View Full Version : If Mckenzie does come in.....
tkiehl
09-27-2004, 12:14 AM
It would make sense as we have a bye week and he would have two full weeks to get into game shape and and to learn our playbook
crazylegs
09-27-2004, 12:25 AM
It would make sense as we have a bye week and he would have two full weeks to get into game shape and and to learn our playbook
After his performance today, no one in their right mind would want him on their team.
That said, expect Jerry to be calling McKenzie 6am for a $6,000,000 signing bonus! :eek:
tkiehl
09-27-2004, 12:27 AM
I do not believe he played mr.crazy
Roughneck
09-27-2004, 12:29 AM
After his performance today, no one in their right mind would want him on their team.
That said, expect Jerry to be calling McKenzie 6am for a $6,000,000 signing bonus! :eek:Dude you are aware the McKenzie didn't even play today, aren't you?
:rolleyes:
Cajuncowboy
09-27-2004, 12:31 AM
Dude you are aware the McKenzie didn't even play today, aren't you?
:rolleyes:
I don't believe he was even with the team today from what I heard earlier.
Encore
09-27-2004, 12:34 AM
I'm sure you saw the long trends hanging out of a Packers Helemt today and assumed it was him?
That's Al Harris. Don't worry I do it all the time. It's easy to identify someone by that.
He wasn't with the team this weekend, which could only mean somthing is on the brinks of happening. He probably only played last week to show off his talent to those teams wanting to aquire him.
Hostile
09-27-2004, 12:53 AM
After his performance today, no one in their right mind would want him on their team.
That said, expect Jerry to be calling McKenzie 6am for a $6,000,000 signing bonus! :eek:
His performance today?
He was listed as Out and did not play.
TheHustler
09-27-2004, 12:59 AM
Wait, I don't know if anyone has mentioned this, but he didn't play today.
On another note, if mike does get traded, it will probably be to New Orleans who have already been offering a 2nd rounder but GB has wanted another player or draft pick in return.
Skeptic
09-27-2004, 12:59 AM
In the words of Stewart Scott....
Boo-YAH!
blindzebra
09-27-2004, 01:13 AM
After his performance today, no one in their right mind would want him on their team.
That said, expect Jerry to be calling McKenzie 6am for a $6,000,000 signing bonus! :eek:
Miss Cleo, you might WANT to add that to your sig line. :D
crazylegs
09-27-2004, 02:14 AM
Miss Cleo, you might WANT to add that to your sig line. :D
His performance today = 0. I never said he played, only that he had a poor performance. Last time I checked 0 = poor.
So effectively we have a player that hasn’t shown that he play under the new boring rule changes.
So is everyone so sure that McK is a shoe in as an imminent improvement? Can he turn around for the ball? The rest of his comrades today couldn’t.
Same team, same associations; you guys love to go in these bewildering statistical tangents 10 -5 can never equate to 7- 9 the next year......NO!
While our own CB’s; after 2 meaningful games still can’t turn around for the ball yet. I suspect that secretly they’re banking that attendance will drop due to mindless drooling and befuddlement.
BTW the initial underlying tone of this post was for enjoyment, humor; you know a whimsical facade of our CB situation?
Never mind.
And I’m sure crazy people call sane people…… crazy. :D
Chuck 54
09-27-2004, 05:00 AM
His performance today = 0. I never said he played, only that he had a poor performance. Last time I checked 0 = poor.
So effectively we have a player that hasn’t shown that he play under the new boring rule changes.
So is everyone so sure that McK is a shoe in as an imminent improvement? Can he turn around for the ball? The rest of his comrades today couldn’t.
Same team, same associations; you guys love to go in these bewildering statistical tangents 10 -5 can never equate to 7- 9 the next year......NO!
While our own CB’s; after 2 meaningful games still can’t turn around for the ball yet. I suspect that secretly they’re banking that attendance will drop due to mindless drooling and befuddlement.
BTW the initial underlying tone of this post was for enjoyment, humor; you know a whimsical facade of our CB situation?
Never mind.
And I’m sure crazy people call sane people…… crazy. :D
hmmm...okay, we were going to let you slide for making up how he played based on the game's score, but this weak excuse to cover up is lame...sorry.
"I never said he played...only that he had a poor performance?" what the heck does that mean? If he was inactive so he could be traded, it would be rather silly to use that "performance" as the reason for not wanting him on your team....we all make little mistakes in our threads from time to time, but it's better to admit it and stick to your opinion...this minor coverup is a tad silly.
MichaelWinicki
09-27-2004, 05:36 AM
hmmm...okay, we were going to let you slide for making up how he played based on the game's score, but this weak excuse to cover up is lame...sorry.
"I never said he played...only that he had a poor performance?" what the heck does that mean? If he was inactive so he could be traded, it would be rather silly to use that "performance" as the reason for not wanting him on your team....we all make little mistakes in our threads from time to time, but it's better to admit it and stick to your opinion...this minor coverup is a tad silly.
It means Crazy doesn't pay attention to football matters quite as much as one would think... ;)
jterrell
09-27-2004, 06:37 AM
His performance today = 0. I never said he played, only that he had a poor performance. Last time I checked 0 = poor.
So effectively we have a player that hasn’t shown that he play under the new boring rule changes.
So is everyone so sure that McK is a shoe in as an imminent improvement? Can he turn around for the ball? The rest of his comrades today couldn’t.
Same team, same associations; you guys love to go in these bewildering statistical tangents 10 -5 can never equate to 7- 9 the next year......NO!
While our own CB’s; after 2 meaningful games still can’t turn around for the ball yet. I suspect that secretly they’re banking that attendance will drop due to mindless drooling and befuddlement.
BTW the initial underlying tone of this post was for enjoyment, humor; you know a whimsical facade of our CB situation?
Never mind.
And I’m sure crazy people call sane people…… crazy. :D
Use your medication.
McKenzie's value went up to GB after watching Harris get torched repeatedly. They were willing to part with McKenzie in part because they thought Harris was a good CB. After yesterday, I doubt they still believe that.
McKenzie had the best performance of any GB DB yesterday by sitting home and laughing his behind off.
Its fairly certian you didn't know that and it would be alot less embarrassing to admit then to toss out that weak junk that threatens your credibility.
After all of that I doubt Dallas is in the running. I think it is NO all the way. Winning yesterday actually makes them even more serious bidders. They have a right to believe they are a potential playoff team with a strong CB addition.
Juke99
09-27-2004, 06:42 AM
His performance today?
He was listed as Out and did not play.
Excuses, excuses, excuses. :)
Cbz40
09-27-2004, 06:52 AM
They were also saying that McKenzie was not playing because he had a bad hamstring.
RalphZero
09-27-2004, 06:57 AM
Are you guys talking about Spuds McKenzie? That Budweiser Beer Dog?
Chuck 54
09-27-2004, 07:00 AM
Are you guys talking about Spuds McKenzie? That Budweiser Beer Dog?
lol....no, spuds would have been traded to the dog pound in cleveland...then maybe he'd have taken a bite out of Warner today.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.