Originally Posted by CATCH17
Had Mike Williams been able to come out as a Sophomore he would've been ranked in the top 3 and thats without even looking who came out that year.
The only reason his #1 ranking isn't validated is because he had to sit out a year.
Some of you forget how good of a player and how great of a talent Mike Williams was.
That one he won, or the team won in spite of him, is still one more than Mirer or George ever even sniffed going to. Thus, his point, was that he was far more accurate on Dilfer (and he was) than the people who had George and Mirer as the next greatest QB's ever.
I remember people trying to proclaim Mirer the next Montana. Yeah how'd that work out? Not so well.
Dilfer was never great but him at 6, with a superbowl ring and a probowl or two is still LIGHT YEARS more than George or Mirer ever accomplished.