PDA

View Full Version : Dan Snyder's next move


Cajuncowboy
03-18-2006, 05:31 PM
After realizing that Dallas just neutralized his entire offseason Danny will now concentrate his efforts on keeping Sean Taylor's sorry rear end out of prison.

AmishCowboy
03-18-2006, 05:35 PM
Changing his underparts as he just Crap his pants!:lmao:

Mavs Man
03-18-2006, 05:36 PM
For Taylor's sake he better, or he'll have a sore-y rear end in prison.

KD
03-18-2006, 05:37 PM
He re-signs Lavar to a 8 year 56 million dollar contract, 18 million guaranteed. My source said this will happen tomorrow at 1:29 pm est time. Be on the lookout.

:)

lurkercowboy
03-18-2006, 05:44 PM
Changing his underparts as he just Crap his pants!:lmao:

Oops!

cowboyfan4life_mark
03-18-2006, 05:47 PM
For Taylor's sake he better, or he'll have a sore-y rear end in prison.
:lmao2: :lmao2:

DallasEast
03-18-2006, 05:56 PM
After realizing that Dallas just neutralized his entire offseason Danny will now concentrate his efforts on keeping Sean Taylor's sorry rear end out of prison.Snyder's probably slipped the entire Supreme Court season tickets, plus a luxury box to boot. Now, don't consider the tickets and luxury box as something to influence the court to overrule any Taylor conviction. No, think of the tickets as a recreational outlet for judges who are usually secluded most of the time; and the luxury box as a security measure while the judges are enjoying the games at FedEx Field.

These would only be innocent gestures, of course. :rolleyes:

DallasKen
03-18-2006, 05:58 PM
I see Dan Snyder's next move being to buy every team in the NFL, thus ensuring himself a super bowl victory.

Murph80
03-18-2006, 06:00 PM
After today a rope and a tree will be his next move

Cajuncowboy
03-18-2006, 06:02 PM
After today a rope and a tree will be his next move

You know this has got to be eating him. When was the last time the skins had a press conference that was televised nationally to announce a signing? I honestly don't remember it. I know they have them but I don't remember ESPN join in the press conference live.

So yeah, maybe that whole rope/tree thing is getting some play in DC.

Charles
03-18-2006, 06:06 PM
I see Dan Snyder's next move being to buy every team in the NFL, thus ensuring himself a super bowl victory.:lmao2:

kingwhicker
03-18-2006, 06:17 PM
More importantly, what will the troll Daniel Synder's next move be?

dstew60105
03-18-2006, 06:25 PM
More importantly, what will the troll Daniel Synder's next move be?


He will overpay for yet another average at best player. Opps, he's already done that.

AmishCowboy
03-18-2006, 06:30 PM
In one day, Jerry up'd Snyder's week long spending spree. Can't wait to see T.O. and Glenn go up against Springs and Rogers, what a mismatch!:lombardi:

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 06:38 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.

Duane
03-18-2006, 06:40 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.
Not really. We improved at inside LB and with us moving to a full time 3-4 defense Glover wasn't on the field as much. That's not so say I won't miss him but his loss isn't huge.

Hostile
03-18-2006, 06:42 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.I hate losing Glover, but there is no way we've taken a step back.

We lost 4 LBs to season ending injury last year. A fact lost on far too many.

On top of that we still have cap room to do more and the Draft is coming soon.

We're a SOLB and FS away from scary on D. Bookend Manny Lawson with DeMarcus Ware and this could be a very scary team to face. A healthy NT will only help.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 06:46 PM
I hate losing Glover, but there is no way we've taken a step back.

We lost 4 LBs to season ending injury last year. A fact lost on far too many.

On top of that we still have cap room to do more and the Draft is coming soon.

We're a SOLB and FS away from scary on D. Bookend Manny Lawson with DeMarcus Ware and this could be a very scary team to face. A healthy NT will only help.

I don't know. The Redskins pre-Gibbs part deax showed that defenses built around the LB's aren't great. I think it all starts up front and Glover could stop the run and pressure the QB.

DallasEast
03-18-2006, 06:47 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.Can't argue with you about Owens, but the defense comment is weak. If we were going to field a 4-3 defense, your point has merit because that would've played to Glover's strengths. But we field a 3-4 defense. We only need for someone to backup or replace Ferguson to fortify the interior of our defensive front.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 06:48 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.



Agreed.. Your defense will easily be exploited by Mark Brunell and co. I think your offense will be formidable, yes, however If given the choice I would rather have the recieving corps of the Redskins than 1 of TO. Also find a decent running back

Duane
03-18-2006, 06:49 PM
Agreed.. Your defense will easily be exploited by Mark Brunell and co. I think your offense will be formidable, yes, however If given the choice I would rather have the recieving corps of the Redskins than 1 of TO. Also find a decent running back
WTH are you talking about? We have two good running backs in Jones and Barber.

Hostile
03-18-2006, 06:50 PM
I don't know. The Redskins pre-Gibbs part deax showed that defenses built around the LB's aren't great. I think it all starts up front and Glover could stop the run and pressure the QB.All 3-4 schemes are built around the LBs.

Good thing this isn't a test day.

Billy Bullocks
03-18-2006, 06:50 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.

Regarding the 1st thing, if that helps you sleep at night before we play you guys, good for you buddy.

I'm not sure how closely you follow Dallas, but let me fill you in on smething, we run a 3-4. Glover has no place in the 3-4. And as much as many of us love and thank Dat Nguyen, Akin Adoyle is better suited to play inside in the 3-4. ANd the draft hasn't even happened yet.

TheHustler
03-18-2006, 06:51 PM
I don't know. The Redskins pre-Gibbs part deax showed that defenses built around the LB's aren't great. I think it all starts up front and Glover could stop the run and pressure the QB.

Yes, but in the 3-4 that's not his role. The NT's role is to command a double team, and Ferguson does that every play.

HTownCowboysFan
03-18-2006, 06:52 PM
After realizing that Dallas just neutralized his entire offseason Danny will now concentrate his efforts on keeping Sean Taylor's sorry rear end out of prison.

Who cares? He can sign whomever the wants -- but he CAN'T, because he just overpaid for a ton of players.

Does anyone else see 2000 again for them....

Hostile
03-18-2006, 06:52 PM
Agreed.. Your defense will easily be exploited by Mark Brunell and co. I think your offense will be formidable, yes, however If given the choice I would rather have the recieving corps of the Redskins than 1 of TO. Also find a decent running backI love it when Skins fans bag on each other.

Billy Bullocks
03-18-2006, 06:52 PM
Agreed.. Your defense will easily be exploited by Mark Brunell and co. I think your offense will be formidable, yes, however If given the choice I would rather have the recieving corps of the Redskins than 1 of TO. Also find a decent running back

Good Ole SKins fans at ait again...dont forget Terry Glenn and Witten. Jones and Barber arent good in your book?

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 06:52 PM
Julius Jones is decent, not bad at all, if he can stay healthy he is a good back. Barber is not good in my opinion, however. The problem with Dallas is they havent been able to exploit defenses by a strong running game followed by the play action pass. They mainly use screen passes out of the backfeild to cover for this weakness. TO will help but you got run to set up the pass

Billy Bullocks
03-18-2006, 06:55 PM
Julius Jones is decent, not bad at all, if he can stay healthy he is a good back. Barber is not good in my opinion, however. The problem with Dallas is they havent been able to exploit defenses by a strong running game followed by the play action pass. They mainly use screen passes out of the backfeild to cover for this weakness. TO will help but you got run to set up the pass

Just the fact that you guys are over here trolling proves how scared you guys really are. We need to address our OL and things will look alot better. Plus, with Glenn and Owens, I'd like to see which team is brave enough to walk their Safety up into the box.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 06:55 PM
Regarding the 1st thing, if that helps you sleep at night before we play you guys, good for you buddy.

I'm not sure how closely you follow Dallas, but let me fill you in on smething, we run a 3-4. Glover has no place in the 3-4. And as much as many of us love and thank Dat Nguyen, Akin Adoyle is better suited to play inside in the 3-4. ANd the draft hasn't even happened yet.

Glover is much more disruptive than Ferguson. I have never been a big fan of the 3-4.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 06:57 PM
Just the fact that you guys are over here trolling proves how scared you guys really are. We need to address our OL and things will look alot better. Plus, with Glenn and Owens, I'd like to see which team is brave enough to walk their Safety up into the box.

I am not afraid at all. You guys better resign Allen or T.O. will never get the ball. Drew isn't going to be buying time on anybody.

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 06:58 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.

umm Maybe you should look at last year Dallas, and Washingtons defense was virtually the same in every category. I doubt losing our backup NT will kill us

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 06:59 PM
Just the fact that you guys are over here trolling proves how scared you guys really are. We need to address our OL and things will look alot better. Plus, with Glenn and Owens, I'd like to see which team is brave enough to walk their Safety up into the box.


Im not scarred at all. Im looking forward to a competitive season and that is all. It will be a very anticipated event for any NFC game this season. As far as putting safteys in the Box "Harm and Hammer" could possibly be the best safteys in the history of the NFL. Look out for Arch and ST on TO.... he will NOT go across the middle....garaunteed

DallasEast
03-18-2006, 06:59 PM
Glover is much more disruptive than Ferguson.Yes, he was.

In the 4-3. I have never been a big fan of the 3-4.Don't worry. Teams like the now defending Super Bowl champion Steelers love it.

Oy.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:01 PM
Yes, he was.

In the 4-3. Don't worry. Teams like the now defending Super Bowl champion Steelers love it.

Oy.

Are you saying the Dallas D is as good as the Steelers?

SkinsHokieFan
03-18-2006, 07:03 PM
Most ironic thread ever

speedkilz88
03-18-2006, 07:03 PM
TO>S.Moss
T.Glenn>Lloyd
Crayton<Randle El

I'll give you Randle El over Crayton, though Crayton put up 22 rec. 341 15.5 avg 2td in 11 games and was still not the same when he came back from injury. Randle El 35 rec 558 15.9 avg 1td in 15 games. Call me generous. Cowboys have the better receiver corps regardless.

DallasEast
03-18-2006, 07:04 PM
Are you saying the Dallas D is as good as the Steelers?Nope. I didn't state that at all.

You stated, "I have never been a big fan of the 3-4."

The point that you've missed is that a 3-4 defense (and the refs) helped crown the last Super Bowl champion. Sure, you don't like the defense, but those who can use it effectively win with it. That's all that really matters.

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:04 PM
Are you saying the Dallas D is as good as the Steelers?

reading is fundamental

AmishCowboy
03-18-2006, 07:05 PM
I don't care for the 3-4 either, but that's what we run and Glover doesn't fit. He's a good player though. As far as T.O. goes, he can only help Glenn on the other side, we use him much the same way the Skins use Moss. With Kosier and Fabbini helping to fix the Line, that should free Witten up and open up holes for JJ and Barber. As far as the D goes, they were pretty good last year, we missed the playoffs due to lousy O-line play and the lack of a kicker. BTW, do you have any LB's yourself?.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:06 PM
Most ironic thread ever


Agreed..... you guys got TO, come on. I would hate my team if they Got TO. The only reason Jones signed him is to sell him.. $$$$$. Do you know how much JJ is going to make off TO.

DallasEast
03-18-2006, 07:08 PM
The only reason Jones signed him is to sell him.. $$$$$. Do you know how much JJ is going to make off TO.Okay, now you're only talking nonsense.

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:08 PM
Agreed..... you guys got TO, come on. I would hate my team if they Got TO. The only reason Jones signed him is to sell him.. $$$$$. Do you know how much JJ is going to make off TO.


Yeah the fact that he is a top 3 WR in the league is only good for selling merchandice doesn't help the team at all :doh:

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:08 PM
Okay, now you're only talking nonsense.

nonsense is Redskins fans native language

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:09 PM
Just love stupid foreskin fans- they are just so dumb, its funny.
Ignorant, badly educated, know nothing about football except from games
like madden, ill informed, its highly amusing.
Just to try and enlighten their poor knowledge starved craniums:
TO and Glenn make up the most dangerous 2 WR's in the NFL.
Witten is a Pro Bowl TE- just to remind you.
JJ has had 2 games better then any Portis has ever had=true he needs to stay healthy but Barber is no slouch. Now the O line is better but we still need to work on it- but progress has been made. Bledsoe can still pass as well as anyone in the NFL not named Peyton Manning; we give him the time and he will slice anyone up. Especially with the weapons he now has.
As regards the D- we pick up one more good LB and a decent vet FS and a good kicker = we are ready to take on anyone anywhere anytime.
By the way: your whole season rests on the shoulders of a 36 year old QB with a history of injuries and coming off another last season. Its just a matter of time before he goes down- and your season with it.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:11 PM
I don't care for the 3-4 either, but that's what we run and Glover doesn't fit. He's a good player though. As far as T.O. goes, he can only help Glenn on the other side, we use him much the same way the Skins use Moss. With Kosier and Fabbini helping to fix the Line, that should free Witten up and open up holes for JJ and Barber. As far as the D goes, they were pretty good last year, we missed the playoffs due to lousy O-line play and the lack of a kicker. BTW, do you have any LB's yourself?.

Marcus Washington is a pro-bowler. Lemar Marshall is underated and there is time to pick up a guy to replace the diva. The Skins also have two linebackers who line up as safeties.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:11 PM
TO>S.Moss
T.Glenn>Lloyd
Crayton<Randle El

I'll give you Randle El over Crayton, though Crayton put up 22 rec. 341 15.5 avg 2td in 11 games and was still not the same when he came back from injury. Randle El 35 rec 558 15.9 avg 1td in 15 games. Call me generous. Cowboys have the better receiver corps regardless.


TEAM PLAYERS:

moss = TO x infinity.

Chemistry = wins

TO = chaos

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:12 PM
TEAM PLAYERS:

moss = TO x infinity.

Chemistry = wins

TO = chaos


sounds like someone is hoping

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:12 PM
Just love stupid foreskin fans- they are just so dumb, its funny.
Ignorant, badly educated, know nothing about football except from games
like madden, ill informed, its highly amusing.
Just to try and enlighten their poor knowledge starved craniums:
TO and Glenn make up the most dangerous 2 WR's in the NFL.
Witten is a Pro Bowl TE- just to remind you.
JJ has had 2 games better then any Portis has ever had=true he needs to stay healthy but Barber is no slouch. Now the O line is better but we still need to work on it- but progress has been made. Bledsoe can still pass as well as anyone in the NFL not named Peyton Manning; we give him the time and he will slice anyone up. Especially with the weapons he now has.
As regards the D- we pick up one more good LB and a decent vet FS and a good kicker = we are ready to take on anyone anywhere anytime.
By the way: your whole season rests on the shoulders of a 36 year old QB with a history of injuries and coming off another last season. Its just a matter of time before he goes down- and your season with it.

Poorly educated?

Ummm did JJ ever have 250 yards and 5 tds?

Next question.

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:14 PM
Poorly educated?

Ummm did JJ every have 250 yards and 5 tds?

Next question.

Might wanna check that yardage again there sport

Hostile
03-18-2006, 07:16 PM
reading is fundamentalNo, reading comprehension is fundamental.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:16 PM
Just love stupid foreskin fans- they are just so dumb, its funny.
Ignorant, badly educated, know nothing about football except from games
like madden, ill informed, its highly amusing.
Just to try and enlighten their poor knowledge starved craniums:
TO and Glenn make up the most dangerous 2 WR's in the NFL.
Witten is a Pro Bowl TE- just to remind you.
JJ has had 2 games better then any Portis has ever had=true he needs to stay healthy but Barber is no slouch. Now the O line is better but we still need to work on it- but progress has been made. Bledsoe can still pass as well as anyone in the NFL not named Peyton Manning; we give him the time and he will slice anyone up. Especially with the weapons he now has.
As regards the D- we pick up one more good LB and a decent vet FS and a good kicker = we are ready to take on anyone anywhere anytime.
By the way: your whole season rests on the shoulders of a 36 year old QB with a history of injuries and coming off another last season. Its just a matter of time before he goes down- and your season with it.


Room to talk I guess considering you have Drew Bledsoe at the helm. I seemed to have forgotten (due to my lack of education) that he was still in his prime. My apologies.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:16 PM
Might wanna check that yardage again there sport

My bad. 218 and 5 td's. Thanks for the correction, sport.

What is JJ's best game? Just checking.

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:17 PM
Ydg is what I meant- though the 5 TD's is interesting. Portis does not seem to be able to break many long runs though- especially late in the season.
But then Gibbs has been riding him pretty hard; that is one thing that BP makes sure of: he will not wear out his RB.

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:18 PM
The stats I found did not show that game- just curious, when did it happen?
JJ has had two games of 194 and 196.

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:19 PM
My bad. 218 and 5 td's. Thanks for the correction, sport.

What is JJ's best game? Just checking.


198 and 3 TDs still you were wrong kiddo :)

DIAF
03-18-2006, 07:19 PM
I would be happy if I had T.O. but don't forget that this guy has already torn two locker rooms apart. This is definitely a risky deal for you guys.

Your weakness is your Defense. It seems that every other team in the east has improved thier defense while you guys have taken a step back. Losing Glover was huge.

Huh? Our defense is a weakness? Maybe at FS, but I think we were damn good everywhere else.

Losing Glover would be huge if we were still playing a 4-3. Which we aren't. There's no place for Glover in a 3-4.

skinsngibbs4life
03-18-2006, 07:19 PM
I'll give you that signing T.O. is a good signing, but personally, I think that there could have been some other areas to target a big signing on than at WR.

first, your WR corps was already pretty good from last year. Glenn had one of the best years of his career, and me-shawn provided a nice #2 possesion reciever for you all. To me, the signing of T.O. just bolstered a position that was definatly not one of your positions of needs going into the offseason.

I believe that a major signing on the offensive line would have been a much more productive signing. Even though you have added depth on the line, I dont think that it was the answer that you all were looking for.

Even though the signing of T.O. will give you one of the better combos or WR in the league, you all might have some troubles along the line, even with flo coming back.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:21 PM
you cannot compare Julius Jones to Clinton Portis.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:22 PM
198 and 3 TDs still you were wrong kiddo :)

Not this time Dad. 2003 with Denver against KC. Portis has had a 4 td game too.

speedkilz88
03-18-2006, 07:24 PM
Our offense needed bigger plays and Keyshawn a solid player was just not capable. The attention TO receives will open up things for the others. Glenn if healthy will probably have a career year.

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:25 PM
In the what have you done for me lately NFL that is a good point since JJ has had injury problems; how some ever, I notice that JJ has had big games against playoof teams while Portis's big games come against teams like Arizona and KC (well know for their D's). JJ's big games came against playoff teams like Seattle and Carolina. Now this last year Portis did real good untill he wore down late- but then again you guys did have a better O line.
I will take JJ over Portis because JJ has less mileage on him- the way Gibbs has been running Portis he will wear down in a couple of years.

Hostile
03-18-2006, 07:25 PM
I'll give you that signing T.O. is a good signing, but personally, I think that there could have been some other areas to target a big signing on than at WR.

first, your WR corps was already pretty good from last year. Glenn had one of the best years of his career, and me-shawn provided a nice #2 possesion reciever for you all. To me, the signing of T.O. just bolstered a position that was definatly not one of your positions of needs going into the offseason.

I believe that a major signing on the offensive line would have been a much more productive signing. Even though you have added depth on the line, I dont think that it was the answer that you all were looking for.

Even though the signing of T.O. will give you one of the better combos or WR in the league, you all might have some troubles along the line, even with flo coming back.Such as?

OL to keep Bledsoe upright? Has been addressed with 2 signings and the Draft is still ahead.

K so we don't lose a couple of fluke games? Have you read how many kickers we've looked at? It is being addressed.

LB depth? One signing plus it is rumored to be the target of the Drfat, which by the way, is still ahead.

FS to finish off the secondary? There are still some options out there, one of them is the NFL Draft, still ahead.

I'd still like to see more done, luckily we still have quite a bit of cap room, and a lot of Draft picks still to make.

I fail to see a glaring weakness being ignored. Would you help a brutha out?

:grin:

BigDFan5
03-18-2006, 07:26 PM
Not this time Dad. 2003 with Denver against KC. Portis has had a 4 td game too.

He still didnt have 250 yards little guy keep spinning

skinsngibbs4life
03-18-2006, 07:27 PM
Our offense needed bigger plays and Keyshawn a solid player was just not capable. The attention TO receives will open up things for the others. Glenn if healthy will probably have a career year.

Glenn had what, 1200 yards recieving last year? With T.O. as your number 1, tell, where are all of those yards going to come from?

If Glenn has a career next year, it will come at the expense of TO being kicked off the team from arguing with parcells about not getting the ball enough.

Hostile
03-18-2006, 07:27 PM
you cannot compare Julius Jones to Clinton Portis.Why not? Is there a law against it?

5Stars
03-18-2006, 07:28 PM
I'll give you that signing T.O. is a good signing, but personally, I think that there could have been some other areas to target a big signing on than at WR.

first, your WR corps was already pretty good from last year. Glenn had one of the best years of his career, and me-shawn provided a nice #2 possesion reciever for you all. To me, the signing of T.O. just bolstered a position that was definatly not one of your positions of needs going into the offseason.

I believe that a major signing on the offensive line would have been a much more productive signing. Even though you have added depth on the line, I dont think that it was the answer that you all were looking for.

Even though the signing of T.O. will give you one of the better combos or WR in the league, you all might have some troubles along the line, even with flo coming back.

"Turn out the lights...the partys over..." :laugh2:

You Redstinks are really worried....you know it, I know it...and when it's all said and done? You will still be back where you belong...

Hey, you had a Lucky year...and now your owner just spent a friggen ton of money to players that are just there to collect a paycheck!

But, don't worry...little Art from the ES forum will make it all good!

:lmao2:

CowboysNumeroUno
03-18-2006, 07:30 PM
Regarding the 1st thing, if that helps you sleep at night before we play you guys, good for you buddy.

I'm not sure how closely you follow Dallas, but let me fill you in on smething, we run a 3-4. Glover has no place in the 3-4. And as much as many of us love and thank Dat Nguyen, Akin Adoyle is better suited to play inside in the 3-4. ANd the draft hasn't even happened yet.

Interesting....it seems that the Skins fans forgot about the draft...Why is that?

Oh yeah they have like 1 first day pick

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:32 PM
Interesting....it seems that the Skins fans forgot about the draft...Why is that?

Oh yeah they have like 1 first day pick


Why bother with unknowns when you can fill your holes with proven players.

5Stars
03-18-2006, 07:33 PM
Oppps....foul!

I'm going to send this post into the NFL office for review!

:lmao2:

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:34 PM
Why not? Is there a law against it?

Yes Sir I believe there is. Great point

CowboysNumeroUno
03-18-2006, 07:35 PM
TEAM PLAYERS:

moss = TO x infinity.

Chemistry = wins

TO = chaos

And your chemistry is coming from where? Danny just bought a new team pretty much....

5Stars
03-18-2006, 07:36 PM
Why bother with unknowns when you can fill your holes with proven players.

Proven? :rolleyes:

You mean like "proven" that the teams they came from don't want them anymore, otherwise they would have paid them to stay? That kind of "proven"? :lmao:

skinsngibbs4life
03-18-2006, 07:37 PM
"Turn out the lights...the partys over..." :laugh2:

You Redstinks are really worried....you know it, I know it...and when it's all said and done? You will still be back where you belong...

Hey, you had a Lucky year...and now your owner just spent a friggen ton of money to players that are just there to collect a paycheck!

But, don't worry...little Art from the ES forum will make it all good!

:lmao2:

is that all that you can say? that we are over here because we are "scared"?
You can't deny the fact that you all were worried about the o-line heading into the offseason. I have seen numerous people on here complain about needing an upgrade over Al Johnson(which didnt happen) and at RT with Petitti( which i guess you could say kind of happened). I dont know if this guy you signed is going to start this year, but if he isnt, its a lot to expect out of a 2nd year player to go out and improve that much. Add in the fact that Larry Allen has been suffering nagging injuries for two straight years now, and you are one injury away from being right where you were at the end of last year.

AmishCowboy
03-18-2006, 07:38 PM
Is that the same as comparing Randle-Al and Lloyd to T.O.?.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:38 PM
Proven? :rolleyes:

You mean like "proven" that the teams they came from don't want them anymore, otherwise they would have paid them to stay? That kind of "proven"? :lmao:

Enter T.O. here. Come on now... That was a softball.

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:38 PM
And your chemistry is coming from where? Danny just bought a new team pretty much....


TO = chaos

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:39 PM
We definitly need to pick up a couple more people on the O line- and we will; but you see there is this thing called the draft- I know that is something you skins seem to ignore a lot- but it does exist. And we have a nice set of picks to use there.

Billy Bullocks
03-18-2006, 07:40 PM
Glover is much more disruptive than Ferguson. I have never been a big fan of the 3-4.

Yes, Glover is more disruptive, as a 3tech tackle. He doesn't draw double teams, like a 3-4 NT should.

And Im so glad that we have Parcells coaching instead of you, and since this is the case, you're personal preference of the defense means nothing. Look at the last SB winners...Pats and Steelers, 4 out of 5 SBs, both run the 3-4..

Im not scarred at all. Im looking forward to a competitive season and that is all. It will be a very anticipated event for any NFC game this season. As far as putting safteys in the Box "Harm and Hammer" could possibly be the best safteys in the history of the NFL. Look out for Arch and ST on TO.... he will NOT go across the middle....garaunteed

Why is it that everytime somebody mentions a WR to you guys, all you hear about is how Taylor and his new homeboy are going to take that persons head off. It's such a bland Skins response to everything.

And I don't think anyone compared Jones to Portis anywhere in this thread either.

Dave_in-NC
03-18-2006, 07:41 PM
Why bother with unknowns when you can fill your holes with proven players.

Hows that been working for you since Danny boy took over? Hes been trying to buy a winner since day one. One decent year? I hate the TO signing, we didnt need it. But as far as building the right way, we are doing great thnx. You guys have players buying their way out.

We still have money and there are still great players to be had.

Why are skins fans even on this forum?

burmafrd
03-18-2006, 07:41 PM
Now I freely admit that the TO signing is a gamble- BUT in the first year at least it should work quite well. And that is the year coming up: and I can tell that the Skins are now VERY worried. They would not be hear blowing so much if they weren't.

CowboysNumeroUno
03-18-2006, 07:41 PM
is that all that you can say? that we are over here because we are "scared"?
You can't deny the fact that you all were worried about the o-line heading into the offseason. I have seen numerous people on here complain about needing an upgrade over Al Johnson(which didnt happen) and at RT with Petitti( which i guess you could say kind of happened). I dont know if this guy you signed is going to start this year, but if he isnt, its a lot to expect out of a 2nd year player to go out and improve that much. Add in the fact that Larry Allen has been suffering nagging injuries for two straight years now, and you are one injury away from being right where you were at the end of last year.

I'm guessing you are referring to Fabini who we signed today, and just because he didn't get a $15 million signing bonus, doesnt mean he cant be and effective player. Also we are likely cutting ties with Allen.

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 07:42 PM
Glover is much more disruptive than Ferguson. I have never been a big fan of the 3-4.

No offense but your comments on our defense are simply not accurate. Our defense is young, talented and about to be dominant with a few more additions. This nucleus should be solid for years to come as well because
most of our players are young. The defense is a huge strenth not a weakness of our team.

Further, it appears you no very little about the 3-4 defense with your comments on LB, Glover as a better player in a 3-4 ecttt. I would have expected you would have made a weakness reference on our offense
save TO but definitely not on our defense. Our defense is going to wreak
havoc on the NFL this year as the young players are developing and the
finishing touches are being addressed in FA and the draft.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:43 PM
Yes, Glover is more disruptive, as a 3tech tackle. He doesn't draw double teams, like a 3-4 NT should.

And Im so glad that we have Parcells coaching instead of you, and since this is the case, you're personal preference of the defense means nothing. Look at the last SB winners...Pats and Steelers, 4 out of 5 SBs, both run the 3-4..



Why is it that everytime somebody mentions a WR to you guys, all you hear about is how Taylor and his new homeboy are going to take that persons head off. It's such a bland Skins response to everything.

And I don't think anyone compared Jones to Portis anywhere in this thread either.

Again, I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams. That means LB's or safeties are going to have to stop the pulling guard. Didn't work too well last year.

5Stars
03-18-2006, 07:43 PM
is that all that you can say? that we are over here because we are "scared"?
You can't deny the fact that you all were worried about the o-line heading into the offseason. I have seen numerous people on here complain about needing an upgrade over Al Johnson(which didnt happen) and at RT with Petitti( which i guess you could say kind of happened). I dont know if this guy you signed is going to start this year, but if he isnt, its a lot to expect out of a 2nd year player to go out and improve that much. Add in the fact that Larry Allen has been suffering nagging injuries for two straight years now, and you are one injury away from being right where you were at the end of last year.

Actually, the Boyz have a draft coming up...with draft picks! The Cowboys have depth...you Redstinks don't!

If anyone on our teams go down...it's going to be your team that suffers!

:laugh2:

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 07:44 PM
TO = chaos

Taylor=Thug:banghead::bang2:

Dave_in-NC
03-18-2006, 07:45 PM
Again, I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams. That means LB's or safeties are going to have to stop the pulling guard. Didn't work too well last year.

I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams.

And the Skins?

superpunk
03-18-2006, 07:45 PM
I don't know. The Redskins pre-Gibbs part deax showed that defenses built around the LB's aren't great. I think it all starts up front and Glover could stop the run and pressure the QB.

We run the 3-4. By it's very nature you HAVE to build around LBs.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:45 PM
I'm guessing you are referring to Fabini who we signed today, and just because he didn't get a $15 million signing bonus, doesnt mean he cant be and effective player. Also we are likely cutting ties with Allen.

I cannot put into words how happy I would be if you guys lost Allen.

A few years ago Madden was talking about two current (at the time) players in the NFL who were the all time best at their position. The first was Jerry Rice. The second was Larry Allen.

The Star will lose some of its gleam when he is gone. Larry Allen was incredible.

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 07:47 PM
Again, I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams. That means LB's or safeties are going to have to stop the pulling guard. Didn't work too well last year.

You do realize Dallas was ranked right there with the skins in overall defense do you not? :lmao2:

Billy Bullocks
03-18-2006, 07:47 PM
Again, I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams. That means LB's or safeties are going to have to stop the pulling guard. Didn't work too well last year.


You should work on reading comprehension. Nowhere did I say the Cowboys defense is what those defenses were. I just simply stated that regardless of your personal preferene in defenses, the facts remain that of the last 5 SB's, 4 times the winner ran a predominantly 3-4.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:50 PM
You do realize Dallas was ranked right there with the skins in overall defense do you not? :lmao2:

I am sorry. I can't get the game at Fed-Ex out of my mind. I did see one excellent defense that day.

burritopunk
03-18-2006, 07:52 PM
Go Browns.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:53 PM
You should work on reading comprehension. Nowhere did I say the Cowboys defense is what those defenses were. I just simply stated that regardless of your personal preferene in defenses, the facts remain that of the last 5 SB's, 4 times the winner ran a predominantly 3-4.

Then who cares if they are running the same defense as the elite teams. Why don't you say that they don't need Glover because they run the poor man's 3-4. Then we would all be on the same page!

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 07:54 PM
I am sorry. I can't get the game at Fed-Ex out of my mind. I did see one excellent defense that day.

I cannot seem to get the 14 wins out of 17 :lmao2::lmao::laugh2:

We own you guys....kinda funny really Gibbs would embarrass himself with this comment:

"It was one of the greatest moments in sports for me," Gibbs said.

We hope you enjoyed your SB with Gibbs last year :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao2:

Since 14 losses and 3 wins makes you happy. :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao:

superpunk
03-18-2006, 07:56 PM
Glenn had what, 1200 yards recieving last year? With T.O. as your number 1, tell, where are all of those yards going to come from?

If Glenn has a career next year, it will come at the expense of TO being kicked off the team from arguing with parcells about not getting the ball enough.

Keyshawn caught 71 balls last year. If you look at TOs yearly totals, that's what he gets alot of the time, save for a couple years in the WCO in SF. Contrary to popular belief, it doesn't have to be one way or another.:)

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 07:57 PM
I cannot seem to get the 14 wins out of 17 :lmao2::lmao::laugh2:

We own you guys....kinda funny really Gibbs would embarrass himself with this comment:

"It was one of the greatest moments in sports for me," Gibbs said.

We hope you enjoyed your SB with Gibbs last year :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao2:

Since 14 losses and 3 wins makes you happy. :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao:

The 2-0 in NFC championship games always brought a smile to my face but I may get kicked off for bringing those up...

seantaylor21
03-18-2006, 07:57 PM
Sean Taylor is not a thug. Leon Lett is a thug.

5Stars
03-18-2006, 07:59 PM
I cannot seem to get the 14 wins out of 17 :lmao2::lmao::laugh2:

We own you guys....kinda funny really Gibbs would embarrass himself with this comment:

"It was one of the greatest moments in sports for me," Gibbs said.

We hope you enjoyed your SB with Gibbs last year :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao2:

Since 14 losses and 3 wins makes you happy. :laugh1: :laugh2: :lmao:

ROYDESTROY....you have earned THREE SILVER STARS!

:star: :star: :star:

superpunk
03-18-2006, 08:00 PM
Then who cares if they are running the same defense as the elite teams. Why don't you say that they don't need Glover because they run the poor man's 3-4. Then we would all be on the same page!

It was their first year running it, Norman. :) And the scoring defense rose from 27th to 12th. I'd say another year, and more fitting personnel should provide more improvement.

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 08:05 PM
The 2-0 in NFC championship games always brought a smile to my face but I may get kicked off for bringing those up...

Not only do we own you:

14 wins=Dallas
3=Skins

We have 5 SB titles....

You have 3....

You are in America's capitol.....

We ARE America's team..:star::starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin

You will always be looking up..celebrating mediocrity....while we enjoy

Excellence!!

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 08:07 PM
Sean Taylor is not a thug. Leon Lett is a thug.

OK...actually Taylor is a CRIMINAL :laugh1::laugh2::bow::bang2:

AmishCowboy
03-18-2006, 08:10 PM
:hammer:

5Stars
03-18-2006, 08:10 PM
Not only do we own you:

14 wins=Dallas
3=Skins

We have 5 SB titles....

You have 3....

You are in America's capitol.....

We ARE America's team..:star::starspin:starspin:starspin:starspin

You will always be looking up..celebrating mediocrity....while we enjoy

Excellence!!

Uhhh, don't forget ROYDESTROY...two of those Redstinks SuperBowls were during strike seasons! :lmao2:

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 08:11 PM
OK...actually Taylor is a CRIMINAL :laugh1::laugh2::bow::bang2:

You don't want to go down this road... Where is big Nate these days?

speedkilz88
03-18-2006, 08:12 PM
I can tell you that Leon Lett is no Dexter Manley!

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 08:12 PM
Uhhh, don't forget ROYDESTROY...two of those Redstinks SuperBowls were during strike seasons! :lmao2:

I think they had a memorable championship game in one of those... I can't put my finger on it.

speedkilz88
03-18-2006, 08:12 PM
You don't want to go down this road... Where is big Nate these days?Home, silly.:lmao2:

5Stars
03-18-2006, 08:13 PM
You don't want to go down this road... Where is big Nate these days?

Where is "one legged Joe" at right now? :lmao2:

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 08:14 PM
Where is "one legged Joe" at right now? :lmao2:

In the Monday Night Football booth with another Washingtonian. It is a good show you should check it out.

5Stars
03-18-2006, 08:18 PM
I think they had a memorable championship game in one of those... I can't put my finger on it.

What? You cannot put your "finger on it"...?

Try taking your fingers out of your nose! The Dallas Cowboys won their SuperBowls playing against the best competition...while your Gibby coach won some two SB's against SCRUBS!

:lmao2:

BrAinPaiNt
03-18-2006, 08:19 PM
In the Monday Night Football booth with another Washingtonian. It is a good show you should check it out.

Ugghhh Joe is one of the worst broadcasters. No NOT because he was once a redskin he is just annoying however I would rather listen to him compared to McGuire

superpunk
03-18-2006, 08:21 PM
You don't want to go down this road... Where is big Nate these days?

Keep bringing irelevant and wrong information....:rolleyes:

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 08:21 PM
What? You cannot put your "finger on it"...?

Try taking your fingers out of your nose! The Dallas Cowboys won their SuperBowls playing against the best competition...while your Gibby coach won some two SB's against SCRUBS!

:lmao2:

The Boys could have stopped them, at least when they won the first one.

kingwhicker
03-18-2006, 08:21 PM
Wow, the MIFBIS Woodworker Gang is out in full force tonight. They must be afraid Owens will pull an out of date cap with an R on it and a pair of 1980s glasses with huge lenses and put them on and a tape of the game and start whining to the refs and saying that he's such a great Christian after scoring a TD in Washington in front of Gibbs.

Grim21Reaper
03-18-2006, 08:22 PM
Keep bringing irelevant and wrong information....:rolleyes:



Ahh. Nate is out of jail. Taylor needs his attorneys.

superpunk
03-18-2006, 08:23 PM
Nate Newton isn't in jail?

Does Nate Newton currently play for the Dallas Cowboys?

Irrelevant.

superpunk
03-18-2006, 08:24 PM
You guys better resign Allen

You mind enlightening us here, boss?

wileedog
03-18-2006, 08:28 PM
Again, I don't see how Steelers and Pats comparisons have any merit. The Boys are lightyears away from those teams. That means LB's or safeties are going to have to stop the pulling guard. Didn't work too well last year.

Because injuries put the likes of Shanle, Fowler and Fujita on the field.

Ayodele and Burnett or a top round draft pick will upgrade those positions exponentially.

The Dline is basically set with Canty, Spears and Ferguson as well as solid depth. The secondary is one of the leagues best if we add a FS, which as has been said ad nauseum we will do with FA and/or the draft.

PIck on the Oline all you want, which still looks very average, but you have no arguement on the Defense, which even after losing half our LBers and our #2 CB last year still put up the almost exact same stats as yours.

And if you want to bring up the 2nd game where you blew us out, why don't you also explain to the me the Giant game when they rolled you like a $5 hooker?

DWAREZ
03-18-2006, 08:36 PM
You don't want to go down this road... Where is big Nate these days?

You mean Taylor's future BIG DADDY :bow::laugh2::eek:

BringOnTO
03-19-2006, 09:08 PM
If we had wanted TO, your sorry cowgirls would have never had him. Instead we went for more team orinated guys, apparently Gibbs doesn't really like selfish asholes like TO. But hey he should fit in great with the cowgirls, you guys are full of them.