Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2008   #16
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPER View Post
The Giants are JUST NOW getting some benefit from trading multiple high draft picks for Eli Manning and he was a pretty sure thing coming out of college. I still believe they would have much better served by keeping Philip Rivers and using those other picks on upgrading other positions.

I am always against trading multiple 1st round picks for one player unless it is a franchise QB and only if you can't get one elsewhere. Even then I would be very reluctant to pull the trigger.
Well said.
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008   #17
Goldenrichards83
Senior Member
 
Goldenrichards83's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2007
Posts:
1,612
Default

Don't understand all the love for Manningham with the 1st pick. Doucet will be a better Pro.

Church is in session
Goldenrichards83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008   #18
Jaxonsdaddd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Posts:
327
Default

Those against a trade up for McFadden have to weigh the risk Vs. Reward. What if he turns out to be Tony Dorsett or Eric Dickerson?

If we signed a CB in free agency, resigned Hamlin and traded for Roy WIlliams then I would be thrilled with McFadden
Jaxonsdaddd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008   #19
ayjackson
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2007
Posts:
208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxonsdaddd View Post
Those against a trade up for McFadden have to weigh the risk Vs. Reward. What if he turns out to be Tony Dorsett or Eric Dickerson?
We already have Earl Campbell.
ayjackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008   #20
Bob Sacamano
Banned
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
57,074
Default

Mel Kiper has us taking Manningham, and Rashard Mendenhall
Bob Sacamano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008   #21
ThreeSportStar80
Banned
 
ThreeSportStar80's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Location:
Mid Atlantic
Posts:
27,093
Default

I don't like either of those picks... CB and RB should be the first two picks.
ThreeSportStar80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #22
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

I thought I have heard Wade say he would never draft a wr in the first, and though Jerry is in charge of the draft I tend to think he would listen to his head coach. For some reason Felix Jones makes me nervous.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #23
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,595
Default

I really like Jones but you know, and maybe it's just me, but I just can't see spending a 1st rd pick on a back up RB. Not that he's not talented because I think he is but I don't think I'd spend a 1st rd pick on a back up RB.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #24
Hailmary
Senior Member
 
Hailmary's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Posts:
2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
I really like Jones but you know, and maybe it's just me, but I just can't see spending a 1st rd pick on a back up RB. Not that he's not talented because I think he is but I don't think I'd spend a 1st rd pick on a back up RB.
I guess in our system, he wouldn't necessarily be a backup but part of a "committee".

I'm still high on Felix, but less so w/ all the CJ talk the last couple of days.
Hailmary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #25
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hailmary View Post
I guess in our system, he wouldn't necessarily be a backup but part of a "committee".

I'm still high on Felix, but less so w/ all the CJ talk the last couple of days.

Well, you could say that but even still, I would not be in favor of spending a 1st Rd pick on a back who was not a feature back, per say. This is why I'm not in favor of trading up for McFadden. McFadden would simply be a part of a two back approach. To me, it's just not worth the price you would have to pay. Now, if we were moving up to get a back that had special skills and was going to be our feature guy, then maybe I could see that. Unless our plan is to move MB, and take a guy who is going to carry the load for us, I am not in favor of taking a back this early. Just to many guys that are good that can be had in the later rounds IMO.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #26
jakeblaze+
Junior Member
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
San Antonio TX
Posts:
9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomson75 View Post
NO. I'll be sick if we address WR before we get a CB. I like Jones, but only if we take a corner at 22. I'm not terribly fond of this crop of WR's, but I wouldn't mind Doucet at 28...only because I think we can get a good RB in the second.
As the draft plays out if we could assume we could get McKelvin, Talib or Reggie Smith at 28, then I wouldn't mind taking a WR at 22 if that WR is DeSean Jackson. I just believe Jackson will turn into a player like a Devin Hester. However, I wouldn't complain at all if we can get McKelvin at 22
jakeblaze+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008   #27
Hailmary
Senior Member
 
Hailmary's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Posts:
2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakeblaze+ View Post
As the draft plays out if we could assume we could get McKelvin, Talib or Reggie Smith at 28, then I wouldn't mind taking a WR at 22 if that WR is DeSean Jackson. I just believe Jackson will turn into a player like a Devin Hester. However, I wouldn't complain at all if we can get McKelvin at 22
I think a better comparison would be Ted Ginn. I'm not crazy about either one, I think their frames are too small to be truly effective in the NFL.
Hailmary is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com