RECAP: Mickey with BaD Radio on The Ticket...

[trickblue]

Mick:
I think they go with Romo from now on. Despite all of the bad things that happened in the first half, they were only down 5 points at half and getting the ball back. I think they rolled the dice and will stay with Romo.
It's sink or swim now with Romo, for the season I think. I think the desperation level got to Parcells.
How do you go back to Bledsoe now? We'll know tomorrow.
I don't think that sitting Bledsoe was an attempt at motivation. You don't sacrifice the team to make a point.
Look, Bledsoe made one bad mistake and held onto the ball too long on one play. I think Bill has made the decision to go with Romo from now on. He told Romo before the game to be ready. I think Bill was convinced Romo could come in and save the day. If you listen after the game he sounded dissappointed that he didn't pull it out. He mentioned he had been in the league for four years.
Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.

[Sportsbabe]

Mickey disgusts me with his Romo hate and his Bledsoe man love.

[CrazyCowboy]

Thanks trickblue!

Let go Romo......get saddled up Zoners....it will be a hell of a ride!

[TheKey]

I just hope Parcells doesnt let the 3 picks change his opinion on Romo.

[SteveOS]

I think Romo deserves to have a full week of practice w/ the first teamers, the gameplanning involved to play the Panthers and be ready for a huge game, knowing he's the man. Let's see how he plays. If Bledsoe starts, the oline could have a record setting performance, in a very bad way.

[noshame]

I think Bill was convinced Romo could come in and save the day. If you listen after the game he sounded dissappointed that he didn't pull it out. He mentioned he had been in the league for four years.

If Bill really believed that, we have issues.

[Hostile]

Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.Bravo Mickey, bravo. :bow:

[Hostile]

Mickey disgusts me with his Romo hate and his Bledsoe man love.Where was that? I must have missed that.

[WoodysGirl]

Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.
He's been reading this board again. :)

[MichaelWinicki]

Mickey disgusts me with his Romo hate and his Bledsoe man love.

I agree.

He was equally biased during the Quincy/Hutch wars.

[theogt]

Mick:
Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.Wow, ain't that the truth.

[ThreeSportStar80]

I just hope Parcells doesnt let the 3 picks change his opinion on Romo.


It's kind of weird because in one instance you say a 4th year QB shouldn't make those kind of mistakes but then you look at the fact this was Romo's first real meaningful playing time with the game on the line, you have got to think he had butterflies at some point...

[theebs]

I am currently in NY at my parents house. It drove me nuts watching the game on tv instead of in the stadium. anyway, I am sitting here watching mike and the mad dog on the yes network.

As many know mike francessa is a cowboys fan and coincidentally a friend of parcells. Mike just told the story of Parcells before he got hired to come to Dallas.

He said parcells told him the kid in new orleans is going to be my qb, meaning delhomme, but parcells became upset that he asked for a million bucks more after they agreed to the deal. Apparently Dan Henning (for those who dont know he is a friend and former parcells qb and o-coordinator) anyway he sent delhomme down to see parcells first, then parcells and delhomme agreed to a deal and he was there and signed and then jake asked for the extra million and parcells and jones said no and let him walk.

Francessa thinks this is the reason they have not won in four years and bill has never been able to find a qb. Without a qb, your team can not win.

I have mixed emotions about the season going forward. I hope that the team comes out fired up sunday night, I personally think carolina are sort of like us and all over the place. I think if we stop the run jake throws those rainbow deep balls and we can get a few. If romo eliminates the int, he may have some success here.

[WoodysGirl]

I agree.

He was equally biased during the Quincy/Hutch wars.Did I miss something? I didn't get that out of this recap.

[Bach]

Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.

Why is it always your guy vs. my guy?

I don't have a horse in this thing. I just want to see the Cowboys succeed. Personally I think Bledsoe takes us nowhere and Romo is an unproven former UDFA who is a longshot to be successful in this league.

It really comes down to the fact we've been hanging all our hopes on has-beens and major projects and not really even attempting to adequately address the situation. Now we are in a major mess and have to hope a 4 year former undrafted QB can become something in the league. The odds are really against that happening. It's possible, but not likely and if not, then we are back to where we were when Aikman retired and will have squandered the better part of another decade.

[Sportsbabe]

Where was that? I must have missed that.

Listen carefully ... everytime he opens his mouth and says anything in reference to the QB dilema.

[tecolote]

Mick:
Among the fans, this is like a presidential debate. Your guy never loses. You spin it to make your guy look better. If you were for him before the debate, you are still for him afterwards.

This is a bit different, a lot of people have grown tired of Bledsoe, a lot of people that supported him before are not doing that now.

Bledsoe has already lost the debate in the eyes of the majority of cowboy fans.

The question now becomes, is it Romo or do we draft a QB high in the first round in 07.

[Sportsbabe]

Did I miss something? I didn't get that out of this recap.

I don't know about the recap. (The recap was well done.) I listen to Mickey live all the time. His condescending comments about Romo are way over the top in my opinion.

I love it when people (he and the other anti-Romo people) say that Romo hasn't done anything in the NFL yet. Well, duh, he hasn't had a chance to play yet.

Speaking for myself, I'm not pushing for him to play because of what he's done in the regular season (he hasn't had a chance ... that would be a stupid premise). I want him to play because he's a gamer; he has pocket presence, he has escapability, he throws a decent ball, he has moxy, he has young legs, and he hasn't been beat down by 350 pound lineman/linebackers for 10 plus years.

He's been studying what we're trying to accomplish at the QB position for quite some time. He can help. The other guy was hurting more than helping.

[Hostile]

Did I miss something? I didn't get that out of this recap.No, you didn't miss anything. It was just a pink elephant wandering by in someone's 100 proof halucinations.

[Hostile]

Listen carefully ... everytime he opens his mouth and says anything in reference to the QB dilema.That's a cop out. Thanks for clarifying.

[jcblanco22]

He said parcells told him the kid in new orleans is going to be my qb, meaning delhomme, but parcells became upset that he asked for a million bucks more after they agreed to the deal. Apparently Dan Henning (for those who dont know he is a friend and former parcells qb and o-coordinator) anyway he sent delhomme down to see parcells first, then parcells and delhomme agreed to a deal and he was there and signed and then jake asked for the extra million and parcells and jones said no and let him walk.

Anybody else get sick when they read this?

[dmq]

I am currently in NY at my parents house. It drove me nuts watching the game on tv instead of in the stadium. anyway, I am sitting here watching mike and the mad dog on the yes network.

As many know mike francessa is a cowboys fan and coincidentally a friend of parcells. Mike just told the story of Parcells before he got hired to come to Dallas.

He said parcells told him the kid in new orleans is going to be my qb, meaning delhomme, but parcells became upset that he asked for a million bucks more after they agreed to the deal. Apparently Dan Henning (for those who dont know he is a friend and former parcells qb and o-coordinator) anyway he sent delhomme down to see parcells first, then parcells and delhomme agreed to a deal and he was there and signed and then jake asked for the extra million and parcells and jones said no and let him walk.

Francessa thinks this is the reason they have not won in four years and bill has never been able to find a qb. Without a qb, your team can not win.

I have mixed emotions about the season going forward. I hope that the team comes out fired up sunday night, I personally think carolina are sort of like us and all over the place. I think if we stop the run jake throws those rainbow deep balls and we can get a few. If romo eliminates the int, he may have some success here.

Well, he mentioned the same story yesterday. Either way. I will be glad that Maddog can't use the "I don't trust Bledsoe" line whenever he picked the other team to win. I guess I never really wanted to here it from Maddog, but he was right.

[MichaelWinicki]

That's a cop out. Thanks for clarifying.



That was abrasive. :)

[Sportsbabe]

That's a cop out. Thanks for clarifying.

:laugh1: What do you mean? I'm serious. You must like Mickey. May be the same way I like Bill. They can do no wrong. We'll have to agree to disagree. Or maybe I'm talking about Mickey Spagnola and you're speaking of Mickey Mouse. That's OK. Honest mistake:)

[iceberg]

Mickey disgusts me with his Romo hate and his Bledsoe man love.

but he is right, we as fans tend to spin the story to our favorite players benefit.

[theebs]

chris russo is a blowhard. I am so glad i dont live in NY anymore, between the ridiculously bad weather and chris russo!! yikes.

Cant wait to get home saturday back in cowboy land and get good info and local cowboy stuff.

[WoodysGirl]

I don't know about the recap. (The recap was well done.) I listen to Mickey live all the time. His condescending comments about Romo are way over the top in my opinion.

I love it when people (he and the other anti-Romo people) say that Romo hasn't done anything in the NFL yet. Well, duh, he hasn't had a chance to play yet.

Speaking for myself, I'm not pushing for him to play because of what he's done in the regular season (he hasn't had a chance ... that would be a stupid premise). I want him to play because he's a gamer; he has pocket presence, he has escapability, he throws a decent ball, he has moxy, he has young legs, and he hasn't been beat down by 350 pound lineman/linebackers for 10 plus years.

He's been studying what we're trying to accomplish at the QB position for quite some time. He can help. The other guy was hurting more than helping.
Is that what that is? He comes across as condescending... I'm not going to get caught up in trying to read into his attitude on the QB situation. Most mediots thought Bledsoe gave the 'boys the best chance to win not even two weeks ago. Now they're saying he wrote his own headstone. Nature of journalism.

As for Romo, I'm still waiting to sweeten my koolaid. Three picks kinda soured it for me.

[lspain1]

I agree.

He was equally biased during the Quincy/Hutch wars.


Mickey was biased in those debates. After the smoke cleared, it seemed apparent he knew things we didn't about Quincy.

[theogt]

Mickey was biased in those debates. After the smoke cleared, it seemed apparent he knew things we didn't about Quincy.Pun intended?

[Chocolate Lab]

I heard the Ranch Report on the Ticket, and I think Babe is referring to the fact that it sounded like Mickey was very much against the QB change last night. Mickey was saying that the game was only a five-point game at the time, and that he wouldn't have made the switch.

But I didn't get out of it that he had anything againt Romo. It was more the timing of the move.

BTW, Dan said he thought Parcells should and would go back to Bledsoe vs. Carolina. Mickey and Bob said no way, there's no going back now.

[Hostile]

:laugh1: What do you mean? I'm serious. You must like Mickey. May be the same way I like Bill. They can do no wrong. We'll have to agree to disagree. Or maybe I'm talking about Mickey Spagnola and you're speaking of Mickey Mouse. That's OK. Honest mistake:)I like Mickey very much, but I've never said he can do no wrong.

I'm saying the idea that these thoughts were Romo hate and Bledsoe love are a pink elephant.

A cop out is when I ask you a question and rather than answer it, you make a pointless suggestion. Just answer the question. where's the Romo hate and Bledsoe love in that recap?

[Maikeru-sama]

I was listening to this in the car and Mickey acted like Parcells couldn't possibly go back to Drew Bledsoe.

Drew Bledsoe is a Professional, I am sure he would go back out on the field and do his job if asked.

- Mike G.

[Hostile]

I heard the Ranch Report on the Ticket, and I think Babe is referring to the fact that it sounded like Mickey was very much against the QB change last night. Mickey was saying that the game was only a five-point game at the time, and that he wouldn't have made the switch.

But I didn't get out of it that he had anything againt Romo. It was more the timing of the move.

BTW, Dan said he thought Parcells should and would go back to Bledsoe vs. Carolina. Mickey and Bob said no way, there's no going back now.That means he hates Romo?

Judas Priest we're over-sensitive.

[WoodysGirl]

I heard the Ranch Report on the Ticket, and I think Babe is referring to the fact that it sounded like Mickey was very much against the QB change last night. Mickey was saying that the game was only a five-point game at the time, and that he wouldn't have made the switch.

But I didn't get out of it that he had anything againt Romo. It was more the timing of the move.

BTW, Dan said he thought Parcells should and would go back to Bledsoe vs. Carolina. Mickey and Bob said no way, there's no going back now.I got that much out of his article on the game. I didn't take it as he was slamming Romo. So much as Parcells was fed up w/Bledsoe's mistakes and had already made his mind to play Romo, but that Romo's play wasn't an improvement over Bledsoe's.

And if anyone was in chat last night, they'll know I hated the move, as well.

[trickblue]

I heard the Ranch Report on the Ticket, and I think Babe is referring to the fact that it sounded like Mickey was very much against the QB change last night. Mickey was saying that the game was only a five-point game at the time, and that he wouldn't have made the switch.

But I didn't get out of it that he had anything againt Romo. It was more the timing of the move.

BTW, Dan said he thought Parcells should and would go back to Bledsoe vs. Carolina. Mickey and Bob said no way, there's no going back now.

Exactly right...

It's hard to translate typed words to actual intent. Mickey didn't down Romo at all. When he was talking about Dallas only being 5 points down when the change was made, he was using that as his argument that Parcells will likely stick with Romo from now on...

[Doomsday101]

I heard the Ranch Report on the Ticket, and I think Babe is referring to the fact that it sounded like Mickey was very much against the QB change last night. Mickey was saying that the game was only a five-point game at the time, and that he wouldn't have made the switch.

But I didn't get out of it that he had anything againt Romo. It was more the timing of the move.

BTW, Dan said he thought Parcells should and would go back to Bledsoe vs. Carolina. Mickey and Bob said no way, there's no going back now.

I agree with Mickey on both accounts. I would not have removed my starter trailing by 5 points at halftime. Now that it is happened I agree that you continue to play him. Pulling Romo at this stage I think would be a big blow to his confidence. I want to see Romo improve but I don't want Romo to be scared of making a mistake and having to look over his shoulder any time he makes 1

[Maikeru-sama]

Exactly right...

It's hard to translate typed words to actual intent. Mickey didn't down Romo at all. When he was talking about Dallas only being 5 points down when the change was made, he was using that as his argument that Parcells will likely stick with Romo from now on...

Well, he also used it as a way to show he didn't agree with the move.

He kept emphasising that the Boys were going to get the ball back and only down by 5. Also, that besides the Interception, Bledsoe really didnt make too many mistakes.

I dont know about him being Anti-Romo, but I walked away from the interview thinking he was definately against the move last night, and there is nothing wrong with that opinion.

[odog422]

Why is it always your guy vs. my guy?

I don't have a horse in this thing. I just want to see the Cowboys succeed. Personally I think Bledsoe takes us nowhere and Romo is an unproven former UDFA who is a longshot to be successful in this league.

It really comes down to the fact we've been hanging all our hopes on has-beens and major projects and not really even attempting to adequately address the situation. Now we are in a major mess and have to hope a 4 year former undrafted QB can become something in the league. The odds are really against that happening. It's possible, but not likely and if not, then we are back to where we were when Aikman retired and will have squandered the better part of another decade.

:hammer: :hammer: :hammer: :hammer: oh yeah, by the way...:hammer:

[Hostile]

Exactly right...

It's hard to translate typed words to actual intent. Mickey didn't down Romo at all. When he was talking about Dallas only being 5 points down when the change was made, he was using that as his argument that Parcells will likely stick with Romo from now on...No, you're wrong Trick. He hates him. Think big purple hatred. That kind.

:wink2:

[Sportsbabe]

Just answer the question. where's the Romo hate and Bledsoe love in that recap?

Oh, you had a question in your post:rolleyes: . OK. I'm a little slow. I did refer to the recap in another post. I said the recap was good and my reply was based on what I heard live on The Ticket. Unlike other posters, I didn't start an entirely new thread to voice my opinion when I already see the topic already started.

I listen to Mickey on the DC website on Talkin Cowboys. He always talks about Romo taking over QB in a condescending manner. That's my answer. Just like in my other posts. His arguments against Romo are illogical and biased. Again, we can agree to disagree.

[Hostile]

Oh, you had a question in your post:rolleyes: . OK. I'm a little slow. I did refer to the recap in another post. I said the recap was good and my reply was based on what I heard live on The Ticket. Unlike other posters, I didn't start an entirely new thread to voice my opinion when I already see the topic already started.

I listen to Mickey on the DC website on Talkin Cowboys. He always talks about Romo taking over QB in a condescending manner. That's my answer. Just like in my other posts. His arguments against Romo are illogical and biased. Again, we can agree to disagree.It's okay to be slow. I have bad knees and couldn't catch you anyway.

:wink2:

I can't read tone of voice in a recap over the Internet. I read that and don't see hatred of Tony Romo. I see paranoia too much. I doubt he hates him. I highly doubt it.

[Sportsbabe]

That means he hates Romo?

Judas Priest we're over-sensitive.

I'm the one that brought up hate so I'll respond: I'm making this assessment based on his comments ever since the idea came up. Not just from his report today. I listen every day. This was not a knee jerk response. Especially his Talking Cowboys show. It's in the archives on podcast. Check it out for yourself. Listen at how he debates the callers and never gives there arguments for giving Romo a try any merit.

[Hostile]

I'm the one that brought up hate so I'll respond: I'm making this assessment based on his comments ever since the idea came up. Not just from his report today. I listen every day. This was not a knee jerk response. Especially his Talking Cowboys show. It's in the archives on podcast. Check it out for yourself. Listen at how he debates the callers and never gives there arguments for giving Romo a try any merit.I'd call that his opinion, not hatred, but hey, what do I know?

[CaptainAmerica]

I think Parcells sees a lot of Delhomme in Romo and if that story from Fransesca is true, Parcells has probably kicked himself a million times for letting Delhomme get away.

I remember Madden saying in the pre-season last year, that when asked how long it would take to turn us around, Parcells said..."It depends on my QB".

I agree that historically it's a longshot that a Div. II, former UFA turns into a quality NFL QB, but check out Delhomme's draft status and measurables and it may just be that Parcells is hoping to get lucky and replace the one that got away.

[peplaw06]

There was something left out of the recap that Mick said that could be construed as being overly picky on Romo.

He pointed out that Romo only had something like 35 yards until the Giants took a 26-7 lead... suggesting the rest of his yards were basically obtained when the game was out of reach, in garbage time, with the Giants in a prevent defense, whatever. But the Giants got up 26-7 pretty quickly. After Romo's first pick, he only had one more drive before that was the score.

I personally didn't take it that way... I just thought it was interesting to hear the facts. But I could see how you could take it that way... especially if you're personally invested in Romo, as we know many here are.

[Chocolate Lab]

I remember Madden saying in the pre-season last year, that when asked how long it would take to turn us around, Parcells said..."It depends on my QB".Boy, I thought of that quote a million times last night...

[baj1dallas]

I don't know about the recap. (The recap was well done.) I listen to Mickey live all the time. His condescending comments about Romo are way over the top in my opinion.

I love it when people (he and the other anti-Romo people) say that Romo hasn't done anything in the NFL yet. Well, duh, he hasn't had a chance to play yet.

Speaking for myself, I'm not pushing for him to play because of what he's done in the regular season (he hasn't had a chance ... that would be a stupid premise). I want him to play because he's a gamer; he has pocket presence, he has escapability, he throws a decent ball, he has moxy, he has young legs, and he hasn't been beat down by 350 pound lineman/linebackers for 10 plus years.

He's been studying what we're trying to accomplish at the QB position for quite some time. He can help. The other guy was hurting more than helping.

Sportsbabe I respectfully disagree with ya on Romo. You seem to be ignoring the fact that we were down only 5 points with Drew in and that gap only widened with Romo in. Now I have nothing against Romo, hey if you want to risk a season to find out about a guy, go for it. But I think the odds are high that he continues making mistakes and that the Boys just end up drafting another QB next year or suffering through another year of Romo's mistakes. I have yet to ever see Romo play a full game without making numerous costly mistakes, whereas I have seen Bledsoe do just that, deny it if you like.

[SultanOfSix]

I have yet to ever see Romo play a full game.

Yep. Neither has anyone else.

[percyhoward]

He pointed out that Romo only had something like 35 yards until the Giants took a 26-7 lead... suggesting the rest of his yards were basically obtained when the game was out of reach, in garbage time, with the Giants in a prevent defense, whatever. But the Giants got up 26-7 pretty quickly. After Romo's first pick, he only had one more drive before that was the score.
All of which sounds like a very good argument against Romo. It will serve Mick in a future Q & A if Parcells decides to go with Bledsoe next week, and a lot of fans write in questioning the decision. Mick's got his ammo ready.

OTOH, if Romo gets the start, and Mick continues on this course, we'll know Jerry's not on board with the move.

[MichaelWinicki]

Sportsbabe I respectfully disagree with ya on Romo. You seem to be ignoring the fact that we were down only 5 points with Drew in and that gap only widened with Romo in. Now I have nothing against Romo, hey if you want to risk a season to find out about a guy, go for it. But I think the odds are high that he continues making mistakes and that the Boys just end up drafting another QB next year or suffering through another year of Romo's mistakes. I have yet to ever see Romo play a full game without making numerous costly mistakes, whereas I have seen Bledsoe do just that, deny it if you like.


And who's the diptoad that had a brand new QB, on Monday night football, against an aggressive defense... come out throwing?

Are you kidding me?

[baj1dallas]

And who's the diptoad that had a brand new QB, on Monday night football, against an aggressive defense... come out throwing?

Are you kidding me?

Well that's the kind of play that if it works, everybody says he's a genius for running an "easy" pass to get his confidence up. It was a screen pass wasn't it?

[TwoDeep3]

Mickey disgusts me with his Romo hate and his Bledsoe man love.

This is simply an amazing take off the anchor post.

I did not read anything in the comments by Spagnola that indicated he had man-love for Bledsoe.

He just stated what the people in charge are thinking.

And yet anything that even hints at a knock on Romo, ie. the disappontment by Parcells that Romo didn't pull it out, is perceived as Mickey siding with Bledsoe.

Perhaps we should all just be Cowboy fans and want to win games and not have favorite players who we place over the team.

And maybe we don't need to wear our hearts on our sleeves about one guy on the team either.

Simply amazing.

[MichaelWinicki]

Well that's the kind of play that if it works, everybody says he's a genius for running an "easy" pass to get his confidence up. It was a screen pass wasn't it?


No, it was a designed roll-out to Witten.


Hey, I know Romo did some stupid things but if you think Bledsoe is/was going to lead this team anywhere you're off-balance.

[bbgun]

I despise him because every column is a Valley Ranch press release. Two weeks ago he wrote a glowing article endorsing Bledsoe as starter. Watch out for the complete 180, pro-Romo column should Bill stick with the kid this week. Mickey's a cipher, pure and simple.

[Hostile]

This is simply an amazing take off the anchor post.

I did not read anything in the comments by Spagnola that indicated he had man-love for Bledsoe.

He just stated what the people in charge are thinking.

And yet anything that even hints at a knock on Romo, ie. the disappontment by Parcells that Romo didn't pull it out, is perceived as Mickey siding with Bledsoe.

Perhaps we should all just be Cowboy fans and want to win games and not have favorite players who we place over the team.

And maybe we don't need to wear our hearts on our sleeves about one guy on the team either.

Simply amazing.See, me and WG aren't alone in our bewilderment.

[MichaelWinicki]

I'm full of sit, you're full of sit... we're all full of sit! [/Hostile]

[Hostile]

I'm full of sit, you're full of sit... we're all full of sit! [/Hostile]I hate the Burger King Commercials of the last 2 years. I refuse to eat there until they get new advertisers. Between that screed, the King, and the burger family crap, it just isn't a place I want to spend my money.

[/rant off]

[BrAinPaiNt]

See, me and WG aren't alone in our bewilderment.

+ me :cool:

[MichaelWinicki]

+ me :cool:

Oh sure! The rain man lends his support!

[Hostile]

+ me :cool:Aramis, Athos, and Porthos ride.

WG is Constance.

(My apologies to anyone whose head that went right over.)

All for one...

[chinch]

Sportsbabe I respectfully disagree with ya on Romo. You seem to be ignoring the fact that we were down only 5 points with Drew in and that gap only widened with Romo in. Now I have nothing against Romo, hey if you want to risk a season to find out about a guy, go for it. But I think the odds are high that he continues making mistakes and that the Boys just end up drafting another QB next year or suffering through another year of Romo's mistakes. I have yet to ever see Romo play a full game without making numerous costly mistakes, whereas I have seen Bledsoe do just that, deny it if you like.

thing is that goalline INT by drew was a real momentum killer... the gints were looking at dominating the game but being down at half but thanks to drew they regained their composure and came out on fire. also Tuna hurt the situation (bad gambler) by not running the ball. romo failed, but was put in position with great odds to fail, and unfavorable odds to succeed yesterday.

we all expect more rest of the year, and i'd be surprised if he doesn't play more like preseason than he did vs NY.

[Crown Royal]

Aramis, Athos, and Porthos ride.

WG is Constance.

(My apologies to anyone whose head that went right over.)

All for one...

What's wrong with Artemis?

[MichaelWinicki]

What's wrong with Artemis?

Oh Hos has been pissy all day. :D

[Hostile]

Oh Hos has been pissy all day. :DAbrasive Mikey...abrasive.

:bang2:

I gotta 'splain this to you like whitewash?

[Hostile]

What's wrong with Artemis?I dunno, jealous of Apollo or something.

[MichaelWinicki]

Abrasive Mikey...abrasive.

:bang2:

I gotta 'splain this to you like whitewash?

ROFL!


At least you didn't give me the "Huck Finn" explanation on the the whitewash.

[Hostile]

ROFL!


At least you didn't give me the "Huck Finn" explanation on the the whitewash.:bang2:

Tom Sawyer.

Sigh..............

:laugh2:

[JPostSam]

dude -- does it take FOUR YEARS to learn not to make those STUPID passes he made that were intercepted? i'm not talking about the one in the endzone, which you can chalk up to butterflies or inexperience or whatever. but on the other two, he threw one right into the hands of a defender, and the ball was then itnercepted, and then he tried some idiotic desperation shuffle pass-type thing right to a defender! it shouldn't take four years of high school to learn not to do those things!