If you could have one dallas player immortalized to the team

[locked&loaded]

who would it be, meaning would play for ever the team. i would say a dominant pass rusher because as long as you can get a rush on the qb you can stay in a game. so i guess charles hayley since im younger than most and charles hayley is the best sack "artist" if you will ive ever seen.

[DragonCowboy]

Roger Staubach. We wouldn't ever have to worry about drafting anyone.

Wait, you mean at his prime, right?

[locked&loaded]

ya, rodger the dodger? haha he was awsome wish tehy would of let him throw a bit more they were over conservative. could of won a few more

[DragonCowboy]

ya, rodger the dodger? haha he was awsome wish tehy would of let him throw a bit more they were over conservative. could of won a few more

I didn't really watch any Staubach games, and I was about to type Aikman, but from what I've heard about Roger (and I haven't really seen any Aikman games, except for his last few years, I'm REALLY young :D ), he was a great player, so I penciled him in there.

[MissionCoach]

Roger The Dodger :bow: :hammer:

[L-O-Jete]

None, they are getting bigger, faster, stronger all the time. I don´t think there is a player from 20 years ago or more who could dominate like he did in his time, not Jim Brown, not Bob Lily, not Payton, not O.J., not LT, not even Montana or Rice in a couple of years.

[THUMPER]

I think I would have to go with Staubach as well. He could play in any era and his mobility might actually fit better in today's game than it did in the 70s.

As much as I would like to have said Bob Lilly I don't think a 260 lb DT could be as dominant in today's game.

[Cajuncowboy]

Staubach and pulling away.

[dougonthebench]

Roger The Dodger :bow: :hammer:


:signmast: what he said!!!!

[bobbie brewskie]

since QBs are the hardest to find youd hafta say staubach > Aikman > any other position.

so lets say this:

if you could have any non-QB immortalized who would it be?

[dougonthebench]

my non QB is immortalized= Bob Lilly

[on8thdayGodcreatedBledsoe]

Bledstudsoe.

[SupermanXx]

I didn't really watch any Staubach games, and I was about to type Aikman, but from what I've heard about Roger (and I haven't really seen any Aikman games, except for his last few years, I'm REALLY young :D ), he was a great player, so I penciled him in there.

Hey bro no offense but the word "assault" in your sig is spelled wrong man hahaha

[burmafrd]

Leaving out QB, its a bit of a toughy. Irvin, Emmitt, Bullett Bob, Haley, Manster, Deion, there are so many all time greats.....

[SupermanXx]

If you could have one dallas player immortalized to the team who would it be

Lynn Scott

oh wait, he's already immortalized to the team

[theogt]

None, they are getting bigger, faster, stronger all the time. I don´t think there is a player from 20 years ago or more who could dominate like he did in his time, not Jim Brown, not Bob Lily, not Payton, not O.J., not LT, not even Montana or Rice in a couple of years.This is the only post on this thread that deserves a hammer icon.

[bobbie brewskie]

None, they are getting bigger, faster, stronger all the time. I don´t think there is a player from 20 years ago or more who could dominate like he did in his time, not Jim Brown, not Bob Lily, not Payton, not O.J., not LT, not even Montana or Rice in a couple of years.

i agree with everything except for Rice and even Payton just because Rice is so far out in his own leage that its not even funny, in this case STATS DONT LIE! the guy will be the best receiver at any time no matter what. and Payton, what he did with the bears was pretty crazy, the guy can ball and is a complete back. guys like jim brown (from what ive heard and seen on ESPN Classics) could do what they did in their time, now just because he was a powerback and wasnt amazing in other aspects. i dont think you could tell me a back like emmitt or payton (a complete back) wouldnt fair well at anytime in the league, or a receiver like Rice wouldnt fair well, he can do it all, im sorry but you dont have numbers like that for playing in the league that long, you have numbers like that because nobody can touch you. now for QBs - the league changes so much and they depend so much on other positions to excel that id have to agree with you, a QB from back in the day cant compete in todays league but you also cant say that they arent on the same level as QBs of today.

[burmafrd]

ROger in his prime would be just as great now as he was then. BETTER, since they really protect QB's now and the WR's can do so much more now then 30 years ago. Montana would be just as good now as he was 20 years ago.

[big dog cowboy]

Bledstudsoe.
:lmao:

[Mansta54]

I'd take Charles Haley or Michael Irvin anytime....

[DallasKnight]

Overall, Roger of course.


Non-QB. I couldn't argue with Irvin, Emmitt, Manster, or Haley.

[DallasKnight]

I take back everything I just said. Non-QB. TOM LANDRY!

[TheHustler]

Emmitt in his prime. Average over 4 yards per carry, control the clock, control the game.

[cowboyuptx]

Michael Irvin

or somebody who hasn't been mentioned yet, Deion Sanders.

Primetime in his prime, that was a thing of beauty.

[on8thdayGodcreatedBledsoe]

:lmao:

What? He's probably going to hold a bunch of Cowboys passing records after this season.

[tyke1doe]

ROger in his prime would be just as great now as he was then. BETTER, since they really protect QB's now and the WR's can do so much more now then 30 years ago. Montana would be just as good now as he was 20 years ago.


I agree.

Unless the game undergoes a serious revolution/evolution, a quarterback who can buy time with his feet, scan the field and throw accurately to his receivers will be a timeless talent.

Montana and Staubach would have fit any era.

I go with Staubach. Was Montana and Elway before Montana and Elway.

[tyke1doe]

I take back everything I just said. Non-QB. TOM LANDRY!

As much as I love Tom Landry (interviewed him once), he had the tendency to "overprepare" his teams, especially in the Super Bowl.

[ghosttown cowboy]

I'll go with #12

[CliffnMesquite]

Larry (Bubba) Cole. :)

[SuspectCorner]

roger was like a fire-and-brimstone minister... despite being a "good catholic".

20 seconds in the huddle pews and the faithful right down to the average viewer/fan knew the cowboys were gonna score to win it.

aikman never had the charisma and leadership skills of roger. and i love aikman.

and, by the way, roger had an amazingly tight deep ball. he couldn't drive it with near the velocity of troy. but he had a glorious touch.

sorry, emmitt... roger's the best cowboy i ever saw.

[DallasKen]

I don't believe in immortilization.

[EMMITTnROY]

Emmitt

[DragonCowboy]

What? He's probably going to hold a bunch of Cowboys passing records after this season.

oh my god, oh my god, LOOK AT HIS AVATAR!! :laugh2:

[stealth]

Manster

[Chuck 54]

Staubach is a no brainer...Qb is the most important position and hardest to fill, so you put in a Hall of Famer who had plenty of arm, plenty of moxie, and unlike Aikman, could carry a team because he was as mobile or more mobile than most guys today.

With him as my all time QB, building a SB team around him wouldn't be all that difficult.

[LeonDixson]

My answer was Roger Staubach hands down. But since it's been qualified to non-QBs I'd have to say Deion. Half the field is covered and punt returns are field-position/game changing plays once again.

[DWelch1775]

Deion, he can play offense, deffense, and special teams.

[Big Dakota]

Roger:)