PDA

View Full Version : Potential Free Agents and Where they may end up


SacredStar
02-11-2006, 05:07 AM
Three mentions of the Cowboys.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5316540

Long read....but interesting.

Here are the Dallas mentions.....

1) Jon Kitna
Vivek: Kyle Boller might be the starter right now for Baltimore, but this experiment will not last very much longer. Kitna would be a nice free-agent pickup who could push and eventually push aside Boller for the starting job for the Ravens. And yes, there is a good chance that the Bengals will not be able to re-sign him even with Carson Palmer's knee injury. Kitna will not want to keep the seat warm while Palmer rehabs.

Al: Cincinnati is in a tough spot here with Kitna. With the paucity of quality quarterbacks in the NFL, Kitna should be able to get a long-term deal with a decent signing bonus and a starting job. The Bengals need insurance for Carson Palmer in case he isn't ready for opening day, but it's unlikely they'll be able to top anything Kitna can get on the open market, especially after giving Palmer a big extension just a few weeks before he tore up his knee against the Steelers. I say Dallas brings Kitna in and gives him a shot to unseat Drew Bledsoe, who only has one year remaining on his contract, as the starter. Unless Dallas does a major refortification of their ineffective line, I can't see them going into next season with the lead-footed Bledsoe as their only option behind center.

2) Mike Vanderjagt
Al: How about Minnesota, which had some of the worst field-goal kicking in the year last season, and where Vanderjagt should find success kicking plenty of meaningless regular-season field goals in the Metrodome.

Vivek: His Kris Brown-like performance in the playoffs against Pittsburgh stamped his ticket out of Indy. He could end the kicker-by-committee plan in Dallas.

3) Keyshawn Johnson
Al: Keyshawn would be due $3 million in roster bonus and base salary in Dallas in 2006. The Cowboys are slightly under the cap, so they don't really need to renegotiate or cut Johnson. I think Dallas keeps him. Johnson is still a productive number two wide receiver and Dallas won't be able to find anyone more productive on the open market for less money.

Vivek: I have not read one rumor about any team being interested in Keyshawn. Dallas.

And one very interesting Washington mention...

1) John Abraham
Al: The Jets will likely franchise Abraham again and keep doing it until a better candidate shows up on their roster. He's exactly the type of player a team should use the tag on. If Abraham stays healthy and motivated, he'll make more money through a series of one-year franchise deals than he would with a long-term deal. If he doesn't do either, the Jets are free to move on after the season without any salary cap concerns or long-term commitment.

Vivek: Franchise tag, and then a trade. Abraham stayed healthy in 2005, so his value is at its highest right now. The shoulder injury to Drew Brees has quieted any Phillip Rivers for Abraham trade talk, so let's send him to Washington.

Read the whole article though to get the full perspective. :)

TwoSteppinJJ
02-11-2006, 05:58 AM
I find it funny how no other team is interested in a good WR like keyshawn... Hell we'll keep him! :starspin

sago1
02-11-2006, 06:59 AM
Keyshawn plays well for Parcells but his age (turns 34) and difficulty with Gruden, and flareup with Bledsoe, scare other teams away despite his play in 05. About a month ago heard rumor Keyshawn looking for more money in next contract; since there no interest in him from other teams, he can forget about that.

MichaelWinicki
02-11-2006, 07:04 AM
Kitna or Bledsoe?

Kitna hands down.

Cbz40
02-11-2006, 07:06 AM
Kitna or Bledsoe?

Kitna hands down.


Good morning Michael......I agree

MichaelWinicki
02-11-2006, 07:09 AM
Good morning Michael......I agree


Morning Pops. :)

CrazyCowboy
02-11-2006, 07:18 AM
I don't see us getting any of those players

KingTuna
02-11-2006, 07:47 AM
I don't see us getting any of those players

Neither do I...We Wll NOT be spending FA $$ on a QB...Bledsoe is the starter in 2006 and 2007.

I think Vinitierai is the kicker we sign.

maxsports
02-11-2006, 09:44 AM
Kitna????? No thanks!! He is a nice back up. Did any of you watch the playoff game against Pittsburgh?????

AbeBeta
02-11-2006, 09:47 AM
Wow. What an odd FA analysis. What coach in their right mind is going to switch QBs willy-nilly like that?

Ashwynn
02-11-2006, 10:26 AM
Wow. What an odd FA analysis. What coach in their right mind is going to switch QBs willy-nilly like that?
I agree, why even look at QBs when the one we have performed admirably. Parcells has no issues with the starter position at QB. Thats a settled issue. Now back up, Kitna would be a good back up, but we all know he aint gunna come here and sit and be happy. Though I would love a job where I just need to be ready and do nothing. Stupid Kitna. Jason Garrett had the right idea. Back up an all pro for 10 years and retire a hero.

Yeagermeister
02-11-2006, 10:38 AM
No thanks to Kitna as a starter but he'd be a decent backup.

kingwhicker
02-11-2006, 10:41 AM
Boy, I'd like to get hold of some "potent tail".

conner01
02-11-2006, 12:23 PM
any writer who thinks bill would dump drew for kitna is an idiot and has no credibility

watertown
02-11-2006, 03:04 PM
****na Sucks bad He looked terrible against the Steelers in the playoffs

TruBlueCowboy
02-11-2006, 03:06 PM
Kitna or Bledsoe?

Kitna hands down.

I think your hatred of Bledsoe is clouding your judgment. ;)

What do Seattle and Cincinnati have in common? They both have two of the best offenses in the NFL that didn't become that way until Jon Kitna was no longer their starting QB. ;)

IMO, Kitna is no more than a Gus Frerotte. Quality back-up, character guy with a lot of heart, who may win you some as a starter, but your team is probably in trouble if he's the guy leading the offense.

Alexander
02-11-2006, 03:16 PM
I think your hatred of Bledsoe is clouding your judgment. ;)

What do Seattle and Cincinnati have in common? They both have two of the best offenses in the NFL that didn't become that way until Jon Kitna was no longer their starting QB. ;)

IMO, Kitna is no more than a Gus Frerotte. Quality back-up, character guy with a lot of heart, who may win you some as a starter, but your team is probably in trouble if he's the guy leading the offense.

I am no Bledsoe lover, but anyone that wants Kitna over him at this stage is certifiable.

blindzebra
02-11-2006, 04:18 PM
Wow. What an odd FA analysis. What coach in their right mind is going to switch QBs willy-nilly like that?

2003 Carter, 2004 Testaverde, 2005 Bledsoe nope all coaches stick with the same QB year to year.:lmao2:

speedkilz88
02-11-2006, 04:56 PM
No way BP changes out Bledsoe for Kitna, Vinny was done thats why he had to let him go.

Vanderjact has problems on kickoffs which is a major turnoff for Parcells. Parcells would probably love to steal Vinateri from NE, but I could also see him show interest in Ryan Longwell.

Bob Sacamano
02-11-2006, 05:23 PM
I find it funny how no other team is interested in a good WR like keyshawn... Hell we'll keep him! :starspin

no teams can talk about free agents until the free agency period begins

Bob Sacamano
02-11-2006, 05:24 PM
No thanks to Kitna as a starter but he'd be a decent backup.

which means he aint coming here, he's not going to trade one backup job for another

big dog cowboy
02-11-2006, 10:50 PM
Kitna or Bledsoe?

Kitna hands down.
Bledsoe>Kitna.

It's not close.