Sturm: X's and O's Breakdown: Who Busted Sunday? - Dallas Cowboys Forum

Kilyin · 09-27-2012

This week, on the Xs and Os breakdown in the film room, I have decided to get to the bottom of the demoralizing moments that happened over and over again on Sunday - the negative plays.

And, I had to narrow that down, since there were so many negative plays in the game. In fact, if you can believe this number, 31 of the 63 offensive plays resulted in 1 yard or LESS. That is shockingly and amazingly pitiful.

However, I didn't want to look at 31 plays, so I boiled it down to just focus on what was going on with the running game. Yes, there were 4 sacks, and that is a major concern, but I wanted to know why 1st and 10 was quickly becoming 2nd and 12 so often on simple, high-percentage run plays. So, these are the 7 - yes, 7 - negative runs that were from under center to DeMarco Murray that resulted in a loss of yardage. These 7 runs went for a total of negative 13 yards.

We will identify the play and then try to see from looking from the end zone angle who got beat on the play. It will appear quickly that there is plenty of blame to go around. This can happen once or twice a game, but to see it 7 times (with 6 before halftime) tells us that the chemistry and continuity is just not there right now in 2012.

http://sturminator.blogspot.com/2012...ed-sunday.html

fortdick · 09-27-2012

This can't be correct, because I keep reading here that Free is responsible for our bad line play. This makes it sound as if everyone, and not just Doug, is responsible. That can't be true, because I have read so here!

**Idgit** · 09-27-2012

This was an awesome read.

btcutter · 09-27-2012

Maybe our run plays needs to be simpler to make up for OL's lack of ability. More plays which they just line up and block the man in front. At least you hope for few positive yards instead of losing yardage all the time.

**Idgit** · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by btcutter

Maybe our run plays needs to be simpler to make up for OL's lack of ability. More plays which they just line up and block the man in front. At least you hope for few positive yards instead of losing yardage all the time.

There are a mix of failures here. Several of these were players just getting beat at the point of attack. There's not much you're going to do there but work on technique.

Other problems had to do with players not able to get where they're supposed to be, and some of that might have to do with recognition. It's also an area where the team happens to really like Phil Costa, so it's possible we might get some improvement there when he gets back into the starting roster.

InmanRoshi · 09-27-2012

That was a great breakdown by Bob. I pointed out some of these exact same plays and the exact same problems in my All 22 film review, so it's good to get some confirmation.

However, I have one quibble with him on the run #1. IMHO, Murray should have just ran right up the back of Vickers to pick up a dirty 2-3 positive yards rather than try to bounce outside. Really, I think Murray was a little off his game on Sunday with his typical stellar vision and missed some lanes he typically doesn't miss. Broaddus said the same thing this morning in his review of the film, and Mickey said that Murray owned up to it as well.

Wolfpack · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by InmanRoshi

That was a great breakdown by Bob. I pointed out some of these exact same plays and the exact same problems in my All 22 film review, so it's good to get some confirmation.

However, I have one quibble with him on the run #1. IMHO, Murray should have just ran right up the back of Vickers to pick up a dirty 2-3 positive yards rather than try to bounce outside. Really, I think Murray was a little off his game on Sunday with his typical stellar vision and missed some lanes he typically doesn't miss. Broaddus said the same thing this morning in his review of the film, and Mickey said that Murray owned up to it as well.

The guy was getting hit in the backfield so much that I think his vision was taken over by survival mode. Romo gets like that too.....

InmanRoshi · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack

The guy was getting hit in the backfield so much that I think his vision was taken over by survival mode. Romo gets like that too.....

Things really didn't start to go downhill until the 4th quarter. The plays in particular I'm thinking off happened early in the game. I think the play I'm speaking to in particular in Bob's breakdown happened in the 2nd drive.

reddyuta · 09-27-2012

that was a brutal read,multiple breakdowns on a single play on many occasions.Murray is not going survive this onslaught if this keeps up.

JoeyBoy718 · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by InmanRoshi

That was a great breakdown by Bob. I pointed out some of these exact same plays and the exact same problems in my All 22 film review, so it's good to get some confirmation.

However, I have one quibble with him on the run #1. IMHO, Murray should have just ran right up the back of Vickers to pick up a dirty 2-3 positive yards rather than try to bounce outside. Really, I think Murray was a little off his game on Sunday with his typical stellar vision and missed some lanes he typically doesn't miss. Broaddus said the same thing this morning in his review of the film, and Mickey said that Murray owned up to it as well.

I agree with you that he "could have" easily gotten the dirty 2-3 yards, but I think the reason he kept trying to make a play by bouncing outside was because of his frustrations with the line. Murray is a playmaker and he wants to break free for a big run or two every game. I think he just felt that with the play of the line that breakout run wouldn't be happening so his frustrations led him to trying to create something out of nothing. I think the same could possibly be said for Romo and some of his boneheaded throws this season. Romo and Murray are a lot similar to me, despite playing different positions, and I can see them letting their frustrations get the better of them. Unfortunately, this O-line isn't giving them anything to be happy about.

InmanRoshi · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyBoy718

I agree with you that he "could have" easily gotten the dirty 2-3 yards, but I think the reason he kept trying to make a play by bouncing outside was because of his frustrations with the line. Murray is a playmaker and he wants to break free for a big run or two every game. I think he just felt that with the play of the line that breakout run wouldn't be happening so his frustrations led him to trying to create something out of nothing. I think the same could possibly be said for Romo and some of his boneheaded throws this season. Romo and Murray are a lot similar to me, despite playing different positions, and I can see them letting their frustrations get the better of them. Unfortunately, this O-line isn't giving them anything to be happy about.

I can buy the frustration and shell shock explainations if it's latter in the game and the accumulative effects of 2-3 quarters of ineffectiveness have taken their toll, but not in the first few series of the game. The runs I'm refering to happend in the 2nd series. I think Murray is just given a lot of lattitude to freelance and attempt the big play. Until the OL starts to build better cohesion and unity I think his focus should be more oriented towards getting 2-3 yards on every carry to keep down and distances manageable, and breaking the 50 yard run is gravy.

Bluestang · 09-27-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by InmanRoshi

That was a great breakdown by Bob. I pointed out some of these exact same plays and the exact same problems in my All 22 film review, so it's good to get some confirmation.

However, I have one quibble with him on the run #1. IMHO, Murray should have just ran right up the back of Vickers to pick up a dirty 2-3 positive yards rather than try to bounce outside. Really, I think Murray was a little off his game on Sunday with his typical stellar vision and missed some lanes he typically doesn't miss. Broaddus said the same thing this morning in his review of the film, and Mickey said that Murray owned up to it as well.

Look at the first play of the Cowboys possesion in the 3rd qtr. Murray missed a big time hole on the left side.

BLEU3ASY · 09-28-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortdick

This can't be correct, because I keep reading here that Free is responsible for our bad line play. This makes it sound as if everyone, and not just Doug, is responsible. That can't be true, because I have read so here!

Why does this happen on every post. There's always someone here saying "this can't be" or "i read it here". Why does everyone feel the need to say I told you so? Like a bunch of kids..

fivetwos · 09-29-2012

I can't see how anyone is the least bit surprised at the current shape of this OLine.

You can't win a fashion show by shopping off the discount rack.

Jerry needs to get over a couple of things..

1. Hiring a "name" OL coach isn't going to overcome garbage talent.

2. Just because Tuinei and Newton were UDFAs who became pro-bowlers doesn't mean that can happen with anyone.

fortdick · 09-29-2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLEU3ASY

Why does this happen on every post. There's always someone here saying "this can't be" or "i read it here". Why does everyone feel the need to say I told you so? Like a bunch of kids..

You obviously haven't been around long enough. Either that, or you are one of those folks that likes to blame Doug Free for the OLine's problems.