Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2012   #1
TwoDeep3
Senior Member
 
TwoDeep3's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,860
Default For Several Years

I was slow on the uptake with Romo. Having been a walk-on, I wanted to see something other than just flash. I wanted substance.

As I stated in a post a few weeks ago, I believe in Romo. These interceptions do not deter my belief.

And here's why.

The steady argument for Romo back in the day was he made the plays and the stats.

Stats have always been a huge argument for him. He had the stats to be an elite QB.

So now the management has surrounded him with Austin, who is a very solid WR. Dez, who is solid at times but woefully inadequate when having to think on the fly. And Ogletree, who is perhaps smarter than Dez but loses focus.

The offensive line cannot adequately protect him and the running game has been non-existent.

So let me see if I have this right.

Romo is carrying the team by himself with two WR's that cannot guarantee they will be in the right spot or that they will catch the ball consistently.

Now factor in Romo is running for his life on nearly all plays and there is no running game to keep the defense honest.

And he still damn near beat the defending Super Bowl champs.

Yep, this is surely Romo's fault.

Climb off the ledge. This is the problem of the people that run this team fielding scrubs and knuckleheads for players and thinking the best player on the team can do it by himself.

Can we please go back to the days when everyone thought I was a Romo hater and defended him like he was their kid brother?
You've been weighed

You've been measured

And you've been found to be a casual fan
TwoDeep3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2012   #2
GloryDaysRBack
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,097
Default

I agree w a lot of this.

Romo needs more help. A disciplinarian at HC, somebody who can reel him in just a tad. And a guy who can build a running game for him.
GloryDaysRBack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #3
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoDeep3 View Post
I was slow on the uptake with Romo. Having been a walk-on, I wanted to see something other than just flash. I wanted substance.

As I stated in a post a few weeks ago, I believe in Romo. These interceptions do not deter my belief.

And here's why.

The steady argument for Romo back in the day was he made the plays and the stats.

Stats have always been a huge argument for him. He had the stats to be an elite QB.

So now the management has surrounded him with Austin, who is a very solid WR. Dez, who is solid at times but woefully inadequate when having to think on the fly. And Ogletree, who is perhaps smarter than Dez but loses focus.

The offensive line cannot adequately protect him and the running game has been non-existent.

So let me see if I have this right.

[View Full Quote]
He has a pretty darn good TE as well and a defense that could be lights out if they could just start playing defense on the other teams 20 instead of our own all the time.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #4
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,253
Default

LOL

Great Post. Sounds familiar.
Hostile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #5
Bwareinrings94
Senior Member
 
Bwareinrings94's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2010
Posts:
251
Default

The Cowboys do not have fertile ground for a disciplined, efficient and effective team to develop. They have a few talented enough individuals from keeping this from flopping completely but too many holes for it to work. Jones simply, philosophically will always try to add talent vs. building a team. He would have to get lucky to find success and his track record of finding offensive lineman is poor to be nice.

I root for them and love the team but watching them after you watch a normal, capable franchise is like getting a root canal.
Bwareinrings94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #6
cajuncocoa
Bleeding silver and blue
 
cajuncocoa's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
Posts:
1,789
Default

Great post, OP...I agree.
It's a new season, let's go!
cajuncocoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #7
Joshmil53
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2011
Posts:
2,511
Default

100% agreed.
Joshmil53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2012   #8
Yakuza Rich
Senior Member
 
Yakuza Rich's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Posts:
10,665
Default

He's not nearly running for his life on all plays or even close to it.

I still believe we should keep Romo around, but I think we need to be smart and start looking to transition into the phase of finding a replacement so when he is no longer a viable option at starting QB, we will have another QB in place.

I am alarmed by some of his inaccuracy lately. At first I chalked it up to playing on the road and perhaps some wind. But he was wild against the Giants, even on times he had all day to throw and had guys wide open.

I think it's flat out foolish to beleve that he's automatically got 4 more good years in him.





YR
The integrity of the Dallas Sports Media can be summed up in this quote 'I've gotta be the bad guy on CBS11 and my radio job on ESPN. I don't have to be the bad guy here.' - Steve Dennis

Legend of Kirby Dar Dar Blog
Yakuza Rich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2012   #9
DanteEXT
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
1,364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakuza Rich View Post
He's not nearly running for his life on all plays or even close to it.

I still believe we should keep Romo around, but I think we need to be smart and start looking to transition into the phase of finding a replacement so when he is no longer a viable option at starting QB, we will have another QB in place.

I am alarmed by some of his inaccuracy lately. At first I chalked it up to playing on the road and perhaps some wind. But he was wild against the Giants, even on times he had all day to throw and had guys wide open.

I think it's flat out foolish to beleve that he's automatically got 4 more good years in him.





YR
I thought he was on target with Witten for the most part, and Austin to a lessor extent (missed on a couple I know). Reminds me of RW times, on target with everyone else, RW passes were everywhere (RW still sucked here, though he was pretty solid redzone WR).
DanteEXT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2012   #10
Yakuza Rich
Senior Member
 
Yakuza Rich's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Posts:
10,665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanteEXT View Post
I thought he was on target with Witten for the most part, and Austin to a lessor extent (missed on a couple I know). Reminds me of RW times, on target with everyone else, RW passes were everywhere (RW still sucked here, though he was pretty solid redzone WR).
He threw a bad pass to a wide open Dez. Dez still caught it for 55 yards, but it should have been an easy TD since he was so wide open. On the very next play, he misses Witten by a mile and Witten was open and that would have been another first down. Instead of making a TD on that drive, we come away with a FG.

He misses Hanna who was wide open, by a mile underneath. He missed Austin by a mile a few times and as Aikman said 'those weren't even close.'

I think his confidence is shaken a little. If he throws a TD like the one to Charles Tillman, he gets blamed for it. If JPP gets lucky and makes a great play, Romo gets the blame. But he has not been very accurate this year. He needs help, but I think we are making a bad move if we think that:

a) he'll stay perfectly healthy in the next 3 years
b) his skills won't decline in the next 3 years.

I think we have a possibly good situation here.

We could draft a QB in the 2nd round next year. Change up the offense scheme and get a different O-Coordinator. Romo should be able to pick up the new offense rather quickly, he's smart and a veteran. The rookie QB will be in an offense that should be suited for him and he can learn under one O-Coordinator.

Give the rookie 2-3 years to learn and then he can be ready for when we are done with Romo.

My issue here is I just get the feeling that we'll never look ahead and we will blow the opportunity to make a fairly seamless transition to a new offense and a new QB.







YR
The integrity of the Dallas Sports Media can be summed up in this quote 'I've gotta be the bad guy on CBS11 and my radio job on ESPN. I don't have to be the bad guy here.' - Steve Dennis

Legend of Kirby Dar Dar Blog
Yakuza Rich is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2012   #11
DallasCowpoke
Fierce Allegiance
 
DallasCowpoke's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2006
Posts:
5,000
Default

A good bit of what the OP has merit, but I'm sorry, some of y'all need to take your blinders off. Romo BADLY missed receivers on at least 3 occasions I recall sunday. And those weren't due to him "running for his life on nearly every play".

Romo's a very good QB and I'm happy he's there. But this complete absolution he's getting because of all the other factors mentioned, are just patently incorrect.



DallasCowpoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2012   #12
SWG9
Senior Member
 
SWG9's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2011
Posts:
727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DallasCowpoke View Post
A good bit of what the OP has merit, but I'm sorry, some of y'all need to take your blinders off. Romo BADLY missed receivers on at least 3 occasions I recall sunday. And those weren't due to him "running for his life on nearly every play".

Romo's a very good QB and I'm happy he's there. But this complete absolution he's getting because of all the other factors mentioned, are just patently incorrect.
There have been games where Romo's receivers and OL failed him miserably, but Sunday wasn't one of them. The line was more than adequate and Witten, Austin, and Bryant were all balling.

Romo flat out sucked Sunday, and he missed a lot more than 3 throws. A LOT.
SWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2012   #13
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
12,239
Default

I agree that some times Romo's teammates have let him down. I did not think he was one of the ten best players that we had on the field for us on Sunday. The Dez INT was probably a WR mistake but also a poor QB read. The Austin TD was a poor decision/throw, the JPP INT should have been lofted a bit more and I think he messed up the red zone sequence at the end of the game.

I do think he is playing at about an average level right now in the league and that isn't good enough for a guy making $11M per year.

I think his limitations in size, arm strength and ability to make reads has finally caught up to him and I don't think he'll be elite again unless his surrounding cast is elite. So we could still win with him with a great defense and a great running game but we usually haven't even had one of those most years here and this is a QB league right now.

I think we should try and trade him in the offseason and start over. He is never going to take us to the promised land but is still a valuable trading chip.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012   #14
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,190
Default

Agreed. All the garbage and chaos around him has finally caught up to him and he can not overcome it. This includes our playcaller and head coach.
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com