PDA

View Full Version : Would you trade Roy Williams (Detroit) for TO?


sportsman
12-04-2006, 07:13 PM
Roy, would love to catch passes from Romo.

Hailmary
12-04-2006, 07:14 PM
Roy, would love to catch passes from Romo.

Why would Detroit want to?

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:15 PM
I would do it in a heartbeat, Roy Williams is just getting started

not that I don't like TO as a Cowboy :)

Yeagermeister
12-04-2006, 07:15 PM
Hmmmm let me think















HELLZ YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jimz31
12-04-2006, 07:16 PM
Well...how many drops does RW have?

Seriously though? No.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:18 PM
Well...how many drops does RW have?

Seriously though? No.

what? Roy WIlliams will be doing this for a good while, TO maybe has 4 years of high-productivity left

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:19 PM
Must be a trick question. Roy is 2nd in the NFL right now (yards). I'd fall over dead if Detriot ever considered this for a second. Nice thought but no way in the world this could ever be a possability.

Alexander
12-04-2006, 07:20 PM
Hold on, is this a Madden question?

Hailmary
12-04-2006, 07:21 PM
what? Roy WIlliams will be doing this for a good while, TO maybe has 4 years of high-productivity left

This is exactly why it's so ridiculous. Even if they are comparable talent-wise, why would Detroit trade a 24yr old for a 32yr old?

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:21 PM
too bad we don't have Dexter anymore, could use him as trade bait

say him and a 3rd?

Yeagermeister
12-04-2006, 07:21 PM
Hold on, is this a Madden question?

:laugh1:

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:22 PM
This is exactly why it's so ridiculous. Even if they are comparable talent-wise, why would Detroit trade a 24yr old for a 32yr old?

he's asking if we would, that's all, and would I? you damn well bet I would

Rampage
12-04-2006, 07:23 PM
idk cause he's a clown too

Hailmary
12-04-2006, 07:24 PM
he's asking if we would, that's all, and would I? you damn well bet I would

Oh, I get it now.

Then I would like to trade Keith Davis for Ed Reed.

Yeagermeister
12-04-2006, 07:25 PM
Oh, I get it now.

Then I would like to trade Keith Davis for Ed Reed.

Now you are understanding it :laugh2:

Payton34Smith22
12-04-2006, 07:25 PM
Yes......

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 07:28 PM
Well let me think about this.......Heck yes!!!!!

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 07:28 PM
Roy, would love to catch passes from Romo.About half this forum said RW would be the biggest bust in that draft. :bang2:

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:29 PM
No, Roy Williams is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up. TO is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up and backs it up on the field.

Hoofbite
12-04-2006, 07:30 PM
Based on the fact that I cannot stand his little 1st down celebration.......NO.

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 07:30 PM
No, Roy Williams is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up. TO is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up and backs it up on the field.

And you are an......nevermind!!!!!!!!! :bang2: :D :D :D :D

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:31 PM
And you are an......nevermind!!!!!!!!! :bang2: :D :D :D :D

How's that 40 point performance against Seattle going?

speedkilz88
12-04-2006, 07:32 PM
About half this forum said RW would be the biggest bust in that draft. :bang2:More like a couple of trolz, try again.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:32 PM
No, Roy Williams is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up. TO is an arrogant SOB who never shuts up and backs it up on the field.

Now now HH, don't let your A&M love affair write checks commmen sense can't cash.

zack
12-04-2006, 07:33 PM
Roy, would love to catch passes from Romo.

Let me think...ahh...no!

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:33 PM
Not to mention that TO has more receptions, twice as many TDs and one less dumbarse prediction

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:33 PM
Now now HH, don't let your A&M love affair write checks commmen sense can't cash.

40 points. We're gonna socre. Seattle.

Ringing any bells yet?

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:35 PM
And TO is doing that with the best #2 WR in football. Roy Williams is the only receiver worth a damn up there.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:36 PM
Not to mention that TO has more receptions, twice as many TDs and one less dumbarse prediction

If your keeping score, you pretty much suck at keeping score.

:D

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:39 PM
40 points. We're gonna socre. Seattle.

Ringing any bells yet?


Signing the most lucrative contract for a WR in the history of the NFL and demanding a new contract the next year, does that ring a bell?

Basically screwing Baltimore, signing with the Eagles and then acting the way he did, does that ring a bell?

Accidental OD, does that ring a bell?

I mean, I'm only getting started here.

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 07:40 PM
More like a couple of trolz, try again.Don't have to, I remember it well.

Jimz31
12-04-2006, 07:40 PM
what? Roy WIlliams will be doing this for a good while, TO maybe has 4 years of high-productivity left

In this NFL, it is a year-by-year thing....don't give me the "he'll be here for years from now" thing.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:40 PM
Signing the most lucrative contract for a WR in the history of the NFL and demanding a new contract the next year, does that ring a bell?

Basically screwing Baltimore, signing with the Eagles and then acting the way he did, does that ring a bell?

Accidental OD, does that ring a bell?

I mean, I'm only getting started here.

That's all well and good, but it's nothing more than a diversionary tactic on your part. TO takes care of his business on the field. Roy Williams runs his motuh and then gets shut down.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:41 PM
Signing the most lucrative contract for a WR in the history of the NFL and demanding a new contract the next year, does that ring a bell?

that wasn't the most lucritave contract for a WR, heck it was lower in annual salary and bonus than what we signed him for

Accidental OD, does that ring a bell?

:jerk:

I mean, I'm only getting started here.

debate HH, but don't bring our players down w/ him

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:42 PM
In this NFL, it is a year-by-year thing....don't give me the "he'll be here for years from now" thing.

I already did

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 07:42 PM
And TO is doing that with the best #2 WR in football. Roy Williams is the only receiver worth a damn up there.You just killed you're own arguement. aggies......:lmao:

Jimz31
12-04-2006, 07:42 PM
I am in favor of Keeping T.O.....and that is saying something as hard as I have been on him.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:42 PM
That's all well and good, but it's nothing more than a diversionary tactic on your part. TO takes care of his business on the field. Roy Williams runs his motuh and then gets shut down.

Now your just being stupid.

I didn't do any of those things and I didn't hold a gun to TOs head. He managed that all by himself.

As far as Roy running his mouth and not producing, well, let me just say again that he's second in the NFL in receiving yards. Your statements don't hold water.

DeathToTheSkinS
12-04-2006, 07:43 PM
no. T.O. hasnt even broken out yet or got started i mean its sorda been an "off year" for him.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:43 PM
If your keeping score, you pretty much suck at keeping score.

:D

No, you just suck at simple mathematics

69 > 64

8 > 4

And TO hasnt said anything he didnt back up on the field. Ever. He's a massive doosh, but he takes care of his business.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:46 PM
You just killed you're own arguement. aggies......:lmao:

Your brain must have skipped a beat on that response

When the QB is throwing to you every other pass play because everyone else sucks, you are bound to catch a few passes if for no other reason than you are getting a lot thrown at you. When you have a Pro Bowl caliber TE, a Pro Bowl caliber #2 WR, a #3 WR who is better than many teams #2, and a coach who sits on leads by running the ball, you arent going to get as many opportunities, and TO still has more production.

Comprende?

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:47 PM
No, you just suck at simple mathematics

69 > 64

8 > 4

And TO hasnt said anything he didnt back up on the field. Ever. He's a massive doosh, but he takes care of his business.

This is a bold face lie. If this were true, he'd still be in Philly.

1043 vs 915 or 16.6 vs 13.3. Those don't count huh? I'm not surprised.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:48 PM
This is a bold face lie. If this were true, he'd still be in Philly.

1043 vs 915 or 16.6 vs 13.3. Those don't count huh? I'm not surprised.

I'll take receptions and TDs anyday

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:49 PM
Your brain must have skipped a beat on that response

When the QB is throwing to you every other pass play because everyone else sucks, you are bound to catch a few passes if for no other reason than you are getting a lot thrown at you. When you have a Pro Bowl caliber TE, a Pro Bowl caliber #2 WR, a #3 WR who is better than many teams #2, and a coach who sits on leads by running the ball, you arent going to get as many opportunities, and TO still has more production.

Comprende?

Actually, TO is probably just as big a part of our offense here in Dallas. TO would probably be leading the league right now if he would have caught half the drops he's had this year.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:50 PM
Now your just being stupid.

I don't suppose you see the epic irony in that sentence. No, I'm sure you don't. :lmao:

[quiote]I didn't do any of those things and I didn't hold a gun to TOs head. He managed that all by himself. [/quote]

What? :confused: That doesnt even make sense.

As far as Roy running his mouth and not producing, well, let me just say again that he's second in the NFL in receiving yards. Your statements don't hold water.

You can take your receiving yards, I'll take my catches, TDs and explosiveness, and we'll call me the winner, how about that? If my statements don't hold any water, than your's are dying somewhere in the Sierra Nevada.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:51 PM
I'll take receptions and TDs anyday


I'm sure you would but you have to look at the offenses each is playing in. Detoit doesn't get near as many opportunities as does Dallas. Of course the TD number is going to be bigger. You gotta think about what Roy would look like in this offense. Turn it around and think about what TO would look like in Detroit.

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 07:51 PM
Your brain must have skipped a beat on that response

When the QB is throwing to you every other pass play because everyone else sucks, you are bound to catch a few passes if for no other reason than you are getting a lot thrown at you. When you have a Pro Bowl caliber TE, a Pro Bowl caliber #2 WR, a #3 WR who is better than many teams #2, and a coach who sits on leads by running the ball, you arent going to get as many opportunities, and TO still has more production.

Comprende?

Yes, being the only good player on your team makes it easier. Damn.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:52 PM
I don't suppose you see the epic irony in that sentence. No, I'm sure you don't. :lmao:

[quiote]I didn't do any of those things and I didn't hold a gun to TOs head. He managed that all by himself.

What? :confused: That doesnt even make sense.



You can take your receiving yards, I'll take my catches, TDs and explosiveness, and we'll call me the winner, how about that? If my statements don't hold any water, than your's are dying somewhere in the Sierra Nevada.[/QUOTE]


Of course I do HH. This is an A&M thing and anybody who knows you knows that about you.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 07:52 PM
I'm sure you would but you have to look at the offenses each is playing in. Detoit doesn't get near as many opportunities as does Dallas. Of course the TD number is going to be bigger. You gotta think about what Roy would look like in this offense. Turn it around and think about what TO would look like in Detroit.

true, true

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:52 PM
This is a bold face lie. If this were true, he'd still be in Philly.

1043 vs 915 or 16.6 vs 13.3. Those don't count huh? I'm not surprised.

Oh really? I seem to remember him leaving Philly because he couldnt get along with his coaches, teammates, or owner and was a massive cancer. he enevr made ANY statement that he didnt back up on the field, in fact he came back 8 weeks after breaking his leg to dominate in the Super Bowl.

Who's lying now? :rolleyes:

And again, I'll take my catches, TDs and playmaking ability any day of the week.

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 07:55 PM
I'm sure you would but you have to look at the offenses each is playing in. Detoit doesn't get near as many opportunities as does Dallas. Of course the TD number is going to be bigger. You gotta think about what Roy would look like in this offense. Turn it around and think about what TO would look like in Detroit.TO would be getting kicked off his third team if he was in Detroit.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:55 PM
Yes, being the only good player on your team makes it easier. Damn.

Did I say it makes it easier? No? :rolleyes:

It makes it more likely you'll get more catches/yards/TDs because of sheer volume of throws going your way. Why do you think Steve Smith put up such ridiculous numbers last year?

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:57 PM
Oh really? I seem to remember him leaving Philly because he couldnt get along with his coaches, teammates, or owner and was a massive cancer. he enevr made ANY statement that he didnt back up on the field, in fact he came back 8 weeks after breaking his leg to dominate in the Super Bowl.

Who's lying now? :rolleyes:

And again, I'll take my catches, TDs and playmaking ability any day of the week.


Your lying. TO said he would bring a championship to Philly. That didn't happen. You can ride TOs jock if you want but history shows that TO has done way worse then guaranting a win or a score.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 07:58 PM
Actually, TO is probably just as big a part of our offense here in Dallas. TO would probably be leading the league right now if he would have caught half the drops he's had this year.

First of all, TO has 11 drops, so if he had 6 more catches, that would put him at 75, not the league leader.

Second, Roy Williams gets more passes thrown his way every game

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 07:59 PM
Did I say it makes it easier? No? :rolleyes:

It makes it more likely you'll get more catches/yards/TDs because of sheer volume of throws going your way. Why do you think Steve Smith put up such ridiculous numbers last year?

I'd actually be very interested in seeing how many times Roy has been thrown to as opposed to TO.

pancakeman
12-04-2006, 08:00 PM
Would they need to put middle names on the backs of the jerseys, too? (Has any team ever had two players with the same first and last names before?)

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:00 PM
Your lying. TO said he would bring a championship to Philly. That didn't happen. You can ride TOs jock if you want but history shows that TO has done way worse then guaranting a win or a score.

For the love of God, it's "you're".

And TO caught 9 passes for 120 yards in the SB with a leg that wasnt even 75% according to team doctors. He didnt let his team down in any way, shape, or form. McChoke lost that game.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:01 PM
Of course I do HH. This is an A&M thing and anybody who knows you knows that about you.

More senseless babble? :confused:

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:01 PM
Your lying. TO said he would bring a championship to Philly. That didn't happen.

he came close, actually was the best player on the field in that game

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:02 PM
he came close, actually was the best player on the field in that game

Apparently, spouting facts makes us liars :laugh2:

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:02 PM
More senseless babble? :confused:

Ouch, that one struck a nerve I'd guess. ;)

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:04 PM
First of all, TO has 11 drops, so if he had 6 more catches, that would put him at 75, not the league leader.

Second, Roy Williams gets more passes thrown his way every game

I'd love to see this statistic. Please provide it.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:07 PM
he came close, actually was the best player on the field in that game


I'd agree with you Summer. All I'm saying is that Roy Williams guaranting a win ro points is not unique. It happens and it's happened to TO many times. TO has done these same kinds of things. This is not a reason to say one is better then the other. Shockey said we would never win in NY. Well, we did. He's an *** but he's also a great player. Just the way it works unfortunatly.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:07 PM
Ouch, that one struck a nerve I'd guess. ;)

No, I just like the posts I read to make sense

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:08 PM
Apparently, spouting facts makes us liars :laugh2:

No HH, just you.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:09 PM
This is not a reason to say one is better then the other.

yeah, don't get why this is a point of argument, it's not like one player determines the outcome of games, esp. what they say

hell, I'd take both TO and Roy on my team anyday, and Glenn, can you imagine that roster?

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:09 PM
No, I just like the posts I read to make sense

I think what you ment to say here is that you just like them to agree with you particular brand of sense. I would hold my breath on that one.

BTW, how you coming on that stat?

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:10 PM
I'd agree with you Summer. All I'm saying is that Roy Williams guaranting a win ro points is not unique. It happens and it's happened to TO many times. TO has done these same kinds of things. This is not a reason to say one is better then the other. Shockey said we would never win in NY. Well, we did. He's an *** but he's also a great player. Just the way it works unfortunatly.

TO never aguranteed a win in that game, he said he would bring a SB to Philly. And to add to that, Roy Williams, after assuring us of a 40 point outburst and win, got beat 34 to 7. TO almost single handidly brought a championship to Philly.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:12 PM
I think what you ment to say here is that you just like them to agree with you particular brand of sense. I would hold my breath on that one.

BTW, how you coming on that stat?

No, I mean your post sdid not make any sense in the context of my post, this thread, or in any alternate reality. It was improper usage, a nonsensical post by all standards. It wasnt about me agreeing with you or not, it was simply poor english skills on your part.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:13 PM
No HH, just you.

:lmao: :laugh2: :lmao: :laugh2:

Again, I doubt you realize the massive beatdown you just personally brought upon yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You are simply too much.

:lmao: :laugh2: :lmao: :laugh2:

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:18 PM
I think what you ment to say here is that you just like them to agree with you particular brand of sense. I would hold my breath on that one.

BTW, how you coming on that stat?

You might as well be arguing with a brick wall.

FWIW, I think a couple of things are obvious here.

1) TO is a better wide receiver than TFRW... a fact that should be pretty obvious. However...
2) TFRW is a darn good wideout, on the verge of entering the top tier if he isn't there already.
3) Plus, TFRW is much younger.
4) Lastly, while TFRW seems to be a jerk in his own right, TO is in a class all to himself and is a much bigger headache.

All in all, while I wouldn't make this speculative trade mid-season this year due to chemistry concerns, I'd be really tempted to in the off-season.

But it's a moot point.

Mike Williams, however, could probably be had for a ham-sandwich, as he's currently getting beat out by a Backup QB on Detroit's WR depth-chart. :eek:

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:19 PM
yeah, don't get why this is a point of argument, it's not like one player determines the outcome of games, esp. what they say

hell, I'd take both TO and Roy on my team anyday, and Glenn, can you imagine that roster?

I don't love TO but i recognize that he has been a great player. If I were able to take one, right now, I'd take Roy Williams. He's younger, he's producing in a bad offense and he's not a bad guy. Yeah, he made a stupid statement but it's not like he's on the front pages week to week.

How intelligent is this BS about how much better TO is then Roy Williams?

Here are TO's statistics in his first 3 years and Roy Williams' stats with 3 seasons not yet completed.

TO

Yds 2553, TDs 26, Rec 162, Avg 15.75.

Roy

Yds 2547, TDs 20, Rec 162, Avg 15.7

Honestly, it's rediculous to say that TO is the better WR. Age is what the deciding factor is in any trade consideration, such as this. Roy Williams has years left to get better. TO is near the end.

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:19 PM
Mike Williams, however, could probably be had for a ham-sandwich, as he's currently getting beat out by a Backup QB on Detoit's WR depth-chart. :eek:

no more TEs! PLEASE!! :D

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:20 PM
Age is what the deciding factor is in any trade consideration, such as this. Roy Williams has years left to get better. TO is near the end.

:hammer:

if you go all the way back to the 2nd reply in this thread ;) I said I would do that trade in a heartbeat, WIlliams is going to be good for a long time, TO, maybe 4 years left of high-productivity

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:21 PM
:lmao: :laugh2: :lmao: :laugh2:

Again, I doubt you realize the massive beatdown you just personally brought upon yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You are simply too much.

:lmao: :laugh2: :lmao: :laugh2:

And I suppose, this is your version of the story yeah? If you say so.

Just produce the statistic you claimed earlier. Has Roy been thrown to more then TO this year?

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:22 PM
TO never aguranteed a win in that game, he said he would bring a SB to Philly. And to add to that, Roy Williams, after assuring us of a 40 point outburst and win, got beat 34 to 7. TO almost single handidly brought a championship to Philly.


Sounds like a very long winded way of saying that he promised something and failed. OK then.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:22 PM
Mike Williams, however, could probably be had for a ham-sandwich, as he's currently getting beat out by a Backup QB on Detroit's WR depth-chart. :eek:

Why? We don't need another TE

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:23 PM
Sounds like a very long winded way of saying that he promised something and failed. OK then.

If you can't recognize the difference, then there's no point in debating with you, because you clearly don't have a clue.

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 08:24 PM
I don't love TO but i recognize that he has been a great player. If I were able to take one, right now, I'd take Roy Williams. He's younger, he's producing in a bad offense and he's not a bad guy. Yeah, he made a stupid statement but it's not like he's on the front pages week to week.

How intelligent is this BS about how much better TO is then Roy Williams?

Here are TO's statistics in his first 3 years and Roy Williams' stats with 3 seasons not yet completed.

TO

Yds 2553, TDs 26, Rec 162, Avg 15.75.

Roy

Yds 2547, TDs 20, Rec 162, Avg 15.7

Honestly, it's rediculous to say that TO is the better WR. Age is what the deciding factor is in any trade consideration, such as this. Roy Williams has years left to get better. TO is near the end.


And that my friend is why I would make the trade in a blink of an eye.

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 08:24 PM
I don't love TO but i recognize that he has been a great player. If I were able to take one, right now, I'd take Roy Williams. He's younger, he's producing in a bad offense and he's not a bad guy. Yeah, he made a stupid statement but it's not like he's on the front pages week to week.

How intelligent is this BS about how much better TO is then Roy Williams?

Here are TO's statistics in his first 3 years and Roy Williams' stats with 3 seasons not yet completed.

TO

Yds 2553, TDs 26, Rec 162, Avg 15.75.

Roy

Yds 2547, TDs 20, Rec 162, Avg 15.7

Honestly, it's rediculous to say that TO is the better WR. Age is what the deciding factor is in any trade consideration, such as this. Roy Williams has years left to get better. TO is near the end.But TO had to play with Jerry Rice. Obviously that made it much harder. :rolleyes:

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:24 PM
And I suppose, this is your version of the story yeah? If you say so.

Just produce the statistic you claimed earlier. Has Roy been thrown to more then TO this year?

TO has been targeted 121 times this year.

TFRW has been targeted 114 times.

So who wins this argument, I lost track. :p:

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:25 PM
So who wins this argument, I lost track. :p:

cbz40!

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:26 PM
If you can't recognize the difference, then there's no point in debating with you, because you clearly don't have a clue.

OK, that's cool, but don't forget to get that statistic posted. Off you go skippy.

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 08:27 PM
cbz40!

I would say Mr White & Mr. ABQ......;) :D

I forgot I had you on ignore....:bang2:

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:28 PM
I would say Mr White & Mr. ABQ......;) :D

I forgot I had you on ignore....:bang2:

someone's getting a lump of coal for Christmas

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 08:29 PM
someone's getting a lump of coal for Christmas

or a bomb in their stocking......:D

Bob Sacamano
12-04-2006, 08:30 PM
or a bomb in their stocking......:D

you wouldn't

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:30 PM
OK, that's cool, but don't forget to get that statistic posted. Off you go skippy.
I posted it for you and you were right. Did you miss it?

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:30 PM
And I suppose, this is your version of the story yeah? If you say so.

Just produce the statistic you claimed earlier. Has Roy been thrown to more then TO this year?

Terrell Owens has been thrown to an average of 10.08 times per game in 12 games this season

Roy Williams has been thrown to an average of 11.5 times per games in 12 starts

It's not A LOT more passes, but it averages out to about 30 more passes per year.

Cbz40
12-04-2006, 08:31 PM
you wouldn't

Nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.......:rolleyes: :D

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:32 PM
Terrell Owens has been thrown to an average of 10.08 times per game in 12 games this season

Roy Williams has been thrown to an average of 11.5 times per games in 12 starts

It's not A LOT more passes, but it averages out to about 30 more passes per year.
Where did you get that? I went to the stats on Sports Illustrated and it said that TO had been targeted more than TFRW.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:32 PM
or a bomb in their stocking......:D

:explode:

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:33 PM
I posted it for you and you were right. Did you miss it?

Yeah, sort of. I was busy fighting back HH's vicious ankle bitting assault when you posted it. I read it after I had already asked again.

BTW, thank you for doing that. I knew it wasn't correct but I had hoped that HH would look it up and come clean. No matter. Thanks again DW.

Hostile
12-04-2006, 08:34 PM
I don't have Madden, so I can't.

ABQCOWBOY
12-04-2006, 08:35 PM
Terrell Owens has been thrown to an average of 10.08 times per game in 12 games this season

Roy Williams has been thrown to an average of 11.5 times per games in 12 starts

It's not A LOT more passes, but it averages out to about 30 more passes per year.

Show the link.

Yeagermeister
12-04-2006, 08:36 PM
I don't have Madden, so I can't.

:laugh1:

Wanna borrow my copy?

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:42 PM
Show the link.

For the record:

TO's Stats:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/3664/index.html


TFRW's Stats:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6766/index.html




It looks like TO could set a new personal best for himself for targets this year.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:44 PM
Where did you get that? I went to the stats on Sports Illustrated and it said that TO had been targeted more than TFRW.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr.php

These stats were as of the end of week 12. Roy Williams had 107 passes thrown his way, TO had 108 passes thrown his way. This does not include passes thrown behind the line of scrimmage however, which TO has seen 2 of and RW has seen 14 of (Surprised me too, they must run WRs screens often). Now, according CBSsportslines game logs from this past week, RW saw 15 passes thrown his way (but only caught 3, Kitna was horrible and Williams dropped several), TO saw 11 passes thrown his way.

107 + 14 + 15 = 136, or about 11.5 passes per game

108 + 2 + 11 = 121, or about 10.08 passes per game

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:45 PM
For the record:

TO's Stats:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/3664/index.html


TFRW's Stats:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6766/index.html




It looks like TO could set a new personal best for himself for targets this year.

There must no be one uniform stat keeper, because I've seen 3 different numbers in regards to TO's passes thrown to from yesterday's game.

Chocolate Lab
12-04-2006, 08:45 PM
In a heartbeat.

Hostile
12-04-2006, 08:46 PM
:laugh1:

Wanna borrow my copy?Naw.

I haven't played a video game in years.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:47 PM
Naw.

I haven't played a video game in years.

:(....

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:47 PM
There must no be one uniform stat keeper, because I've seen 3 different numbers in regards to TO's passes thrown to from yesterday's game.

And if my stats are wrong, I apologize in advance, I hadnt seen those SI stats

jimmy40
12-04-2006, 08:52 PM
And if my stats are wrong, I apologize in advance, I hadnt seen those SI statsHow can you apologize in advance when you've already posted them?

Danny White
12-04-2006, 08:53 PM
And if my stats are wrong, I apologize in advance, I hadnt seen those SI stats

You deserve some credit for finding some at least.

This whole thread is stupid, so it doesn't really matter. You just took it to a whole new level... but I suppose that was your intent from the beginning! :p:

As long as we're entertaining this absurd hypothetical, what would they put on the back of the uniforms to differentiate between the two Roy Williamses? I'd recommend putting their full names "The Great Roy Williams" and "The Fake Roy Williams."

Hostile
12-04-2006, 08:54 PM
:(....I have no idea what that means.

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 08:59 PM
I have no idea what that means.

Video games can soothe the soul ;)

The30YardSlant
12-04-2006, 09:00 PM
You deserve some credit for finding some at least.

This whole thread is stupid, so it doesn't really matter. You just took it to a whole new level... but I suppose that was your intent from the beginning! :p:

As long as we're entertaining this absurd hypothetical, what would they put on the back of the uniforms to differentiate between the two Roy Williamses? I'd recommend putting their full names "The Great Roy Williams" and "The Fake Roy Williams."

How about "DADDY" and "Quitter", respectively ;)

ABQCOWBOY
12-05-2006, 03:49 AM
How about "DADDY" and "Quitter", respectively ;)


I suppose if it works for you, that's all that really matters.

I honestly don't see the big deal. Williams' stats are remarkably simular in his first 3 seasons (with 9 fewer games played) then are Ownes'. He made a stupid statement that he probably shouldn't have but in the grand scheme, it's not that big a deal. It could be much worse.

For Example, he could be in jail for demanding entrance into a stip club after hours, striking a police officer and generally being an idiot. Bengals WR Reggie McNeal yesterday.

You don't see that with Roy Williams. At least, I'm not aware of any such behavior. JMO I suppose.

schon
12-05-2006, 06:23 AM
This is exactly why it's so ridiculous. Even if they are comparable talent-wise, why would Detroit trade a 24yr old for a 32yr old?

b/c its matt millen. ;)

CrazyCowboy
12-05-2006, 06:27 AM
Detroit would laugh at us....

Chuck 54
12-05-2006, 07:17 AM
I would trade T.O. for Roy Williams today, even in the midst of a playoff run. That would be a trade you'd have to be an idiot not to make...it would secure the WR spot at the top for years to come, barring injury.

Nice hypothetical, but there aren't many teams who would trade their young #1 WR for T.O. simply because he's near the end of his career, not even considering all the other reasons.

Hostile
12-05-2006, 07:36 AM
Video games can soothe the soul ;)
Not if you have an angry soul. I play golf. Fresh air, sunshine, and exercise.

Aikbach
12-05-2006, 07:37 AM
Not if you have an angry soul. I play golf. Fresh air, sunshine, and exercise.In that case try an ESV or KJV.;)

Hostile
12-05-2006, 07:38 AM
In that case try an ESV or KJV.;)A who and a what?

Aikbach
12-05-2006, 07:39 AM
A who and a what?English Standard Version, King James Version.

Hostile
12-05-2006, 07:54 AM
English Standard Version, King James Version.Oh gotcha. Do that daily.

Doomsday101
12-05-2006, 07:57 AM
Without thinking twice about it. Williams has great talent and is much younger. I think Williams is now entering his prime.

BrAinPaiNt
12-05-2006, 08:04 AM
I lost a large amount of brain cells reading this thread, and I need the few I have, now I have a headache.

Thanks Guys. ;)

sportsman
12-08-2006, 09:28 PM
I use to be in support for TO and all his antics. This team don't need him.

If not Detroit, anywhere.

NIBGoldenchild
12-08-2006, 11:57 PM
I'd actually be very interested in seeing how many times Roy has been thrown to as opposed to TO.


STATS, Inc. has TO at 121 attempts, and RW at 114. They also have TO at 10 drops, while Roy only has 2.