Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2010   #16
DaBoys4Life
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Cowboy Nation
Posts:
15,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Realist View Post
You are mistaken. Holland was bad when he was in. He's an FA anyway. As a matter of fact people were saying Holland must be really bad if he can't keep Proctor off the field.

Your last 2 sentences couldn't be more wrong.

"O Line depth is solid, especially at the interior positions."

2008: Wheels fell of when a guard went down.

2009: Train kept a rollin when a tackle went down.

We have good depth outside not inside.

Check mate.
That's not really true. If we consider Brad Johnson as our back up and the reluctance of our team to get a better guy or replace him it's pretty OBV. Wade like to stick with his players no matter how bad they are.
DaBoys4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #17
The Realist
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggems View Post
How about Walter McFadden instead of Pender
I'll take either. Good player.
The Realist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #18
BraveHeartFan
We got a hat. I want a ring.
 
BraveHeartFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Duncan, Oklahoma
Posts:
21,143
Send a message via AIM to BraveHeartFan Send a message via MSN to BraveHeartFan
Default

Any mock that gets us some quality O-Line depth is going to be a pretty good one with me. We need some solid O-Line depth for sure.
BraveHeartFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #19
The Realist
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life View Post
That's not really true. If we consider Brad Johnson as our back up and the reluctance of our team to get a better guy or replace him it's pretty OBV. Wade like to stick with his players no matter how bad they are.
Now your just arguing to save face.

Our line was a trainwreck when Kosier went down.

There is probably a reason we had an interest in Unger at 51 and not 3 OT's who have all started this year...........

Vollmer, Beatty, Loadholt.........

Sorry for throwing so much at you.
The Realist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #20
VACowboy
Senior Member
 
VACowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,453
Default

I hate the idea of trading down. I'd rather be trading up in 2-4, but I could live with this, especially Pouncey and Owusu-Ansah.
VACowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #21
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,968
Default

Any Mock that has us trading up or down before the draft begins is a total crapshoot.

We all know Jerry (and help) make those decisions on the fly based on how the draft is falling for them. It would be incredibly moronic to do otherwise unless you were at or near the top of the board (and the mystery reduced).

Having said that, these mocks are for fun and that's what this board is all about! So have some fun with it!
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #22
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWJC View Post
Any Mock that has us trading up or down before the draft begins is a total crapshoot.
Any mock is a total crapshoot.
junk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #23
UnoDallas
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2009
Location:
USA
Posts:
5,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life View Post
Indeed it's a big fall of from Koiser to Proctor. Holland wasn't bad when Holland went out and we had to go back to Proctor then that is when it became a problem. I don't play madden just because I'm young and like video games doesn't mean I play madden. With that said the O Line depth we have is more than solid.Especially at the interior positions.
so your countimng on

Holland - Procter - and Mcq as our backups

some all pro talent there

I rather give Brewster - Bright a chance
UnoDallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010   #24
DaBoys4Life
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Cowboy Nation
Posts:
15,621
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnoDallas View Post
so your countimng on

Holland - Procter - and Mcq as our backups

some all pro talent there

I rather give Brewster - Bright a chance

Brewster is option.
DaBoys4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010   #25
The Realist
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBoys4Life View Post
Brewster is option.
Again, you are not making sense.

You just said OL depth at interior positions is better than it is at OT.

Yet, everyone saw the wheels fall off when Kosier went down last year and the we kept on rolling with Free when Colombo went down.
The Realist is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com