Hillis v Schmitt

[tomson75]

Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life

*sigh*

Hillis 6'0 3/4 240
Schmitt 6'0 1/4 247
Hester 5'10 1/2 220 4.60

just break up your theory not only is hester small than schmitt he ran a better 40 wait didn't HIllis run a better forty than Mario ?

You did what? You broke up my theory? Where? When did this happen?


Are you a retard?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

If hes value and we pick him up in the fourth round or after where every prognosticator then I dont completely hate is. Say what you want about Fasano, but he was value at wehre we picked him in the second round. I also think thta another year under Garrett and hes going to get better.

A quality FB would help us on short yardage and ST.

But reaching for a fullback would make me start structure fires. Reaching is bad but reaching for a position you really don't need is just asinine. Reaching for a FB is something I would expect Al Davis to do.

Now I said this before. Its very doubtful that a rookie FB would see much playing time seeing the staffs tendency to play vets in a vertical passing game and the fact that both guys played in VERY heavy running offenses.

[Alexander]

Not another Owen Schmitt thread.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Originally Posted by Alexander

Not another Owen Schmitt thread.

Its a FB thread. 15 years and people still want another Daryl Johnston. Its as if they dont watch today's game.

[Bob Sacamano]

Originally Posted by tomson75

22. Owen Schmitt
28. Peyton Hillis

give it up theo, the white, Jamar Martin aint coming here

[tomson75]

Originally Posted by Bob Sacamano

give it up theo, the white, Jamar Martin aint coming here

Meh...it was worth a shot.

[Bob Sacamano]

Originally Posted by tomson75

Meh...it was worth a shot.

I don't care if that was a poor shot or not, that was funny as crap, I about died laughing