Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dough Boy
I'll answer. He played LB well enough. Also, how many games did you watch. The guy will make a good 3-4 DE. Do you know anything about the 3-4. Based on your above comments, no...
Why is he not a first round prospect - because drafting is an inexact science - something you should know about based on your inability to be factual and consistent.
I think we have beat this to death. I'm not sure how much you've seen Tuck play. Based on your writing, I would say little. Based on your comparisoin vs most draft scouts, I would little. Lastly, playing the run as a LB and playing the run as DE are totally different. To answer your question above - scouts say he dosen't play the run well as a DE.
Not that it matters, but I told you earlier that I watched about 5 ND games last year and 5 this year. Why did I have to post this again.
You want links: Here they go...
[View Full Quote]http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2005/tuck_justin
http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/pla...ustintuck.html
http://2005.otcdraft.com/content/pro...JustinTuck.php
Unlike you, I don't have to create a story. Everything I posted I have a link to. Now for you, can you provide that link that supports your contention that Tuck got beat out of his LB spot? How about a link that supports your words, that he is a poor tackler? What about a link that supports him being a liability in coverage and can't play in space?
I can't what for your response on this one.
|
Again, the question was, have you ever watched this player play LB while at ND? Not, how many games have you watched. Have you ever seen him play LB at ND? I have. I answered you in an earlier post. I have been watching this kid play for a good 3 years close. I watched him as a freshman try to play LB but he was not a good LB. He was then moved to DE, where he found his position. I usually watch about 5 to 6 games a year. I have seen him play a lot. Have you ever seen him play LB?
Where did I say the guy will make a pretty good 3-4 DE? He'll never be a DE in a 3-4. Maybe an edge rusher but not a DE. I suspect your being creative again.
"Why is he not a first round prospect - because drafting is an inexact science - something you should know about based on your inability to be factual and consistent. " That's your answer? Nice. Way to avoid the question. I'll answer the question for you. Because he is not what you make him out to be. He is a nice edge pass rushing DE tweener. That's it.
The reason I wanted to be clear on how many games you've watched is because, if you've only watched him the last two year, then you've never seen him play LB. He has played DE for the last two seasons.
All the links that you provide, as I expected, are of him at DE. A point I expected to see. Vertually none of them talk about him as a LB. I can find no evaluations of him as an NFL LB, at all. What does that tell you? I can also find no link that supports your theory of him being able to play well in space, as a LB. My comment about him playing well in space is at the LB position. He doesn't do it well. If you are making the point that he plays well as a DE, in space, that's all well and good but what the hell does that have to do with him playing well in space as a LB? The whole point of this thread is that Tuck is a DE and not a LB.
If your going to post links to refute what I'm saying, at least post links that talk about the actual points discussed. In this case, it is Tuck as a LB. It has always been the point. The problem here is that you've jumped into the deep water and you didn't understand what was being discussed. The discussion was of Tuck as a LB. I said he will always be an edge rusher. I said he was one dimensional. I said he would be an excellent edge rusher. You made the point that he would be a LB in a 3-4. I agree, he can't be a LB in a 4-3. If he's going to play LB, it would have to be a 3-4. In fact, here is exactly what I posted on him being a 3-4 LB. "In a 3-4, I think you can move him around some but you gotta bring him to be effective. He can chase down plays but he seems to take false steps or miss diagnose plays a lot, when playing LB. In fairness, he has not played LB his whole career at ND but I suspect that's because he wasn't great at it. As a rush specialist, I'm all over the guy. I really think he can be effective if all he's asked to do is penetrate the line of scrimmage." However, even in a 3-4, he can be schemed. Offenses can dictate he covers the run. The only way to avoid this is to continuesly move him around. This would mean that the rest of your LBs would have to compensate. Can it be done? Yes, but it's not as easy as you could think.
I can not provide links to him playing have difficulty playing in space, as a LB because nobody sees him as one. He hasn't played there since he was a freshman so what does that tell you? I can not find a link that shows he was beaten out either. Links from 4 years ago are difficult to find but that's fine. I will conceed the point. I will, however, say that had he been able to play LB, he would have stayed there. He was naturally suited to rush end, something I've said all along, and that's where he played at ND.
You think he will be able to play as a 3-4 LB. I think he's strickly and edge rusher. We will see who is correct. I believe you will be disapointed if you expect him to be a LB. However, I believe you will be very pleased if you expect him to be a pass rusher. One dimensional is how I would describe him, at this point in his career. I would not be in favor of using a first round pick on him. Second, OK, but not first.