Final Draft Order Scenarios

[Hostile]

NFL Draft is April 29th & 30th in New York City.

117 days until the Draft.

http://nfldrafttracker.com/


1. Texans, 2-14, .546

2. Saints, 3-13, .523

3. Titans, 4-12, .512
4. Jets, 4-12, .527
5. Packers, 4-12, .531
T6. Raiders, 4-12, .539 (Coin flip)
T6. 49ers, 4-12, .539 (Coin flip)

8. Bills, 5-11, .500
9. Lions, 5-11, .504
10. Cardinals, 5-11, .508

11. Rams, 6-10, .484
12. Browns, 6-10, .508
13. Ravens, 6-10, .523
14. Eagles, 6-10, .531

15. Falcons, 8-8, .492

16. Dolphins, 9-7, .457
17. Vikings, 9-7, .484
18. Cowboys, 9-7, .523
19. Chargers, 9-7, .559 (Hardest schedule in the NFL in 2005)

20. Chiefs, 10-6, .504
21. Patriots, 10-6, .508
22. Broncos (Via Redskins, 10-6, .539)

23. Panthers, 11-5, .449 (Lesser Division Record tie breaker)
24. Buccaneers, 11-5, .449 (Greater Division Record tie breaker)
25. Bears, 11-5, .457
26. Bengals, 11-5, .477
T27. Steelers, 11-5, .492 (Coin flip)
T27. Giants, 11-5, .492 (Coin flip)

29. Jaguars, 12-4, .465

30. Seahawks, 13-3, .430 (Easiest schedule in the NFL in 2005)
31. Broncos, 13-3, .500 (Super Bowl Runner up is the actual #31 Pick)

32. Colts, 14-2, .457 (Super Bowl Winner is the actual #32 Pick)

[Rude]

I hate to say it, but I wish we would play the young QBs and see what happens, I mean even if we lose we get 4 picks down and a glimpse of our QBs.

[Thick 'N Hearty]

Thanks for the update Hostile. Now that we can finally look ahead to next year... "The Dallas Cowboys, with the 21st pick in the draft, select (you fill in the blank)...

[jimmy40]

NFL Draft is April 29th & 30th in New York City.

117 days until the Draft.

http://nfldrafttracker.com/

Order if the Cowboys win...

1. Texans, 2-14, .542

2. Saints, 3-13, .520

3. Titans, 4-12, .508
4. Jets, 4-12, .527
5. Packers, 4-12, .531
6. 49ers, 4-12, .535
7. Raiders, 4-12, .543

8. Rams, 5-11, .488
9. Bills, 5-11, .500
10. Cardinals, 5-11, .504
11. Lions, 5-11, .508

12. Browns, 6-10, .508
13. Ravens, 6-10, .523
14. Eagles, 6-10, .535

15. Falcons, 8-8, .492

16. Dolphins, 9-7, .457
17. Vikings, 9-7, .480
18. Chargers, .563 (Hardest schedule in the NFL in 2005)

19. Patriots, 10-6, .508 (Lost head to head w/ Chiefs)
20. Chiefs, 10-6, .508 (Won head to head w/ Patriots)
21. Cowboys, 10-6, .520
22. Broncos (Via Redskins, 10-6, .543)

23. Buccaneers, 11-5, .449
24. Panthers, 11-5, .453
25. Bears, 11-5, .457
26. Bengals, 11-5, .477
27. Steelers, 11-5, .492
28. Giants, 11-5, .496

29. Jaguars, 12-4, .461

30. Seahawks, 13-3, .426 (Easiest schedule in the NFL in 2005)
31. Broncos, 13-3, .504 (Super Bowl Runner up is the actual #31 Pick)

32. Colts, 14-2, .453 (Super Bowl Winner is the actual #32 Pick)


Order if the Rams win...

1. Texans, 2-14, .546

2. Saints, 3-13, .523

3. Titans, 4-12, .512
4. Jets, 4-12, .527
5. Packers, 4-12, .531
T6. Raiders, 4-12, .539 (Tie breaker Conference Record, then coin flip)
T6. 49ers, 4-12, .539 (Tie breaker Conference Record, then coin flip)

8. Bills, 5-11, .500
9. Lions, 5-11, .504
10. Cardinals, 5-11, .508

11. Rams, 6-10, .484
12. Browns, 6-10, .508
13. Ravens, 6-10, .523
14. Eagles, 6-10, .531

15. Falcons, 8-8, .492

16. Dolphins, 9-7, .457
17. Vikings, 9-7, .484
18. Cowboys, 9-7, .523
19. Chargers, 9-7, .559 (Hardest schedule in the NFL in 2005)

20. Chiefs, 10-6, .504
21. Patriots, 10-6, .508
22. Broncos (Via Redskins, 10-6, .539)

23. Panthers, 11-5, .449 (Lesser Division Record tie breaker)
24. Buccaneers, 11-5, .449 (Greater Division Record tie breaker)
25. Bears, 11-5, .457
26. Bengals, 11-5, .477
27. Steelers, 11-5, .492 (Lesser Conference Record Tie Breaker)
28. Giants, 11-5, .492 (Greater Conference Record Tie Breaker)

29. Jaguars, 12-4, .465

30. Seahawks, 13-3, .430 (Easiest schedule in the NFL in 2005)
31. Broncos, 13-3, .500 (Super Bowl Runner up is the actual #31 Pick)

32. Colts, 14-2, .457 (Super Bowl Winner is the actual #32 Pick)Shouldn't the Patriots be picking lower than us?

[50cent]

So how do we target Hos?

[bbgun]

What a travesty that a loaded playoff team like NE picks ahead of us.

[lkelly]

Playoff teams pick after non-playoff teams, correct? Didn't we visit this scenario with Buffalo's pick last year?

[Hostile]

Shouldn't the Patriots be picking lower than us?Why would they?

The number 1 tie breaker is strength of schedule.

[jimmy40]

Why would they?

The number 1 tie breaker is strength of schedule.Aren't they in the playoffs?

[Hostile]

Playoff teams pick after non-playoff teams, correct? Didn't we visit this scenario with Buffalo's pick last year?No, the first tie breaker is still the strength of schedule.

Minnesota and St. Louis made the playoffs in 2004. See where they picked in the 2005 Drfat. 18th and 19th.

[bbgun]

Playoffs are not a factor unless you reach the SB. St Louis was a playoff team that drafted ahead of Buffalo last year.

[Hostile]

Aren't they in the playoffs?Weren't Minnesota and St. Louis in the playoffs last year?

Being in the playoffs does NOT give you a lower Draft order.

1st tie breaker is Strenght of Schedule, period.

[jimmy40]

No, the first tie breaker is still the strength of schedule.

Minnesota and St. Louis made the playoffs in 2004. See where they picked in the 2005 Drfat. 18th and 19th.Thanks, this has been explained both ways several times here today.

[Hostile]

Playoffs are not a factor unless you reach the SB. St Louis was a playoff team that drafted ahead of Buffalo last year.Exactly right.

[jimmy40]

Weren't Minnesota and St. Louis in the playoffs last year?

Being in the playoffs does NOT give you a lower Draft order.

1st tie breaker is Strenght of Schedule, period.I couldn't tell you where the heck Minn and St. Louis drafted last year.

[Hostile]

I couldn't tell you where the heck Minn and St. Louis drafted last year.If the playoff teams picked after the non playoff teams they would pick from 21 through 32.

Last year Minnesota picked 18th and St. Louis picked 19th. Both made the playoffs at 8-8.

Buffalo was 9-7, missed the playoffs, and picked 22 (our pick).

Only the Super Bowl participants are slotted. The rest rely on record and tie breakers.

[parchy]

I couldn't tell you where the heck Minn and St. Louis drafted last year.

I could, because I remember those dummies taking Alex Barron and Erasmus James over Spears.

[lkelly]

Now I recall. We were pulling for Minnesota to adavance in the playoffs to improve our draft position.

In the end, it wouldn't have mattered. Dallas would have picked Spears even if they had drafted several spots higher with their second 1st rounder.

Interesting that the Eagles had a nightmare of a season and are rewarded with only the 14th pick.

Also weird that there are NO 7-9 teams this year and only one 8-8 team. I guess this extends the streak of the Falcons not having back to back winning seasons in franchise history for 2 more years.

[Hostile]

Now I recall. We were pulling for Minnesota to adavance in the playoffs to improve our draft position.

In the end, it wouldn't have mattered. Dallas would have picked Spears even if they had drafted several spots higher with their second 1st rounder.

Interesting that the Eagles had a nightmare of a season and are rewarded with only the 14th pick.

Also weird that there are NO 7-9 teams this year and only one 8-8 team. I guess this extends the streak of the Falcons not having back to back winning seasons in franchise history for 2 more years.It amazed me how many teams were 9-7 or better. That is unreal. 2 8-8 teams made the playoffs last year.

This year two 10-6 teams could be eliminated as well as three 9-7 teams if Dallas wins. If they lose it is one 10-6 team and four 9-7 teams.

[big dog cowboy]

Thanks Hos.

It appears I was incorrect in my information regarding this subject this afternoon. I wholeheartedly apologize for that. :o:

[jimmy40]

I could, because I remember those dummies taking Alex Barron and Erasmus James over Spears.I liked Barron but haven't heard anything about him this year, not like Spears has set the world on fire though.

[Hostile]

Thanks Hos.

It appears I was incorrect in my information regarding this subject this afternoon. I wholeheartedly apologize for that. :o:You lost me.

[jimmy40]

You lost me.He's the one that got me screwed up on this deal earlier today. Lol.

[SDogo]

Hos, did you do that 49ers/Raiders tie breaker or are you saying that's what the tie breaker would be?

[Hostile]

He's the one that got me screwed up on this deal earlier today. Lol.Oh, so he was saying playoffs teams are slotted below non playoffs teams?

Silly Doggy.

:wink2:

[jimmy40]

Oh, so he was saying playoffs teams are slotted below non playoffs teams?

Silly Doggy.

:wink2:Hell, he convinced me.

[Hostile]

Hos, did you do that 49ers/Raiders tie breaker or are you saying that's what the tie breaker would be?I actually haven't done it yet.

The team with the worst Conference record would pick ahead of the other. If still tied it goes to coin flip.

[parchy]

I liked Barron but haven't heard anything about him this year, not like Spears has set the world on fire though.

Barron is getting tossed around by Ellis tonight, and Spears was much higher on everybody's big board than both James and Barron. As little as I've heard from Barron, I've heard less from James.

[Hostile]

Hell, he convinced me.Then I'm glad he wasn't selling you a used car or buying you a drink.

:grin:

[SDogo]

I actually haven't done it yet.

The team with the worst Conference record would pick ahead of the other. If still tied it goes to coin flip.

OAK 2-10; SF 3-9

[Hostile]

Hos, did you do that 49ers/Raiders tie breaker or are you saying that's what the tie breaker would be?I just figured the tie breaker and edited the post.

Raiders pick ahead of the 49ers.

Raiders were 2-10 vs. the AFC.

49ers were 3-9 vs. the NFC.

[Hostile]

OAK 2-10; SF 3-9Oops.

[SDogo]

I think this is where all the confusion comes from. Check out the last bullett

http://football.about.com/od/miscinformation/a/detdraftorder.htm

[Hostile]

I think this is where all the confusion comes from. Check out the last bullett

http://football.about.com/od/miscinformation/a/detdraftorder.htm

Makes sense.

[SDogo]

Makes sense.

I think that's why everyone thinks that playoff teams select after non-playoff teams.

I gotta admit, I'm a little confused myself after reading GBN's as well.

If a playoff team has a worst record then a non-playoff team then yeah, they select ahead of the non-playoff team but if they have the same records the playoff team selects after.

Confused I am :D

[Hostile]

Original post updated to reflect the final order.

[Hostile]

18. Cowboys, 9-7, .523

22. Broncos (Via Redskins, 10-6, .539)

30. Broncos, 13-3, .500 (Unless they go to the Super Bowl)


Please let there be a player at 18 that they want so bad they offer both picks to us.

[rojan]

18. Cowboys, 9-7, .523

22. Broncos (Via Redskins, 10-6, .539)

30. Broncos, 13-3, .500 (Unless they go to the Super Bowl)


Please let there be a player at 18 that they want so bad they offer both picks to us.


That would be amazing...I heard there were alot of talented OT's...We can get a RT and a MLB in the 1st

[jbsg02]

That would be amazing...I heard there were alot of talented OT's...We can get a RT and a MLB in the 1st

they might be interested if we we're also willing to trade ellis or glover, which we are. they are in need of a D-Lineman.

If a hypothetical situation came up where a player they loved was still on the board like Maroney or Kiwanuka. It's highly unlikely, and we may have to throw a pick their way but...

Cowboys give:
18th pick
LaRoi Glover
Maybe a 3rd?

Cowboys get:
Both Broncos picks