Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-17-2008   #31
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeSportStar80 View Post
Again, I'm stating MY opinion... I believe he's a better pro prospect because of his ability to run after the catch.
I've got no problem with your opinion, I'm just making mine clear so when Jerry comes on Cowboy Zone looking for future draft scouts, maybe he'll notice me and pay me 2 mil a year.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #32
BraveHeartFan
We got a hat. I want a ring.
 
BraveHeartFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Duncan, Oklahoma
Posts:
21,143
Send a message via AIM to BraveHeartFan Send a message via MSN to BraveHeartFan
Default

If he really runs near that fast and is there mid-round 2 then y eah I'd be thrilled if we grabbed him up.
BraveHeartFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #33
garrett316
Senior Member
 
garrett316's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Pittsburgh, PA
Posts:
2,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverbear View Post
I've seen him play 2 or 3 games, and it's the same for me... I've even heard the announcers comment on it, leading me to believe it's a problem he's had in games I didn't see, too...

Beyond that, he's more or less a one season wonder, having put up just 65 catches in 22 games played in his first two seasons... when you read comments about him not being real physical, not being willing to work the middle of the field, and having a hard time getting off the jam, you start to think he sounds like a faster Brandon Lloyd...

Here's a sentence from NFL Draft Dog that sums him up nicely, IMO:



[View Full Quote]
How is Manningham a one year wonder? He caught 27 passes, 6 of which went for tds, as a freshman. Not bad for a freshman.

As a sophomore he caught 38 balls for over 700 yrads with 9 tds in 9 games. He missed 4 games with a knee injury which he had surgery on and still came back to play in UM's final 3 games. If my math is right that projects to 60 rec. for over 1,000 yards and 13 tds.

His junior year he caught 72 passes for over 1100 yards and 12 more tds.

I wouldn't classify him as a one year wonder. That designation should go to Limas Sweed more than Manningham.
garrett316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #34
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parcells316 View Post
How is Manningham a one year wonder? He caught 27 passes, 6 of which went for tds, as a freshman. Not bad for a freshman.

As a sophomore he caught 38 balls for over 700 yrads with 9 tds in 9 games. He missed 4 games with a knee injury which he had surgery on and still came back to play in UM's final 3 games. If my math is right that projects to 60 rec. for over 1,000 yards and 13 tds.

His junior year he caught 72 passes for over 1100 yards and 12 more tds.

I wouldn't classify him as a one year wonder. That designation should go to Limas Sweed more than Manningham.
I was with you all the way to that point. Sweed's college career is pretty similar to Manningham's, I'd say.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #35
garrett316
Senior Member
 
garrett316's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Pittsburgh, PA
Posts:
2,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
I was with you all the way to that point. Sweed's college career is pretty similar to Manningham's, I'd say.
Really? Well, Sweed played 4 years at UT and appeared in 40 career games. His numbers were 124 receptions for 1915 yards and 20 tds.

Manningham only played 3 years at UM, and appearing in 8 fewer games than Sweed did, caught 137 passes for 2,310 yardas and 27 tds. So , in basically 1 fewer season Manningham had more catches, yards, and tds than Sweed.

Sweed also never sniffed 1,000 yards in any season and will be 24 in 2008. Manningham turns 22 in May.
garrett316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #36
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parcells316 View Post
Really? Well, Sweed played 4 years at UT and appeared in 40 career games. His numbers were 124 receptions for 1915 yards and 20 tds.

Manningham only played 3 years at UM, and appearing in 8 fewer games than Sweed did, caught 137 passes for 2,310 yardas and 27 tds. So , in basically 1 fewer season Manningham had more catches, yards, and tds than Sweed.

Sweed also never sniffed 1,000 yards in any season and will be 24 in 2008. Manningham turns 22 in May.
I don't think stats tell the whole story there, but you're entitled to your opinion.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #37
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsmyQB View Post
Read on footballs future he ran a a 4.39 at his pro day on a slow track!

If he's there middle round 2, I'd trade up to get him, I really like him and would be GREAT VALUE!
Especially if we go for a big W.R. like Hardy in round 1.
I'd like to get Romo a future #1 and a speed slot guy for the rest of his career NOW to grow together and not have to worry about W.R. for a long time!
I was surpised he was timed at 4.6+ originally, but 4.39 is a head scratcher. I don't see how you can drop that much. In any case, I consider him very polished compared to msot of the others, but not enough to take before late Rd2. Seeing that we may grab a WR in Rd 1, I would not use that 2nd rd pick for another WR.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2008   #38
lkelly
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,924
Default

Not mentioned in this awe inspiring debate is the fact that Manningham has some Antonio Bryant in him. He's a bit of a head case.
lkelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008   #39
BraveHeartFan
We got a hat. I want a ring.
 
BraveHeartFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Duncan, Oklahoma
Posts:
21,143
Send a message via AIM to BraveHeartFan Send a message via MSN to BraveHeartFan
Default

Man that would be terrible. I'm really upset about the Bryant deal cause I thought the kid had plenty of talent, and upside, if he could have lost his attitude and stupid nature.
BraveHeartFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008   #40
ThatsmyQB
Banned
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parcells316
Really? Well, Sweed played 4 years at UT and appeared in 40 career games. His numbers were 124 receptions for 1915 yards and 20 tds.

Manningham only played 3 years at UM, and appearing in 8 fewer games than Sweed did, caught 137 passes for 2,310 yardas and 27 tds. So , in basically 1 fewer season Manningham had more catches, yards, and tds than Sweed.

Sweed also never sniffed 1,000 yards in any season and will be 24 in 2008. Manningham turns 22 in May.




Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
I don't think stats tell the whole story there, but you're entitled to your opinion.
ThatsmyQB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2008   #41
ThatsmyQB
Banned
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
I was surpised he was timed at 4.6+ originally.

He didn't run 4.6+
He ran under 4.6 at combine!
ThatsmyQB is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com