Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2011   #1
dbair1967
Arch Defender
 
dbair1967's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
30,783
Default Casserly comment last night on draft

Was watching NFLN, they were asking him how big a drop off there was from first round to second round and he said huge.

I cant recall exactly how he worded it afterward, but he said something like "this is the worst draft I have seen in a decade or more"

The somewhat fortunate thing for us is the positions we need the most help (OL, DL) are pretty decent.

A new era begins
dbair1967 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-28-2011   #2
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
32,065
Default

Good, because I agree with him. Looks to me like there are just very few can't-miss guys, and a lot of average-looking players slated to go pretty high.
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #3
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

More than the problem at the top, the problem is in the mid rounds. I think its a horrendous draft for the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds. Guys like Will Rackley and Edmund Gates would be 5th round small school projects in a good draft, and they're going to go in the 2nd round this year.


That's why I'm not entirely enamored with trading back just for the sake of trading back, because all those mid round picks look like training camp fodder to me. Generally I'm for just taking the guy you want at #9, and be happy you came away with one of the few impact players in the draft.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #4
Duane
Senior Member
 
Duane's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
6,852
Send a message via ICQ to Duane Send a message via AIM to Duane Send a message via Yahoo to Duane
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
More than the problem at the top, the problem is in the mid rounds. I think its a horrendous draft for the 3rd, 4th and 5th rounds. Guys like Will Rackley and Edmund Gates would be 5th round small school projects in a good draft, and they're going to go in the 2nd round this year.


That's why I'm not entirely enamored with trading back just for the sake of trading back, because all those mid round picks look like training camp fodder to me. Generally I'm for just taking the guy you want at #9, and be happy you came away with a difference maker.
Exactly. Trading down and collecting a bunch of mediocre mid round talent doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Duane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #5
speedkilz88
Senior Member
 
speedkilz88's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,305
Default

I think Gosselin said that it was three rounds deep on OL/DL and RBs are deep throughout the draft. With all the juniors that came out I think it's a lot deeper than Casserly thinks.
****






"The restructures are built in. Everybody’s making a big to do about this. I don’t know why."- Stephen Jones
speedkilz88 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #6
Hoofbite
Senior Member
 
Hoofbite's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
29,093
Default

Seems like every year someone says something like this.
Hoofbite is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #7
dbair1967
Arch Defender
 
dbair1967's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
30,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoofbite View Post
Seems like every year someone says something like this.
Usually its the opposite. You have fans crowing left and right about "this is the most awesome draft ever and we didnt play our cards right in getting extra picks like New England!!!!"

And I agree with Casserly, I dont think this is a particularly talented draft, nor do I think its a deep draft.

A new era begins
dbair1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #8
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoofbite View Post
Seems like every year someone says something like this.
No kidding, and there is always panic in the streets.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #9
dbair1967
Arch Defender
 
dbair1967's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
30,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Lab View Post
Good, because I agree with him. Looks to me like there are just very few can't-miss guys, and a lot of average-looking players slated to go pretty high.
I kinda agree with him. Its also why I wont be surprised if we stay at 9 or slip down just a few spots, then move up from 40 back into the first round giving us two 1sts.

I think this is def a draft they should look for quality over quantity. They could easily get starters at OL and DL with those first two picks. Or maybe two OL starters.

A new era begins
dbair1967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #10
chip_gilkey
Senior Member
 
chip_gilkey's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2008
Posts:
2,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbair1967 View Post
Was watching NFLN, they were asking him how big a drop off there was from first round to second round and he said huge.

I cant recall exactly how he worded it afterward, but he said something like "this is the worst draft I have seen in a decade or more"

The somewhat fortunate thing for us is the positions we need the most help (OL, DL) are pretty decent.
It does seem as though there are going to be a few good OL and DL prospects around at our 40 pick.
chip_gilkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #11
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
Posts:
19,596
Default

I disagree about how large the drop off is.

There are simply some positions where we are used to see 3 or 4 standouts that are struggling to field 1 or 2 stand out guy, safety, ILB, WR, QB and RB for example.

That doesn't mean the drop-off is huge, it means the entire draft is sketchy.

That being said, this is one of the deepest DT and DE classes in some time, and while there may not be that elite QB, there are a number of guys that could have productive NFL careers that are slated to go in the 2nd round, like my boy Christian Ponder.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #12
visionary
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
4,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
I disagree about how large the drop off is.

There are simply some positions where we are used to see 3 or 4 standouts that are struggling to field 1 or 2 stand out guy, safety, ILB, WR, QB and RB for example.

That doesn't mean the drop-off is huge, it means the entire draft is sketchy.

That being said, this is one of the deepest DT and DE classes in some time, and while there may not be that elite QB, there are a number of guys that could have productive NFL careers that are slated to go in the 2nd round, like my boy Christian Ponder.
agreed
the draft is sketchy but is deep

no need to panic, there are plenty of good options on OG/DL in rounds 2 and 3
visionary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #13
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Actually Goose said it's a awful year for interior offensive linemen. After the 2nd round, there's barely anyone even worth drafting.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #14
visionary
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
4,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
Actually Goose said it's a awful year for interior offensive linemen. After the 2nd round, there's barely anyone even worth drafting.
but there are good options at the top of #2
and rackley will likely go late 2, early 3
visionary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011   #15
morasp
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,745
Default

Mayock also said it was a terrible draft class. Billick said there are only three blue chip players, usually you see 7 or 8. Blue chip being 100% clean on or off the field with no questions about his desire or ability.
morasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com