
|
03-17-2007
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 1,895 |
|
Best Draft Preview Publication???
If I'm going to get just one, which is the one to get? Opinions?
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#2
|
|
Insulin Beware
Joined: | Dec 2004 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 9,167 |
|
www.cowboyszone.com :biggrin:
Honest answer, idk. I am not too much of a draftnick - I always just grab one at an airport at some point in March when I will be flying.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#3
|
|
Formerly joshjwc9
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 1,500 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
www.cowboyszone.com :biggrin:
Honest answer, idk. I am not too much of a draftnick - I always just grab one at an airport at some point in March when I will be flying.
|
Actually I have Lindy's but have read TSN's and PFW's as well, go with TSN, their pages are much more informative and Lindy's although decent looks akward with some of the postion ratings and slotting some people......they have a few who I think are horrible rated in the 2nd round like Tony Hunt and they have Steve Smith in the 4th as well.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 15,407 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshjwc9
Actually I have Lindy's but have read TSN's and PFW's as well, go with TSN, their pages are much more informative and Lindy's although decent looks akward with some of the postion ratings and slotting some people......they have a few who I think are horrible rated in the 2nd round like Tony Hunt and they have Steve Smith in the 4th as well.
|
I have Lindy's and Sporting News and their opinions on some prospects differ greatly - it will be interesting to see who turns out to be right.
"I don't understand it Stephen, it's opening day 2014, where is everybody?"
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#5
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
in all reality
none, as they are published before the Combine and Pro Day workouts, so someone like Jason Hill, they talk about his lack of speed, even though he ran a 4.36, so he obviously isn't slow, and since they publish them before the Combine and Pro Days, if an unknown has great workouts then and becomes a sleeper, they usually aren't mentioned in the rags, so on Draft Day, when you're flipping throug the mag, and someone like Paul McQuistan, or Jason Hatcher, goes in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, you say "who? they weren't in the mag"
but w/ saying that, I like TSN's Draft Guide, nice formatting, making everything clear and conchise, plus it's the one I've always gone w/ since I can remember
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 11,875 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano
in all reality
none, as they are published before the Combine and Pro Day workouts, so someone like Jason Hill, they talk about his lack of speed, even though he ran a 4.36, so he obviously isn't slow, and since they publish them before the Combine and Pro Days, if an unknown has great workouts then and becomes a sleeper, they usually aren't mentioned in the rags, so on Draft Day, when you're flipping throug the mag, and someone like Paul McQuistan, or Jason Hatcher, goes in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, you say "who? they weren't in the mag"
but w/ saying that, I like TSN's Draft Guide, nice formatting, making everything clear and conchise, plus it's the one I've always gone w/ since I can remember
|
That's why the online sites are much better. As stasheroo said, the PFW was the standard among draftniks untill JB's death, then they went down hill. I've been getting Ourlads since 1987 when we took Noonan and it's a pretty good book. Something to look at on the throne  I bought the sporting news and ESPNs book last year off the newsstand and they were typical low standard stuff.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 15,407 |
|
Sporting News' newsstand version is a nice read for the money ($8). If I had to pick one, that's probably it.
I use to really like Pro Football Weekly's guide until Joel Buschbaum died.
It hasn't been the same since.
"I don't understand it Stephen, it's opening day 2014, where is everybody?"
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#8
|
|
What's it going to be then, eh?
Joined: | Feb 2005 |
Posts: | 18,539 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stasheroo
Sporting News' newsstand version is a nice read for the money ($8). If I had to pick one, that's probably it.
|
A nice read?
Sorry, any publication that ranks Kevin Kolb over Brady Quinn is not worth to rip the pages out to use as a bum wipe.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#9
|
|
Formerly joshjwc9
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 1,500 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander
A nice read?
Sorry, any publication that ranks Kevin Kolb over Brady Quinn is not worth to rip the pages out to use as a bum wipe.
|
I think you are thinking of PFW......
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#10
|
|
What's it going to be then, eh?
Joined: | Feb 2005 |
Posts: | 18,539 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshjwc9
I think you are thinking of PFW......
|
No, the Sporting News has Brady Quinn rated as a third round talent behind Kevin Kolb. Pro Football Weekly has him rated number one.
I really have no problem thinking he's going to be a flop. That's valid speculation and takes fortitude to publish. That might be the point as it could sell the magazine better.
I just cannot see how Kolb can be anything close to being superior. A lot of people don't follow college football closely and rely on these magazines. I just don't care for misleading opinion. But I know it is not about that, it is about selling the magazine.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Posts: | 15,407 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexander
A nice read?
Sorry, any publication that ranks Kevin Kolb over Brady Quinn is not worth to rip the pages out to use as a bum wipe.
|
That's what's nice about holding onto them for a few years. To see who's right and who's wrong.
Ryan Leaf was once highly-ranked too.
As was Joey Harrington.
Neither worked out too well.
There's plenty of speculation and a good bit of luck involved in the draft.
"I don't understand it Stephen, it's opening day 2014, where is everybody?"
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#12
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 57,074 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stasheroo
That's what's nice about holding onto them for a few years. To see who's right and who's wrong.
Ryan Leaf was once highly-ranked too.
As was Joey Harrington.
Neither worked out too well.
There's plenty of speculation and a good bit of luck involved in the draft.
|
the thing I like to do is pick up an old edition of TSN and see how they did on the positional ratings: QBs have a B+ grade, etc
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#13
|
|
Surrealist
Joined: | Nov 2005 |
Posts: | 43,253 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stasheroo
That's what's nice about holding onto them for a few years. To see who's right and who's wrong.
Ryan Leaf was once highly-ranked too.
As was Joey Harrington.
Neither worked out too well.
There's plenty of speculation and a good bit of luck involved in the draft.
|
For example...
http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2001/0305/1130313.html
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 803 |
|
Do any of these guides have our updated F/A signings?
In past years I've bought multiple guides early and have had arguments w/ friends on draft day, because the draft guide has us picking up a certain position in the draft, but since we already addressed this position in free agency...
I try to explain, but they think the draft guide writers know all.
This year I wanted to wait for a newer more accurate release.
|
|
|
03-17-2007
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2005 |
Posts: | 1,852 |
|
i like thehuddlereport and it's $10.00 and there mocks are very accurate as the draft gets closer.nfldraftcoundown is a good one as the draft gets closer but they don't have the later rnd guys ranked well
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.
|