game winning streak.

Actually, having a three game win streak has the exact same amount of relevance as those super bowl wins to the game this sunday.

Nothing.

[Mansta54]

1. The win streak has much more to do with Sunday's game than your trophy case that hasn't changed in a decade.
2. I haven't told anyone not to post because they don't have a 3 game winning streak.


Does KC have a trophy case? If so, it must be real small.......

[brokeback]

I couldn't have said it better.. I think the 5 SB rings got to him.. You have a SB ring Mansta? No? Oh. You mean other people have 5 rings. If I become a Cowboys fan, how long does it take for me to get my 5 rings?

[SkinsandTerps]

1. The win streak has much more to do with Sunday's game than your trophy case that hasn't changed in a decade.



hahahaha.


OMG. You owe me a beer.

[superpunk]

hahahaha.


OMG. You owe me a beer.

And when a Skins fan on a Cowboys board thinks you're a moronic troll......:)

[big dog cowboy]

So what have you ever done to contribute to those Superbowl wins? I'm guessing you swigged a few pull-tab tallboys and cussed a lot. Feel free to talk smack about the accomplishments of complete strangers. I don't recall Staubach hoisting the trophy and thanking big dog cowboy for throwing a key block, catching that pass, or swigging that beer. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention.
Been a Cowboy fan since before our first great super bowl victory. If that isn't enough history for ya, to bad. Just because your team can't win the big game don't try and come into a Cowboy forum and bring us down to your level. I will feel free to talk about our accomplishments because I am proud of them. While it would have been nice, Staubach didn't need to thank me for anything. Everyone associated with the team knows how much the die hards have supported the Cowboys through the good and bad times. Just remember, when watching the game tomorrow, when CBS shows those super bowl banners, each and every Cowboy fan believe they had a part of that history. Nothing you or anybody else can say or do can take that away from us.

[BigDFan5]

And when a Skins fan on a Cowboys board thinks you're a moronic troll......:)


You know its bad when the Skins fans on a Cowboys board is laughing at you

[Mansta54]

And when a Skins fan on a Cowboys board thinks you're a moronic troll......:)


It must be real cold in hell right now!!!!

[SkinsandTerps]

The Cowboys have lost more SBs than the Chiefs have even played in.
Last one being ? Probably before you were born.

I am pretty sure that the Cowboys won the SB in 96 Vs. the Steelers.

:D.

[big dog cowboy]

And when a Skins fan on a Cowboys board thinks you're a moronic troll......:)
Freakin' priceless.

:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

[BigDFan5]

The Cowboys have lost more SBs than the Chiefs have even played in.
Last one being ? Probably before you were born.

I am pretty sure that the Cowboys won the SB in 96 Vs. the Steelers.

:D.


You are correct beat the Steelers 27-17 January 96

Chiefs played in 2 winning 1

Cowboys played in 8 Winning 5

[BigDFan5]

brokeback
Banned


Thanks Mods

[sacase]

brokeback, your time on this board is likely coming to an end.

Wow, you know you are a supertroll when a skin fan sides with the cowboys on something.

[SkinsandTerps]

You are correct beat the Steelers 27-17 January 96

Chiefs played in 2 winning won

Cowboys played in 8 Winning 5

"winning won" ?

You might have had more beverages than me. :bow:

Do you know what year they won in ? I think it was in the early 70's or late 60's.

This guy just dug a deeper and deeper hole for himself. Kinda silly to have me defending the Cowboys, when I am rooting for the Chiefs.

Maybe I made a mistake...

[Mansta54]

"winning won" ?

You might have had more beverages than me. :bow:

Do you know what year they won in ? I think it was in the early 70's or late 60's.

This guy just dug a deeper and deeper hole for himself. Kinda silly to have me defending the Cowboys, when I am rooting for the Chiefs.

Maybe I made a mistake...


Naw, you didn't make a mistake. That guy was a JOKE.

[Mansta54]

Wow, you know you are a supertroll when a skin fan sides with the cowboys on something.


Nice pics (africa), thanks for sharing. Looks like you had great company too:)

[SkinsandTerps]

Wow, you know you are a supertroll when a skin fan sides with the cowboys on something.

:lmao2:

As most of you guys know, I love smack talk and will defend the Redskins as much as possible...

But to disrespect the game and its history is just stupid. The other Chiefs fans (GoChiefs and ChiefsGirl ? ? ) have seemed like honest fans of their teams and true fans of the game. People like this just irritate me.

[BigDFan5]

"winning won" ?

You might have had more beverages than me. :bow:

Do you know what year they won in ? I think it was in the early 70's or late 60's.

This guy just dug a deeper and deeper hole for himself. Kinda silly to have me defending the Cowboys, when I am rooting for the Chiefs.

Maybe I made a mistake...


haha damn my typing to fast and not thinking :(

They played in 1967 and 1970 winning in 1970

[SkinsandTerps]

haha damn my typing to fast and not thinking :(

They played in 1967 and 1970 winning in 1970

Understood.

Hey, I was in the general vicinity.

There is no way that guy was 35+ acting like that.

[Mansta54]

:lmao2:

As most of you guys know, I love smack talk and will defend the Redskins as much as possible...

But to disrespect the game and its history is just stupid. The other Chiefs fans (GoChiefs and ChiefsGirl ? ? ) have seemed like honest fans of their teams and true fans of the game. People like this just irritate me.


Me too, that cat was off the hook...

[BigDFan5]

Understood.

Hey, I was in the general vicinity.

There is no way that guy was 35+ acting like that.


was it 35? I thought it was 3+5

[Mansta54]

was it 35? I thought it was 3+5



You could tell he was just a kid..

[Uh-Oh]

The Cowboys have lost more SBs than the Chiefs have even played in.
Last one being ? Probably before you were born.

I am pretty sure that the Cowboys won the SB in 96 Vs. the Steelers.

:D.
Hell has frozen over. :lmao: GO SKINSANDTERPS! :bow:

[AdamJT13]

Actually, I'm incredibly good at math. In fact, I had a perfect math score on the SAT back in the day. (No, I don't expect you to believe me, but it's true.) I admit I'm using very questionable methods to come up with the 1 in 27 stat, but the math is sound.
All I've said is that they're wrong approx 1/3 of the time. If you randomly choose 3 of their collective historical picks, there is approximately a 1 in 27 chance of them all being wrong.

That's not "sound" math, it's misguided math. Just because you can multiply 3x3x3 doesn't mean you're actually figuring out the odds of them being wrong about this game. What you did is calculate the odds that one (or all) of them would be wrong about any three games. But see, in this case, all three are picking ONE game, and they're picking the same team to win. So the odds of them all being wrong (based on their prior accuracy) is simply the average of the odds of each one being wrong. If you found 10 prognosticators who each had 66.67 percent accuracy, and they all picked Team A over Team B in a pick'em game, the odds that all 10 would be wrong is 33.33 percent (if one is wrong, they're all wrong). If you had 10,000 of the same prognosticators, the odds still would be 33.33 percent. The odds don't change just because there's more of them -- they're still picking only one game.

[Reality]

That's not "sound" math, it's misguided math. Just because you can multiply 3x3x3 doesn't mean you're actually figuring out the odds of them being wrong about this game. What you did is calculate the odds that one (or all) of them would be wrong about any three games. But see, in this case, all three are picking ONE game, and they're picking the same team to win. So the odds of them all being wrong (based on their prior accuracy) is simply the average of the odds of each one being wrong. If you found 10 prognosticators who each had 66.67 percent accuracy, and they all picked Team A over Team B in a pick'em game, the odds that all 10 would be wrong is 33.33 percent (if one is wrong, they're all wrong). If you had 10,000 of the same prognosticators, the odds still would be 33.33 percent. The odds don't change just because there's more of them -- they're still picking only one game.I find so few people appreciate mathematics like I do :D

-Reality

[BigDFan5]

I find so few people appreciate mathematics like I do :D

-Reality

My best math 8+22+88 = 3 :)

[Mansta54]

My best math 8+22+88 = 3 :)


Nice!!! I like that, very creative and true...:)

[TunaFan33]

I guess we'll see what happens tomorrow.

I have a bad feeling about this game. However-in wk 5, ONLY Matt Mosley(among 1000's of pundits) predicted we would beat the Iggles.

[cowboyeric8]

My best math 8+22+88 = 3 :)


That reminds me of during the 95 year a fan held up a sign 8+22=30 I always thought that was cool.

[Bob Sacamano]

Beat the 2-time defending SB champs while you were losing to Denver.

congrats, you beat a Pat team, less than 80% healthy

[Bob Sacamano]

I'd much rather be coming off wins against 6-4 and 9-2 teams than coming off of two losses against 8-2 and 7-4 teams.

losing to 8-2 and 7-4 teams, respectively, is bad?

name the last bad team, we've lost too

you'll have to go back to week 5, while we only have to go back 3 weeks to see your loss against a bad team...

[Bob Sacamano]

Actually, I'm incredibly good at math. In fact, I had a perfect math score on the SAT back in the day. (No, I don't expect you to believe me, but it's true.) I admit I'm using very questionable methods to come up with the 1 in 27 stat, but the math is sound.
All I've said is that they're wrong approx 1/3 of the time. If you randomly choose 3 of their collective historical picks, there is approximately a 1 in 27 chance of them all being wrong.
That said, I know I'm very conveniently manipulating the stats here. Lighten up.

so you admit to BSing and trolling? nice

[Bob Sacamano]

If you can play a great game at home and still lose to Denver, you don't belong in the playoffs.

being that Denver is an AFC team, and not NFC, I find that extremely hard to believe

we lost a tough, fought out game, against one of the league's premier teams, in fact, if our kicker doesn't blow his only chip-shot...game over, we win, and you have nothing to say...

btw, I don't believe in coulda, shoulda, woulda, but we came this close to beating Denver, so how exactly is that any indication of playoff success or failure?

[Bob Sacamano]

I'm talking about my team and getting a bunch of Dallas fans all worked up.

I'm actually not breaking a sweat, making you look a fool

[Bob Sacamano]

damn, he's been bozo'd

all that work...WASTED!

[jazzcat22]

That does it, no need to watch the game then.

:rolleyes:

Oh, there is a reason to watch the game (I got your sarcasm), it is called Dallas 27, KC 14

We sent KC packing once (old Dallas Texans), we will do it again. Lamar Hunt and the NFL (Tabliarse) will continue their hatred toward Dallas.

[StevenOtero]

You play the odds and listen to the experts while our defense COMMENCE to beating that ........ Hope you come back to the board after the game, don't vanish on us... Show some heart and show up.........

Yez'r , someone sticky this thread for that reason.

[caesarod]

Well, that was entertaining. Curious: What specifically did he say to get banned?

[Bob Sacamano]

he got banned for trolling