Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2004   #91
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk
hybrids
I knew that word had to be in thread somewhere.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline  
Old 09-26-2004   #92
davidyee
Maple Leaf
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,631
Default Nors...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
243 pounds 5-11
228 pounds 6-2

Hos is going with the skinny guy. We all agree Coak is small but still packs 235. Al S is small by any NFL standard. Roy Williams our FS is bigger.
I'm not going to get caught up with your semantics game of what constitutes bigger, but I would appreciate that if you do debate with someone at least acknowledge the terms on which that person is engaging.

If you carefully read Hostile's response he was talking about starting LBs of which you INCORRECTLY responded with the names of James, Shanle and Thornton. All three who are NOT, and I repeat NOT starting LBs on this team!!!!!

So please debate inside the limits of the comments which in this case is Singleton, Coakley and Nguyen who are all starters.
davidyee is offline  
Old 09-27-2004   #93
Banned_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
On Tony Romo's B
Posts:
5,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidyee
I'm not going to get caught up with your semantics game of what constitutes bigger, but I would appreciate that if you do debate with someone at least acknowledge the terms on which that person is engaging.

If you carefully read Hostile's response he was talking about starting LBs of which you INCORRECTLY responded with the names of James, Shanle and Thornton. All three who are NOT, and I repeat NOT starting LBs on this team!!!!!

So please debate inside the limits of the comments which in this case is Singleton, Coakley and Nguyen who are all starters.

I think Nors point was that if Parcells was so hung up on height, it's easy to see that he has 3 guys that are taller than Dat and Dex. Thus, if "height" meant that much to Parcells, they would be starting.

Watch the game tonite and look for key plays by the LB's.

K?
Banned_n_austin is offline  
Old 09-27-2004   #94
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,242
Default

Our LBs are average at best.

The whole defense has to scheme around having them exposed.

They rarely make big plays.

They get overpowered at the point of contact.

For all their ability in pursuit, they do a woeful job on runs to the outside because they are easily blocked by FBs and TEs.

Coakley has been bad in coverage this year which is supposed to be his strength.

I think our D will be much better off when Singleton and Coakley are upgraded. Hopefully James' play will pickup throughout the year as he gains more experience. Unfortunately, after James there does not appear to be an everydown LBer ready to emerge although Thornton may be able to bring some heat from OLB in a 3-4 alignment.
Eskimo is offline  
Old 09-27-2004   #95
Banned_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
On Tony Romo's B
Posts:
5,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo
Our LBs are average at best.

The whole defense has to scheme around having them exposed.

They rarely make big plays.

They get overpowered at the point of contact.

For all their ability in pursuit, they do a woeful job on runs to the outside because they are easily blocked by FBs and TEs.

Coakley has been bad in coverage this year which is supposed to be his strength.

I think our D will be much better off when Singleton and Coakley are upgraded. Hopefully James' play will pickup throughout the year as he gains more experience. Unfortunately, after James there does not appear to be an everydown LBer ready to emerge although Thornton may be able to bring some heat from OLB in a 3-4 alignment.
OK...

Watch the game tonite, k?

Big plays will happen from Dex and Dat.

Promise.
Banned_n_austin is offline  
Old 09-27-2004   #96
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,242
Default

I hope you're right BNA.

I don't dislike the current group of LBs, I just don't sing their praises. They were good against Cleveland but pathetic against the Vikes.
Eskimo is offline  
Old 09-27-2004   #97
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default think

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo
Our LBs are average at best.

The whole defense has to scheme around having them exposed.

They rarely make big plays.

They get overpowered at the point of contact.

For all their ability in pursuit, they do a woeful job on runs to the outside because they are easily blocked by FBs and TEs.

Coakley has been bad in coverage this year which is supposed to be his strength.

I think our D will be much better off when Singleton and Coakley are upgraded. Hopefully James' play will pickup throughout the year as he gains more experience. Unfortunately, after James there does not appear to be an everydown LBer ready to emerge although Thornton may be able to bring some heat from OLB in a 3-4 alignment.
Draft - LB will be addressed - we are aging there and undersized.
Nors is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com