PDA

View Full Version : When, if ever, will Romo be ready?


LandryFan
06-09-2006, 10:23 AM
I've read many posts saying that there is no way BP would count on Romo to back up Bledsoe for more than a game or two should Bledsoe go down this year.

My problem with that train of thought is this: Romo is starting his fourth year with the team. He certainly ought to have the playbook/system down pat by now. He was good enough to be the # 2 QB last year. If Drew goes down, here comes Romo. What veteran FA capable of saving the day was waiting in the wings to sign with Dallas if Drew did go down? If BP and JJ were willing to ride out the year risking that Romo could do the job if need be last year, then why not this year?

If experience is, indeed the major problem with relying on Romo, the he'll NEVER get into a game. It's a Catch-22 situation. BP won't play him due to lack of experience, but he would have to play to get the experience.

How much bench time and practice does it take for a coach to say a guy is ready to play? Even for an UDFA, if he's not seriously ready to compete this year, he probably won't ever be. Thoughts?

wileedog
06-09-2006, 10:27 AM
Parcells said he'll get a lot of playing time in pre-season, and sounded fairly upbeat about him.

Reading between the lines they may think he's ready. Although between the lines is always a minefield when Parcell's talks.

We'll know in a couple of months one way or the other.

CactusCowboy
06-09-2006, 10:40 AM
Who says he's NOT ready? There was not a situation where he was required to play last year. Me thinks he is ready.

Chocolate Lab
06-09-2006, 10:44 AM
But Parcells has said before that he was going to play players, and then never did.

We've gone three years now without our starting QB missing even one entire game, and that's almost unheard of. As tough as Bledsoe is, that luck almost has to run out at some point.

Doomsday
06-09-2006, 10:51 AM
Im excited to see what Romo can do this preseason I have been impressed with his on field awareness, poise and cant wait to see him how much he has progressed from last season.

JackMagist
06-09-2006, 11:01 AM
Romo will be ready this year if he is needed. He might well have been ready last year had the occasion arisen. We will never really know as long as Bledsoe is here and healthy because Pre-Season just isn't the same as regular season.

Angus
06-09-2006, 12:01 PM
Bledsoe probably has a pretty good idea of how good Romo is or is likely to be if he ever gets in a game. It may be hard for Parcells to get Bledsoe to come out of a game, even if he's hurt. Bledsoe would probably move heaven and hell to avoid being replaced by Romo the way he was by Brady.

Zippy Speedster
06-10-2006, 07:19 AM
Something just tells me that this guy, Romo, has the head nessacary to be a quarterback in this league. I believe this is what Parcells has seen which tells him that he's his guy and not Henson. I know this much, he won the backup slot last year in preseason and Henson didn't do very much to convince it should be the other way around instead. He's consistantly risen himself up through the ranks from his unknown rookie status,. something his competition could never boast as the same. And most importatnly he hasn't whined and cried, alienating, Bill, in the process. He's quite simply shown up for work everyday and done his job, constatnly pushing himself to be better. Just no place, imo, for this "fair" crap that fills the Henson camp and their boyfriend. He is in the spot he is in for a reason. And obviously reasons many of the fanbase would just as soonly ignore then take for truth. Amazing how Parcells is a man-of-his-word, one of the biggest straight-talkers to hit this league, yet when it fits, everything he says is just a "mind-game" made up to induce some sort of reverse-inspiration, lol.

For instance;
Bill tells the press he's not going to talk about TO until training camp, period, then end, the fanbase stands up and cheers because noway the press is going to crack him...YEEHAW! A couple of breathes later he says he's not overely impressed with Henson's progress...woosh...Bill is playing "mindgames" and doesn't really mean what he says.

The only players Bill plays headgames with are his top draft picks or starting quarterbacks (emphasis on "starting") who are getting ahead of themselves due to the quality of topnotch play they're showing. He doesn't want it to get into their heads so he messes with them and makes them prove to not only him, but to themselves, that they can be everything everyone is making them out to be. Curtis Martin, prime example. Roy Williams, even though he wasn't one of Bill's personal picks, though still young, another example. Terrance Newman. And I'm willing to bet it's already started for Ware and Spears. No, actually we already know it's started for Ware, and the results are beingn shown in how much he's bulked up this offseason. Bill just doesn't waste his time on players who will let him down anymore, he learned his lesson with Bryant. Henson began letting him down since Thanksgiving Day 2 years ago, if not a whole lot sooner. In turn, Romo, has become "his guy".

JackMagist
06-10-2006, 08:39 AM
Something just tells me that this guy, Romo, has the head nessacary to be a quarterback in this league. I believe this is what Parcells has seen which tells him that he's his guy and not Henson. I know this much, he won the backup slot last year in preseason and Henson didn't do very much to convince it should be the other way around instead. He's consistantly risen himself up through the ranks from his unknown rookie status,. something his competition could never boast as the same. And most importatnly he hasn't whined and cried, alienating, Bill, in the process. He's quite simply shown up for work everyday and done his job, constatnly pushing himself to be better. Just no place, imo, for this "fair" crap that fills the Henson camp and their boyfriend. He is in the spot he is in for a reason. And obviously reasons many of the fanbase would just as soonly ignore then take for truth. Amazing how Parcells is a man-of-his-word, one of the biggest straight-talkers to hit this league, yet when it fits, everything he says is just a "mind-game" made up to induce some sort of reverse-inspiration, lol.

For instance;
Bill tells the press he's not going to talk about TO until training camp, period, then end, the fanbase stands up and cheers because noway the press is going to crack him...YEEHAW! A couple of breathes later he says he's not overely impressed with Henson's progress...woosh...Bill is playing "mindgames" and doesn't really mean what he says.

The only players Bill plays headgames with are his top draft picks or starting quarterbacks (emphasis on "starting") who are getting ahead of themselves due to the quality of topnotch play they're showing. He doesn't want it to get into their heads so he messes with them and makes them prove to not only him, but to themselves, that they can be everything everyone is making them out to be. Curtis Martin, prime example. Roy Williams, even though he wasn't one of Bill's personal picks, though still young, another example. Terrance Newman. And I'm willing to bet it's already started for Ware and Spears. No, actually we already know it's started for Ware, and the results are beingn shown in how much he's bulked up this offseason. Bill just doesn't waste his time on players who will let him down anymore, he learned his lesson with Bryant. Henson began letting him down since Thanksgiving Day 2 years ago, if not a whole lot sooner. In turn, Romo, has become "his guy".I'm with you on the statements you made about Tony Romo. I think he is a good guy who works hard and does his best to overcome whatever shortcomings he may actually have or may be perceived to have due to his UDFA status. I think he is a solid, smart football player who has a very good shot right now of becoming our QB of the future.

But the rest of your anti-Henson rhetoric has little basis in any factual information. Anyone who calls Bill Parcells "one of the biggest straight-talkers to hit this league" just isn't paying attention to what is really going on. I simply cannot buy into your agenda driven disparagement of Drew Henson.

Bluefin
06-10-2006, 10:06 AM
I get the feeling Bill Parcells thinks Tony Romo is ready to start if need be and that's why he's planning to give the quarterback plenty of reps come pre-season.

Sink or swim.

The biggest question to survival for a young QB is self confidence, IMO, and Romo reportedly has it. He believes he is ready to play.

ESPN's Chris Mortensen said it wouldn't surprise him if Romo played his way onto the field this season right after the draft.



Bledsoe would probably move heaven and hell to avoid being replaced by Romo the way he was by Brady.
No doubt.

I hope Bledsoe has a healthy and productive season with the Cowboys, but I'll admit to wanting to get a good idea of what we have behind door number 2.

If the running game and the offensive line are improved, Bledsoe should be able to get through the schedule unscathed and have a solid shot at a 4000 yard passing season.

Improving in those areas would also greatly help Romo if he were called or forced into action.

Dallas has been awful at developing offensive skill players since drafting the triplets, it'd be nice to see we finally did it right with a player like Romo.

AbeBeta
06-10-2006, 10:23 AM
Bledsoe would probably move heaven and hell to avoid being replaced by Romo the way he was by Brady.

Romo = Brady? :lmao2:

wileedog
06-10-2006, 10:25 AM
The biggest question to survival for a young QB is self confidence, IMO, and Romo reportedly has it. He believes he is ready to play.

He's going to need it, because the Dallas fanbase and media generally does not suffer less than Royalty from their QB.

He's going to have a much, much shorter leash than most when he finally does step on the field, and because of his draft status (or lack thereof) an awful lot of people are not going to take him seriously until he wins something. If he struggles early there will be quick calls for Henson (if he's still here) or whatever vet is on the roster behind him.

jterrell
06-10-2006, 10:31 AM
Romo = Brady? :lmao2:
He didn't say that. And Brady was not the player he is now when he beat out Bledsoe.

Bledsoe was a franchise Qb for the Pats and they built around him but the OL started to really fall off and Bledsoe started taking lots of hits. LOTS. His play declined. Brady was able to step in and avoid those hits. He didn't make great passes but he drove the bus and avoided mistakes. He was cheap as a QB can ever be and young. He occasionally made plays out of absolute nothing and was a better fit with a shaky OL than Bledsoe was ever gonna be. He's gotten better each season since then to be what he is today.

His point was that once you get beaten out because of injury you are unlikely to ever let an injury sideline you again unless its impossible to play through. BP likes that mentality and Bledsoe displays it. So did Aikman, fwiw.

The backup QB regardless of who it is will play only if Bledsoe is seriously injured once we get passed pre-season.

I do believe BP has decided the open competition between 2 and 3 is closed so the 2 can get more reps. As to the decision itself, we will see. BP has been wrong before but he didn't make this decision overnight and sees more of both QBs then we ever will as fans. Its quite possible both guys have NFL futures as they have been developed smartly IMHO, with practice time and film room time before being tossed to the wolves. Its really the way Brady was developed and its the way Ron Wolf develops guys.

Glenn Carano
06-10-2006, 11:17 AM
We can all sit here and guess if Romo is or is not ready. The bottom line is we'll never know until he takes snaps in a real NFL game.

JackMagist
06-10-2006, 11:42 AM
Romo = Brady? :lmao2:People are really twisting everything anyone says today. :cool:

Vertigo_17
06-10-2006, 12:37 PM
We can all sit here and guess if Romo is or is not ready. The bottom line is we'll never know until he takes snaps in a real NFL game.
:hammer:

I'm really looking forward to pre-season so we can get a look at Romo, although it's still not even close to regular season speed.

The30YardSlant
06-10-2006, 12:43 PM
Before Drew Henson

t.o.boys81
06-10-2006, 01:04 PM
At least we now know we have a reliable guy behind Bledsoe if we need him. That's pretty important. I feel good about the situation.

BigDFan5
06-10-2006, 02:33 PM
Before Drew Henson

Hey look, a post from you that has nothing to do with the topic. Nope no agenda from you huh :lmao:

The30YardSlant
06-10-2006, 02:42 PM
Hey look, a post from you that has nothing to do with the topic. Nope no agenda from you huh :lmao:

Question:

When, if ever, will Romo be ready?

Answer:

Before Drew Henson

Pretty simple really

BigDFan5
06-10-2006, 02:43 PM
Question:



Answer:



Pretty simple really

Like I said another agenda driven post that had nothing to do with Romo, or his playing ability.

It is pretty simple. Yo u have an agenda and will go into any thread that is not about that subject and try to thrust your agenda into it. Very simple

The30YardSlant
06-10-2006, 02:51 PM
Like I said another agenda driven post that had nothing to do with Romo, or his playing ability.

It is pretty simple. Yo u have an agenda and will go into any thread that is not about that subject and try to thrust your agenda into it. Very simple

Is this really that hard to understand? A question was posed, asking when Tony Romo would be ready to be a capable NFL quarterback. I answered said question by noting that Romo, in my opinion, will be ready to play in the NFL before Drew Henson. The thread starter did not ask why Romo would be ready, or how he would be ready in regards to his playing ability, simply WHEN would he be ready.

In other words, it is YOU who is veering off topic here, not I.

BigDFan5
06-10-2006, 05:18 PM
Is this really that hard to understand? A question was posed, asking when Tony Romo would be ready to be a capable NFL quarterback. I answered said question by noting that Romo, in my opinion, will be ready to play in the NFL before Drew Henson. The thread starter did not ask why Romo would be ready, or how he would be ready in regards to his playing ability, simply WHEN would he be ready.

In other words, it is YOU who is veering off topic here, not I.

Your agenda is obvious to everyone on the board HH, But by all means don't let reality stop you.

MONT17
06-10-2006, 05:21 PM
Romo is better than Quincy threads, soon enough!!!

2much2soon
06-10-2006, 05:31 PM
...but the OL started to really fall off and Bledsoe started taking lots of hits. LOTS. His play declined. Brady was able to step in and avoid those hits. He didn't make great passes but he drove the bus and avoided mistakes. He was cheap as a QB can ever be and young. He occasionally made plays out of absolute nothing and was a better fit with a shaky OL than Bledsoe was ever gonna be.



Me thinks you are describing some things reflective of the current Dallas offensive line and of Romo.
In Romo's limited playing time I have seen him show escapability and make a few plays. He is young and cheap. The offensive line has question marks.
Whether he is Bledsoe's next Tom Brady is a huge unknown but some of the parallels are there.

MONT17
06-10-2006, 05:45 PM
who was that QB in the 80s that was replaced by every young great QB to come into the league? was it Craig Morton? or was it DeBerg? or both? Bledsoe may be that same guy!!!


I cant wait for the Bledsoe is Better than Romo and Quincy put together threads!

Romo is the da man and ALL of u guys will see why Drew took every snap last year!!! BILL knows it too... Chicks only dig guys with great skills and chicks dig Romo!


both Drews days are numbered!

2much2soon
06-10-2006, 06:25 PM
Steve Deberg. It helped that he played until he was like 56, too.

The30YardSlant
06-10-2006, 07:55 PM
Your agenda is obvious to everyone on the board HH, But by all means don't let reality stop you.

Where is this "reality" that shows Henson will be ready before Romo? And why do you fail to address my post, an instead just, again, throw out a baseless accusation that I somehow have an agenda driven hate towards all things henson? Seems to me the reason is fairly obvious: You have no response to my previous post because you know its true, and resort to insults and "nanny-nanny boo-boo" tactics in hopes you dont get exposed for it.

BigDFan5
06-11-2006, 12:19 AM
Where is this "reality" that shows Henson will be ready before Romo?

Nobody in this thread has said that. Reality is you have an agenda and will spread it to any thread no matter what the topic.


And why do you fail to address my post, an instead just, again, throw out a baseless accusation that I somehow have an agenda driven hate towards all things henson?

Wasn't an accusation, it was a fact and everyone here knows it.



Seems to me the reason is fairly obvious: You have no response to my previous post because you know its true, and resort to insults and "nanny-nanny boo-boo" tactics in hopes you dont get exposed for it.


No response to what? You made no point. The thread had nothing to do with Henson it asked WHEN Romo would be ready. But instead of opining about Romo, his worth and a timetable for when he may be ready, you decided to throw a log on the Henson fire. You are as transparent as gift wrapping tape HH. Your only opinion of Romo is "Henson sucks". If more people were pushing for Romo you would say that Romo sucks. Your entire existence on this forum is to stir the pot, and take opposite stances just to argue. It has been noted by many people that you are nothing more than nors lite. So come on HH "expose" me. Because you have alredy been exposed for the fraud that you are, and everyone see's it.

TwoDeep3
06-11-2006, 03:41 AM
Wake me when Romo takes a snap in a real game where he isn't doing the mopping up.

When he orchestrates a drive against real starters in a game where the outcome is still in question.

When he leads a team to victory against people who will be in the league a few weeks later, and not working for a company in a straight job because they have a flag football team and need a ringer.

Until then, save the hyperbole.