Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-09-2012   #1
Star4Ever
Senior Member
 
Star4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2006
Location:
Posts:
5,501
Send a message via Yahoo to Star4Ever
Default In NFL history

Has any franchise had two better QBs, RBs, and WRs than the Cowboys? Roger and Troy, Tony D and Emmitt, and Irvin and Drew? Every other franchise seems to come up short at one position or the other.
Star4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2012   #2
Joshmil53
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2011
Posts:
2,511
Default

QBs could be Packers/49ers.
Joshmil53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #3
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
26,108
Default

SF had a better starting three and two than we every had. Jerry, TO, and ?Taylor. They also had two HOF QBs on the same team. BTW, it pains me to say this; a great deal.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #4
Cowboys&LakersFan
Banned
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
14,198
Default

Cowboys are second behind the 49ers.
Cowboys&LakersFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #5
Star4Ever
Senior Member
 
Star4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2006
Location:
Posts:
5,501
Send a message via Yahoo to Star4Ever
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan View Post
Cowboys are second behind the 49ers.
And what two great RBs do they have on par with Emmitt and Tony D? That's why I said ALL six positions.
Star4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #6
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,256
Default

I think the 2 RBs category gives it automatically to Dallas. Combine Tony and Emmitt's rushing yards in Dallas and it is better than any other team's top 3 or 4 combined. The only team that might come close is the Bears and they do not have the QBs and WRs to win this.
Hostile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #7
Star4Ever
Senior Member
 
Star4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2006
Location:
Posts:
5,501
Send a message via Yahoo to Star4Ever
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile View Post
I think the 2 RBs category gives it automatically to Dallas. Combine Tony and Emmitt's rushing yards in Dallas and it is better than any other team's top 3 or 4 combined. The only team that might come close is the Bears and they do not have the QBs and WRs to win this.
Absolutely agree. That's my point. I don't think any other franchise comes that close to "all six positions". They all fall short at one position or the other. We have been very blessed over the years (excluding the last 15 or so. LOL).
Star4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #8
KJJ
You Have an Axe to Grind
 
KJJ's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2009
Location:
Posts:
7,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
SF had a better starting three and two than we every had. Jerry, TO, and ?Taylor. They also had two HOF QBs on the same team. BTW, it pains me to say this; a great deal.
Two HOF QB's on the same team is pretty amazing.
KJJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #9
GoCowboysGo
Senior Member
 
GoCowboysGo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Posts:
887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
SF had a better starting three and two than we every had. Jerry, TO, and ?Taylor. They also had two HOF QBs on the same team. BTW, it pains me to say this; a great deal.
True, but if Murchison had been a mediocre owner, he would have built a better team around Danny White, we should be able to say we had two HOF'ers on one team with Staubach and White.

It will always torment me how great Danny White was and how little respect he gets.
GoCowboysGo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #10
KJJ
You Have an Axe to Grind
 
KJJ's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2009
Location:
Posts:
7,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCowboysGo View Post
True, but if Murchison had been a mediocre owner, he would have built a better team around Danny White, we should be able to say we had two HOF'ers on one team with Staubach and White.

It will always torment me how great Danny White was and how little respect he gets.
When White took over the Cowboys he pretty much had the same team Staubach won the SB with 3 years earlier. A lot of those players hadn't even reached 30 years old this is the reason those teams got to 3 straight NFC title games.
KJJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #11
KJJ
You Have an Axe to Grind
 
KJJ's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2009
Location:
Posts:
7,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCowboysGo View Post
True, but if Murchison had been a mediocre owner, he would have built a better team around Danny White, we should be able to say we had two HOF'ers on one team with Staubach and White.

It will always torment me how great Danny White was and how little respect he gets.

I always roll my eyes when fans say Danny White didn't have the team around him to win a championship when he took over basically the same team that Staubach won a SB with. Here's the roster that White started off with in 1980 checkout the ages of the key players. They only had 7 starters over 30.


http://www.pro-football-reference.co...980_roster.htm
KJJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #12
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
26,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCowboysGo View Post
True, but if Murchison had been a mediocre owner, he would have built a better team around Danny White, we should be able to say we had two HOF'ers on one team with Staubach and White.

It will always torment me how great Danny White was and how little respect he gets.
I absolutely agree with this. Roger may tell you White was the better athlete and a member of that team did let me know he was. They competed in basketball, ping pong and more and Roger would normally lose and get pissed.

I don't think Danny had the imposition of will that Roger had and few have. There was a different atmosphere in the huddle with Roger than Danny. But if Danny had what Roger did then I think he would have won a SB or three.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #13
KB1122
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Posts:
565
Default

I tend to point out that the Colts have had a great quarterbacking tradition, because no one ever thinks of the Colts as having one of the great quarterbacking traditions.

Unitas and Manning.

Faulk and Dickerson.

Harrison and Berry.
KB1122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012   #14
Diogenes
Senior Member
 
Diogenes's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2012
Posts:
1,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KB1122 View Post
I tend to point out that the Colts have had a great quarterbacking tradition, because no one ever thinks of the Colts as having one of the great quarterbacking traditions.

Unitas and Manning.

Faulk and Dickerson.

Harrison and Berry.

Edgerrin James was pretty good. Unitas and Manning are the best 1-2 QB combination ever but it's hard to think of the Indianapolis Colts and the Baltimore Colts as the same team.
Diogenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012   #15
THUMPER
Papa
 
THUMPER's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Posts:
9,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KB1122 View Post
I tend to point out that the Colts have had a great quarterbacking tradition, because no one ever thinks of the Colts as having one of the great quarterbacking traditions.

Unitas and Manning.

Faulk and Dickerson.

Harrison and Berry.
That was the only team I thought of as being comparable to us.

I would rank Unitas & Manning above Staubach and Aikman.

Emmitt & Dorsett rank well above Dickerson & Faulk who both only played a few years with the Colts and played their best years with the Rams.

Raymond Berry and Marvin Harrison vs Michael Irvin and Bob Hayes (you could add in Reggie Wayne for them and Drew Pearson for us). I think I would have to give the edge to the Colts at WR mostly on production. They caught a LOT of passes in their careers!

Overall, I would give the edge to the Cowboys since we were far better at RB than the Colts and slightly lower at QB 7 WR.

People don't think about the Rams but they have had some great QBs, RBs & WRs in their history:

QBs: Bob Waterfield, Norm van Brocklin, Roman Gabriel, & Kurt Warner

RB: Dan Towler, Lawrence McCutcheon, Eric Dickerson, Marshall Faulk, & Steven Jackson

WRs: Jim Benton, Tom Fears, Elroy Hirsch, Red Phillips, Jack Snow, Henry Ellard, Issac Bruce, & Torry Holt

I still think we were better at every position though.
Captain Nathan Brittles: "Only the man who commands can be blamed. It rests on me... mission failure!"

"Jerry Jones is a billionaire fan who bought his own team for the express purpose of buying his way into the game. He wants to hang out with the players, stand in front of the cameras, be the face of the team (yech), make personnel moves as if this were a video game, and more than anything else, be seen as the guy who made it all happen."

THUMPER 10/14/2009
THUMPER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com