Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2013   #1
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default Do Cowboys switch to the 4-3 now?

Could this be a possibility? If so, we can throw all of our mocks in the trash right meow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It wouldn't have to be a first-round pick, and we will have free-agent money.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2013   #2
fishspill
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Posts:
874
Default

If we go 4-3 my Margus Hunt pet cat dies an extremely early death. We'll see what happens, I suppose.
fishspill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #3
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default

What is prototypical 4-3 DE build? That probably really seems like a stupid question, but Cowboys have been in 3-4 ever since my draft mind can remember.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It wouldn't have to be a first-round pick, and we will have free-agent money.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #4
Leadbelly
Senior Member
 
Leadbelly's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
218
Default

Would solve the Anthony Spencer issue.

WLB: Ernie Sims?; Rookie mid-rounder like Sean Porter / Gerald Hodges / Zaviar Gooden
MLB: Sean Lee; Dan Connor
SLB: Bruce Carter; Alex Albright
Leadbelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #5
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,725
Default

So Lissemore and Hatcher are our DTs right? Ware and possible Spencer are the DEs. Lee is MLB, Carter is OLB, other OLB is ?

I think that means we try to fill in the OLB with someone who is more of a run thumper.

Any thoughts?
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #6
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default

Reading up a little on it (from other posters and on the internet), we could actually be really close to having all the personnel:

RDE: Ware (he played DE in college)
DT: Hatcher and Lissemore (this shouldn't be a problem for them)
LDE: Spencer or draft pick (Spencer played DE at Purdue; both Cliff Avril and Osi Umenyora have the same build as Spencer, ~ 6'3" and 260lbs)
SLB: Lee
WLB: Carter
MLB: 1st round draft pick (Manti Te'o, Alec Ogletree, Kevin Minter are all 1st-round worthy)

The secondary would not change (except hopefully an upgrade at S, i.e. Jairus Byrd)
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #7
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Posts:
12,838
Default

We've had 43 personnel for a long time. Lots of our DTs and DEs are better suited for that technique. Plus, it should be easier to for Lee and Carter to make plays because they won't have to get off of guards as often.

I like the move. Rat, if he stays around, could be a beast.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #8
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamziD View Post
Reading up a little on it (from other posters and on the internet), we could actually be really close to having all the personnel:

RDE: Ware (he played DE in college)
DT: Hatcher and Lissemore (this shouldn't be a problem for them)
LDE: Spencer or draft pick (Spencer played DE at Purdue; both Cliff Avril and Osi Umenyora have the same build as Spencer, ~ 6'3" and 260lbs)
SLB: Lee
WLB: Carter
MLB: 1st round draft pick (Manti Te'o, Alec Ogletree, Kevin Minter are all 1st-round worthy)

The secondary would not change (except hopefully an upgrade at S, i.e. Jairus Byrd)
Curious why Lee would not be the MLB, he is a general on the defense, it is natural fit. Carter was a OLB before, should be good for coverages on the TE etc. THe other guy would be a bruiser I think, a guy who can still get around, I like the guys who have enough mobility. I love the idea of Te'O but could he be an OLB?
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #9
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert70x7 View Post
What is prototypical 4-3 DE build? That probably really seems like a stupid question, but Cowboys have been in 3-4 ever since my draft mind can remember.
Jason Pierre Paul
Pre-draft measurements:
6-5, 270, 4.7 forty

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #10
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
Jason Pierre Paul
Pre-draft measurements:
6-5, 270, 4.7 forty
It can range, Robert Mathis is what? 230-240lbs? And Julius Peppers is 285-290lbs.
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #11
JoeyBoy718
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Oct 2011
Posts:
885
Default

It doesn't really change our needs. It only adds to it. People will still say we need a big NT or an interior D-lineman who can rush the passer. And then we would need to get yet another LB.
JoeyBoy718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #12
gmoney112
Senior Member
 
gmoney112's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2008
Location:
Posts:
2,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert70x7 View Post
What is prototypical 4-3 DE build? That probably really seems like a stupid question, but Cowboys have been in 3-4 ever since my draft mind can remember.
6'4-6'6. 260-280. Long arms, quick 10 yard dash. Basically an OLB with about 20 more pounds on him.

I think a 4-3 would be fine and probably better suited for us at this point since Spencer will probably be walking and there is no suitable replacement for him. Much easier to find personnel for a 4-3 than to find an OLB that can actually make plays.

We need 1-2 more additions on the defensive line to field an above average unit.

NT: Ratliff, Hatcher, Lissemore, Crawford. This is a pretty solid group actually. It'll be interesting to see what we do here as I can't see Ratliff being cut. Traditionally in a 4-3 you have a typical "run stopping" DT but then most teams only carry 4 tackles and we don't have that clog.

DE: Ware, Albright? Wilber?...definately need a 1st rounder or a FA opposite Ware if we want to scare teams. We have to dedicate significant resources to this position as it's to a 4-3 as an OLB is to a 3-4. Johnson from the Bengals if he isn't franchised would be a legitimate nightmare. Maybe Cliff Avril, Dwight Freeney, etc.

At LB it'd obviously be Carter, Sims, and Lee. Maybe McSurdy in the mix? I'd expect a mid round pick at LB for adequate depth.

Not really that much of a transition. I'd argue finding an OLB capable of producing next season would be harder than finding a DE that can play. We only really need a couple of pieces in our 4-3 that can be addressed fairly effectively through the draft and FA in one offseason.
gmoney112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #13
dwmyers
Senior Member
 
dwmyers's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Posts:
1,952
Opinion

Why stick with a sissy defense like the 4-3? I say we go 7 diamond and dare folks to pass on us!!1!

D-
dwmyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #14
hra8700
Senior Member
 
hra8700's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2010
Posts:
666
Default

If we go 4-3 having bobby Wagner and Brockers and resigning mike Jenkins looks a hell of a lot better than just Morris Claiborne (as great a player as I think he'll be)
hra8700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013   #15
TheFinisher
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
1,743
Default

It really depends on what kind of 4-3 we'd be running.

Lee and Carter can play whatever scheme you want them to.

Outside of that we'd have a ton of work to do in the front 7. Hatcher/Spencer would be out of place, and Spears/Coleman are aging vets who are past their prime. Same could be said for Ratliff, but he might have something left as a rotational 3Tech.

Crawford could be a decent strong side end and Wilber is a more natural fit in space as a Sam than he was as a stand up guy in the 3-4' so those would be positives.

I'm sure Ware would still be effective as a rush end, but it wouldn't be a bad idea to start stockpiling some young prototypical guys through the draft.

I would say we'd definitely need at least 1 true DE and UT to get this kick started , as those are the toughest positions and most important ones to fill for a successful 4-3 front.

Then there's the issue of the secondary, are we looking more at a Tampa 2 or a press man scheme? If its Lovie Smith and the Tampa 2 then we better get some new safeties, because the range we have currently back there will not cut it.

Just too many questions right now, we'll have to wait and see who they bring in as DC.

Last edited by TheFinisher : 01-08-2013 at 10:17 PM.
TheFinisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com