Sorry, Last T.O. question (from me)

[Kaika]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.

[chinch]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?
Nope.

[REDVOLUTION]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.


We swept them last = Just another incentive..

want another.... WE ARE THE DALLAS COWBOYS.... need more?:lmao:

[Blue&Silver]

You're not alone.

I miss talking about football, and hearing from all the other players. Now? What's TO going to do next. Its like nobody else exists except Terrell Owens.

[SupermanXx]

Yes. We'd be a lot better off without the best reciever in football.

GET REAL!!!

[REDVOLUTION]

You're not alone.

I miss talking about football, and hearing from all the other players. Now? What's TO going to do next. Its like nobody else exists except Terrell Owens.


Well if Bill and Drew would get TO the ball then YOU WOULD be talking about football.... "did you see that TD" = "did you see that first down" - "did you see that catch" etc... etc... etc... etc... etc... etc...

[Kaika]

Yes. We'd be a lot better off without the best reciever in football.

GET REAL!!!

You really believe he's the best reciever??


Wow

[theebs]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.

Of course we would, he doesnt fit on this team, he is a piece of crap and he should have known this when he signed here, he simply did not fit.

As has been said many times, what would have been wrong with keeping keyshawn and giving the boatload of money to steve hutchinson? I think hutchinson would have made more of an impact yesterday over owens and kosier....

Thats just me, I dont like the guy, I think he is a bad fit for this team and where it is at and I believe that we are a team still in progress.

He came here for the money, jerry jones panicked and signed him without looking at it clearly, square pegs dont fit in round holes.

Unfortunately I believe the next bad move jerry jones will make is to try and get a coach who will cowtow to a guy like owens and then we will really have a reason to have crazy reactions and ridicule in the message board land.

[SupermanXx]

You really believe he's the best reciever??


Wow

Wow what? Okay, lemme rephrase and say "one of" the best, but that still doesn't change my point

What you're saying is you'd give back those 3 Super Bowl rings in the 90's in exchange for a reciever with less baggage than Irvin had.

again, get real

[Doomsday101]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.

I did not want him here but I saw nothing yesterday to feel he was a problem.

[SupermanXx]

I did not want him here but I saw nothing yesterday to feel he was a problem.

Coming from Doomsday101, that says a lot

[AmishCowboy]

Yes, I feel we need to start getting him the ball more.

[Kaika]

Wow what? Okay, lemme rephrase and say "one of" the best, but that still doesn't change my point

What you're saying is you'd give back those 3 Super Bowl rings in the 90's in exchange for a reciever with less baggage than Irvin had.

again, get real


Hey, hey Calm down. I'm just giving an opinion here .
Lighten up.

[SupermanXx]

Hey, hey Calm down. I'm just giving an opinion here .
Lighten up.

I know man, it's nothing personal

All I've got is an opinion as well and it may not be the right one

no hard feelings

[tommyboy10]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.


He fits here, he is a great football player, he blocks....and I truly believe that if he hadn;t had even one catch yesterday, but this team wins, he would've bene bery happy. Until he blows up and disproves that, you CANNOT convince me otherwise. He is attention because ESPN and the rest of the mediots won't let it go.

He is not the reason for any loss....Listen to his teammates---they'd let you know if something was going on....heck, they're asked about it all the time.

Bottom line---he gives us a better chance of winnig than most other receivers---and that's important, because after all, IT IS ABOUT FOOTBALL AFTER ALL!

[Kaika]

We're both here for the same reason to fix the Boys problems. I don't care who's right or wrong or how we do it, just so we get the Boys back on track.
:wink2:

Do you hear us Bill ????????

[tommyboy10]

He fits here, he is a great football player, he blocks....and I truly believe that if he hadn;t had even one catch yesterday, but this team wins, he would've bene bery happy. Until he blows up and disproves that, you CANNOT convince me otherwise. He is attention because ESPN and the rest of the mediots won't let it go.

He is not the reason for any loss....Listen to his teammates---they'd let you know if something was going on....heck, they're asked about it all the time.

Bottom line---he gives us a better chance of winnig than most other receivers---and that's important, because after all, IT IS ABOUT FOOTBALL AFTER ALL!

Wow, I am quite retarted..I need to start proofreading more! Oops---sorry you guys had to try to read that mess! LOL

[BHendri5]

You really believe he's the best reciever??


Wow

Duh, who do you think is the best receiver? Not Moss, and Moss, not Harrison, Not Holt, Not Bruce, who do you think?

Yes Owens is the best with Steve Smith very very close

[Kaika]

Duh, who do you think is the best receiver? Not Moss, and Moss, not Harrison, Not Holt, Not Bruce, who do you think?

Yes Owens is the best with Steve Smith very very close

What's going on here ????Why did I deserve a" Duh"
Can't anyone disagree and have a difference of opinion here without getting disrespected???
If this is the norm here I guess I'll be movin on.

[tommyboy10]

What's going on here ????Why did I deserve a" Duh"
Can't anyone disagree and have a difference of opinion here without getting disrespected???
If this is the norm here I guess I'll be movin on.

For the record, most here aren't that way. I know for me, I learn alot from others, see things a different way, or from a different view---however, I do still disagree with you as far as him being here----we are actually better off for it. Again, just my opinion.

[WV Cowboy]

Does anyone here think as I do that we would be better off without T.O.?

I mean , not for nothing ,but do we really need all the hype and baggage that comes with him ,we gave the beagles added incentive for this game , and all the media BS previously has to take affect on the team.
I thought we played pretty good without him . Heaven knows that the wide outs were not the problem in the past years.
I believe that $$ could have been better spent.

I don't know, I was just thinking out loud I guess.

If we aren't going to throw it to him, run a reverse to him, or in some way get him the ball, then yes the money could have been better spent.

[tommyboy10]

If we aren't going to throw it to him, run a reverse to him, or in some way get him the ball, then yes the money could have been better spent.

He has had good games---heck, we couldn't get the ball to anyone yesterday!

[WV Cowboy]

He has had good games---heck, we couldn't get the ball to anyone yesterday!

0 touches in the first half, ... something is wrong.

[tommyboy10]

0 touches in the first half, ... something is wrong.

True, I agree....very wrong....BUT, it isn't his fault, and we have used him some.

But he is underutilized. We need to step that up, and get him the ball early and often----he has an amazing ability to separate from the defender and run for days.