PDA

View Full Version : Springs out, Portis doubtful for week one


The30YardSlant
09-03-2006, 09:18 PM
According to SportsTalk 980 in Washington. Said Springs could be out until week 4.

dmq
09-03-2006, 09:24 PM
Now that just made my pillow softer tonight.:D

ghst187
09-03-2006, 09:27 PM
i really think they'll start the season 0-2

Danny White
09-03-2006, 09:38 PM
Rumph has actually been serviceable for them in Springs' absence. Portis is the key for them. If he can't go, then they will struggle mightily. Betts is also banged up.

Smashmouth24
09-03-2006, 09:40 PM
Now that just made my pillow softer tonight.:D

If this means you're taking comfort in injuries sustained by two pretty good NFL players, you're an embarassment.

Danny White
09-03-2006, 09:54 PM
If this means you're taking comfort in injuries sustained by two pretty good NFL players, you're an embarassment.
I think he's just relieved that Springs is taking his rehab seriously and making sure he's fully recovered before coming back. ;)

Cowboy from New York
09-03-2006, 09:57 PM
I'm real eager to see them got dominated by the Vikes and all of their "don't worry it's only preseason" talk turns to "oh crap!" . Then, in week #2 we'll have the pleasure of pushing all of them over the brink into full scale panic mode.

theebs
09-03-2006, 09:58 PM
If this means you're taking comfort in injuries sustained by two pretty good NFL players, you're an embarassment.

I second that. Anyone who wishes injury on another player is a jerk.

Injuries water down the nfl and the accomplishments.

There is no easy way out when it comes to competition, you must compete every week and to be the last man standing you are going to have to play the best talent and beat them. Thinking you are better because you beat an injury depleted team is false and your accomplishments are without merit.

I say keep the whole league healthy and may the best team win.

Injuries suck, especially after all the planning and signing and drafting that goes on in the league, it throws off everything.

Bach
09-03-2006, 09:58 PM
If this means you're taking comfort in injuries sustained by two pretty good NFL players, you're an embarassment.


I don't think they are life-threatening, or career-threatening. I, therefore, am not going to miss any sleep over it.

DragonCowboy
09-03-2006, 09:59 PM
I cringe every time I hear about Springs' injury...gah..

BrAinPaiNt
09-03-2006, 09:59 PM
If this means you're taking comfort in injuries sustained by two pretty good NFL players, you're an embarassment.


Or it could be his way of saying he thinks Springs is such a good player it will make him sleep better knowing he will not be on the field.

Sad or not, whether he believes it or not, IMO Springs is clearly the best player on that defense WHEN HEALTHY.

DragonCowboy
09-03-2006, 10:00 PM
Or it could be his way of saying he things Springs is such a good player it will make him sleep better knowing he will not be on the field.

Sad or not, whether he believes it or not, IMO Springs is clearly the best player on that defense WHEN HEALTHY.

Thank you.

I wasn't going to say it. It does feel a bit relieving to know that he's not going to be on the field.

The fact that he'll be fine doesn't make me worry.

dallasfan31
09-03-2006, 10:05 PM
i like portis a lot i hope he gets healthy soon.

K-DOGG
09-03-2006, 10:07 PM
I hope Rumph is still starting in week 2! I have watched him for years with the 49ers and he is Toast waiting to be buttered!!!!!!!:laugh2:

Rampage
09-03-2006, 10:52 PM
if portis doesn't play redskins won't beat good teams

yennor24
09-03-2006, 11:01 PM
I want them to have a full roster, no excuses.....

MossBurner
09-03-2006, 11:01 PM
Now that just made my pillow softer tonight.:D

Classless dog. I actually love it when guys like you perpetuate the stereotype. You should be ashamed.

MossBurner
09-03-2006, 11:03 PM
Or it could be his way of saying he thinks Springs is such a good player it will make him sleep better knowing he will not be on the field.

Sad or not, whether he believes it or not, IMO Springs is clearly the best player on that defense WHEN HEALTHY.

1. Sean Taylor



GAP




2. Marcus Washington


3. Shawn Springs

WilmingtonHeel
09-03-2006, 11:11 PM
I don't wish injuries on anyone. Springs has been hurt alot in his career and luckly for the Skins he's been pretty much healthy for them don't be surprise he and Moss (who's been nicked up alot) return to their form before they change teams. Karma has a way of paying back the classless

Cowboy from New York
09-03-2006, 11:13 PM
1. Sean Taylor



GAP




2. Marcus Washington


3. Shawn Springs


I've seen some of their fans mention that DT Cornelius Griffin is a major factor too. I thought I read he was dinged up as well.

BrAinPaiNt
09-03-2006, 11:21 PM
1. Sean Taylor



GAP




2. Marcus Washington


3. Shawn Springs


Sean may be the best athlete on your defense.

I think Springs is the most valuable because of the number of times Greg likes to blitz.

When springs is healthy he is the best player IMO.

Holloway805
09-03-2006, 11:26 PM
So, Moss Burner, are injuries an excuse if you go 0-2?

parchy
09-03-2006, 11:33 PM
Thinking you are better because you beat an injury depleted team is false and your accomplishments are without merit.
This is BS. Washington's 35-7 win over us last year isn't "without merit" because we were banged up going into that game. You play the players that are put in front of you. Doesn't mean your win is any less sweet, or without merit for that matter. A win is a win is a win is a win.

This along with "one game at a time" always baffled me when it comes to fans. The players aren't going into the locker room after the game saying, "sheesh dude, that was a great win and it put us in the playoffs, but that team was losing a safety. Let's mourn."

:rolleyes:

Smashmouth24
09-03-2006, 11:34 PM
1. Sean Taylor



GAP




2. Marcus Washington


3. Shawn Springs

You couldn't know less about your favorite team's defense if you think Sean Taylor is their best OR most important player. Cornelius Griffin, Springs, Washington. I don't know where Taylor falls after that but it aint close.

theebs
09-03-2006, 11:36 PM
This is BS. Washington's 35-7 win over us last year isn't "without merit" because we were banged up going into that game. You play the players that are put in front of you. Doesn't mean your win is any less sweet, or without merit for that matter. A win is a win is a win is a win.

This along with "one game at a time" always baffled me when it comes to fans. The players aren't going into the locker room after the game saying, "sheesh dude, that was a great win and it put us in the playoffs, but that team was losing a safety. Let's mourn."

:rolleyes:

NIce way to turn around what I said. This pertains to wishing and being happy other players are injured.

I am not saying you shouldnt take the win if you beat a banged up team, but rooting for them to be hurt is BS to me.

kmd24
09-04-2006, 12:44 AM
Classless dog. I actually love it when guys like you perpetuate the stereotype. You should be ashamed.

You're overracting, IMO. Springs is *already injured* and will come back when he comes back. It's not like the guy is wishing for Roy Williams to end Santana Moss's season. If you want examples of this, go visit ES and find any thread that involves TO and Sean Taylor.

If you don't admit to feeling relief when one of the opposing team's best players is going to miss your upcoming games, then you are disingenuous at best. It doesn't mean that you want the guy to experience pain, have his season ended, nor have his career ended.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you.

MossBurner
09-04-2006, 09:55 AM
If you don't admit to feeling relief when one of the opposing team's best players is going to miss your upcoming games, then you are disingenuous at best. It doesn't mean that you want the guy to experience pain, have his season ended, nor have his career ended.

Maybe the difference is too subtle for you.

Not too subtle for me. I guess I'm a football purist, in the sense that I want my team to defeat its arch rival at full strength.

Otherwise, you have to listen to the garbage that Redskins' fans have heard since last December - that the Boys weren't at full strength for the massacre.

Injuries suck at so many levels.

fortdick
09-04-2006, 10:05 AM
Classless dog. I actually love it when guys like you perpetuate the stereotype. You should be ashamed.

Oh, stop. You guys at extremeskins would be thrilled if something happened to Roy. You'd be dancing the the ethereal hallways.

Gfunk
09-04-2006, 10:23 AM
Oh, stop. You guys at extremeskins would be thrilled if something happened to Roy. You'd be dancing the the ethereal hallways.
wrong, most of us @ ES prefer to play opposing teams, especially division rivals, at full strength

in response to the thread, Portis will start week 1 and Springs will hopefully be back for week 2

speedkilz88
09-04-2006, 10:24 AM
NIce way to turn around what I said. This pertains to wishing and being happy other players are injured.

I am not saying you shouldnt take the win if you beat a banged up team, but rooting for them to be hurt is BS to me.Talk about turning around what was said. Those guys were injured weeks ago, nobody was rooting for them to hurt; the guy just felt better knowing he wasn't going to be playing us week 2. sheesh:rolleyes:

kmd24
09-04-2006, 10:41 AM
Not too subtle for me. I guess I'm a football purist, in the sense that I want my team to defeat its arch rival at full strength.

Otherwise, you have to listen to the garbage that Redskins' fans have heard since last December - that the Boys weren't at full strength for the massacre.

Injuries suck at so many levels.

A football purist would realize that injuries are part of the game and that there is a reason that rosters are 53 men deep. Depth is just as important a facet of a team as having talent at the various positions.

The only reason to bring up the injuries from the massacre in Fedex last year is to make a counterpoint against sophomoric Redskins fans that think the result of that game is a strong predictor of future matchups. Anyone with any sense at all should realize it is not.

fanfromvirginia
09-04-2006, 11:06 AM
Look, this whole other-teams'-injuries deal is tricky to deal with. A little diplomacy, at the very least, is required. One shouldn't wish for injuries and one shouldn't rejoice when it happens but team success in the NFL is a function of staying relatively injury free, which means, in other words, that we need other teams to have more injuries than us.

I feel sorry for individual players when they get hurt; the worse the injury is, the more I feel sorry for them. At the same time, as someone with a dog in this fight and as someone who realizes that these things happen, I'm glad when we're less injured than other teams, which is just a significantly more polite way of saying I'm glad when other teams are more injured than us.

I expect fans from other teams to not rejoice and gloat when our players get injured but I do not expect sympathy cards when our injury report is longer than theirs on game day.

big dog cowboy
09-04-2006, 11:20 AM
in response to the thread, Portis will start week 1
Oh really?

OOTF
09-04-2006, 11:23 AM
I'm real eager to see them got dominated by the Vikes and all of their "don't worry it's only preseason" talk turns to "oh crap!" . Then, in week #2 we'll have the pleasure of pushing all of them over the brink into full scale panic mode.

That would be sweet:rolleyes:

Secondary2None3141
09-04-2006, 11:35 AM
I root for injuries to rivals.

Does that make me "classless"?

Maybe, but who gives a crap.

Anything to help my Cowboys win is great as far as I'm concerned.

I hope Springs and Portis' injury lingers all season.

Yeah, I'm a jerk. So what.

silver
09-04-2006, 11:38 AM
I root for injuries to rivals.

Does that make me "classless"?

Maybe, but who gives a crap.

Anything to help my Cowboys win is great as far as I'm concerned.

I hope Springs and Portis' injury lingers all season.

Yeah, I'm a jerk. So what.
as long as they're mild injuries, nothing season or career threathening then go ahead. ;)

AsthmaField
09-04-2006, 11:49 AM
1. Sean Taylor



GAP




2. Marcus Washington


3. Shawn Springs

Athletically speaking, you may be right. However, if you take into consideration the positions they play and the relative importance of that position to a defense, your list, IMO, would be wrong.

CB's are much more important to a defense then safeties. DT's are more important than Safeties as well. LB's? In a 4-3, I think they're about even with the importance of the safeties.

So, thinking that... here is how I would rate it:

1. Shawn Springs. A good cover corner allows Gregg Williams to do any number of things, including blitzing and going to man coverage.

2. Cornelius Griffin. I would rate him a very close second to Springs. He collapses the pocket with his pass rush and helps shut down the run. Without him, the Redskins pass rush is very weak, even with a blitz... and the Redskins tend to get gashed up the middle by quick hitting runs. Griffin going out very well might be worse than Springs going out, but I'll leave the first two in this order.

3. Carlos Rogers. For the same reasons that I listed Springs. Having him and Springs at corner really free's up your safeties and allows Gregg Williams to play any number of pressure schemes.

4. Sean Taylor. I'd rank him above Washington, although I think Washington plays OLB better than Taylor plays FS. I would put Sean ahead because he has a physical presence that is important to your defense and he's terrific athletically. He can do anything you'd want a FS to do and he's an intimidator. He'll blow the occasional assignment but he means a lot to the defense.

5. Marcus Washington. A very, very good OLB. He's better than the 5th best player on the defense... but because he's an OLB in a 4-3, his impact is lessened.

If the Redskins had a decent DE, he'd probably be ranked #1 in importance... but because they don't, they don't have a DE listed in the top 5. Andre Carter has shown no signs of being anything special at all... so unless he completely changes from the preseason and recent past seasons, he'll be just another guy on the end.

I think that Salave'a is more important to the defense than many people give him credit for. He really plugs up the run and while he isn't a force on the pass rush, he brings 100% effort on every play and helps plug the run like Gregg Williams loves. I won't rank him... but I do think he's a good role player for the D.

Avery
09-04-2006, 11:50 AM
Injuries or not last year, we shouldn't have lost 35-7. We just played poorly and the Redskins played well.

I wonder how many touches Portis will get though for fantasy purposes.

The30YardSlant
09-04-2006, 12:06 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that washington's defense will not improve because of these additions, and may even digress somewhat.

Andre Carter moved to OLB in SF because he was getting manhandled by OTs back in 2003. He isnt strong enough to take on 320 pound lineman consistantly, which is what Washignton will ask him to do. He is also one of the worst starting DEs in the NFL in run support.

Adam Archuleta is simply the worst starting safety in pass coverage in the NFL. Redskins fans think RW is bad, just wait until Adam Archuleta gets beat like a rented mule one a week in and week out basis.

They will likley be playing a rookie 2nd round pick at OLB most of the season, and he is coming off of an fairly serious injury.

Phillip Daniels is an extremely average DE, whom only had a decent year last season because he got to go against Torrin Tucker for 60 minutes.

Carlos Rogers got beat fairly routinely last season. I know he was only a rookie and will get better, but I don't see him as a lockdown corner at this point.

Kenny Wright sucks. He makes Walt Harris look like Ronnie Lott.

Their defense, unlike the Cowboys', lacks depth. Their best backup CB MIGHT make the Dallas roster as the 5th CB. None of the backup safeties would, Jeff Posey might make our LB crew as a last resort, and none of their backup D-Linemen would make our team.

Depth, especially on the D-Line, is more important than one or two star players.

stasheroo
09-04-2006, 12:38 PM
wrong, most of us @ ES prefer to play opposing teams, especially division rivals, at full strength

in response to the thread, Portis will start week 1 and Springs will hopefully be back for week 2

Where'd this info come from?

:fact:

AsthmaField
09-04-2006, 12:49 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that washington's defense will not improve because of these additions, and may even digress somewhat.

I could see that. They don't have the athletes that the Skins fans think they do. Taylor, Griffin, Washington, Springs and Rogers are good to pretty good. Salave'a is solid against the run. The rest are nothing to write home about and you're correct... their depth is atrocious.

Andre Carter moved to OLB in SF because he was getting manhandled by OTs back in 2003. He isnt strong enough to take on 320 pound lineman consistantly, which is what Washignton will ask him to do. He is also one of the worst starting DEs in the NFL in run support.


Carter was moved to OLB because they went to a 3-4 and no way is Carter a 3-4 DE. I agree that OT's do manhandle him but I've heard from more than one source that he is solid against the run. Is that true? I don't know... but Skins fans are certainly saying he's solid against the run. Personally, I think he'll be a bust in Washington... he just isn't very good. Carter might stand up against the run (that's debatable) but I can tell you right now... he's not going to provide the pass rush that Skins fans had hoped.

Adam Archuleta is simply the worst starting safety in pass coverage in the NFL. Redskins fans think RW is bad, just wait until Adam Archuleta gets beat like a rented mule one a week in and week out basis.

You're right about that. I still get the giggles when I think about how much money they gave Archuleta. It's insane. Don't they even watch film? His coverage is atrocious and TE's are going to have a field day against him. Oh he hits okay and can tackles... but those guys are a dime-a-dozen. Hearing skins fans defend him is just plain funny.

They will likley be playing a rookie 2nd round pick at OLB most of the season, and he is coming off of an fairly serious injury.


I thought Holdman was going to be starting at SOLB? Not that he's any good anyway... but he'll be better than McIntosh... at least this year. I don't think McIntosh can stay healthy and he doesn't look that good anyway. How many picks did they trade to get that guy?:laugh2:

Phillip Daniels is an extremely average DE, whom only had a decent year last season because he got to go against Torrin Tucker for 60 minutes.


VERY average, at best. He wouldn't play for a lot of teams.

Carlos Rogers got beat fairly routinely last season. I know he was only a rookie and will get better, but I don't see him as a lockdown corner at this point.

I think Rogers is going to be a pretty good one. Maybe not a shutdown corner at this point, but he's played pretty well. Good thing for them too, because they don't have squat after Springs and Rogers.

Kenny Wright sucks. He makes Walt Harris look like Ronnie Lott.

Wright is horrible. I laughed when all the Redskin fans were saying what a great pickup Wright was and that he was a starter for the Jags last year and he's their third corner. :lmao:

He started a few games for the Jags, but they couldn't get that guy out of the lineup quick enough. That's why they said "Don't let the door hit'cha on the way out" in free agency. He played horribly last season, and he's picked up right where he left off this preseason. Put it this way: Rumph is a better corner than him. :eek: That is really saying something, because Rumph S-U-C-K-S.

Their defense, unlike the Cowboys', lacks depth. Their best backup CB MIGHT make the Dallas roster as the 5th CB. None of the backup safeties would, Jeff Posey might make our LB crew as a last resort, and none of their backup D-Linemen would make our team.

They have very little depth... and I think that you're right... I don't think that Wright or Rumph would make our 63 man roster. If you take out Marcus Washington... Dallas has at least 6 LB's that are better than anyone they have. That's sad.


Depth, especially on the D-Line, is more important than one or two star players.


Having good starters is obviously important... but in today's NFL, you have to have depth. Third and 4th corners are vital because of the 3 and 4 WR sets that you see so often these days. Safeties who can cover and depth there will become more and more important with the increased emphasis being put on the TE position by more and more teams. Two TE sets are becoming more important, and Archuleta (and their backups) will have issues there. Without depth along the DL, your starters wear out and get gashed against the run late in games. It's vital to have depth on defense... much more so than on offense... and if you don't have it, then you'll have problems... Particularly in the 4th quarters of games.

NIBGoldenchild
09-04-2006, 01:14 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that washington's defense will not improve because of these additions, and may even digress somewhat.

For some reason, that doesn't surprise me. ;)

Andre Carter moved to OLB in SF because he was getting manhandled by OTs back in 2003.

This is extremely false. Carter was switched to OLB because the base defense was changed to a 3-4. He's too small to play DE in that type of defense. You shouldn't make things up.

Adam Archuleta is simply the worst starting safety in pass coverage in the NFL. Redskins fans think RW is bad, just wait until Adam Archuleta gets beat like a rented mule one a week in and week out basis.

I can't argue with this. I never really wanted AA, and his deficiencies in coverage are well known. Yet before Ryan Clark became a Redskin, he was flame bait as a Giant and Gregg Williams hid his weaknesses pretty well.

They will likley be playing a rookie 2nd round pick at OLB most of the season, and he is coming off of an fairly serious injury.

I've heard nothing of McIntosh exhibiting signs of the old injury still affecting him.

Carlos Rogers got beat fairly routinely last season. I know he was only a rookie and will get better, but I don't see him as a lockdown corner at this point.

You couldn't have possibly watched many Skins games and come up with this conclusion. Rogers was seldom beat, money in run defense, a sure tackler, and beaten far less frequently than any other DB on the roster save Springs and Taylor.

Kenny Wright sucks. He makes Walt Harris look like Ronnie Lott.

Lucky for us it looks like Mike Rumph, who impressed in pre-season, will be the nickel corner. :D

Their defense, unlike the Cowboys', lacks depth. Their best backup CB MIGHT make the Dallas roster as the 5th CB. None of the backup safeties would, Jeff Posey might make our LB crew as a last resort, and none of their backup D-Linemen would make our team.

Despite all of this being subjective nonsense, what does it have to do with the topic? And since when has a defense that ranked lower than ours last season, somehow become the standard that the Skins defense should be compared against? Ridiculous.

Bizwah
09-04-2006, 01:20 PM
I have no problem with pointing out how injuries can affect a team's performance.

The 35-7 loss we suffered last year was mainly due to injuries. Any Skins fan that thinks otherwise is smoking something. But that doesn't mean they can't enjoy the win. I'm also not saying that the win was "cheap" or "diminished".

I've read on this board and on ES that we're no where near the talent level of the Skins. They claim that the thrashing we suffered last year was a true indicator of where our teams were.

But if you look at our situations, you know that's not the case.

These two injuries will hurt the Skins. I think the loss of Springs will hurt them worse than Portis.

I do see both of them playing week two regardless.

Gfunk
09-04-2006, 01:31 PM
Where'd this info come from?

:fact:
just my prediction, Gibbs won't announce it till the last minute (that Portis is playing)

The30YardSlant
09-04-2006, 01:55 PM
This is extremely false. Carter was switched to OLB because the base defense was changed to a 3-4. He's too small to play DE in that type of defense. You shouldn't make things up.

No, it's not. Yes, they moved to the 3-4 defense, but guess what? Andre Carter started the last 4 games of the 2003 season (when they still used the 4-3) at, you guessed it, OLB. The coaches were tired of him getting blown off the ball by offensive tackles continuosly.

I can't argue with this. I never really wanted AA, and his deficiencies in coverage are well known. Yet before Ryan Clark became a Redskin, he was flame bait as a Giant and Gregg Williams hid his weaknesses pretty well.

Tell that to the Redskins fans who maintian he is as good as RW.

I've heard nothing of McIntosh exhibiting signs of the old injury still affecting him.

Even if it doesnt, he was a slightly above average college player who was picked about 30 picks too high.

You couldn't have possibly watched many Skins games and come up with this conclusion. Rogers was seldom beat, money in run defense, a sure tackler, and beaten far less frequently than any other DB on the roster save Springs and Taylor.

Rogers gave up 4 TDs in 7 starts and had the highest thrown against/TD ratio of any CB that started at least 5 games. Yes, he was beat fairly routinely.

And just FYI, Sean Taylor was also beaten reguarly last season.

Lucky for us it looks like Mike Rumph, who impressed in pre-season, will be the nickel corner. :D

:lmao2:

Best news Patrick Crayton has gotton since he found out Sean Taylor was responsible for him over the top back in 2004.

Despite all of this being subjective nonsense, what does it have to do with the topic? And since when has a defense that ranked lower than ours last season, somehow become the standard that the Skins defense should be compared against? Ridiculous.

Washignton finished one whole spot ahead of Dallas in total defense

The30YardSlant
09-04-2006, 03:01 PM
just my prediction, Gibbs won't announce it till the last minute (that Portis is playing)

Care to wager on that?

MossBurner
09-04-2006, 03:07 PM
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that washington's defense will not improve because of these additions, and may even digress somewhat.

Andre Carter moved to OLB in SF because he was getting manhandled by OTs back in 2003. He isnt strong enough to take on 320 pound lineman consistantly, which is what Washignton will ask him to do. He is also one of the worst starting DEs in the NFL in run support.

Adam Archuleta is simply the worst starting safety in pass coverage in the NFL. Redskins fans think RW is bad, just wait until Adam Archuleta gets beat like a rented mule one a week in and week out basis.

They will likley be playing a rookie 2nd round pick at OLB most of the season, and he is coming off of an fairly serious injury.

Phillip Daniels is an extremely average DE, whom only had a decent year last season because he got to go against Torrin Tucker for 60 minutes.

Carlos Rogers got beat fairly routinely last season. I know he was only a rookie and will get better, but I don't see him as a lockdown corner at this point.

Kenny Wright sucks. He makes Walt Harris look like Ronnie Lott.

Their defense, unlike the Cowboys', lacks depth. Their best backup CB MIGHT make the Dallas roster as the 5th CB. None of the backup safeties would, Jeff Posey might make our LB crew as a last resort, and none of their backup D-Linemen would make our team.

Depth, especially on the D-Line, is more important than one or two star players.

With any due respect, Gregg Williams knows how to run a defense better than you. He could have kept Walt Harris and Ryan Clark, but chose to replace them with Wright and Archuleta. He brought in Andre Carter and he will start instead of Renaldo Wynn. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that you know better than him. Please.

Double Trouble
09-04-2006, 03:23 PM
With any due respect, Gregg Williams knows how to run a defense better than you. He could have kept Walt Harris and Ryan Clark, but chose to replace them with Wright and Archuleta. He brought in Andre Carter and he will start instead of Renaldo Wynn. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that you know better than him. Please.I hate this rationale. If we can't debate the decisions, why bother having a message board?

Regardless of the reasons, Carter hasn't had a big year since 2002. It seems a stretch to me to expect him to be a big time pass rusher when he hasn't been for 4 years. And 260 lbs at LDE? That's a recipe for disaster.

I agree with those who've defended Rogers. Once he gets his legs under him, he'll be a heck of a CB. Paired with Taylor, you'll have dynamic duo in the secondary for years to come, provided Taylor stays out of prison.

Archuleta is horrible. I can't believe they not only signed him, but have him a ton of $ to boot. With the great receiving weapons Dallas and NYG have, it's seems to me unthinkable they'd have wanted him.

As for why GW and JG got rid of those guys, they had weaknesses and tried to address them with the limited talent available in FA.

The30YardSlant
09-04-2006, 03:26 PM
With any due respect, Gregg Williams knows how to run a defense better than you. He could have kept Walt Harris and Ryan Clark, but chose to replace them with Wright and Archuleta. He brought in Andre Carter and he will start instead of Renaldo Wynn. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that you know better than him. Please.

First of all, Greg Williams didnt bring anybody in. Daniel Snyder and Joe Gibbs did. They likely had input from Williams, but he had no say in the final decision, not with the egos that are Danny Boy and Gibbs above him i the food chain.

Second, just because a coach THINKS players will do better than others, doesnt mean they will.

Smashmouth24
09-04-2006, 03:50 PM
With any due respect, Gregg Williams knows how to run a defense better than you. He could have kept Walt Harris and Ryan Clark, but chose to replace them with Wright and Archuleta. He brought in Andre Carter and he will start instead of Renaldo Wynn. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that you know better than him. Please.

With any (sic) due respect, Dick LeBeau knows how to run a defense better than Gregg Williams. He could have had Adam Archuleta, a free agent, but instead chose Ryan Clark, also a free agent. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that Gregg Williams knows better than him. Please.

Kilyin
09-04-2006, 03:52 PM
Not only will Portis miss week 1, I am betting he misses week 2 as well. In fact, I wouldn't expect him to play until week 4.

HeHateMe
09-04-2006, 04:30 PM
I personally think Springs is much more important at this point that Portis is to the Redskins.

And he wont be back anytime soon.

MossBurner
09-04-2006, 05:13 PM
As for why GW and JG got rid of those guys, they had weaknesses and tried to address them with the limited talent available in FA.

You said it, GW got rid of the two worst starters (SS, NB) on the defense and replaced them with better players. Also, Andre Carter replaces Renaldo Wynn who becomes a solid backup.

MossBurner
09-04-2006, 05:15 PM
First of all, Greg Williams didnt bring anybody in. Daniel Snyder and Joe Gibbs did. They likely had input from Williams, but he had no say in the final decision, not with the egos that are Danny Boy and Gibbs above him i the food chain.


Gibbs, an ego? Ha! Didn't he just turn over play-calling duties.

And without a doubt, JG lets GW run the defense and pick his guys.

You're just being difficult.

MossBurner
09-04-2006, 05:16 PM
With any (sic) due respect, Dick LeBeau knows how to run a defense better than Gregg Williams. He could have had Adam Archuleta, a free agent, but instead chose Ryan Clark, also a free agent. Do you expect me or any football fan to believe that Gregg Williams knows better than him. Please.

There might have been a difference in cost there.

Lovie Smith, HC of the best defense in the league, fought tooth and nail to get AA.

NIBGoldenchild
09-04-2006, 10:22 PM
No, it's not. Yes, they moved to the 3-4 defense, but guess what? Andre Carter started the last 4 games of the 2003 season (when they still used the 4-3) at, you guessed it, OLB. The coaches were tired of him getting blown off the ball by offensive tackles continuosly.

If Carter really didn't start at OLB until the last 4 games, which I doubt, than that was the fault of the Niners coaches from the start. A player of his size isn't fit for DE in the 3-4 defense.


Even if it doesnt, he was a slightly above average college player who was picked about 30 picks too high.

I've read scouting reports that say he was more than an above average college player. But whatever, that is your opinion, you're entitled to it.


Rogers gave up 4 TDs in 7 starts and had the highest thrown against/TD ratio of any CB that started at least 5 games. Yes, he was beat fairly routinely.

Please prove it. I recall Rogers giving up one touchdown, that's it. And no, he was not beaten "fairly routinely". Watch the football games before you claim a player played poorly.

And just FYI, Sean Taylor was also beaten reguarly last season.

This is even more false than your statement about Rogers.


Washignton finished one whole spot ahead of Dallas in total defense

Does that make anything I said false? :confused:

NIBGoldenchild
09-04-2006, 10:28 PM
First of all, Greg Williams didnt bring anybody in. Daniel Snyder and Joe Gibbs did. They likely had input from Williams, but he had no say in the final decision, not with the egos that are Danny Boy and Gibbs above him i the food chain.

You continue to spout falsehoods. Gregg Williams has made every decision on defensive players since he's been a Skins coach. Gibbs stated this when GW was hired.

ConstantReboot
09-04-2006, 10:56 PM
Lovie Smith, HC of the best defense in the league, fought tooth and nail to get AA.

Lovie Smith was the def. coordinator for the Rams before and knows AA pretty well. So him wanting AA was based more on familiarity.

Lovie started coaching the Bears in 2004. Before then the Bears already had a pretty stout defense before he arrived.

Therefore you should not associate Lovie Smith wanting AA is not really a true endorsement for Archuleta.

NIBGoldenchild
09-05-2006, 09:26 AM
Lovie Smith was the def. coordinator for the Rams before and knows AA pretty well. So him wanting AA was based more on familiarity.

Can your prove that? Seems like a plain assumption to me.

kmd24
09-05-2006, 10:25 AM
If Carter really didn't start at OLB until the last 4 games, which I doubt, than that was the fault of the Niners coaches from the start. A player of his size isn't fit for DE in the 3-4 defense.

I think he's saying that the Niners had Carter at OLB when they were still running a 4-3.

Doomsday101
09-05-2006, 10:27 AM
Should be fun watching the vikes beat up on the skins next Monday.