Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2013   #1
erod
Senior Member
 
erod's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
2,431
Default Ignore defense entirely this offseason?

Should Dallas just ignore the defense altogether this offseason and draft?

Saturday, 149 points were scored in two games. Not a lick of defense to speak of. Pretty much the same thing yesterday outside of Patriots defense that stood up in stretches. The LOSING teams scored 35, 31, 28, and 28 points.

So why even bother spending big money and top picks on defense?

The read option is going to be especially unfair to defenses. Colin Kaepernick ran for 179 yards WITHOUT BEING TOUCHED ONCE. How is that possible in the NFL, to run 179 yards without someone so much as laying a finger on you? Literally, it did.

A quarterback can run around all over, then just when the hit is coming....sssslllliiiiiiiddddeeee to safety. Nary a hang nail. Add that to the four-inch tackle box defenders are allowed to hit a QB in the pocket, plus the bevy of creative ways to call interference/holding/contact on a defensive back, and I don't know exactly what a defensive coordinator is supposed to do.

So I implore Valley Ranch to draft and acquire offense, offense, offense. It's only logical.

Because that's football today in the Madden videogame world.
erod is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 01-14-2013   #2
tecolote
Senior Member
 
tecolote's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,415
Default

I'm with you, 3 of the 4 remaining teams are in the bottom half of defensive rankings this year.

Just go out and try to build the best o line possible.
tecolote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #3
Coy
Senior Member
 
Coy's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
1,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tecolote View Post
I'm with you, 3 of the 4 remaining teams are in the bottom half of defensive rankings this year.

Just go out and try to build the best o line possible.
Not to mention that this weekend all 8 teams scored at least 28 points, offense is the way to go and it starts with the o-line, and play calliing of course.
Coy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #4
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

I would never approach a draft ignoring anything. It's not a need filling exercise. You're there to acquire talent.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #5
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I would never approach a draft ignoring anything. It's not a need filling exercise. You're there to acquire talent.
I think we will have to repeat this over and over again all offseason in every thread.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #6
jobberone
Save the Snow Leopard
 
jobberone's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
26,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risen Star View Post
I would never approach a draft ignoring anything. It's not a need filling exercise. You're there to acquire talent.

I believe you draft the BPA at a position of need using a tier system. However, I agree with you about drafting talent first. If you use a tier system then you'd better be reasonably accurate about it o/w you'll find yourself reaching. Talent first, need second.
Did you know there are only 5000 Snow Leopards in the wild now and they are confined to Central Asia? However, the effective global population (those likely to reproduce) is less than half that number.
jobberone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #7
Deep_Freeze
Senior Member
 
Deep_Freeze's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
6,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
I believe you draft the BPA at a position of need using a tier system. However, I agree with you about drafting talent first. If you use a tier system then you'd better be reasonably accurate about it o/w you'll find yourself reaching. Talent first, need second.
Need has to a part of it, a smaller part though. At the end of the day, you want more talent on your team, and no reaching just cause you want a certain position. You don't reach for the next tier of player at a position just cause you need that position, you go after the talent that is there.

I just wish more people would realize that instead of just saying what we need to do in the draft, cause it doesn't work like that at all, especially the later you go into the draft.
"Since I was a kid, all I ever wanted to be was a Cowboy" - Morgan Freeman from An Unfinished Life
Deep_Freeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013   #8
Doomsday101
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
70,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jobberone View Post
I believe you draft the BPA at a position of need using a tier system. However, I agree with you about drafting talent first. If you use a tier system then you'd better be reasonably accurate about it o/w you'll find yourself reaching. Talent first, need second.
I agree. I think you have to look at both BPA and position of need.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
Doomsday101 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #9
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,190
Default

We can't ignore the defense all together.


I doubt very seriously Dallas drafts Warmack. If they go OL it will be someone else and it will be in a trade down.

I imagine our 1st pick will be on the DL or Safety.


Quote:
Originally Posted by tecolote View Post
I'm with you, 3 of the 4 remaining teams are in the bottom half of defensive rankings this year.

Just go out and try to build the best o line possible.
I'd love to see us pump about 75% of our resources into fixing this OL.

Im sure Leary, Costa, and Parnell are the changes that will be made though.
CATCH17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #10
DBOY3141
Senior Member
 
DBOY3141's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
2,529
Default

Besides a safety and DL, I would use this draft for offense only. OL/RB.

Once we get the "real" cap numbers we will have a better understanding of what we are playing with.

With a better OL and less injuries, this team could have won 10 games. We are not years away....hopefully JJ doesn't screw it up.
DBOY3141 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #11
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CATCH17 View Post
I'd love to see us pump about 75% of our resources into fixing this OL.

Im sure Leary, Costa, and Parnell are the changes that will be made though.
I wouldn't rule out Leary or Parnell being answers. But we can't rely on it.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #12
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,357
Default

Wont happen but could you imagine lining up Ertz from Stanford and Witten in two TE packages as a base ala NE?
RS12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #13
ninja
Numbnuts
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
4,602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS12 View Post
Wont happen but could you imagine lining up Ertz from Stanford and Witten in two TE packages as a base ala NE?
Under Garrett, I could easily imagine what would happen with Ertz and Witten. Absolutely nothing.

We had Hanna who seemed to flash some talent early in camp. Boy-Genius Garrett got him on the field the last 4 games or so. Ridiculous.

Last edited by ninja : 01-14-2013 at 04:06 PM. Reason: grammar
ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #14
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Posts:
12,833
Default

Um, Baltimore, NE, SF, and ATL for 3 quarters all played excellent defense.

The scores might not necessarily say that, but there were a lot of meaningless points scored this weekend. I would say that in every game this weekend, the team that played the better defense won.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013   #15
CowboyStar88
Senior Member
 
CowboyStar88's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Posts:
2,113
Default

This is why I think having speedy/Atheltic Linebackers will payoff huge. It will allow them to match up because of their speed. That's why I want to bring Sims back and team him up with Lee and Carter becuase those guys can fly to the ball and cover a lot of ground and I think this is what is going to help keep the Read Option in check is fast atheltic Linebackers who can fly to the ball. Also I think the FS becomes increasingly important as well. So if I am Dallas I draft the best possible safety in the 1st rd. Get the backside of the defense athletic and fast.
RIP #53 Jerry Brown


If you talk the talk you better walk the walk! Go Cowboys!!! Love the 2013 draft!!
CowboyStar88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com