Time For The Roy Williams Experiment [Archive] - Dallas Cowboys Forum

Fernando Fernandez

11-13-2006, 01:32 PM

stealth

11-13-2006, 01:34 PM

he is way to small to play that position.
both the guys you list are too young to be trusted back there.
and lol @ benching henry

other than that it sounds like a great idea to me.

iceberg

11-13-2006, 01:38 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?

and i know idiots, but i'll leave names off of here for now. but wow - 3 posting cliches to end 1 post. "book it", self congratulatory phrases, and the claim you knew the hottest cowboy would be the hottest cowboy just because you..um...yea, said so.

austintodallas

11-13-2006, 01:39 PM

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.Bench Henry and start Watkins? Wow...just wow. They don't even play the same position.

Bryan8284

11-13-2006, 01:39 PM

This is the idiot that is calling for everyone to be benched in place of high schoolers nearly.

DallasDomination

11-13-2006, 01:39 PM

Roy Williams would get eaten alive in that position...We would really suck lol.

Leave Williams where he is and give him a good FS and we're rolling...Moving him to Ellis spot would be madness.

Fernando Fernandez

11-13-2006, 01:45 PM

he is way to small to play that position.
both the guys you list are too young to be trusted back there.
and lol @ benching henry

other than that it sounds like a great idea to me.

...and Romo had never thrown an NFL pass
...and Romo wasn't even drafted!

anyway, Roy is what 238 lbs? His quickness and toughness will make up for his size..he will be a BEAST at OLB if given the chance.

As for the secondary...young guys have talent too! Elam and watkins would compliment each others play. Roy W could not be counted on by watkins, hence Watkins looked bad.

Fernando Fernandez

11-13-2006, 01:46 PM

Roy Williams would get eaten alive in that position...We would really suck lol.

Leave Williams where he is and give him a good FS and we're rolling...Moving him to Ellis spot would be madness.

ROY WILLIAMS will not get eaten alive at OLB...he is too quick and uses his hands very well to fight off blocks...watch some tape!

DallasDomination

11-13-2006, 01:51 PM

I'll give you some tape... Have you watched him Blitz?

He starts the BLitz from 30 yards away and by the time he gets to the LOS The play is already over lol...He needs to fix that.

Dont get me wrong he Makes big plays but He's still plays like a rookie sometimes.

DallasDomination

11-13-2006, 01:52 PM

ROY WILLIAMS will not get eaten alive at OLB...he is too quick and uses his hands very well to fight off blocks...watch some tape!

If Ware and Roy Williams went head to head who would win?

If you think roy would You are out of your mind...

stealth

11-13-2006, 01:52 PM

...and Romo had never thrown an NFL pass
...and Romo wasn't even drafted!

anyway, Roy is what 238 lbs? His quickness and toughness will make up for his size..he will be a BEAST at OLB if given the chance.

As for the secondary...young guys have talent too! Elam and watkins would compliment each others play. Roy W could not be counted on by watkins, hence Watkins looked bad.

you realize that by saying romo was gonna be good you had just as much chance to be wrong. That was a 50 50 statement you ended up right and now think you are a football genius? watkins is a rookie that was getting lost in the NFL game, the last thing on his mind was he couldn't count on roy.

you really should learn a bit more about the game.

fortdick

11-13-2006, 01:52 PM

ROY WILLIAMS will not get eaten alive at OLB...he is too quick and uses his hands very well to fight off blocks...watch some tape!

He is too light to play LB in the 3-4. Prolly could get away with it in the 4-3 but he would have to take on OT in the 320 lb range. If they got their hands on him, he would be done. He is also too short to play OLB.

Finally, why take him out of his natural position and teach him a new one in the middle of the season? HE can come up from the SS spot and provide coverage and free a LB to go.

Leave it alone!

superpunk

11-13-2006, 01:55 PM

Also, we should take Romo and put him at wedge-buster on ST.

Roy is playing like the best safety in the league, and people still want to move him. Oh wait, this guy isn't a person.
http://www.blipnet.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/troll4alert.gif

Portland Fanatic

11-13-2006, 01:56 PM

Go back to class...the lunch bell just rang :bang2:

2much2soon

11-13-2006, 01:59 PM

Its not gonna happen in the 3-4.
Probably won't happen if they go back to the 4-3, either, when Parcells is gone.
Roy would be an average sized OLB in the 4-3, though. Plenty of those guys aren't 250+ bruisers like 3-4 backers.
By the way, Donnie Edwards is listed around 225 and playing inside in SD's 3-4.

Hostile

11-13-2006, 01:59 PM

Hoo boy, it's going to be a long Monday if this is what's getting served up as ideas to chew on.

:bang2:

BrAinPaiNt

11-13-2006, 02:00 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b26/smalls_25_21/sandlot.jpg
You're killing me Smalls!

Fernando Fernandez

11-13-2006, 02:02 PM

...Finally, why take him out of his natural position and teach him a new one in the middle of the season? HE can come up from the SS spot and provide coverage and free a LB to go.

Leave it alone!

ROY w is very talentd...just been playing at the wrong spot for us.
He won't have to LEARN that new position...his natural instincts to get to the ball carrier are excellent...THAT is what you want in a LB!

peplaw06

11-13-2006, 02:08 PM

Time for the Roy Williams Experiment

http://my.fit.edu/%7Ejbobosky/BBS/Makesmoresence.jpg

BrAinPaiNt

11-13-2006, 02:10 PM

http://my.fit.edu/%7Ejbobosky/BBS/Makesmoresence.jpg

:laugh2:

At least that looks fun.

superpunk

11-13-2006, 02:13 PM

Post more pics. Let's bring this thread down...

http://www.msu.edu/~bawolaar/ .thanks.tribs.jpg

iceberg

11-13-2006, 02:15 PM

Post more pics. Let's bring this thread down...

http://www.msu.edu/~bawolaar/ .thanks.tribs.jpg

i hope you understand why i'm still a bit leary of posting pics. : )

WoodysGirl

11-13-2006, 02:17 PM

Post more pics. Let's bring this thread down...

http://www.msu.edu/~bawolaar/ .thanks.tribs.jpghttp://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y164/nbr1diva/yourthreadismine.jpg

iceberg

11-13-2006, 02:17 PM

Also, we should take Romo and put him at wedge-buster on ST.

Roy is playing like the best safety in the league, and people still want to move him. Oh wait, this guy isn't a person.

and the cheerleaders will not take their place on the OL for all blocking purposes.

then again, i'll bet the "illegal use of hands" penalty will skyrocket.

WoodysGirl

11-13-2006, 02:17 PM

i hope you understand why i'm still a bit leary of posting pics. : )
:laugh2:

fortdick

11-13-2006, 02:17 PM

ROY w is very talentd...just been playing at the wrong spot for us.
He won't have to LEARN that new position...his natural instincts to get to the ball carrier are excellent...THAT is what you want in a LB!

Now that is just crazy talk!

superpunk

11-13-2006, 02:18 PM

i hope you understand why i'm still a bit leary of posting pics. : )

You should have all pic-posting privileges revoked. I don't care if that was intentional or not, that image is burned on my brain.

Kind of like Tub-girl.

vomit.

Hostile

11-13-2006, 02:19 PM

i hope you understand why i'm still a bit leary of posting pics. : ):laugh2:

Me too.

superpunk

11-13-2006, 02:19 PM

and the cheerleaders will not take their place on the OL for all blocking purposes.

then again, i'll bet the "illegal use of hands" penalty will skyrocket.

Zing! Pom-poms is powerful for blocking purposes.

BAZ

11-13-2006, 02:20 PM

I think every time the Cowboys play well they should change the team around the next game and try unknown factors for no other reason then just because.

JPM

11-13-2006, 02:21 PM

http://www.forcedshaving.com/wp-content/images/2004-09-23-0001.jpg

BrAinPaiNt

11-13-2006, 02:21 PM

http://webpages.charter.net/brainpaint/FLAV.jpg
We got magnum brown, shoothki - valoothki
Super-calafraga-hestik-alagoothki
You could put dat in ya dont know what I said book

iceberg

11-13-2006, 02:23 PM

I think every time the Cowboys play well they should change the team around the next game and try unknown factors for no other reason then just because.

i think one day they should all come out wearing the same number.

BrAinPaiNt

11-13-2006, 02:23 PM

http://webpages.charter.net/brainpaint/children.jpg

Dat Dude

11-13-2006, 02:29 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?

One of the dumbest posts Ive ever read.. 2 small to play SOLB in 3-4 and would get beat up to point of injury... Just because you are quick and hit hard doesnt mean youll be nasty at a 3-4 OLB.. get real...

Watkins should start, I agree...

fortdick

11-13-2006, 02:31 PM

One of the dumbest posts Ive ever read..

Now that was just rude! Just because it was true doesn't mean you can be rude about it. Well, maybe in this one case. . . . .

:D

superpunk

11-13-2006, 02:32 PM

http://www.rusfilm.pitt.edu/2004/films/images/little-old-ladies-still2.jpg

Old Lady: I think we should move Roy to OLB!

Midget: You're an arsehat.

BrAinPaiNt

11-13-2006, 02:41 PM

http://www.rusfilm.pitt.edu/2004/films/images/little-old-ladies-still2.jpg

Old Lady: I think we should move Roy to OLB!

Midget: You're an arsehat.

:laugh2: :bow: I think we may have the winner.

BAZ

11-13-2006, 02:49 PM

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8521/halpap4ri1.jpg
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/111/karatepe0.jpg
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/9751/catsbatcountyfc1.jpg

dbair1967

11-13-2006, 02:50 PM

stealth

11-13-2006, 03:05 PM

http://www.forcedshaving.com/wp-content/images/2004-09-23-0001.jpg

I am the only person on earth who this annoys the crap out of.
that bunny clearly has two pancakes on his head.

BigDFan5

11-13-2006, 03:06 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g152/BigDFan5/-Hand_Puppet.gif

iceberg

11-13-2006, 03:09 PM

I am the only person on earth who this annoys the crap out of.
that bunny clearly has two pancakes on his head.

i think this would all depend on how the pancake batter was originally poured. there are times i know you *think* there are (2) pancakes there and the waffle house loves this trick. (ihop would never do this to you) but i think from all replays and angles that are available to us, we simply don't have enough evidence to overturn the call that there is one pancake on his head.

conversely, if they had said (2) pancakes, i don't think there's enough for us to change it to (1) either.

guess we're just stuck in this delima.

stealth

11-13-2006, 03:11 PM

i think this would all depend on how the pancake batter was originally poured. there are times i know you *think* there are (2) pancakes there and the waffle house loves this trick. (ihop would never do this to you) but i think from all replays and angles that are available to us, we simply don't have enough evidence to overturn the call that there is one pancake on his head.

conversely, if they had said (2) pancakes, i don't think there's enough for us to change it to (1) either.

guess we're just stuck in this delima.

can we at least agree that the bunny at the very least has moxie?

iceberg

11-13-2006, 03:13 PM

can we at least agree that the bunny at the very least has moxie?

oh hell no. if you have moxie you don't sit around with ANY pancakes on your head. you slap the aunt jemima who put 'em there and dare anyone to top it off with melted butter and syrup. THEN you have moxie.

i think it's safe to say those w/moxie don't have pancake controversies on their head.

BigDFan5

11-13-2006, 03:15 PM

stealth

11-13-2006, 03:17 PM

oh hell no. if you have moxie you don't sit around with ANY pancakes on your head. you slap the aunt jemima who put 'em there and dare anyone to top it off with melted butter and syrup. THEN you have moxie.

i think it's safe to say those w/moxie don't have pancake controversies on their head.

I don't know that fire in the bunnies eyes tells me he could tell jerry jones to get on the bus while sinking the eightball and dating jessica simpson. Perhaps the pancakes on his head were the direct result of him losing a bet and the bunny is not one to welch on a bet. He is a stand up guy with a bounce in his step not seen for years. He would likely be hopping mad at your affirmation that he has no moxie.

iceberg

11-13-2006, 03:21 PM

I don't know that fire in the bunnies eyes tells me he could tell jerry jones to get on the bus while sinking the eightball and dating jessica simpson. Perhaps the pancakes on his head were the direct result of him losing a bet and the bunny is not one to welch on a bet. He is a stand up guy with a bounce in his step not seen for years. He would likely be hopping mad at your affirmation that he has no moxie.

i must disagree!

if you have true "moxie" then you don't make bets that would eventually have the possiblity of placing pancakes on your head. you simply realize the social penalty for that and avoid the bet and make it something more along the lines of having to play 1 full game in a roman centurian helmet vs. putting a soggy pancake on your head.

and that's not "fire" in the bunnies eyes. we've analyzed the overall picture and that's simply "red eye" that didn't get adjusted in photoshop when they had the chance. the real look you see is "oh hell they got the picture and i've got this damn pancake on my head that looks like a waffle house special". (bunnies know of this crime also)

after further review, the call stands. the bunny has no moxie.

stealth

11-13-2006, 03:26 PM

i must disagree!

if you have true "moxie" then you don't make bets that would eventually have the possiblity of placing pancakes on your head. you simply realize the social penalty for that and avoid the bet and make it something more along the lines of having to play 1 full game in a roman centurian helmet vs. putting a soggy pancake on your head.

and that's not "fire" in the bunnies eyes. we've analyzed the overall picture and that's simply "red eye" that didn't get adjusted in photoshop when they had the chance. the real look you see is "oh hell they got the picture and i've got this damn pancake on my head that looks like a waffle house special". (bunnies know of this crime also)

after further review, the call stands. the bunny has no moxie.

I heard he has razor blades under the pancakes.
and that the pancakes were made with spoiled buttermilk.
if that aint moxie I don't know what is.

iceberg

11-13-2006, 03:29 PM

I heard he has razor blades under the pancakes.
and that the pancakes were made with spoiled buttermilk.
if that aint moxie I don't know what is.

sounds like a bad trick or treat experience gone twilight zone.

now if the pancakes were soaked in everclear and on fire and he was eating them with a pitchfork while lobbing TD passes to TO, THEN i could see your point.

Joe a Cowboys fan

11-13-2006, 03:29 PM

iceberg

11-13-2006, 03:32 PM

Isn't there always a much ado about nothing post here on Fridays. I say let bunnies wear pancakes if they want to and let Roy Williams play SS because he has to. Besides it is much too soon for April Fools jokes. November fools just doesn't have the same ring to it.

hey - if the bunny wants to wear pancakes, i support him in that. i just disagree it has anything to do with moxie vs. just bad taste in headwear.

BigDFan5

11-13-2006, 03:36 PM

Pancakes are for losers, a bunny with real Moxie wears muffins on his head

http://img17.exs.cx/img17/3972/cupcake.jpg

Hostile

11-13-2006, 03:40 PM

I ignored this thread for too long.

Funny stuff. :laugh2:

BigDFan5

11-13-2006, 03:43 PM

http://djphiberoptix.com/pancake.jpg

stealth

11-13-2006, 03:46 PM

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7213/carpm4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

that's moxie!

that is a full size car on his head. That is one big bunny

superpunk

11-13-2006, 03:49 PM

Pancakes are for losers, a bunny with real Moxie wears muffins on his head

http://img17.exs.cx/img17/3972/cupcake.jpg

Only a gay bunny would wear a pink puff-muffin on his head. Next thing you know, he'll be listening to ABBA and working out. That's not a bunny I want leading my team.

ThreeSportStar80

11-13-2006, 03:57 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?

I'm glad you ARE NOT the head coach or GM of the Cowboys because they would be in serious trouble! That statement is completely bananas, Roy Williams wouldn't last three games at OLB and any other LB position! I think you should go study Football 101 buddy...

:rolleyes:

iceberg

11-13-2006, 04:17 PM

http://djphiberoptix.com/pancake.jpg

now that looks like a cheap mcdonalds hamburger that someone dug out of the bottom of the bag.

you gott have moxie (or be stoned) to eat that burger!

iceberg

11-13-2006, 04:18 PM

Only a gay bunny would wear a pink puff-muffin on his head. Next thing you know, he'll be listening to ABBA and working out. That's not a bunny I want leading my team.

but what if this were the bunny guarding the cave in montey python?

that bunny could wear whatever it wanted and still have moxie, but he's more the exception than the rule.

Chuck 54

11-13-2006, 04:21 PM

like I've been saying for awhile now guys...MOVE RW to Ellis' OLB spot and put Elam in RW's SS spot.

Watch tape of Elam during the preseason...he is a playmaker!

RW is tough, quick and hits hard, so he will survive at OLB PLUS he is better at covering the short passes...again watch tape when he plays close to the line. Just have him eat a few more biscuits this week.

PS:Bench Henry...start Watkins again. Watkins and Elam will be a great tandem.

Book it!

I KNOW talent!
Tony Romo ring a bell?
LOL...now that's funny....Roy may be the man at SS, and maybe...maybe he could play a weakside LB in a pinch, but if we lined him up at SLB against the OT's and TE's, he'd get destroyed.

stealth

11-13-2006, 04:24 PM

He's some pig
Some pig
Some terrific, radiant, humble pig
He is some pig

Oh, wow, look at him now
Zuckerman's famous pig
Suey, whaddya see?
The greatest hog in history!
Fine, swine, wish he was mine
What if he's not so big?
He's some terrific, radiant, humble thig-a-majig of a
Fine, phenomena

My land, isn't he grand?
Zuckerman's famous pig
Golly, you gotta agree he's a real celebrity
Fine, swine wish he was mine
What if he's not so big?
He's some terrific, radiant, humble thig-a-majig of a pig
The terrific, radiant, humble
Zuckerman
Zuckerman
Zuckerman
Zuckerman
Zuckerman's
Zuckerman's famous pig!